The aims of this study were (a) to determine whether Spanish children with reading disabilities (RD) show a speech perception deficit and (b) to explore the locus and nature of this perceptive deficit. A group of 29 children with RD, 41 chronological age—matched controls, and 27 reading ability—matched younger controls were tested on tasks of speech perception. The effect of linguistic unit (word vs. syllable) and type of phonetic contrast (voicing, place and manner of articulation) were analyzed in terms of the number of errors and the response time. The results revealed a speech perception deficit in Spanish children with RD that was independent of the type of phonetic contrast and of linguistic unit.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adlard, A., & Hazan, V. (1998). Speech perception in children with specific reading difficulties (dyslexia). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human ExperimentalPsychology, 1, 153—177.
2.
Best, C., & Avery, R.A. (1999). Left hemisphere advantage for click consonants is determined by linguistic significance and experience. Psychological Science, 10, 65— 70.
3.
Bishop, D.V.M., Carlyon, R.P., Deeks, J.M., & Bishop, S.J. (1999). Auditory temporal processing impairment: Neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1295— 1310.
4.
Blomert, L., & Mitterer, H. (2004). The fragile nature of the speech-perception deficit in dyslexia: Natural vs. synthetic speech. Brain andLanguage , 8, 21—26.
5.
Bradley, D.C., Sánchez-Casas, R., & García-Albea, J.E. (1993). The status of the syllable in the perception of Spanish and English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 197—233.
6.
Bradlow, A.R., Kraus, N., Nichol, T.G., McGee, T.J., Cunningham, J., Zecker, S.G., et al. (1999). Effects of lengthened format transition duration on discrimination and neural representation of synthetic CV syllables by normal and learning-disabled children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2086— 2096.
7.
Brady, S.A., Shankweiler, D.P., & Mann, V. (1983). Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 35, 345—367.
8.
Breier, J.I., Gray, L., Fletcher, J.M., Diehl, R.L., Klaas, P., Foorman, B.F., et al. (2001). Perception of voice and tone onset time continua in children with dyslexia with and without attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 245—270.
9.
Breier, J.I., Gray, L., Fletcher, J.M., Foorman, B.F., & Klaas, P. (2002). Perception of speech and nonspeech stimuli by children with and without reading disability and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 226—250.
10.
Breznitz, Z. (2003). Speed of phonological and orthographic processing as factors in dyslexia: Electrophysiological evidence. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 183—206.
11.
Breznitz, Z., & Meyler, A. (2003). Speed of lower-level auditory and visual processing as a basic factor in dyslexia: Electrophysiological evidence. Brain andLanguage, 85, 166—184.
12.
Bryant, P., & Goswami, U. (1986). Strengths and weaknesses of the reading level design: A comment on Backman, Mamen, and Ferguson. Psychological Bulletin,100, 101—103.
13.
Cattell, R.B., & Cattell, A.K.S. (1995). Tests de factor g: Escala 1 [A measure of g: Scale 1] (A. Cordero, M. V. De la Cruz, & N. Seisdedos, Trans.). Madrid: TEA. (Original work published 1950)
14.
Cattell, R.B., & Cattell, A.K.S. (2001). Tests de factor g: Escala 2 [A measure of g: Scale 2]. Madrid: TEA. (Original work published 1950)
15.
Chiappe, P., Chiappe, D.L., & Siegel, L. (2001). Speech perception, lexicality, and reading skill . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 58—74.
16.
Csépe, V., Gyurkócza, E.E., & Osman-Sági, J. (1998). Normal and disturbed phoneme perception as reflected by the mismatch negativity: Do event-related potentials help to understand dyslexia? Pathophysiology, 5, 202.
17.
Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., & Ruano, E. (1996). Batería de evaluación de los procesos lectores de los niños de educación primaria (PROLEC) [Assessment test of reading skills for children in primary education]Madrid: TEA.
18.
Cutler, A. (1990). Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation . In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 105—121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Seguí, J. (1983). A language-specific comprehension strategy. Nature, 304, 159—160.
20.
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Seguí, J. (1986). The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory andLanguage, 25, 385— 400.
21.
Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113—121.
22.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450—466.
23.
de Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J. (1998). Impaired speech perception in poor readers: Evidence from hearing and speech reading. Brain andLanguage, 64, 269—281.
24.
de Weirdt, W. (1988). Speech perception and frequency discrimination for good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 163—183.
25.
Domínguez, A., & Cuetos, F. (1992). Desarrollo de las habilidades de reconocimiento de palabras en niños con distinta competencia lectora. Cognitiva , 2, 193—208
26.
Eimas, P.D., Siqueland, E.R., Jusczyk, P.W., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303—306.
27.
Elliot, L.L., Scholl, M.E., Grant, W.K., & Hammer, M.A. (1990). Perception of gated, highly familiar spoken monosyllabic nouns by children with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 248—259. Farmer, M.E., & Klein, R.M. (1993). Auditory and visual temporal processing in dyslexic and normal readers. In P. Tallal, A. M. Galaburda, R. R. Linas, & C. von Euler (Eds.), Temporal information processing in the nervous system: Special reference to dyslexia and dysphasia, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 339—341.
28.
Farmer, M.E., & Klein, R.M. (1995). The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 2, 460—493.
29.
Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Liberman, I.Y., Stuebing, K.K., et al. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6—23.
30.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., & Lynn, A. (1996). Relation of phonological and orthographic processing to early reading: Comparing two approaches to regression-based, reading-level-match designs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 639—652.
31.
Fowler, A.M. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phonological awareness. In S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological process in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 97—117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
Godfrey, J.J., Syrdal-Lasky, A.K., Millay, K.K., & Knox, C.M. (1981). Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 401—424.
33.
Goswami, U. (2003). Why theories about developmental dyslexia require developmental designs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 534—540.
34.
Habib, M., Rey, V., Daffaure, V., Camps, R., Espesser, R., Joly Potuzz, B., et al. (2002). Phonological training in children with dyslexia using temporally modified speech: A three step pilot investigation . Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 37, 289—308.
35.
Hari, R., & Kiesila, P. (1996). Deficit of temporal auditory processing in dyslexic adults. Neuroscience Letters, 205, 138—140.
36.
Jiménez, J.E. (1997). A reading-level match study of phonemic processes underlying reading disabilities in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 23—40.
37.
Jiménez, J.E., Díaz, A., Ortiz, M.R., Rodrigo, M., García, E., Guzmán, R., et al. (2002, June). SICOLE: A tutorial intelligent system in assessing and remedial education of dyslexia in Spanish. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the International Dyslexia Association, Washington, DC.
38.
Jiménez, J.E., & Hernández-Valle, I. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 267—275.
Jiménez, J.E., & Ramírez, G. (2002). Identifying subtypes of reading disabilities in the Spanish language. The SpanishJournal of Psychology, 5, 3—19.
41.
Kail, R. (1991). Developmental changes in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin,109, 490—501.
42.
Kinsbourne, M., Rufo, D.T., Gamzu, E., Palmer, R.L., & Berliner, A.K. (1991). Neuropsychological deficits in adults with dyslexia. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 3, 763—775.
43.
Kraus, N., McGee, T.J., Carrell, T.D., Zecker, S.G., Nicol, T.G., & Koch, D.B. (1996). Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficit in children with learning problems. Science, 273, 971—973.
44.
Liberman, A.M., & Mattingly, I.G. (1989). A specialization for speech perception. Science, 243, 489—494.
45.
Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A.M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1—33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
46.
Lieberman, P.B., Meskill, R.H., Chatillon, M., & Schupack, H. (1985). Phonetic speech perception deficit in dyslexia . Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 28, 480—486.
47.
Maassen, B., Groenen, P., Crul, T., Assman-Hulsmans, C., & Gabreels, F. (2001). Identification and discrimination of voicing and place of articulation in developmental dyslexia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 4, 319—339.
48.
Manis, F.R., McBride-Chang, C., Seidenberg, M.S., Keating, P., Doi, L.M., & Petersen, A. (1997). Are speech perception deficits associated with developmental dyslexia?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 66, 211—235.
49.
McAnally, K.I., Hansen, P.C., Cornelissen, P.L., & Stein, J.F. (1997). Effect of time and frequency manipulation on syllable perception in developmental dyslexics. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 912—924.
50.
McBride-Chang, C. (1996). Models of speech perception and phonological processing in reading. Child Development, 4, 1836—1856.
51.
McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R.W., & Chang, L. (1997). Growth modeling of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 621—630.
52.
McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1—86.
53.
Mehler, J., Dommergues, J.Y., Frauenfelder, U., & Seguí, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298—305.
54.
Metsala, J. (1997). Spoken word recognition in reading disabled children . Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 159—169.
55.
Metsala, J.L., & Walley, A.C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89—119). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56.
Mody, M. (2003). Rapid auditory processing deficits in dyslexia: A commentary on two differing views. Journal of Phonetics , 31, 529—539.
57.
Mody, M., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Brady, S. (1997). Speech perception deficit in poor readers: Auditory processing or phonological coding?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 199—231.
58.
Nittrouer, S. (1999). Do temporal processing deficits cause phonological processing problems?Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 925—942.
59.
Nittrouer, S., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Mc-Gowan, R.S. (1989). The emergence of phonetic segments: Evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 30, 319—329.
60.
Norris, D., McQueen, J.M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 299— 325.
61.
Ortiz, M.R., García, A.I., & Guzmán, R. (2002). Remedial interventions for children with reading disabilities: Speech perception—An effective component in phonological training?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 334—342.
62.
Ortiz, M.R., & Guzmán, R. (2003). Contribución de la percepción del habla y la conciencia fonémica a la lectura de palabras. [Contribution of speech perception and phonemic awareness to word reading]. Cognitiva, 15, 3—17.
63.
Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Felguera, T., Christophe, A., & Mehler, J. (1993). Attentional allocation within syllable structure of spoken words. Journal of Memory andLanguage, 32, 373—389.
64.
Post, Y.V., Foorman, B.R., & Hiscock, M. (1997). Speech perception and speech production as indicators of reading difficulty. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 3—27.
65.
Ramus, F. (2001). Outstanding questions about phonological processing in dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7, 197—216.
66.
Reed, M.A. (1989). Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 270— 292.
67.
Rey, V., De Martino, S., Espesser, R., & Habib, M. (2002). Temporal processing and phonological impairment in dyslexia: Effect of phoneme lengthening on order judgment of two consonants. Brain andLanguage, 80, 576—591.
68.
Rodrigo, M., & Jiménez, J.E. (1999). An analysis of the reading errors of normal readers and reading disabled children in Spanish. Journal of Research on Reading, 22, 180—197.
69.
Schulte-Koerne, G., Deimel, W., Bartling, J., & Remschmidt, H. (1999). The role of phonological awareness, speech perception, and auditory temporal processing for dyslexia . European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 3, 28—34.
70.
Sebastián, N., Dopoux, E., Seguí, J., & Mehler, J. (1992). Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Memory andLanguage, 31, 18—32.
71.
Sebastián-Gallés, N. (1996). Speech perception in Catalan and Spanish. In M. Carreiras, J. E. García-Albea, & N. Sebastián-Gallés (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 1—19). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
72.
Seisdedos, N., De la Cruz, M.V., Cordero, A., & González, M. (1991). Test de aptitudes escolares (TEA). Madrid: TEA.
73.
Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Carré, R., & Demonet, J.F. (2001). Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 384— 388.
74.
Share, D.L., Jorm, A.F., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (2002). Temporal processing and reading disability. Reading and Writing, 15, 151—178.
75.
Siegel, L.S., & Ryan, E.B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973—980.
76.
Snowling, M., Goulandris, N., Bowlby, M., & Howell, P. (1986). Segmentation and speech perception in relation to reading skill: A developmental analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 489— 507.
77.
Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L.S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24—53.
78.
Stein, J.F., & McAnally, K. (1995). Auditory temporal processing in developmental dyslexics. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 16, 220—228.
79.
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1987). The phoneme as a perceptuomotor structure. In A. All-port, D. Mackay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.), Language perception and production (pp. 67—84). London: Academic Press.
80.
Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Mody, M. (1995). Auditory temporal perception deficits in the reading impaired: A critical review of the evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 508—514.
81.
Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain andLanguage, 9, 182—198.
82.
Tallal, P., Miller, S., & Fitch, H. (1993). Neurological basis of speech: A case for the preeminence of temporal processing. In P. Tallal, A. M. Galaburda, R. R. Linas, & C. von Euler (Eds.), Temporal information processing in the nervous system: Special reference to dyslexia and dysphasia, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 27—47.
83.
Tallal, P., & Piercy, M. (1973). Developmental aphasia: Impaired rate of non-verbal processing as a function of sensory modality. Neuropsychologia , 11, 389—398.
84.
Tallal, P., & Piercy, M. (1974). Developmental aphasia: Rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception. Neuropsychologia , 12, 89—93.
85.
Tallal, P., & Piercy, M. (1975). Developmental aphasia: The perception of brief vowels and extended stop consonants. Neuropsychologia, 13, 69—74.
86.
Tobey, E.A., & Cullen, J.K. (1984). Temporal integration of tone-glides by children with auditory-memory and reading problems. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 27, 527—533.
87.
Waber, D.P., Wolff, P.H., Weiler, M.D., Bellinger, D., Marcus, D.H., Forbes, P., et al. (2001). Processing of rapid auditory stimuli in school-age children referred for evaluation of learning disorder. Child Development, 72, 37—49.
88.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). The development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology , 30, 73—87.
89.
Walley, A.C., Metsala, J.L., & Garlock, V.M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 5—20.
90.
Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. (1987). Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 48—61.
