In the first part of this article, we briefly present the context of mathematics education in Italy and its specific programs, teaching and assessment methods, use of psychological concepts, and policies in favor of pupils with difficulties. We illustrate the importance and the role of mathematics teachers' associations. In the second part, we focus more directly on the issue of arithmetic learning and learning disabilities in Italy. Despite the absence of a specific strong tradition in the field, new perspectives regarding mathematics education are evident in Italy. The preparation of new assessment tools has proceeded together with an effort toward the identification of subtypes of arithmetic learning disabilities. A basic distinction has been made between difficulties in number processing/calculation and problem-solving tasks. Within the area of calculation, a finer distinction between numerical knowledge, speed, and accuracy seems critical, but a more articulated differentiation of subcomponents relying on modern cognitive—neuropsychological models can be used also.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arzarello, F. (1992). La ricerca in didattica della matematica [Research in mathematics education]. L'Insegnamento della Matematica e delle Scienze Integrate, 15, 345—356.
2.
Arzarello, F. (1996). Tendenze attuali della ricerca italiana in didattica della matematica [Trends in Italian research on mathematical teaching]. NotiziarioUMI, 1—2, 68—78.
3.
Arzarello, F., & Bartolini-Bussi, M. (1998). Italian trends of research in mathematics education: A national case study in the international perspective . In J. Kilpatrick & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), What is research in mathematics education and what are its results? (pp. 243—262). Washington, DC: Kluwer.
4.
Boscolo, P. (1997). Psicologia dell'apprendimento scolastico [Psychology of school learning]. Torino, Italy: Utet.
5.
Castelnuovo, E. (1965). L'oggetto e l'azione nell'insegnamento della geometria intuitiva [Object and action in intuitive geometry teaching]. Il Materiale per l'Insegnamento della Matematica10, 41—65.
6.
Cornoldi, C., Lucangeli, D., & Bellina M. (2002). AC-MT Test: Test per la valutazione delle difficoltà di calcolo [The AC-MT arithmetic achievement test]. Trento , Italy: Erickson.
Cornoldi, C., Rigoni, F., Tressoldi, P., & Vio, C. (1999). Imagery deficit in nonverbal learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 48—57.
9.
Jordan, N.C., & Montani, T.O. (1997). Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving: A comparison in children with specific and general mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 629—639.
10.
Lucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1997). Mathematics and metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship? MathematicalCognition, 2, 121—139.
11.
Lucangeli, D., Cornoldi, C., & Tellarini, M. (1998). Metacognitive difficulties in problem solving skills. Advances in Learning Disabilities, 12, 219—243.
12.
Lucangeli, D., & Passolunghi, M.C. , (1995), Psicologia dell'apprendimento matematico [Psychology of mathemetical learning]. Torino , Italy: Utet.
13.
Lucangeli, D., Tressoldi, P., & Cendron, M. (1998). SPM: Test di valutazione delle abilita' di soluzione dei problemi matematici [The SPM test for math problem solving achievement] . Trento, Italy: Erickson.
14.
Lucangeli, D., Tressoldi, P., & Cendron, M. (1999). Validation of a comprehensive model for mathematical word problem solving. ContemporaryJournal of Educational Psychology, 23, 257—275.
15.
Lucangeli, D., Tressoldi, P., & Fiore, C. (1998). ABCA: Test di valutazione delle abilita' di calcolo aritmetico [The ABCA arithmetic achievement test]. Trento , Italy: Erickson.
16.
Malara, N.A., Menghini, M., & Reggiani, M. (1996). Italian research in mathematics education: 1988—1995 . Rome: Litoflash.
17.
McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107—157.
18.
McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Basili, A. (1985). Cognitive mechanism in number processing and calculation: Evidence from dyscalculia. Brain andCognition, 4, 171—96.
19.
Passolunghi, M.C., Cornoldi, C., & De Liberto, S. (1999). Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific poor problem solvers. Memory and Cognition, 27, 779—790.
20.
Rourke, B.P., & Strang, J.D. (1983). Concept formation and nonverbal reasoning abilities of children who exhibit specific academic problems with arithmetic. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology12, 33—39.
21.
Salthouse, T.A. (1994). The aging of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 535—543.
22.
Santagata, R., & Stigler J.W. (2000). Teaching mathematics: Italian lessons from a cross-cultural perspective. Unpublished manuscript.
23.
Sempio, O. (1997). Il bambino e la costruzione del numero [Numerical knowledge in children]. Rome: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
24.
Shafrir, U., & Siegel, L.S. (1994). Subtypes of learning disabilities in adolescents and adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 123—134.
25.
Temple, C.M. (1991). Procedural dyscalculia and number fact dyscalculia: Double dissociation in developmental dyscalculia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 155—176.
