This study reports on several specific neurocognitive process predictors of reading outcomes for a sample of 278 children with reading disabilities. Three categories of response (i.e., poor, average, and good) were formed via growth curve models of six reading outcomes. Two nested discriminant function analyses were conducted to evaluate the predictive capability of the following models: (a) an intervention and phonological processing model that included intervention group, phonological awareness, and rapid naming and (b) an additive cognitive neuropsychological model that included measures of memory, visual processes, and cognitive or intellectual functioning. Over and above the substantial explanatory power of the base model, the additive model improved classification of poor and good responders. Several of the cognitive and neuropsychological variables predicted degree of reading outcomes, even after controlling for type of intervention, phonological awareness, and rapid naming.
Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. ( 2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 300-316.
2.
Baddeley, A.D. ( 1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
Beery, K.E., & Buktenica, N.A. (1989). Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
4.
Berninger, V.W., Raskind, W., Richards, T., Abbott, R., & Stock, P. ( 2008). A multidisciplinary approach to understanding developmental dyslexia within working-memory architecture: Genotypes, phenotypes, brain, and instruction. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 707-744.
Braden, J.P., & Shaw, S.R. ( 2009). Intervention validity of cognitive assessment: Knowns, unknowables, and unknowns. Assessment for Effective Intervention , 34, 106-115.
7.
Cirino, P.T., Rashid, F.L., Sevcik, R.A., Lovett, M.W., Frijters, J.C., Wolf, M., & Morris, R. ( 2002). Properties of measures of beginning decoding and related abilities in poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 35, 526-539.
8.
Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R.G. ( 1974). Rapid "automatized" naming of pictured objects, colors, letters, and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186-202.
9.
Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R.G. ( 1976). Naming of objects by dyslexic and other learning-disabled children. Brain & Language, 3, 1-15.
10.
Engelmann, S., & Bruner, E.C. ( 1988). Reading Mastery I/II fast cycle: Teacher’s guide . Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates.
11.
Evans, J.J., Floyd, R.G., McGrew, K.S., & Leforgee, M.H. (2001). The relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and reading achievement during childhood and adolescence. School Psychology Review , 31(2), 246-262.
12.
Fiorello, C.A., Hale, J.B., & Snyder, L.E. ( 2006). Cognitive hypothesis testing and response to intervention for children with reading problems. Psychology in the Schools , 43, 835-853.
13.
Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Barnes, M., Stuebing, K.K., Francis, D.J., Olson, R.K., . . . Shaywitz, B.A. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidenced-based evaluation. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 185-239). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
14.
Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Liberman, I.Y., Stuebing, K.K., . . . Shaywitz, B.A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 1-18.
15.
Floyd, R.G., Keith, T.Z., Taub, G.E., & McGrew, K.S. (2007). Cattell -Horn -Carroll cognitive abilities and their effects on reading decoding skills: g has indirect effects, more specific abilities have direct effects.School Psychology Quarterly, 22, (2) 200-233.
16.
Fuchs, D., & Young, C.L. ( 2006). On the irrelevance of intelligence in predicting responsiveness to reading instruction. Exceptional Children, 73, 8-30.
17.
Gardner, M.E. ( 1988). Test of Visual-Perceptual Skills. San Francisco, CA: Health Publishing.
18.
Gathercole, S.E. ( 2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513-543.
19.
Gathercole, S.E., & Alloway, T.P. ( 2006). Practitioner Review: Short-term and working memory impairments in neurodevelopmental disorders: diagnosis and remedial support. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,47, (1), 4-15.
20.
Gathercole, S.E., Alloway, T.P., Willis, C., & Adams, A.-M. ( 2005). Working memory in children with reading disabilities . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 265-281.
21.
Gathercole, S.E., & Baddeley, A.D. (1990). The role of phonological memory in vocabulary acquisition: A study of young children learning new names . British Journal of Psychology, 81, 439-454.
22.
Glutting, J.J., Watkins, M.W., Konold, T.R., & McDermott, P.A. (2006). Distinctions without a difference: The utility of observed versus latent factors from the WISC-IV in estimating reading and math achievement on the WIAT-II. Journal of Special Education, 40, 103-114.
23.
Grogan, S.C. ( 1995). Which cognitive abilities at age four are the best predictors of reading ability at age seven? Journal of Research in Reading , 18, 24-31.
24.
Gustafson, S., & Samuelsson, S. (1999). Intelligence and dyslexia: Implications for diagnosis and intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 127-134.
25.
Hale, J.B., Fiorello, C.A., Kavanagh, J.A., Holdnack, J.A., & Aloe, A.M. ( 2007). Is the demise of IQ interpretation justified? A response to special issue authors. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 37-51.
26.
Hale, J.B., Kaufman, A., Naglieri, J.A., & Kavale, K.A. ( 2006). Implementation of idea: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools , 43, 753-770.
27.
Hicks, C. ( 1980). The ITPA visual sequential memory task: An alternative interpretation and the implications for good and poor readers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 16-25.
28.
Hoskyn, M., & Swanson, H.L. ( 2000). Cognitive processing of low achievers and children with reading disabilities: A selective meta-analytic review of the published literature . School Psychology Review, 29, 102-119.
29.
Huba, M.E., Vellutino, F.R., & Scanlon, D.M. ( 1990). Auditory and visual retention in poor and normal readers when verbal encoding is disrupted. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 95-112.
30.
Johnston, R.S., & Morrison, M. ( 2007). Toward a resolution of inconsistencies in the phonological deficit theory of reading disorders: Phonological reading difficulties are more severe in high-IQ poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 40, 66-79.
31.
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, A.L. ( 1990). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
32.
Kavale, K.A. ( 1982). Meta-analysis of the relationship between visual perceptual skills and reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 15, 42-51.
33.
Kirby, J.R., Parrila, R.K., & Pfeiffer, S.L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453-464.
34.
Lervåg, A., Bråten, I., & Hulme, C. ( 2009). The cognitive and linguistic foundations of early reading development: A Norwegian latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 45, 764-781.
35.
Liberman, I.Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write. Reading and Special Education , 6(6), 8-17.
36.
Lovett, M.W., Barron, R.W., & Benson, N.J. ( 2003). Effective remediation of word identification and decoding difficulties in school-age children with reading disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 273-292). New York, NY : Guilford.
37.
Lovett, M.W., De Palma, M., Frijters, J.C., Steinbach, K., Temple, M., Benson, N., & Lacerenza, L. ( 2008). Interventions for reading difficulties: A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 333-352.
38.
Lovett, M.W., Lacerenza, L., & Borden, S.L. ( 2000). Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 458-476.
39.
Lovett, M.W., Lacerenza, L., Borden, S.L., Frijters, J.C., Steinbach, K.A., & De Palma, M. ( 2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 263-283.
40.
Lovett, M.W., Lacerenza, L., Murphy, D., Steinbach, K.A., De Palma, M., & Frijters, J.C. (2005). The importance of multiple-component interventions for children and adolescents who are struggling readers. In J. Gilger & S. Richardson (Eds.), Research-based education and intervention: What we need to know (pp. 67-102). Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.
41.
Manis, F.R., Seidenberg, M.S., & Doi, L.M. ( 1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129-157.
42.
Mano, Q.R., & Osmon, D.C. ( 2008). Visuoperceptualorthographic reading abilities: A confirmatory factor analysis study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 421-434.
43.
Metsala, J.L., Stavrinos, D., & Walley, A.C. ( 2009). Children’s spoken word recognition and contributions to phonological awareness and nonword repetition: A 1-year follow-up. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 101-121.
44.
Morris, R.D., Lovett, M.W., Wolf, M., Sevcik, R.A., Steinbach, K.A., Frijters, J.C., & Shapiro, M. (in press). Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, SES, and race as factors on remedial outcome. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0022219409355472.
45.
Nelson, J.R., Benner, G.J., & Gonzalez, J. ( 2003). Learner characteristics that influence the treatment effectiveness of early literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 255-267.
46.
Oh, H.-J., Glutting, J.J., Watkins, M.W., Youngstrom, E.A., & McDermott, P.A. (2004). Correct interpretation of latent versus observed abilities: Implications from structural equation modeling applied to the WISC-III and WIAT linking sample. Journal of Special Education, 38, 159-173.
47.
O’Malley, K.J., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B.R., Fletcher, J.M., & Swank, P.R. ( 2002). Growth in precursor and reading-related skills: Do low-achieving and IQ-discrepant readers develop differently?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 19-34.
48.
Reiter, A., Tucha, O., & Lange, K.W. ( 2005). Executive functions in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 11, 116-131.
49.
Richards, T.L., & Berninger, V. ( 2008). Abnormal fMRI connectivity in children with dyslexia during a phoneme task: Before but not after treatment. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 294-304.
50.
Richards, T.L., Berninger, V., Winn, W., Stock, P., Wagner, R., Muse, A., & Maravilla, K. ( 2007). Functional MRI activation in children with and without dyslexia during pseudoword aural repeat and visual decode: Before and after treatment. Neuropsychology, 21, 732-741.
51.
Sattler, J.M. ( 1992). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler .
52.
Scanlon, D.M., & Vellutino, F.R. (1997). A comparison of the instructional backgrounds and cognitive profiles of poor, average, and good readers who were initially identified as at risk for reading failure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 191-215.
53.
Scarborough, H.S. ( 1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115-136.
54.
Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Carlson, C.D., & Foorman, B.R. ( 2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265-282.
55.
Scheiman, M., & Rouse, M.W. ( 2005). Optometric management of learning-related vision problems . New York, NY: C. V. Mosby.
56.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (2003). Issues in the identification of learning disabilities. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Identification and assessment: Advances in learning and behavior disabilities (pp. 1-36). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
57.
Siegel, L.S. ( 1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469-479.
58.
Siegel, L.S. ( 1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 618-629.
59.
Simos, P.G., Fletcher, J.M., Sarkari, S., Billingsley-Marshall, R., Denton, C.A., & Papanicolaou, A.C. (2007a). Altering the brain circuits for reading through intervention: A magnetic source imaging study . Neuropsychology, 21, 485-496.
60.
Simos, P.G., Fletcher, J.M., Sarkari, S., Billingsley-Marshall, R., Denton, C.A., & Papanicolaou, A.C. (2007b). Intensive instruction affects brain magnetic activity associated with oral word reading in children with persistent reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 37-48.
61.
Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L.S. ( 1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
62.
Stuebing, K.K., Fletcher, J.M., LeDoux, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, S.E., & Shaywitz, B.A. (2002). Validity of IQdiscrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 469-518.
63.
Swanson, H.L., & Jerman, O. ( 2007). The influence of working memory on reading growth in subgroups of children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 249-283.
64.
Swanson, H.L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D.M., & Hammill, D.D. ( 2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407-444.
65.
Swanson, H.L., Zheng, X., & Jerman, O. ( 2009). Working memory, short-term memory, and reading disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 260-287.
66.
Tiu, R.D., Jr., Thompson, L.A., & Lewis, B.A. ( 2003). The role of IQ in a component model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 424-436.
67.
Torgesen, J.K. ( 2005). Recent discoveries on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 521-537). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
68.
Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K.K.S., & Conway, T. ( 2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
69.
Torgesen, J.K., & Davis, C. ( 1996). Individual difference variables that predict response to training in phonological awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 1-21.
70.
Torgesen, J.K., & Wagner, R.K. ( 1996). The comprehensive test of reading related phonological processes. Tallahassee, FL: Author .
71.
Vellutino, F.R. ( 2001). Further analysis of the relationship between reading achievement and intelligence: A response to Naglieri. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 306-310.
72.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. ( 2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 223-238.
73.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, (4)601-638.
74.
Vellutino, F.R., Tunmer, W.E., Jaccard, J.J., & Chen, R. ( 2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3-32.
75.
Wagner, R.K., & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.
76.
Wagner, R., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive Tests of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
77.
Watson, C., & Willows, D.M. ( 1995). Information processing patterns in specific reading disability . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 216-231.
78.
Wechsler, D. ( 1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children- Third Edition (WISC-III). New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
79.
Wilkinson, G.S. ( 1993). The Wide Range Achievement Test 3. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
80.
Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. ( 1998). Poor reading: A deficit in skill-automatization or a phonological deficit? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 321-340.
81.
Wolf, M., Barzillai, M., Gottwald, S., Miller, L., Spencer, K., Nor-ton, E., Lovett, M.W., & Morris, R.D. ( 2009). The RAVEO intervention: Connecting neuroscience to the classroom. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 84-93.
82.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. ( 2000). Naming speed processes, timing and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387-407.
83.
Wolf, M., Goldberg-O’Rourke, A., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P., & Morris, R. ( 2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 43-72.
84.
Wolf, M., Miller, L., & Donnelly, K. ( 2000). Retrieval, Automaticity, Vocabulary Elaboration, Orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive, fluency-based reading intervention program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 375-386.
85.
Woodcock, R.W. ( 1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests- Revised (WRMT-R). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
