Previous research studies examining the effects of graphic organizers on reading comprehension for students with learning disabilities (LD) are reviewed. An extensive search of the professional literature between 1963 and June 2001 yielded a total of 21 group design intervention studies that met the criteria for inclusion in the synthesis. Using graphic organizers (i.e., semantic organizers, framed outlines, cognitive maps with and without a mnemonic) was associated with improved reading comprehension overall for students with LD. Compared to standardized reading measures, researcher-developed comprehension measures were associated with higher effect sizes. Initial gains demonstrated when using graphic organizers were not revealed during later comprehension tasks or on new comprehension tasks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvermann, D.E., & Boothby, P.R. (1986). Children's transfer of graphic organizer instruction . Reading Psychology, 7(2), 87— 100.
2.
Anders, P.L., Bos, C.S., & Filip, D. (1984). The effect of semantic feature analysis on the reading comprehension of learning disabled students. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), Changing perspectives on reading/language processing and instruction (pp. 162—166). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
3.
Ausubel, D.P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
4.
Bean, T.W., Singer, H., Sorter, J., & Frazee, C. (1986). The effect of metacognitive instruction in outlining and graphic organizer construction on students' comprehension in a tenth-grade world history class. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 153— 169.
5.
Becker, B.J. (1988). Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 41, 257—278.
6.
Bergerud, D., Lovitt, T.C., & Horton, S. (1988). The effectiveness of textbook adaptations in life science for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 70—76.
7.
Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2001). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent readers. New York: Guilford Press .
8.
Bos, C.S., & Anders, P.L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31—42.
9.
Bos, C.S., & Anders, P.L. (1992). Using interactive teaching and learning strategies to promote text comprehension and content learning for students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development, andEducation, 39, 225— 238.
10.
Bos, C.S., Anders, P.L., Filip, D., & Jaffe, L.E. (1985). Semantic feature analysis and long-term learning . In J. A. Niles & R. V. Lalik (Eds.), Issues in literacy: A research perspective (pp. 42—47). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
11.
Bos, C.S., Anders, P.L., Filip, D., & Jaffe, L.E. (1989). Effects of an interactive instructional strategy for enhancing reading comprehension and content learning for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 384— 390.
12.
Bos, C.S., & Vaughn, S. (2002). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
Boyle, J.R. (1996). The effects of a cognitive mapping strategy on the literal and inferential comprehension of students with mild disabilities . Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 86—98.
14.
Boyle, J.R. (2000). The effects of a Venn diagram strategy on the literal, inferential, and relational comprehension of students with mild disabilities . Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 5— 13.
15.
Boyle, J.R., & Weishaar, M. (1997). The effects of expert-generated versus student-generated cognitive organizers on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 12, 228—235.
16.
Boyle, J.R., & Yeager, N. (1997). Blueprints for learning: Using cognitive frameworks for understanding. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(4), 26—31.
17.
Bryant, D.P., Ugel, N., Thompson, S., & Hamff, A. (1999). Instructional strategies for content-area reading instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 293—302.
18.
Bryant, D.P., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Ugel, N., Hamff, A., & Hougen, M. (2000). Reading outcomes for students with and without reading disabilities in general education middle-school content area classes . Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(3), 24—38.
19.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
20.
Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Darch, C., & Carnine, D. (1986). Teaching content area material to learning disabled students. Exceptional Children, 53, 240— 246.
22.
Darch, C., & Eaves, R. (1986). Visual displays to increase comprehension of high school learning-disabled students. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 309—318.
23.
Darch, C., & Gersten, R. (1986). Direction-setting activities in reading comprehension: A comparison of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly , 9, 235—243.
24.
Deshler, D.D., & Schumaker, J. (1993). Strategy mastery by at-risk students: Not a simple matter. Elementary School Journal, 94, 153—167.
25.
Dunston, P.J. (1992). A critique of graphic organizer research. Reading Research and Instruction, 31(2), 57—65.
26.
Elbaum, B.E., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., & Moody, S.W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure?Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605—619.
27.
Gardill, M.C., & Jitendra, A.K. (1999). Advanced story map instruction: Effects on reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 2—17.
28.
Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Lloyd, J.W. (2000). Designing high-quality research in special education: Group experimental design. The Journal of Special Education , 34, 2—18.
29.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L.S.,Williams, J.P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279—320.
30.
Griffin, C.C., Simmons, D.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (1991). Investigating the effectiveness of graphic organizer instruction on the comprehension and recall of science content by students with learning disabilities. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 7, 355—376.
31.
Griffin, C.C., & Tulbert, B.L. (1995). The effect of graphic organizers on students' comprehension and recall of expository text: A review of the research and implications for practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties,11, 73—89.
32.
Horton, S.V., Lovitt, T.C., & Bergerud, D. (1990). The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 12—22.
33.
Hudson, P., Lignugaris-Kraft, B., & Miller, T. (1993). Using content enhancements to improve the performance of adolescents with learning disabilities in content classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 106—126.
34.
Karlsen, B., & Garduel, E.F.Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Educational Measurement.
35.
Lapp, D., Flood, J., & Ranck-Buhr, W. (1995). Using multiple text formats to explore scientific phenomena in middle school classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties,11, 173—186.
36.
Lovitt, T., Rudsit, J., Jenkins, J., Pious, C., & Benedetti, D. (1986). Adapting science materials for regular and learning disabled seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 31—39.
37.
Mayer, R.E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 30—42.
38.
Moore, D.W., & Readence, J.E. (1980). A meta-analysis of the effects of graphic organizers on learning from text. In M. L. Kamil & A. J. Moe (Eds.), Perspectives in reading research and instruction: Twenty-ninth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 213—217). Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.
39.
Moore, D.W., & Readence, J.E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 11—17.
40.
Pirozzolo, F.J., & Rayner, K. (1979). Cerebral organization and reading disability. Neuropsychologia, 17, 485—491.
41.
Pressley, M., & Harris, K.R. (1994). More about increasing the quality of educational intervention research: A synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 191—208.
42.
Rice, G.E. (1994). Need for explanations in graphic organizer research. Reading Psychology: AnInternational Quarterly, 15, 39— 67.
43.
Rivera, D.P., & Smith, D. (1997). Teaching students with learning and behavior problems (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
44.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill .
46.
Simmons, D.C., Griffin, C.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (1988). Effects of teacher-constructed pre- and post-graphic organizer instruction on sixth-grade science students' comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Research,82(1), 15—21.
47.
Sinatra, R.C., Stahl-Gemake, J., & Berg, D.N. (1984). Improving reading comprehension of disabled readers through mapping. The Reading Teacher, 38(l), 22— 29.
48.
Swanson, H.L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities . New York: Guilford Press.
49.
Taylor, B., Harris, L., & Pearson, P.D. (1988). Reading difficulties: Instruction and assessment . New York: Random House.
50.
Vellutino, F., Harding, C., Stager, J., & Phillips, F. (1975). Differential transfer in poor and normal readers. Journal of GeneticPsychology, 126, 3—18.
51.
Weisberg, R., & Balajthy, E. (1990). Development of disabled readers' metacomprehension ability through summarization training using expository text: Results of three studies. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 6(2), 117—136.
52.
Witelson, S. (1977). Developmental dyslexia: Two right hemispheres and none left. Science, 195, 309—311.
53.
Wittrock, M.C. (1992). Knowledge acquisition and comprehension. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed., pp. 699—705). New York: Macmillan.
54.
Wong, B. (1978). The effects of directive cues on the organization of memory and recall in good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Research, 72, 32—38.
