This investigation analyzed the relation between cognitive functioning and mathematical achievement in 114 students in fourth, fifth, and sixth grades. Differences in cognitive performance were studied concurrently in three selected achievement groups: mathematical learning disability group (MLD), low achieving group (LA), and typically achieving group (TA). For this purpose, performance in verbal memory and in the PASS cognitive processes of planning, attention, and simultaneous and successive processing was assessed at the end of the academic course. Correlational analyses showed that phonological loop and successive and simultaneous processing were related to mathematical achievement at all three grades. Regression analysis revealed simultaneous processing as a cognitive predictor of mathematical performance, although phonological loop was also associated with higher achievement. Simultaneous and successive processing were the elements that differentiated the MLD group from the LA group. These results show that, of all the variables analyzed in this study, simultaneous processing was the best predictor of mathematical performance.
AdamsJ. W.HitchG. (1997). Working memory and children’s mental addition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67, 21–38.
2.
AdamsJ. W.HitchG. (1998). Children’s mental arithmetic and working memory. In DonlanC. (Ed.), The development of mathematical skills (pp. 201–205). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
3.
AshmanA. F.DasJ. P. (1980). Relation between planning and simultaneous-successive processing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 371–382.
4.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
5.
BaddeleyA. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5–28.
6.
BaddeleyA. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.
7.
BaddeleyA. D. (2007). Working memory, thought and action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. (1974). Working memory. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
BadianN. (1983). Dyscalculia and nonverbal disorders of learning. In MycklebustH. R. (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (Vol. 5, pp. 235–264). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
10.
BakerS. R.TalleyL. H. (1972). Relationship of visualization skills to achievement in freshman chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 49, 775–776.
11.
BakerS. R.TalleyL. H. (1974). Visualization skills as a component of aptitude for chemistry—A construct validation study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 95–97.
12.
BarbaresiW. J.KatusicS. K.ColliganR. C.WeaverA. L.JacobsenS. J. (2005). Math learning disorder: Incidence in a population based birth cohort, 1976–1982, Rochester, Minn. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 5, 281–289.
13.
BattistaM. T. (1994). On Greeno’s environmental/model view of conceptual domains: A spatial/geometric perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 86–94.
14.
BishopA. J. (1989). Review of research on visualisation in mathematics education. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1), 7–16.
15.
BodnerG. M.McMillenT. L. B. (1986). Cognitive restructuring as an early stage in problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 727–737.
16.
BullR.Andrews-EspyK.WiebeS. A. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 205–228.
17.
BullR.JohnstonR. S. (1997). Children’s arithmetical difficulties: Contributions from processing speed, item identification and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 1–24.
18.
BullR.ScherifG. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19, 273–293.
19.
CamosV.BarrouilletP. (2004). Adult counting is resource demanding. British Journal of Psychology, 9, 19–30.
20.
CaseR. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21.
ChongS. L.SiegelL. S. (2008). Stability of computational deficits in math learning disability from second through fifth grades. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 300–317.
22.
DasJ. P. (1988). Simultaneous-successive processing and planning. In SchmeckR. (Ed.), Learning styles and learning strategies (pp. 101–129). New York, NY: Plenum.
23.
DasJ. P. (1999). PASS Reading Enhancement Program (PREP). Deal, NJ: Sarka Educational Resources.
24.
DasJ. P. (2000). PREP: A cognitive remediation program in theory and practice. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 28(2), 83–95.
25.
DasJ. P.AbbottJ. (1995). PASS: An alternative approach to intelligence. Psychology and Developing Societies, 7, 155–184.
26.
DasJ. P.HeemsbergenD. B. (1983). Planning as a factor in the assessment of cognitive processes. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 1–16.
27.
DasJ. P.NaglieriJ. A. (2001). The Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System in theory and practice. In AndrewsJ. J. W.SakolfskeD. H.JanzenH. L. (Eds.), Handbook of psychoeducational assessment: Ability, achievement, and behavior in children (pp. 34–64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28.
DasJ. P.NaglieriJ. A.KirbyJ. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
DasJ. P.VarnhagenC. K. (1986). Neuropsychological functioning and cognitive processing. In ObrzutJ. E.HyndG. W. (Eds.), Child neuropsychology, Vol. 1: Theory and research (pp. 117–140). New York, NY: Academic Press.
30.
DeañoM. (2000). Cómo prevenir las dificultades de cálculo [How to prevent calculus disabilities]. Málaga, Spain: Aljibe.
31.
DeañoM. (2005). Mejora en el aprendizaje del cálculo en alumnos con debilidad cognitiva [Improvement of learning calculus in students with cognitive disabilities]. Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogía, 39, 365–389.
32.
DeañoM. (2006). Programa de Recuperación y Enriquecimiento PASS-Matemático (PREP-M). Un programa cognitivo para alumnos con necesidades educativas [PASS-Mathematical Recovery and Enrichment Program (PREP-M). A cognitive program for students with educational needs. Educación, Desarrollo y Diversidad, 9(3), 37–64.
33.
DeañoM.AlfonsoS.FernándezM. J. (2006). El D. N:CAS como sistema de evaluación cognitiva para el aprendizaje [The D.N:CAS as a cognitive assessment system of learning.]. In DeañoM. (Ed.), Formación del profesorado para atender a las necesidades específicas de apoyo educativo. XXXII Reunión Científica Anual (pp. 159–182). Ourense, Spain: AEDES.
34.
DeañoM.TelladoF. (2009). Instrucción basada en los procesos PASS [Instruction based on the PASS cognitive processes]. In BarcaA. (Ed.), Motivación y Aprendizaje en Contextos Educativos (pp. 369–398). Granada, Spain: Grupo Editorial Universitario.
35.
DehaeneS. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
de JongP. F.van der LeijA. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.
37.
De SmedtB.JanssenR.BouwensK.VerschaffelL.BoetsB.GhesquièreP. (2009). Working memory and individual differences in mathematics achievement: A longitudinal study from first to second grade. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 186–201.
38.
DeStefanoD.LeFevreJ. A. (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 353–386.
39.
DiezmannC. M.WattersJ. J. (2000). Identifying and supporting spatial intelligence in young children. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1, 299–313.
40.
FuchsL.FuchsD.ComptonD.PowellS.SeethalerP.CapizziA.SchatschneiderC. (2006). The cognitive correlates of third-grade skills in arithmetic, algorithmic computation and arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 29–43.
41.
FürstA. J.HitchG. J. (2000). Different roles for executive and phonological components of working memory and mental arithmetic. Memory and Cognition, 28, 774–782.
42.
GarnettK.FleischnerJ. E. (1983). Automatization and basic fact performance of normal and learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 223–230.
43.
GarofaloJ. (1986). Simultaneous synthesis, regulation, and arithmetical performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 229–238.
44.
GathercoleS. E.PickeringS. J. (2000). Working memory deficits in children with low achievement in the national curriculum at 7 years of age. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 177–194.
45.
GearyD. C. (2005). Role of cognitive theory in the study of learning disability in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 305–307.
46.
GearyD. C.BaileyD. H.LittlefieldA.WoodP.HoardM. K.NugentL. (2009). First-grade predictors of mathematical learning disability: A latent class trajectory analysis. Cognitive Development, 34, 411–429.
47.
GearyD. C.BrownS. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of processing differences in gifted, normal and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398–406.
48.
GearyD. C.BrownS. C.SamaranayakeY. A. (1991). Cognitive addition: A short longitudinal study of strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in normal and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 787–797.
49.
GearyD. C.Burlingham-DubreeM. (1989). External validation of the strategy choice model for addition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 175–192.
50.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.Byrd-CravenJ.DeSotoM. C. (2004). Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 121–151.
51.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.Byrd-CravenJ.NugentL.NumteeC. (2007a). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343–1359.
52.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.HamsonC. O. (1999). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: Patterns of functions and deficits in children at risk for a mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 213–263.
53.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.Byrd-CravenJ. (2007b). Strategy use, long-term memory and working memory capacity. In BerchD.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 83–105). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
54.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.Byrd-CravenJ. (2008). Development of number line representations in children with mathematical learning disability. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 277–299.
55.
GearyD. C.WidamanK. F.LittleT. D.CormierP. (1987). Cognitive addition: Comparison of learning disabled and academically normal elementary school children. Cognitive Development, 2, 149–169.
56.
Gross-TsurV.ManorO.ShalevR. S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 25–33.
57.
HeathcoteD. (1994). The role of visuo-spatial working memory in the mental addition of multi-digit addends. Cahiers de Psychologie/Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 207–245.
58.
HechtS. A.TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (2001). The relations between phonological processing abilities and emerging individual differences in mathematical computation skills: A longitudinal study from second to fifth grades. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 192–227.
59.
HeinJ.BzufkaM. W.NeumarkerK. J. (2000). The specific disorder of arithmetic skills. Prevalence studies in a rural and an urban population and their clinico-neuropyschological validation. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, II87–II101.
60.
HermelinB.O’ConnorN. (1986). Spatial representations in mathematically and in artistically gifted children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 150–157.
61.
HitchG. (1978). The numerical abilities of industrial apprentices. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 51, 163–176.
62.
Iglesias-SarmientoV. (2009). Dificultades de aprendizaje en el dominio aritmético y en el procesamiento cognitivo subyacente [Learning difficulties in the mastery of arithmetic and in the underlying cognitive processing]. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest database. (UMI No. AAT 3386296)
63.
ImboI.VandierendonckA. (2006). The role of phonological and executive working memory resources in simple arithmetic strategies. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 910–933.
64.
JohnsonJ. A.BardosA. N.TayebiK. A. (2003). Discriminant validity of the Cognitive Assessment System for students with written expression disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21, 180–195.
65.
JordanN. C.HanichL. B.KaplanD. (2003). Arithmetic fact mastery in young children: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 103–119.
66.
JordanN. C.MontaniT. O. (1997). Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving: A comparison of children with specific and general mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 624–634.
67.
JosephL. M.HunterA. D. (2001). Differential application of a cue card strategy for solving fraction problems: Exploring instructional utility of the cognitive assessment system. Child Study Journal, 31, 123–136.
68.
JosephL. M.McCachranM. E.NaglieriJ. A. (2003). PASS cognitive processes, phonological processes, and basic reading performance for a sample of referred primary-grade children. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 304–314.
69.
KirbyJ. R.AshmanA. F. (1984). Planning skills and mathematics achievement: Implications regarding learning disability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2, 9–22.
70.
KirbyJ. R.DasJ. P. (1990). A cognitive approach to intelligence: Attention, coding and planning. Canadian Psychology, 31, 320–331.
71.
KirbyJ.WilliamsN. H. (1991). Learning problems: A cognitive approach. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Kagan and Woo.
72.
KoontzK. L.BerchD. B. (1996). Identifying simple numerical stimuli: Processing inefficiencies exhibited by arithmetic learning disabled children. Mathematical Cognition, 2(1), 1–23.
73.
KoponenT.AunolaK.AhonenT.NurmiJ.-E. (2007). Cognitive predictors of single-digit and procedural calculation skills and their covariation with reading skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 220–241.
74.
KrajewskiK.SchneiderW. (2009). Exploring the impact of phonological awareness, visual-spatial working memory, and preschool quantity-number competencies on mathematics achievement in elementary school: Findings from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 516–531.
75.
KroesbergenE. H.Van LuitJ. E. H.NaglieriJ. A. (2003). Mathematics learning difficulties and PASS cognitive processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 574–582.
76.
KroesbergenE. HVan LuitJ. E. H.NaglieriJ.A.TaddeiS.FranchiE. (2010). PASS processes and early mathematics skills in Dutch and Italian kindergartners. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 585-593.
77.
LanderlK.BevanA.ButterworthB. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 8–9-year-old students. Cognition, 93, 99–215.
78.
LeongC. K.ChengS. C.DasJ. P. (1985). Simultaneous-successive syntheses and planning in Chinese readers. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 19–31.
79.
LewisC.HitchG. J.WalkerP. (1994). The prevalence of specific arithmetic difficulties and specific reading difficulties in 9- to 10-year-old boys and girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 283–292.
80.
LindsayR. L. (2001). Attentional function as measured by a continuous performance task in children with dyscalculia. Journal of Developmental and Behavioural Pediatrics, 22, 287–292.
81.
LogieR. H.BaddeleyA. D. (1987). Cognitive processes in counting. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 310–326.
82.
LogieR. H.GilhoolyK. J.WynnV. (1994). Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 22, 395–410.
83.
LuriaA. R. (1966). Human brain and psychological processes. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
84.
LuriaA. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
85.
LuriaA. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man. New York, NY: Basic Books.
86.
MazzoccoM. M. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In BerchD.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 29–47). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
87.
MazzoccoM. M. M.MyersG. F. (2003). Complexities in identifying and defining mathematics learning disability in the primary school age years. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 218–253.
88.
McKenzieB.BullR.GrayC. (2003). The effects of phonological and visual-spatial interference on children’s arithmetical performance. Educational and Child Psychology, 20(3), 93–107.
89.
McLeanJ. F.HitchG. J. (1999). Working memory impairments in children with specific arithmetic learning difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67, 345–357.
90.
MercerC. (1997). Students with learning disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
91.
MeyerM. L.SalimpoorV. N.WuS. S.GearyD. C.MenonV. (2010). Differential contribution of specific working memory components to mathematical skills in 2nd and 3rd graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 101–109.
92.
MurphyM. M.MazzoccoM. M. M.HanichL.EarlyM. C. (2007). Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) varies as a function of the cut-off criterion used to define MLD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 458–478.
93.
NaglieriJ. A. (1999). Essentials of CAS assessment. New York, NY: Wiley.
94.
NaglieriJ. A. (2000). Can profile analysis of ability test scores work? An illustration using the PASS theory and CAS with an unselected cohort. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 419–433.
95.
NaglieriJ. A.DasJ. P. (1987). Construct and criterion related validity of planning, simultaneous and successive cognitive processing tasks. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 353–363.
96.
NaglieriJ. A.DasJ. P. (1997a). Cognitive Assessment System. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
97.
NaglieriJ. A.DasJ. P. (1997b). Cognitive Assessment System interpretive handbook. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
98.
NaglieriJ. A.DasJ. P. (2002). Practical implications of general intelligence and PASS cognitive processes. In SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 855–884). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
99.
NaglieriJ. A.DasJ. P.StevensJ. J.LedbetterM. F. (1991). Confirmatory factor analysis of planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive cognitive processing tasks. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 1–17.
100.
NaglieriJ. A.GottlingS. (1997). Mathematics instruction and PASS cognitive processes: An intervention study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 513–520.
101.
NaglieriJ. A.JohnsonD. (2000). Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention in improving arithmetic computation based on the PASS theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 591–597.
102.
NaglieriJ. A.KaufmanJ. C. (2001). Understanding intelligence, giftedness and creativity using the PASS theory. Roeper Review, 23(3), 151–156.
103.
NaglieriJ. A.RojahnJ. (2004). Construct validity of the PASS theory and CAS: Correlations with achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 174–181.
104.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
105.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007a). PISA 2006. Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Volume 1: Analysis. Paris, France: Author.
106.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007b). PISA 2006. Volume 2: Data. Paris: Author.
107.
ParrilaR. K.KendrickM. E.PapadopoulosT. C.KirbyJ. R. (1999). Efficacy of cognitive reading remediation program for at-risk children in grade 1. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 27(2), 1–31.
108.
PassolunguiM. C.MammarellaI. C.AltoèG. (2008). Cognitive abilities as precursors of the early acquisition of mathematical skills. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 229–250.
109.
PassolunghiM. C.SiegelL. S. (2004). Working memory and access to numerical information in children with disability in mathematics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 348–367.
110.
PassolunghiM. C.VercelloniB.SchadeeH. (2007). The precursors of mathematics learning: Working memory, phonological ability, and numerical competence. Cognitive Development, 22, 165–184.
111.
SiegelL. S. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: A perspective on Guckenberger v. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 304–319.
112.
SiegelL. S.RyanE. B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973–980.
113.
SimmonsF.SingletonC.HorneJ. K. (2008). Phonological awareness and visual–spatial sketchpad functioning predict early arithmetic attainment: Evidence from a longitudinal study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 711–722.
114.
SolanH. A.Shelley-TremblayJ.FicarraA.SilvermanM.LarsonS. (2003). Effect of attention therapy on reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 556–563.
115.
StanovichK. E. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350–361.
116.
SwansonH. L. (1993). Working memory in learning disability subgroups. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 87–114.
117.
SwansonH. L. (2006). Cognitive processes that underlie mathematical precociousness in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 239–264.
118.
SwansonH. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471–491.
119.
SwansonH. L.JermanO.ZhengX. (2008). Growth in working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 343–379.
120.
SwansonL.KimK. (2007). Working memory, short–term memory, and naming speed as predictors of children’s mathematical performance. Intelligence, 35, 151–168.
121.
SwansonH. L.Sachse-LeeC. (2001). Mathematical problem solving and working memory in children with learning disabilities: Both executive and phonological processes are important. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 294–321.
122.
TempleC. M.SherwoodS. (2002). Representation and retrieval of arithmetical facts: Developmental difficulties. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 733–752.
123.
TrbovichP. L.LeFevreJ. (2003). Phonological and visual working memory in mental addition. Memory and Cognition, 31, 738–745.
124.
van der SluisS.van der LeijA.de JongP. F. (2005). Working memory in Dutch children with reading- and arithmetic-related LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 207–221.
125.
WaiJ.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2009). Spatial ability for stem domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835.
126.
WarrickP. D. (1989). Investigation of the PASS model (planning, attention, simultaneous, successive) of cognitive processing and mathematics achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus.
127.
WattersJ. J.EnglishL. S. (1995). Children’s application of simultaneous and successive processing in inductive and deductive reasoning problems: Implications for developing scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 699–714.
128.
WechslerD. (1993). Escala de Inteligencia de Wechsler para niños–Revisada (WISC-R) [Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Revised]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.
129.
WuS. S.MeyerM. L.MaedaU.SalimpoorV.TomiyamaS.GearyD. C.MenonV. (2008). Standardized assessment of strategy use and working memory in early mental arithmetic performance. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 365–393.
