Effects of a Peer-Mediated Phonological Skill and Reading Comprehension Program on Reading Skill Acquisition for Middle School Students with Reading Disabilities
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2005
Effects of a Peer-Mediated Phonological Skill and Reading Comprehension Program on Reading Skill Acquisition for Middle School Students with Reading Disabilities
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a peer-mediated instructional approach on the teaching of phonological skills and reading comprehension for middle school (sixth- to eighth-grade) students with reading disabilities. All students (n = 38) were identified as having learning disabilities and reading at the third-grade level or below. One group was taught using a peer-mediated phonological skill program, Linguistics Skills Training (LST), and a peer-mediated reading comprehension program, Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS). The contrast group was taught in the more traditional whole-class format using a widely implemented remedial reading program. The results showed significant differences between conditions, with students receiving the LST/PALS instruction outperforming the contrast group on Letter—Word Identification, Word Attack, and Passage Comprehension using the Woodcock-Johnson Test of Achievement—III. Furthermore, large effect sizes for growth were found on Letter—Word Identification, Word Attack, and Passage Comprehension for the LST/PALS treatment group. No differences were found between conditions for reading fluency. Findings are discussed in regard to instruction delivery format (peer tutoring vs. whole class) with respect to best practices for middle school students with reading disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
2.
Adams, M., Treiman, R., & Pressley, M. (1998). Reading, writing, and literacy. In P. Mussen, J. Flavell, & E. Markman (Eds.). Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Cognitive development, 275—355. New York: Wiley.
3.
Allor, J.H., Fuchs, D., & Mathes, P.G. (2001). Do students with and without lexical retrieval weaknesses respond differently to instruction?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 264—275.
4.
Baumann, J.F. (1984). The effectiveness of a direct instruction paradigm for teaching main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly , 20, 93—115.
5.
Calhoon, M.B. (2003). Linguistics skills training reading program. Georgia State University. Unpublished manual.
6.
Calhoon, M.B., & Fuchs, L.S. (2003). The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies and curriculum-based measurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education , 24, 235—245.
Doctorow, M., Wittrock, M.C., & Marks, C. (1978). Generative processes in reading education. Journal of Reading Psychology, 70, 109—118.
11.
Ehri, L.C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, O. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.). Handbook of reading research: Vol II (pp. 383— 417). New York: Longman.
12.
Elbaum, B.E., Schumm, J.S., & Vaughn, S.V. (1997). Urban middle-elementary students' perceptions of grouping formats for reading instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 475—500.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2001). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: Extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school. Remedial and Special Education, 22(1) 15—22.
15.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Burish, P. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 85—91.
16.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Otaiba, S.A., Nyman, K., Yang, N.J., et al. (2000). Strengthening kindergartners' reading readiness in Title I and non-Title I schools. Paper presented at the Pacific Coast Research Conference, La Jolla, CA.
17.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Otaiba, S.A., Yen, L., Yang, N.J., et al. (2002). Exploring the importance of reading programs for kindergartners with disabilities in the mainstream classroom. Exceptional Children, 68, 295—311.
18.
Fuchs, D., Mathes, P.G., & Simmons, D.C. (1997). Peer-assisted leaning strategies: Making classroom more responsive to academic diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174—206.
19.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Phillips, N.B., & Bentz, J. (1994). Classwide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children, 60, 518—537.
20.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hops, M.K., & Jenkins, J.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 241— 258.
21.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., & Phillips, N. (1993). Peabody peer-assisted learning strategies (PALS): Math methods. (Available from Dr. Lynn S. Fuchs, Box 328, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203).
22.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Kazdan, S. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 309—318.
23.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Phillips, N.B., Hamlett, C.L., & Karns, K. (1995). Acquisition and transfer effects of class wide peer-assisted learning strategies in mathematics for students with varying leaning histories. School Psychology Review, 24, 604—620.
24.
Glass, G.V., McGraw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Greenwood, C.R., & Delquadri, J. (1995). Classwide peer tutoring and the prevention of school failure. Preventing School Failure, 39(4), 21—25.
26.
Greenwood, C.R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. Vance (1989). Longitudinal Effects of Classwide Peer Tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 371—383.
27.
Hall, S., & Moats, L. (1999). Straight talk about reading: How parents can make a difference in the early years. Chicago: Contemporary Books.
28.
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., & Rivkin, S.G. (1998). Does special education raise academic achievement for students with disabilities? (Working Paper No. 6690). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research .
29.
Howell, K.W., & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA : Wads-worth.
30.
Kavale, K.A. (1988). The long term of learning disabilities. In M. C. Wang, H. J. Walburg, & M. C. Reynolds (Eds.). The handbook of special education: Research and practice (pp. 303—344) New York: Pergamon.
31.
Lovett, M.W., Borden, S.L., Lacerenza, L., Frijters, J.C., Steinbach, K.A., & De Palma, M. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 263—283.
32.
Lovett, M.W., Borden, S.L., Lacerenza, & DeLuca , Teresa (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically and strategy-based reading training programs . Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 805—822.
33.
Maheady, L. (1997). Preparing teachers for instructing multiple ability groups. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 322—339.
34.
Maheady, L., Harper, G.F., Mallette, B., & Winstanley, N. (1991). Implementation requirements associated with the use of a classwide peer tutoring system. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 177—198.
35.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Mohler, L.J., Beranek, M.L., Spencer, V., Boon, R.T., et al. (2001). Can middle school students with serious reading difficulties help each other and learn anything?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 18—27.
36.
Mathes, P.G., Grek, M.L., Howard, J.K., Babyak, A.E., & Allen, S.H. (1999). Peer-assisted learning strategies for first-grade readers: A tool for preventing early reading failure. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 1—13.
37.
Mathes, P.G., Howard, J.K., Allen, S.H., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Peer- assisted learning strategies for first-grade readers: Responding to the needs of diverse learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 62—94.
38.
McCray, A.D. (2001). The intermediate grades: Middle school students with reading disabilities. The Reading Teacher, 55, 298—300.
39.
Moats, L.C. (1999). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
40.
Moody, S.W., Vaughn, S.R., Hughes, M.Y., & Fisher, M. (2000). Reading instruction in the resource room: Set up for failure. Exceptional Children, 16, 305—316.
41.
Olson, R.K., Wise, B., Johnson, M., & Ring, J. (1997). The etiology and remediation of phonologically based word recognition and spelling disabilities: Are phonological deficits the “hole” story? In B. Blachman (Eds.), Foundations of reading acquisition (pp. 305—326). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
Palincscar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activity. Cognition and Instruction , 2, 117—175.
Schrank, F.A., & Woodcock, R.W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III compuscore and profiles program [Computer software]. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
45.
Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 22, 151—218.
46.
Share, D.L., & Stanovich, K.E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education, 1, 1—57.
47.
Shaywitz, S.E. (1996). Dyslexia. Scientific American , 275, 98—104.
48.
Simmons, D.C., Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Mathes, P.G., & Hodge, J.P. (1995). Effects of explicit teaching and peer-mediated instruction on the reading achievement of learning disabled and low performing students. The Elementary School Journal, 95, 387—408.
49.
Simmons, L. (2001). Saxon phonics intervention. Norman, OK: Saxon.
50.
Swanson, H.L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 32, 504—532.
51.
Swanson, H.L. (2001). Research on interventions for adolescents with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of outcomes related to higher-order processing. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 331—348.
52.
Swanson, H.L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277—321.
53.
Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (1998). Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54.
Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K.K.S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Leaning Disabilities, 34, 33—58, 78.
55.
Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D.J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99—114.
56.
Wehby, J.H., Falk, K.B., Barton-Arwood, S., Lane, K.L., & Cooley, C. (2003). The impact of comprehensive reading instruction on the academic and social behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 225—239.
57.
Wolf, M. (1999). What time may tell: Towards a new conceptualization of developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 3—28.
58.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387—407.
59.
York, E. (1973). York linguistics method. Unpublished manual.
60.
Zigmond, N. (1996). Educational intervention research and students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(2), 69—73.
61.
Zigmond, N., & Baker, J.M. (1995). Concluding comments: Current and future practices in inclusive schooling. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 245—250.
62.
Zigmond, N., & Thornton, H. (1985). Follow-up of post-secondary age learning disabled graduates and drop-outs. Learning Disabilities Research, 1, 50—55.
