The present study focuses on math and related skills among 32 girls with fragile X (n = 14) or Turner (n = 18) syndrome during late elementary school. Performance in each syndrome group was assessed relative to Full Scale IQ—matched comparison groups of girls from the general population (n = 32 and n = 89 for fragile X syndrome and Turner syndrome, respectively). Differences between girls with fragile X and their comparison group emerged on untimed arithmetic calculations, mastery of counting skills, and arithmetic problem verification accuracy. Relative to girls in the comparison group, girls with Turner syndrome did not differ on untimed arithmetic calculations or problem verification accuracy, but they had limited mastery of counting skills and longer response times to complete the problem verification task. Girls with fragile X or Turner syndrome also differed from their respective comparison groups on math-related abilities, including visual—spatial, working memory, and reading skills, and the associations between math and those related skills. Together, these findings support the notion that difficulty with math and related skills among girls with fragile X or Turner syndrome continues into late elementary school and that the profile of math and related skill difficulty distinguishes the two syndrome groups from each other.
Anderson, P., Anderson, V., Northam, E., & Taylor, H.G. (2000). Standardization of the Contingency Naming Test (CNT) for school-aged children: A measure of reactive flexibility. Clinical Neuropsychological Assessment,1, 247—273.
2.
Badian, N.A. (1983). Dyscalculia and nonverbal disorders of learning . In H. R. Myklebust (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (Vol. 5, pp. 235—264). New York: Stratton.
3.
Bailey, D.B., Jr., Hatton, D.D., & Skinner, M. (1998). Early developmental trajectories of males with fragile X syndrome. American Journal of Mental Retardation , 103, 29—39.
4.
Beery, K.E. (1997). The Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual— motor integration (4th ed.). Parsippany, NJ: Modern Curriculum Press.
5.
Bennetto, L., Pennington, B.F., Porter, D., Taylor, A.K., & Hagerman, R.J. (2001). Profile of cognitive functioning in women with the fragile X mutation. Neuropsychology,15, 290—299.
6.
Berch, D.B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 289—384.
7.
Bruandet, M., Molko, N., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2004). A cognitive characterization of dyscalculia in Turner syndrome. Neuropsychologia,42, 288—298.
8.
Buchanan, L., Pavlovic, J., & Rovet, J. (1998). A reexamination of the visuospatial deficit in Turner syndrome: Contributions of working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology,14, 341—367.
9.
Butterworth, B. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 455—467). New York: Psychology Press.
10.
Connolly, A.J. (1998). KeyMath—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
11.
Cornish, K., Swainson, R., Cunnington, R., Wilding, J., Morris, P., & Jackson, G. (2004). Do women with fragile X syndrome have problems in switching attention: Preliminary findings from ERP and fMRI. Brain andCognition, 54, 235—239.
12.
Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R. (1974). Rapid “automatized” naming of pictured objects, colors, letters, and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186—202.
13.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Mathematical problem solving: Instructional intervention . In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of children's mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 397—414). Baltimore : Brookes.
Geary, D.C. (1994). Children's mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
Geary, D.C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4—15.
17.
Geary, D.C., Bow-Thomas, C., & Yao, Y. (1992). Counting knowledge and skill in cognitive addition: A comparison of normal and mathematically disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,54, 372—391.
18.
Gelman, R., & Meck, E. (1983). Preschoolers' counting: Principles before skill . Cognition, 13, 343—359.
19.
Ginsburg, H.P., & Baroody, A.J. (1990). Test of early mathematics ability (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
20.
Gross-Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R.S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 25—33.
21.
Hagerman, R.J. (2002). The physical and behavioral phenotype. In R. J. Hagerman & P. J. Hagerman (Eds.), Fragile X syndrome: Diagnosis, treatment, and research (pp. 3—109). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
Hammill, D.D., Pearson, N.A., & Voress, J.K. (1993). Developmental test of visual perception (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
23.
Jordan, N.C., Kaplan, D., & Hanich, L.B. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586—597.
24.
Jordan, N.C., & Montani, T.O. (1997). Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving: A comparison of children with specific and general mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 624—634.
25.
Kirk, J.W., Mazzocco, M.M.M., & Kover, S.T. (2005). Assessing executive dysfunction in girls with fragile X or Turner syndrome using the Contingency Naming Test (CNT). Developmental Neuropsychology,28, 755—777.
26.
Kwon, H., Menon, V., Eliez, S., Warsofsky, I.S., White, C.D., Dyer-Friedman, J., et al. (2001). Functional neuroanatomy of visuospatial working memory in fragile X syndrome: Relation to behavioral and molecular measures. American Journal of Psychiatry,158, 1040—1051.
27.
Mazzocco, M.M.M. (1998). A process approach to describing mathematics difficulties in girls with Turner syndrome. Pediatrics, 102, 492—496.
28.
Mazzocco, M.M.M. (2001). Math learning disability and math LD subtypes: Evidence from studies of Turner syndrome, fragile X syndrome, and neurofibromatosis Type 1. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 520—533.
29.
Mazzocco, M.M.M., Bhatia, N., & Early, M.C. (2005). Number sense and automaticity in sixth graders with or without mathematical difficulties. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development , Atlanta, GA.
30.
Mazzocco, M.M.M., Bhatia, N.S., & Lesniak-Karpiak, K. (2006). Visuospatial skills and their association with math performance in girls with fragile X or Turner syndrome. Child Neuropsychology,12, 87—110.
31.
Mazzocco, M.M., & Kover, S.T. (2007). A longitudinal assessment of executive function skills and their association with math performance. Child Neuropsychology,13, 18—45.
32.
Mazzocco, M.M.M., & Myers, G.F. (2003). Complexities in identifying and defining mathematics learning disability in the primary school-age years. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 218—253.
33.
Mazzocco, M.M.M., Pennington, B.F., & Hagerman, R.J. (1993). The neurocognitive phenotype of female carriers of fragile X: Additional evidence for specificity. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 14, 328—335.
34.
Mazzocco, M.M.M., & Thompson, R.E. (2005). Kindergarten predictors of math learning disability. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 142—155.
35.
Murphy, M.M., Mazzocco, M.M.M., Gerner, G., & Henry, A.E. (2006). Mathematics learning disability in girls with Turner syndrome or fragile X syndrome. Brain andCognition , 61, 195—210.
36.
Murphy, M.M., Mazzocco, M.M.M., & McCloskey, M. (in press). Neurodevelopmental disorders and mathematics learning disability (MLD): Fragile X and Turner syndromes. In M. Barnes (Ed.), Genes, brain and development: The neurocognition of genetic disorders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Rivera, S.M., Menon, V., White, C.D., Glaser, B., & Reiss, A.L. (2002). Functional brain activation during arithmetic processing in females with fragile X syndrome is related to FMR1 protein expression . Human Brain Mapping,16, 206—218.
38.
Rovet, J.F. (1993). The psychoeducational characteristics of children with Turner syndrome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 333—341.
39.
Rovet, J.F. (2004). Turner syndrome: A review of genetic and hormonal influences on neuropsychological functioning. Child Neuropsychology,10, 262—279.
40.
Rovet, J.F., Szekely, C., & Hockenberry, M.N. (1994). Specific arithmetic calculation deficits in children with Turner syndrome. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 820—839.
41.
Stringer, R., Toplak, M.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (2004). Differential relationships between RAN performance, behaviour ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 891—914.
42.
Swanson, H.L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471—491.
43.
Taylor, H.G., Albo, V.C., Phebus, C.K., Sachs, B.R., & Bierl, P.G. (1987). Postirradiation treatment outcomes for children with acute lymphocytic leukemia: Clarification of risks. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 12, 395—411.
44.
Temple, C.M. (2002). Oral fluency and narrative production in children with Turner's syndrome. Neuropsychologia,40, 1419—1427.
45.
Temple, C.M., & Carney, R. (1996). Reading skills in children with Turner's syndrome: An analysis of hyperplexia. Cortex, 32, 335—345.
46.
Temple, C.M., Carney, R.A., & Mullarkey, S. (1996). Frontal lobe function and executive skills in children with Turner's syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology,12, 343—363.
47.
Temple, C.M., & Marriott, A.J. (1998). Arithmetical ability and disability in Turner's syndrome: A cognitive neuropsychological analysis. Developmental Neuropsychology,14, 47—67.
