Continuing unresolved problems in the field of special education include the continued use of discrepancy models; the need for better identification models; continued debate over programmatic issues, ranging from inclusion to self-contained models; and the continued overrepresentation of certain ethnic and racial groups in the learning disabilities (LD) category. This article focuses on students with mild learning disorders in general, and LD in particular, providing a perspective on how this problem has been addressed and suggesting a multilevel approach in which local context plays a central role. We suggest that overrepresentation is best conceptualized as an indicator of underlying issues rather than as the proper focal point of remediation efforts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, J., Carnine, D.W., Coutinho, M.J., Edgar, E.B., Fuchs, L.S., Forness, S.R., et al. (2000). Bridging the special education divide. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 258—260, 267.
2.
Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Perdomo-Rivera, C. (1996). Ecobehavioral analysis of instruction for at-risk language minority students. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 245—258.
3.
Artiles, A.J. (2003). Special education's changing identity: Paradoxes and dilemmas in views of culture and space. Harvard Educational Review, 73, 164—202.
4.
Artiles, A.J., Harry, B., Reschly, D., & Chinn, P. (2002). Placement of students of color in special education: A critical overview. MulticulturalPerspectives, 4, 3—10.
5.
Artiles, A. J., & Ortiz, A. A. (Eds.). (2002). English language learners with special education needs. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
6.
Artiles, A.J., Rueda, R., Salazar, J., & Higareda, I. (2002). English-language learner representation in special education in California urban school districts. In D. J. Losen & G. Orfield (Eds.), Racial inequality in special education (pp. 265— 284). Boston : Harvard Education Press.
7.
Artiles, A.J., Rueda, R., Salazar, J., & Higareda, I. (2005). Within-group diversity in minority special education disproportionate representation: The case of English language learners in California's urban school districts. Exceptional Children , 71, 283—300.
8.
Artiles, A.J., & Trent, S.C. (1994). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. The Journal of Special Education , 27, 410—437.
9.
Artiles, A.J., & Trent, S.C. (2000). Representation of culturally/linguistically diverse students. In C. R. Reynolds & E. Fletcher-Jantzen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of special education (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 513—517). New York: Wiley .
10.
Artiles, A.J., Trent, S.C., & Palmer, J. (2004). Culturally diverse students in special education: Legacies and prospects. In J.A. Banks & C.M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp.716-735). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Baca, L., De Valenzuela, J., & Garcia, S. (1996). A new approach to prereferral intervention: The PEP model. Boulder: University of Colorado at Boulder, BUENO Center for Multicultural Education.
12.
Barrera, M. (2003). Curriculum-based dynamic assessment for new- or second-language learners with learning disabilities in secondary education settings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(1), 69—84.
13.
Brantlinger, E. (1997). Using ideology: Cases of nonrecognition of the politics of research and practice in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67, 425—459.
14.
Champion, R. (Summer 2002) Taking measure: Choose the right data for the job. Journal of Staff Development. 23(3). Retrieved November 21, 2005 , from http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/jsd/champion234.cfm
15.
Clark, R.E., & Estes, F. (2002) Turning research into results: A guide to selecting the right performance solutions. Atlanta, GA: CEP Press.
16.
Cloud, N. (2002). Culturally and linguistically responsive instructional planning. In A. Artiles & A. Ortiz (Eds.), English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment and instruction (pp. 107—132). McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
17.
Cisero, C.A., & Royer, J.M. (1995). The development and cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 3, 275—303.
18.
Covington, M.V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review ofPsychology, 51, 171—200.
19.
Davis, L.J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. London: Verso.
20.
Durgunoglu, A.Y., Nagy, W.E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B.J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology , 85, 453—465.
21.
Finn, J.D. (1982). Patterns in special education placement as revealed by the OCR surveys. In K. A. Heller, W. H. Holtzman, & S. Messick (Eds.), Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity (pp. 322—381). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22.
Garcia, S. (2002). Parent—professional collaboration in culturally sensitive assessment. In A. Artiles & A. Ortiz (Eds.), English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment and instruction (pp. 87—106). McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
23.
Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English-language learners. Exceptional Children, 66, 454—470.
24.
Hallahan, D.P., & Mock, D.R. (2003). A brief history of the field of learning disabilities . In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 16—29). New York : Guilford Press.
25.
Kirpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels . San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler .
26.
Klingner, J.K., Ahwee, S., Pilonieta, P., & Menendez, R. (2003). Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 69, 411—429.
27.
Klingner, J.K., Artiles, A.J., Kozleski, E., Harry, B., Zion, S., Tate, W., Durán, G.Z., & Riley, D. (2005). Addressing the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education through culturally responsive educational systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(38). Retrieved November 21, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n38/
28.
Lindsey, K.A., Manis, F.R., & Bailey, C.E. (2003). Prediction of first-grade reading in Spanish-speaking English-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology , 95, 482—494.
29.
Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability. New York : New York University Press.
30.
McLaughlin, M. J., & Rouse, M. (Eds.). (1999). Special education and school reform in the United States and Britain. London: Routledge.
31.
Mercer, J. (1973). Labeling the mentally retarded: Clinical and social systems perspectives on mental retardation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
Muter, V., & Diethelm, K. (2001). The contribution of phonological skills and letter knowledge to early reading development in a multilingual population. Language Learning, 51(2), 187-219.
33.
National Research Council. (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Panel on Selection and Placement of Students in Programs for the Mentally Retarded, Committee on Child Development Research and Public Policy, K. A. Heller, W. H. Holtzman, and S. Messick (Eds), Commission on behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34.
National Research Council. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education, M. S. Donovan & C. T. Cross (Eds.), Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35.
Ormrod, J.E. (2003). Cognitive factors in motivation. In Educational psychology: Developing learners (4th ed., pp. 388—426). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
36.
Ortiz, A. (2002). Prevention of school failure and early intervention for English language learners. In A. Artiles & A. Ortiz (Eds.), English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment and instruction (pp. 31—50). McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
37.
Ortiz, A., & Yates, J. (2002). Considerations in the assessment of English language learners referred to special education. In A. Artiles & A. Ortiz (Eds.), English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment and instruction (pp. 65—86). McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
38.
Oswald, D.P., Coutinho, M.J., & Best, A.M. (2000, November 17). Community and school predictors of overrepresentation of minority children in special education. Paper prepared for the Harvard University Civil Rights Project Conference on Minority Issues in Special Education, Cam-bridge, MA.
39.
Oswald, D., Coutinho, M.J., Singh, N., & Best, A. (1998). Ethnicity in special education and relationships with school related economic and educational variables. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 194—206.
40.
Pintrich, P.R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667— 686.
41.
Reid, D.K., & Valle, J.W. (2004). Learning dis/ability as the intersection of competing discourses: Implications for classrooms, parents, and research. In B. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (3rd ed., pp. 515—534). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
42.
Reschly, D.J. (1997). Disproportionate minority representation in general and special education: Patterns, issues, and alternatives. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Education.
43.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
Rueda, R., & Artiles, A.J., Salazar, J., & Higareda, I. (2002). An analysis of special education as a response to the diminished academic achievement of Chicano/ Latino students: An update . In R. R. Valencia (Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Past, present, and future (2nd ed., pp. 310—332). London: Routledge Falmer.
45.
Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C.D., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B.R., & Fletcher, J.M. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implication for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 35, 245—256.
46.
Semrud-Clikeman, M.K., Guy, M., Guy, K., Griffin, J.D., & Hynd, G.W. (2000). Rapid naming deficits in children and adolescents with reading disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brain andLanguage, 74, 70—83.
47.
Swanson, H. L., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of learning disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.
48.
Swanson, H.L., Saez, L., Gerber, M., & Leafstedt, J. (2004). Literacy and cognitive functioning in bilingual and nonbilingual children at or not at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 3—18.
49.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation . Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68—81.
