Researchers of mathematics learning disability (MLD) commonly use cutoff scores to determine which participants have MLD. Some researchers apply more restrictive cutoffs than others (e.g., performance below the 10th vs. below the 35th percentile). Different cutoffs may lead to groups of children that differ in their profile of math and related skills, including reading, visual—spatial, and working memory skills. The present study assesses the characteristics of children with MLD based on varying MLD definitions of math performance either below the 10th percentile (n = 22) or between the 11th and 25th percentile (n = 42) on the Test of Early Math Ability, second edition (TEMA-2). Initial starting levels and growth rates for math and related skills were examined in these two MLD groups relative to a comparison group (n = 146) whose TEMA-2 performance exceeded the 25th percentile. Between kindergarten and third grade, differences emerged in the starting level and growth rate, suggesting qualitative differences among the three groups. Despite some similarities, qualitative group differences were also observed in the profiles of math-related skills across groups. These results highlight differences in student characteristics based on the definition of MLD and illustrate the value of examining skill areas associated with math performance in addition to math performance itself.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alarcón, M., DeFries, J.C., Light, J.G., & Pennington, B.F. (1997). A twin study of mathematics disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 617—623.
2.
Anderson, P., Anderson, V., Northam, E., & Taylor, H.G. (2000). Standardization of the contingency naming test (CNT) for school-aged children: A measure of reactive flexibility. Clinical Neuropsychological Assessment, 1, 247—273.
3.
Badian, N.A. (1983). Dyscalculia and non-verbal disorders of learning . In H. R. Myklebust (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (pp. 235—264). New York : Stratton .
4.
Barbaresi, W.J., Katusic, S.K., Colligan, R.C., Weaver, A.L., & Jacobsen, S.J. (2005). Math learning disorders: Incidence in a population-based birth cohort, 1976—82, Rochester, Minn. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 5, 281—289.
5.
Bowers, P.G., & Newby-Clark, E. (2002). The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 109— 126.
6.
Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive function as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19, 273—293.
7.
Butterworth, B. (2003). Dyscalculia screener. London : NFER Nelson.
8.
Butterworth, B. (2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines , 46, 3—18.
9.
Ceci, S.J. (1991). How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology, 27, 703—722.
10.
Clarren, S.B., Martin, D.C., & Townes, B.D. (1993). Academic achievement over a decade: A neuropsychological prediction study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 9, 161—176.
11.
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970—974.
12.
Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R. (1974). Rapid “automatized” naming of pictured objects, colors, letters, and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186—202.
13.
Dunn, L.M. & Markwardt, F.C. (1970). Examiner's Manual: Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
14.
Epsy, K.A., McDiarmid, M.M., Cwik, M.F., Stalets, M.M., Hamby, A., & Senn, T.E. (2004). The contribution of executive function to emergent mathematic skills in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology , 26, 465—486.
15.
Fias, W., & Fischer, M.H. (2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 43—54). New York: Psychology Press.
16.
Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Lyon, G.R., Foorman, B.R., Stuebing, K.K., et al. (1998). Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 186—203.
17.
Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.E., & Rourke, B.P. (1996). Defining learning and language disabilities: Conceptual and psychometric issues with the use of IQ tests. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 132— 143.
18.
Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Stuebing, K.K., Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, B.A., & Shaywitz, S.E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98—108.
19.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Prentice, K. (2004). Responsiveness to mathematical problem-solving instruction: Comparing students at risk of mathematics disability with and without risk of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 37, 293— 306.
20.
Geary, D.C. (1990). A componential analysis of an early learning deficit in mathematics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 363—383.
Geary, D.C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4—15.
23.
Geary, D.C., Bow-Thomas, C.C., & Yao, Y. (1992). Counting knowledge and skill in cognitive addition: A comparison of normal and mathematically disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 372—391.
24.
Geary, D.C., & Brown, S.C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398—406.
25.
Geary, D.C., Brown, S.C., & Samaranayake, V.A. (1991). Cognitive addition: A short longitudinal study of strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in normal and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 787—797.
26.
Geary, D.C., Hamson, C.O., & Hoard, M.K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236—263.
27.
Geary, D.C., & Hoard, M.K. (2005). Learning disabilities in arithmetic and mathematics: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 253— 267). New York: Psychology Press.
28.
Geary, D.C., Hoard, M.K., Byrd-Craven, J., & DeSoto, M.C. (2004). Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 121—151.
29.
Geary, D.C., Hoard, M.K., & Hamson, C.O. (1999). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: Patterns of functions and deficits in children at risk for a mathematical disability . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 213—239.
30.
Gelman, R., & Meck, E. (1983). Preschoolers' counting: Principles before skill . Cognition, 13, 343—359.
31.
Ginsburg, H.P., & Baroody, A.J. (1990). Test of early mathematics ability (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
32.
Gross-Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R.S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 25—33.
33.
Hammill, D.D., Pearson, N.A., & Voress, J.K. (1993). Developmental test of visual perception (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
34.
Hanich, L.B., Jordan, N.C., Kaplan, D., & Dick, J. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 615—626.
35.
Hoard, M.K., Geary, D.C., & Hamson, C.O. (1999). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: Performance of low- and average-IQ children. MathematicalCognition, 5, 65—91.
36.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G.S. (1984). Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
37.
Jiménez Gonzalez, J.E., & Garcia Espínel, A.I. (1999). Is IQ—achievement discrepancy relevant in the definition of arithmetic learning disabilities?Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 291—301.
38.
Jordan, N.C., Levine, S.C., & Huttenlocher, J. (1995). Calculation abilities in young children with different patterns of cognitive functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 53—64.
39.
Jordan, N.C., Hanich, L.B., & Kaplan, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834—850.
40.
Jordan, N.C., Kaplan, D., & Hanich, L.B. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586— 597.
41.
Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42.
Landerl, K., Bevan, A., & Butterworth, B. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 8—9 year old students. Cognition, 93, 99—125.
43.
Light, J.G., & DeFries, J.C. (1995). Comorbidity of reading and mathematics disabilities: Genetic and environmental etiologies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 96—106.
44.
Lindsay, R.L., Tomazic, T., Levine, M.D., & Accardo, P.J. (2001). Attentional function as measured by a continuous performance task in children with dyscalculia. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 22, 287—292.
45.
Mazzocco, M.M.M. (2001). Math learning disability and math LD subtypes: Evidence from studies of Turner syndrome, fragile X syndrome, and neurofibromatosis Type 1. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 520—533.
46.
Mazzocco, M.M.M., & Myers, G.F. (2003). Complexities in identifying and defining mathematics learning disability in the primary school-age years. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 218—253.
47.
McLean, J.F., & Hitch, G.J. (1999). Working memory impairments in children with specific arithmetic learning difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 240—260.
48.
Morris, R.D., Stuebing, K.K., Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Lyon, G.R., Shankweiler, D.P., et al. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology , 90, 347—373.
49.
Ostad, S.A. (1997). Developmental differences in addition strategies: A comparison of mathematically disabled and mathematically normal children . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 345—357.
50.
Passolunghi, M.C., & Siegel, L.S. (2001). Short-term memory, working memory, and inhibitory control in children with difficulties in arithmetic problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 44—57.
51.
Passolunghi, M.C., & Siegel, L.S. (2004). Working memory and access to numerical information in children with disability in mathematics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 348—367.
52.
Ramaa, S., & Gowramma, I.P. (2002). A systematic procedure for identifying and classifying children with dyscalculia among primary school children in India. Dyslexia, 8, 67—85.
53.
Räsänen, P., & Ahonen, T. (1995). Arithmetic disabilities with and without reading difficulties: A comparison of arithmetic errors. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 275—295.
Shalev, R.S., Manor, O., Auerbach, J., & Gross-Tsur, V. (1998). Persistence of developmental dyscalculia: What counts?Journal of Pediatrics, 133, 358—362.
56.
Shalev, R.S., Manor, O., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia: A prospective six-year follow-up. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47, 121—125.
Stringer, R., Toplak, M.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (2004). Differential relationships between RAN performance, behaviour ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 891—914.
59.
Swanson, H.L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471—491.
60.
Taylor, H.G., Albo, V.C., Phebus, C.K., Sachs, B.R., & Bierl, P.G. (1987). Post-irradiation treatment outcomes for chidlren with acute lymphocytic leukemia: Clarification of risks. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 12, 395—411.
61.
The Psychological Corporation. (1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. San Antonio, TX: Author.
62.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 27, 276— 286.
63.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology , 30, 73—87.
64.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised . San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
65.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
66.
Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
67.
White, J.L., Moffitt, T.E., & Silva, P.A. (1992). Neuropsychological and socio-emotional correlates of specific arithmetic disability. Archives ofClinical Neuropsychology , 7, 1—16.
68.
Wilson, K.M., & Swanson, H.L. (2001). Are mathematics disabilities due to a domain-general or a domain-specific working memory deficit?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 237—248.
69.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415—439.
