The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the potential for computer-assisted instruction (CAI) to enhance number combination skill among children with concurrent risk for math disability and reading disability. A secondary purpose was to examine the effects of CAI on spelling. At-risk students were assigned randomly to math or spelling CAI, which they received in 50 sessions over 18 weeks. Acquisition and transfer effects were assessed. The results indicated that math CAI was effective in promoting addition but not subtraction number combination skill and that transfer to arithmetic story problems did not occur. Spelling CAI effects were reliable on acquisition and transfer spelling measures, with small to moderate effect sizes on transfer to reading measures. These results provide the basis for additional work with larger samples.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiken, L.R. (1972). Language factors in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 42, 459—385.
2.
Berninger, V., Vaughn, K., Abbott, R., Brooks, A., Abbott, S., Rogan, L., et al. (1998). Early intervention for spelling problems: Teaching functional spelling units of varying size with a multiple-connections framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 587—605.
3.
Brady, S. A., & Shankweiler, D. P. (Eds.). (1991). Phonological processes in literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Carpenter, T.P., & Moser, J.M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in Grades 1 through 3. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 179—203.
5.
Christensen, C.A., & Gerber, M.M. (1990). Effectiveness of computerized drill and practice games in teaching basic math facts. Exceptionality, 1, 149—165.
6.
Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347—362.
7.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K., Kuehnle, K., & Lowry, L. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of spelling and performance on standardized achievement tests (Research Report No. 22) . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
8.
Fleishner, J.E., Garnett, K., & Shepherd, M.J. (1982). Proficiency in arithmetic basic fact computation of learning disabled and nondisabled children. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 4, 47— 56.
9.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D.L., Powell, S.R., Seethaler, P.M., Capizzi, A.M., Schatschneider, C., & Fletcher, J.M. (2006). The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 29-43.
10.
Geary, D.C. (1990). A componential analysis of an early learning deficit in mathematics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 363—383.
Geary, D.C., Bow-Thomas, C.C., & Yao, Y. (1992). Counting knowledge and skill in cognitive addition: A comparison of normal and mathematically disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 372—391.
13.
Geary, D.C., & Brown, S.C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398—406.
14.
Geary, D.C., Brown, S.C., & Samaranayake, V.A. (1991). Cognitive addition: A short longitudinal study of strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in normal and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 787—797.
15.
Geary, D.C., Hamson, C.O., & Hoard, M.K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetic cognition: A longitudinal study of processes and concept deficits with children with learning disabilities . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236—263.
16.
Geary, D.C., Widaman, K.F., Little, T.D., & Cormier, P. (1987). Cognitive addition: Comparison of learning disabled and academically normal elementary school children. Cognitive Development, 2, 249— 269.
17.
Gersten, R., Jordan, N.C., & Flojo, J.R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 38, 293-304.
18.
Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
Goldman, S.R., Pellegrino, J.W., & Mertz, D.L. (1988). Extended practice of basic addition facts: Strategy changes in learning-disabled students. Cognition and Instruction , 5, 223—265.
20.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Chorzempa, B.F. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669—686.
21.
Gross-Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R.S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 37, 906—914.
Hasselbring, T.S., Goin, L.I., & Bransford, J.D. (1988). Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus onExceptional Children, 20(6), 1—7.
24.
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
25.
INSERM Cognitive Neuroimagery Unit. (2003, September). Brain research and learning sciences: Mini-symposium on the design of rehabilitation software for dyscalculia. Orsay, France: Center for Educational Research and Innovation.
26.
Jordan, N.C., & Hanich, L. (2000). Mathematical thinking in second-grade children with different forms of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 567—578.
27.
Jordan, N.C., Hanich, L.B., & Kaplan, D. (2003). Arithmetic fact mastery in young children: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 103—119.
28.
Jordan, N.C., & Montani, T.O. (1997). Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving: A comparison of children with specific and general mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 624—634.
29.
Lemaire, P., & Siegler, R.S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children's learning of multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 124, 83—97.
30.
Lewis, C., Hitch, G.J., & Walker, P. (1994). The prevalence of specific arithmetic difficulties and specific reading difficulties in 9- to 10-year-old boys and girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 35, 283—292.
31.
MacArthur, C.A., Haynes, J.A., Malouf, D.B., Harris, K., & Owings, M. (1990). Computer-assisted instruction with learning disabled students: Achievement, engagement, and other factors that influence achievement . Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 311—328.
32.
Mayer, D.P. (1998). Do new teaching standards undermine performance on old tests?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 1—16.
33.
McDermott, P.A., & Watkins, M.W. (1983). Computerized vs. conventional remedial instruction for learning disabled pupils. The Journal of Special Education , 17, 81—88.
34.
McMaster, K.N., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Compton, D.L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445—463.
35.
Okolo, C.M. (1992). The effect of computer-assisted instruction format and initial attitude on the arithmetic facts proficiency and continuing motivation of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 3, 195—211.
36.
Ostad, S.A. (1997). Developmental differences in addition strategies: A comparison of mathematically disabled and mathematically normal children. TheBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 345—357.
37.
Pellegrino, J.W., & Goldman, S.R. (1987). Information processing and elementary mathematics . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 23—32.
38.
Riley, M.S., & Greeno, J.G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction , 5, 49— 101.
39.
Riley, M.S., Greeno, J.G., & Heller, J.I. (1983). Development of children's problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153—196). New York: Academic Press.
40.
Stevens, K.B., Blackhurst, A.E., & Slaton, D.B. (1991). Teaching memorized spelling with a microcomputer: Time delay and computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 153— 160.
41.
Tournaki, N. (2003). The differential effects of teaching addition through strategy instruction versus drill and practice to students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 36, 449—458.
42.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., & Gordon, J. (1992). Early spelling acquisition: Does writing really beat the computer?Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 223—228.
43.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., Hecht, S.A., Barker, T.A., Burgess, S.R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A five year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468—479.
44.
Wilson, R., Majsterek, D., & Simmons, D. (1996). The effects of computer-assisted versus teacher-directed instruction on the multiplication performance of elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 382— 390.
45.
Woodcock, R.W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
46.
Woodward, J., & Baxter, J. (1997). The effects of an innovative approach to mathematics on academically low-achieving students in inclusive settings. Exceptional Children, 63, 373—388.
