In this study, we examined the characteristics of reading disability (RD) in the seventh grade of the Greek educational system and the corresponding diagnostic practice. We presented a clinically administered assessment battery, composed of typically employed tasks, and a fully automated, computer-based assessment battery that evaluates some of the same constructs. In all, 261 children ages 12 to 14 were tested. The results of the traditional assessment indicated that RD concerns primarily slow reading and secondarily poor reading and spelling accuracy. This pattern was matched in the domains most attended to in expert student evaluation. Automatic (computer-based) screening for RD in the target age range matched expert judgment in validity and reliability in the absence of a full clinical evaluation. It is proposed that the educational needs of the middle and high school population in Greece will be best served by concentrating on reading and spelling performance—particularly fluency—employing widespread computer-based screening to partially make up for expert-personnel shortage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adlard, A., & Hazan, V. (1998). Speech perception in children with specific reading difficulties. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 51A, 153—177.
2.
Ahissar, M., Protopapas, A., Reid, M., & Merzenich, M.M. (2000). Auditory processing parallels reading abilities in adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 13907—13912.
3.
Anthony, J.L., & Lonigan, C.J. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 43—55.
4.
Beitchman, J.H., & Young, A. (1997). Learning disorders with a special emphasis on reading disorders: A review of the past 10 years. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1020—1032.
5.
Bishop, D.V.M., North, T., & Donlan, C. (1996). Nonword repetition as a behavioural marker for inherited language impairment: Evidence from a twin study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 37, 391—403.
6.
Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874—886.
7.
Caravolas, M., & Volín, J. (2001). Phonological spelling errors among dyslexic children learning a transparent orthography: The case of Czech. Dyslexia , 7, 229—245.
8.
Chitiri, H., & Willows, D. (1994). Word recognition in two languages and orthographies: English and Greek. Memory & Cognition, 22, 313—325.
9.
Chliounaki, K., & Bryant, P. (2002). Construction and learning to spell. Cognitive Development, 17, 1489—1499.
10.
Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I.Y., Katz, L., & Tola, G. (1988). Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 1—16.
11.
De Weirdt, W. (1988). Speech perception and frequency discrimination in good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 163—183.
12.
Defior, S., Martos, F., & Cary, L. (2002). Differences in reading acquisition development in two shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 135—148.
13.
Ellis, N.C., Natsume, M., Stavropoulou, K., Hoxhallari, L., van Daal, V., Polyzoe, N., et al. (2004). The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 4, 438—468.
14.
Fletcher, J.M., Foorman, B.R., Boudousquie, A., Barnes, M.A., Schatschneider, C., & Francis, D.J. (2002). Assessment of reading and learning disabilities: A research-based intervention-oriented approach. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 27—63.
15.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M.K., & Jenkins, J.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239—256.
16.
Gathercole, S.E., Willis, C., Baddeley, A.D., & Emslie, H. (1994). The children's test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2, 103—127.
Gottardo, A., Siegel, L.S., & Stanovich, K.E. (1997). The assessment of adults with reading disabilities: What can we learn from experimental tasks?Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 42—54.
19.
Grove, W.M., Zald, D.H., Lebow, B.S., Snitz, B.E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A metaanalysis . Psychological Assessment, 12, 19— 30.
20.
Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 103— 128.
21.
Hatzigeorgiu, N., Gavrilidou, M., Piperidis, S., Carayannis, G., Papakostopoulou, A., Spiliotopoulou, A., et al. ( 2000, May 31—June 2). Design and implementation of the online ILSP corpus. In Proceedings of the second international conference of language resources and evaluation (Vol. 3, pp. 1737—1740). Athens, Greece.
22.
Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 401—413.
23.
Ives, B. (2003). Effect size use in studies of learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 490—504.
24.
Jenkins, J.R., Fuchs, L.S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S.L. (2003). Accuracy and fluency in list and context reading of skilled and RD groups: Absolute and relative performance levels. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 237—245.
25.
Jiménez González, J.E., & Hernández Valle, I. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 44—60.
26.
Lancaster, S., & Mellard, D. (2005). Adult learning disabilities screening with an Internet-administered instrument. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3, 62— 73.
27.
Landerl, K. (2001). Word recognition deficits in German: More evidence from a representative sample. Dyslexia, 7, 183— 196.
28.
Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2000). Deficits in phoneme segmentation are not the core problem of dyslexia: Evidence from German and English children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 243—262.
29.
Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German—English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315—334.
30.
Lehtola, R., & Lehto, J.E. (2000). Assessing dyslexia in Finnish high school students: A pilot study. European Journal of Special Needs Education , 15, 255—263.
31.
Lyon, G.R., Fletcher, J.M., & Barnes, M.C. (2002). Learning disabilities. In E. J. Mash & R. Barkley (Eds.), Child psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 520—586). New York: Guilford Press.
32.
Maridaki-Kassotaki, A. (1998). Ικανοττα βραχυχρονς συγκρατσς ϕώνολογικών πλροϕοριών καιεπιδοσ στν ανα γνώσ: Μια προσπα θεια διερευνσς τς µεταξυ τους σχεσς [Evaluation of the relationship between phonological working memory and reading ability in Greek-speaking children]. Psychologia, 5, 44—52.
33.
Mavrommati, T.D., & Miles, T.R. (2002). A pictographic method for teaching spelling to Greek dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 8, 86—101.
34.
Mayringer, J., & Wimmer, H. (2000). Pseudoname learning by German-speaking children with dyslexia: Evidence for a phonological learning deficit. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 116—133.
35.
McBride-Chang, C. (1995). What is phonological awareness?Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 179—192.
36.
Muller, K., & Brady, S. (2001). Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal , 14, 757—799.
37.
Naglieri, J.A. (2004). Psychological testing on the Internet: New problems, old issues. The American Psychologist, 59, 150— 162.
38.
Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (1988). Becoming a skilled reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
39.
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Levin, J.R., & Leech, N.L.( 2003). Do effect-size measures measure up?: A brief assessment . Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 1, 37—40.
40.
Paraskevopoulos, I.N., Kalantzi-Azizi, A., & Giannitsas, N.D. (1999). Αθνατεστ διαγνώσς δυσκολιών µαθσς [AthenaTest for the diagnosis of learning difficulties] . Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
41.
Porpodas, C.D. (1999). Patterns of phonological and memory processing in beginning readers and spellers of Greek. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 406—416.
42.
Rack, J., Snowling, M., & Olson, R. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29—53.
43.
Ramus, F. (2001). Outstanding questions about phonological processing in dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7, 197—216.
44.
Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S.C., Day, B.L., Castellote, J.M., White, S., et al. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: Insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain, 126, 1—25.
45.
Raven, J. (1976). Standard progressive matrices. New York: Psychological Corp.
46.
Reed, M.A. (1980). Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 270—292.
47.
Sabatini, J.P. (2002). Efficiency in word reading of adults: Ability group comparisons. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 267— 298.
48.
Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C.D., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B.R., & Fletcher, J.M. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 35, 245—256.
49.
Schulte-Körne, G., Deimel, W., Bartling, J., & Remschmidt, H. (1999). The role of phonological awareness, speech perception, and auditory processing for dyslexia. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 8, 260—267.
50.
Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Carre, L., & Demonet, J.F. (2001). Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 384— 399.
51.
Seymour, P.H.K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J.M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies . The British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143—174.
52.
Shaywitz, S.E. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York: Knopf.
Sideridis, G.D., Morgan, P.L., Botsas, G., Padeliadu, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Predicting LD on the basis of motivation, metacognition, and psychopathology: An ROC analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 215—229.
55.
Siegel, L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469—478.
56.
Siegel, L.S. (2003). IQ-discrepancy definitions and the diagnosis of LD: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 2—3.
57.
Stanovich, K.E. (1988). Explaining the difference between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590— 604.
58.
Stein, N.L. (1984). Η ανα πτυ ξ τς ικανο ττας τών παιδιώ ν να λε νε ιστοριες [The development of children's storytelling ability]. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Keimena ekseliktikis psychologias, tomos a: Glossa. Athens: Gutenberg .
59.
Tallal, P. (1976). Rapid auditory processing in normal and disordered language development. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research , 19, 561—571.
60.
Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain andLanguage, 9, 182—198.
61.
Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K.K.S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33—58.
62.
Torgesen, J.K., & Houck, D. (1980). Processing deficiencies of learning-disabled children who perform poorly on the digit span test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 141—160.
63.
Tressoldi, P.E., Stella, G., & Faggella, M. (2001). The development of reading speed in Italians with dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 34, 414—417.
van der Leij, A., & van Daal, V.H.P. (1999). Automatization aspects of dyslexia: Speed limitations in word identification, sensitivity to increasing task demands, and orthographic compensation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 417— 428.
66.
Wagner, R.K., & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin,101, 192—212.
67.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). The development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology , 30, 73—87.
68.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., Hecht, S.A., Barker, T.A., Burgess, S.R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468—479.
69.
Warnke, A. (1999). Reading and spelling disorders: Clinical features and causes. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 8, 1—12.
70.
Weaver, S.M.( 2000). The efficacy of extended time on tests for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 47—56.
71.
Wimmer, H., & Mayringer, H. (2002). Dysfluent reading in the absence of spelling difficulties: A specific disability in regular orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 272—277.
72.
Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668—680.
73.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415—438.
74.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming speed processes, timing and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387—407.
75.
Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211—239.
76.
Wolf, M., O'Rourke, A.G., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P., & Morris, R. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 43—72.
77.
Zahos, G.I., & Zahos, D.I. (1998). Δυσλεξια. Αντιµετώπισ−Αποκαταστασ. Οδγ ιες εϕαρµογς προγρα µµατος [Dyslexia: Guide to the application of an intervention—remediation program]. Athens: Author.
78.
Ziegler, J.C., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 169—193.
79.
Zoccolotti, P., de Luca, M., Judica, A., Orlandi, M., & Spinelli, D. (1999). Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme— phoneme correspondence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 191—216.
