Several studies have shown that children with learning disabilities (LD) have difficulty in inhibiting irrelevant information, which generates endogenous interference from working memory. Other inhibition capacities have not yet been investigated, however. This article reports on an experiment examining the capacities of children with LD to inhibit exogenous interference, such as automatic, prepotent responses and distractor interference. Fifteen 11-year-old children with LD and 15 matched controls completed four tasks of inhibition, using the Stroop and Eriksen's flanker paradigms. To test the hypothesis that inhibition can be differentiated in terms of the type of material it acts on, each paradigm was used with numerical and nonnumerical stimuli. Our results showed that children with LD did not exhibit significantly larger interference effects than controls. Moreover, the pattern of results did not differ according to the type of material used. These findings indicate that children with LD do not show impairment in the inhibition of exogenous information—a finding that contradicts the material-specific inhibition hypothesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arbuthnott, K.A. (1995). Inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Phenomena and models. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology ofCognition, 14, 3—45.
2.
Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5—28.
3.
Barkley, R.A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin,121, 65—94.
4.
Bjorklund, D.F., & Harnishfeger, K.K. (1990). The resources construct in cognitive development: Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition. Developmental Review, 10, 48—71.
5.
Bull, R., Johnston, R.S., & Roy, J.A. (1999). Exploring the role of the visual—spatial sketch pad and central executive in children's arithmetical skills: Views from cognition and developmental neuropsychology. Developmental Neuropsychology, 15, 421—442.
6.
Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19, 273—293.
7.
Cerella, J. (1990). Aging and information-processing rate. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed., pp. 201—221). San Diego: Academic Press.
8.
Chiappe, P., Hasher, L., & Siegel, L.S. (2000). Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability. Memory & Cognition, 28, 8—17.
9.
Christ, S.E., White, D.A., Mandernach, T., & Keys, B.A. (2001). Inhibitory control across the life-span. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 653—669.
10.
Dagenbach, D., & Carr, T.H. (1994). (Eds.). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. San Diego: Academic Press.
11.
De Beni, R., Palladino, P., Pazzaglia, F., & Cornoldi, C. (1998). Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficits of poor comprehenders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 305— 320.
12.
Dempster, F.N. (1991). Inhibitory processes: A neglected dimension of intelligence. Intelligence, 15, 157—173.
13.
Dempster, F.N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45—75.
14.
Dempster, F.N. (1995). Interference and inhibition in cognition. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition . San Diego: Academic Press.
15.
Dempster, F.N., & Brainerd, C.J. (1995). Interference and inhibition in cognition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16.
Dempster, F.N., & Corkill, A.J. (1999). Individual differences in susceptibility to interference and general cognitive ability. Acta Psychologica, 101, 395—416.
17.
Eliason, M.J., & Richman, L.C. (1987). The continuous performance test in learning disabled and nondisabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 20, 614—619.
18.
Eriksen, B.A., & Eriksen, C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics , 16, 143—149.
19.
Fisher, D.F., Monty, R.A., & Glucksberg, S. (1969). Visual confusion matrices: Fact or artifact?The Journal of Psychology, 71, 111— 125.
20.
Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 145—173.
21.
Friedman, N.P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101—135.
22.
Gernsbacher, M.A. (1997). Group differences in suppression skill. Aging, Neuropsychology, andCognition, 4, 175—184.
23.
Gernsbacher, M.A., & Faust, M.E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245—262.
24.
Gernsbacher, M.A., Varner, K.R., & Faust, M.E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430—445.
25.
Harnishfeger, K.K. (1995). The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 175—204). San Diego: Academic Press.
26.
Harnishfeger, K.K., & Bjorklund, D.F. (1994). A developmental perspective on individual differences in inhibition. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 331— 356.
27.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 22, pp. 193—224). San Diego: Academic Press.
28.
Hasher, L., Zacks, R.T., & May, C.P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age . In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653—675). Cam-bridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
Hitch, G.J., & McAuley, E. (1991). Working memory in children with specific arithmetical learning difficulties. The British Journal of Psychology, 82, 375—386.
30.
Howell, D.C. (1998). Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines [Statistical methods in the humanities] (M. Rogier, Trans.). Paris: De Boek Université. (Original work published 1997)
31.
Isaki, E., & Plante, E. (1997). Short-term and working memory differences in language/ learning disabled and normal adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 30, 427—437.
32.
Kramer, A.F., Humphrey, D.G., Larish, J.F., Logan, G.D., & Strayer, D.L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491—512.
33.
Lambert, E., & Chesnet, D. (2001). Novlex: Une base de données lexicales pour les élèves de primaire [Novlex: A lexical database for primary school students] . L' Année Psychologique, 101, 277—288.
34.
Lobrot, M. (1980). Batterie d'épreuves pour mesurer la lecture et l'orthographe: Manuel [Reading and spelling test battery: Manual]. Paris: Editions et Application Psychologiques.
35.
Lorsbach, T.C., Wilson, S., & Reimer, J.F. (1996). Memory for relevant and irrelevant information: Evidence for deficient inhibitory processes in language/learning disabled children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 447—466.
36.
Lorsbach, T.C., & Worman, L.J. (1988). Negative transfer effects in learning disabled children: Evidence for cognitive rigidity?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 116—125.
37.
Marczewski, P., & Van der Linden, M. (1999). Déficits cognitifs et fonctionnement frontal chez les patients schizophrènes [Cognitive deficits and frontal lobe function in schizophrenia patients]. In M. Van der Linden, X. Seron, D. Le Gall, & P. Andrès (Eds.), Neuropsychologie des lobes frontaux (pp. 355—379). Marseille, France: SOLAL.
38.
May, C.P., Kane, M.J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin,118, 35—54.
39.
McDowd, J.M., Oseas-Kreger, D.M., & Filion, D.L. (1995). Inhibitory processes in cognition and aging. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 363—400). San Diego: Academic Press.
40.
McIntyre, C.W., Murray, M.E., & Black-well, S.L. (1981). Visual search in learning disabled and hyperactive boys. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 14, 156—158.
41.
McLean, J.F., & Hitch, G.J. (1999). Working memory impairments in children with specific arithmetic learning difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 240—260.
42.
Morgan, A.E., Singer-Harris, N., Bernstein, J.H., & Waber, D.P. (2000). Characteristics of children referred for evaluation of school difficulties who have adequate academic achievement scores. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 489—500.
43.
Neill, W.T., Valdes, L.A., & Terry, K.M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207— 261). San Diego: Academic Press.
44.
Nigg, J.T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy . Psychological Bulletin,126, 220— 246.
45.
Passolunghi, M.C., Cornoldi, C., & De Liberto, S. (1999). Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific poor problem solvers. Memory & Cognition, 27, 779—790.
46.
Passolunghi, M.C., & Siegel, L.S. (2001). Short-term memory, working memory, and inhibitory control in children with difficulties in arithmetic problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 44—57.
47.
Passolunghi, M.C., & Siegel, L.S. (2004). Working memory and access to numerical information in children with disability in mathematics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 348—367.
48.
Pavese, A., & Umiltà, C. (1998). Symbolic distance between numerosity and identity modulates Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1535—1545.
49.
Rourke, B.P. (1993). Arithmetic disabilities, specific and otherwise: A neuropsychological perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 26, 214—226.
50.
Sattler, J.M. (1982). Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
51.
Shilling, V.M., Chetwynd, A., & Rabbitt, P.M.A. (2002). Individual inconsistency across measures of inhibition: An investigation of the construct validity of inhibition in older adults. Neuropsychologia, 40, 605—619.
52.
Siegel, L.S., & Ryan, E.B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973—980.
53.
Simonart, G. (1998). Echelle d'apprentissages scolaires primaires: manuel [Scale of primary learning skills: Manual]. Braine-le-Château , Belgium: Application des Techniques Modernes.
54.
Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 18, 643—662.
55.
Swanson, H.L. (1993). Working memory in learning disability subgroups . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 87—114.
56.
Swanson, H.L. (1994). Short-term memory and working memory: Do both contribute to our understanding of academic achievement in children and adults with learning disabilities?Journal of Learning Disabilities , 27, 34—50.
57.
Van der Linden, M. (2000). Une approche cognitive et neuropsychologique du trouble obsessionnel compulsif [Cognitive and neuropsychological approach of obsessive—compulsive disorder]. In M. Van der Linden, J. M. Danion, & A. Agniel (Eds.), La psychopathologie: Une approche cognitive et neuropsychologique237—264. Marseille , France: SOLAL.
58.
Van der Sluis, S., de Jong, P.F., & van der Leij, A. (2004). Inhibition and shifting in children with learning deficits in arithmetic and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 239—266.
59.
Verhaegen, P., & De Meersman, L. (1998). Aging and the Stroop effect: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 13, 120— 126.
60.
Wechsler, D. (1996). Echelle d'intelligence de Wechsler pour enfants: Manuel [Wechsler intelligence scale for children: Manual]. (3rd ed.). Paris: Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
61.
Weiler, M.D., Forbes, P., Kirkwood, M., & Waber, D. (2003). The developmental course of processing speed in children with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 178—194.
62.
Wilhardt, L., & Sandman, C.A. (1988). Performance of nondisabled adults and adults with learning disabilities on a computerized multiphasic cognitive memory battery . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 179—185.
63.
Wilson, S.P., & Kipp, K. (1998). The development of efficient inhibition: Evidence from directed-forgetting tasks. Developmental Review, 18, 86—123.
64.
World Health Organization. (1995). Classification statistique internationale des maladies et problèmes de santé connexes, 10è mise à jour [International Statistical classification of diseases and related health disorders, 10th revision]. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
