The majority of high-stakes tests from elementary school through postsecondary education include the timed impromptu essay as a measure of writing performance. For adolescents with writing disorders, this type of evaluation often presents a significant barrier. The purpose of the current study was twofold. First, we investigated the influence of handwritten, typed, and typed/edited formats of an expository essay on the quality scores received by students with (n = 65) and without ( n = 65) dyslexia. Second, we examined the contribution of spelling, handwriting, fluency, and vocabulary complexity to the quality scores that students with and without dyslexia received on the same writing task. Analyses indicated that vocabulary complexity, verbosity, spelling, and handwriting accounted for more variance in essay quality scores for writers with dyslexia than for their typically achieving peers. Both group and individual student outcomes are reported to better understand the needs of struggling writers with dyslexia. Implications for assessment, instruction, and accommodations are discussed with an eye toward reform efforts that target improved teaching and learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, R.D., & Berninger, V.W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology , 85, 478—508.
2.
Adams, M.J. (2001). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author .
4.
Arnold, V., Legas, J., Obler, S., Pacheco, M.A., Russell, C., & Umbdenstock, L. (1990). Do students get higher scores on their word-processed papers? A study of bias in scoring handwritten vs. word-processed papers. Unpublished manuscript, Rio Hondo College, Whiter, CA.
5.
Ayres, L. (1912). A scale for measuring the quality of handwriting of school children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
Berninger, V.W., & Graham, S. (1998). Language by hand: A synthesis of a decade of research on handwriting. Handwriting Review, 12, 11—25.
7.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English . London: Longman.
8.
Böckel, C. (2002, November). Concordance programs. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://www.unigiessen.de/~ga1007/ComputerLab/concordance.htm
9.
Briggs, D. (1970). The influence of handwriting on assessment. Educational Research, 13, 50—55.
10.
Briggs, D. (1980). A study of the influence of handwriting upon grades using examination scripts. Educational Review, 32, 185— 193.
11.
Bruck, M. (1993). Component spelling skills of college students with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 171—184.
12.
Buly, M.R., & Valencia, S.W. (2002). Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state reading assessments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 219—239.
13.
Cahalan-Laitusis, C. (2003). Accommodations on high stakes writing tests for students with disabilities. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved July 6, 2004, from http://ets.org/research.html
14.
Carlisle, J.F., & Rice, M.S. (2002). Improving reading comprehension: Research-based principles and practices. Baltimore: York Press.
15.
Chase, C. (1986). Essay test scoring: Interaction of relevant variables . Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 33—41.
Cooper, C.R., & Odell, L. (1999). Evaluating writing: The role of teachers' knowledge about text, learning, and culture. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
18.
Dennis, J.L., & Swinthe, Y. (2001). Pencil grasp and children's handwriting legibility during different length writing tasks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 171—183.
19.
Elbow, P. (1973). Writing with teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Elbow, P. (1981). Writing with power. New York : Oxford University Press.
21.
Englert, C.S. (1990). Unraveling the mysteries of writing through strategy instruction. In T. E. Scruggs & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 186—223). New York: Springer Verlag.
22.
Feldt, L.S. (1962). The reliability of measures of handwriting quality . Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 288—299.
23.
Floyd, R., Gregg, N., & Keith, T. (2005). Reading comprehension across the lifespan. Manuscript submitted for publication.
24.
Freeman, F.N. (1959). A new handwriting scale. Elementary School Journal, 59, 218— 221.
25.
Goodenough, A. (2001, May 23). Teaching by the book, no asides allowed [Electronic version]. The New York Times, p. A1.
26.
Graham, S. (1982). Measurement of handwriting skills: A critical review. Diagnostique, 8, 32—42.
27.
Graham, S. (1986a). A review of handwriting scales and factors that contribute to variability in handwriting scores. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 373—380.
28.
Graham, S. (1986b). The reliability, validity, and utility of three handwriting measurement procedures. The Journal of Educational Research, 79, 373—380.
29.
Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students' compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology , 82, 781—791.
30.
Graham, S., Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Abbott, S.P., & Whitaker, S. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170—182.
31.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2004). Writing better: Effective strategies for teaching students with learning disabilities. Baltimore: Brookes.
32.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. (1999). Assessment and intervention in overcoming writing difficulties: An illustration from the self-regulated strategy development model. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 255—264.
33.
Graham, S., Harris, K., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620—633.
34.
Graham, S., & Weintraub, N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980—1994. Educational Psychology Review , 8, 7—86.
35.
Gregg, N. (1995). Written expression disorders: Neuropsychology and cognition. Boston, MA: Kluwer .
36.
Gregg, N., Coleman, C., Stennett, R., & Davis, M. (2002). Discourse complexity of college writers with and without disabilities: A multidimensional analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 23—38.
37.
Gregg, N., Coleman, C., & Hartwig, J. (in press). Written expression disorders and the adult population with learning disorders. In L. E. Wolf, H. Scribner, & J. Wasserstein (Eds.), Adult learning disorders: Contemporary issues (Neuropsychology handbook series). New York: Psychology Press.
38.
Gregg, N., Coleman, C., Stennett, R., Davis, M., Nielsen, K., Knight, D., et al. (2001). Sublexical and lexical processing of young adults with learning disabilities and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder . In E. Witruk (Ed.), Basic functions of language and language disorders (pp. 1—31). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
39.
Gregg, N., & Hartwig, J. (2005). Written expression assessment: An integrated approach . In S. W. Lee (Ed.), Encyclopedia of school psychology (pp. 590—600) New York : Sage.
40.
Gregg, N., Hoy, C., Flaherty, D.A., Norris, P., Coleman, C., Davis, M., et al. (2005). Documenting decoding and spelling accommodations for postsecondary students demonstrating dyslexia—It's more than processing speed. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3, 1—17.
41.
Hatcher, J., Snowling, M.J., & Griffiths, Y.M. (2002). Cognitive assessment of dyslexic students in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 119— 133.
42.
Hayes, J.R. (2004). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In R. B. Ruddell & N. U. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1399—1431). Newark, DE: IRA.
43.
Hollenbeck, K., Tindal, G., Stieber, S., & Harniss, M. (1999). Handwritten versus word-processed statewide compositions: Do judges rate them differently? Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon, Eugene.
44.
Hughes, D.C., Keeling, B., & Tuck, B.F. (1983). Effects of achievement expectations and handwriting quality on scoring essays. Journal of Educational Measurement , 20, 65—70.
45.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
46.
Jarvis, S. (2002). Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19(1), 57—84.
47.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. (1993). Wide range achievement test (3rd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Jastak .
48.
Johnson, D., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
49.
Kaufman, A., & Kaufman, N. (1993). Kaufman adolescent and adult intelligence test . Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
50.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Kintsch, W. (2004). The construction— integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In R. B. Ruddell & N. U. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1270—1328). Newark, DE: IRA.
52.
Larsen, S.C., & Hammill, D.P. (1989). Test of legible handwriting. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
53.
Markham, L.R. (1976). Influences of handwriting quality on teacher evaluation of written work. American Educational Research Journal, 13, 277—283.
54.
Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson—III Tests of Achievement: Handwriting Analysis scale: Examiner's manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
55.
McKeown, M.G., & Beck, I.L. (1988). Learning vocabulary: Different ways for different goals. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 42—46.
56.
Nagy, W.E. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension . Newark, DE: IRA.
57.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.
58.
Powers, D.E., Fowles, M.E., Farnum, M., & Ramsey, P. (1994). Will they think less of my handwritten essay if others word process theirs? Effects on essay scores of intermingling handwritten and word-processed essays. Journal of Educational Measurement , 31, 220—233.
59.
Rosenblum, S., Weiss, P.L., & Parush, S. (2004). Handwriting evaluation for developmental dysgraphia: Process versus product. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 433—458.
60.
Russell, M., & Plati, T. (2001). Effects of computer versus paper administration of a state-mandated writing assessment. Teachers College Record . Retrieved November 17, 2004, from http://epaa.edu/epaa/v8n19.html
61.
Salzmann, A. (n.d.). Using a concordance. Retrieved March 13, 2007 , from http://www.iei.uiuc.edu/structure/structure1/conc.html
Thorndike, E.L. (1910). Handwriting. Teachers College Record, 11, 83—175.
64.
Treiman, R. (1997). Spelling in normal children and dyslexics. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 191—218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
65.
Van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
66.
Vermeer, A. (2000). Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data. Language Testing, 17(1), 65—83.
67.
Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
68.
White, E.M. (1995). An apologia for the timed impromptu essay test . Cancer Causes & Control, 46, 30—45.
69.
White, E.M. (2001). The opening of the modern era of writing assessment: A narrative. College English, 63, 306—320.
70.
Zachary, R.A. (1991). Shipley institute of living scale (rev. ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
