A Cross-Sectional Study of Mathematics Achievement,Estimation Skills,and Academic Self-Perception in Students of Varying Ability

Abstract

This study investigated students' mathematics achievement, estimation ability, use of estimation strategies, and academic self-perception. Students with learning disabilities (LD), average achievers, and intellectually gifted students (N = 135) in fourth, sixth, and eighth grade participated in the study. They were assessed to determine their mathematics achievement, ability to estimate discrete quantities, knowledge and use of estimation strategies, and perception of academic competence. The results indicated that the students with LD performed significantly lower than their peers on the math achievement measures, as expected, but viewed themselves to be as academically competent as the average achievers did. Students with LD and average achievers scored significantly lower than gifted students on all estimation measures, but they differed significantly from one another only on the estimation strategy use measure. Interestingly, even gifted students did not seem to have a well-developed understanding of estimation and, like the other students, did poorly on the first estimation measure. The accuracy of their estimates seemed to improve, however, when students were asked open-ended questions about the strategies they used to arrive at their estimates. Although students with LD did not differ from average achievers in their estimation accuracy, they used significantly fewer effective estimation strategies. Implications for instruction are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baroody, A.J. , & Gatzke, M.R. (1991). The estimation of set size by potentially gifted kindergarten-age children. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 59—68.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York : Academic Press.

Crites, T. (1992). Skilled and less-skilled estimators' strategies for estimating discrete quantities. The Elementary School Journal, 92, 601—615.

Forrester, M.A. , & Pike, C.D. (1998). Learning to estimate in the mathematics classroom: A conversation-analytic approach. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 334—356.

Gersten, R. , & Chard, D. (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 44, 18—28.

Glaser, R. (1991). Expertise and assessment. In M. Wittrock & E. Baker (Eds.), Testing and cognition (pp. 17—30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Grimes, L. (1981). Learned helplessness and attribution theory: Redefining children's learning problems. Learning Disability Quarterly , 2, 94—100.

Heath, N.L. (1996). The emotional domain: Self-concept and depression in children with learning disabilities. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 10A, 47—75.

Hegarty, M. , & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual—spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684—689.

10.

Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.

11.

Leutzinger, L.P. , Rathmell, E.C. , & Urbatsch, T.D. (1986). Developing estimation skills in the primary grades . In H. L. Schoen & M. J. Zweng (Eds.), Estimation and mental computation: 1986 yearbook (pp. 82—92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics .

12.

Light, J.G. , & DeFries, J.C. (1995). Comorbidity of reading and mathematics disabilities: Genetic and environmental etiologies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 96—106.

13.

Mayer, R.E. (1985). Mathematical ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: Information processing approach (pp. 127— 150). San Francisco: Freeman.

14.

Meltzer, L.J. (1993). Strategy use in students with learning disabilities: The challenge of assessment. In L. J. Meltzer (Ed.), Strategy assessment and instruction for students with learning disabilities: From theory to practice (pp. 93—136). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

15.

Meltzer, L.J. , Katzir-Cohen, T. , Miller, L. , & Roditi, B. (2001). The impact of effort and strategy use on academic performance: Student and teacher perceptions. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 85—98.

16.

Meltzer, L.J. , & Montague, M. (2001). Strategic learning in students with learning disabilities: What have we learned? In D. Hallahan & B. K. Keogh (Eds.), Research and global perspectives in learning disabilities (pp. 11—130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

17.

Meltzer, L.J. , Roditi, B. , Houser, R.F. , & Perlman, M. (1998). Perceptions of academic strategies and competence in students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 437—451.

18.

Montague, M. (1997). Cognitive strategy training in mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 164—177.

19.

Montague, M. , & Applegate, B. (1993). Mathematical problem-solving characteristics of middle school students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 175—201.

20.

Montague, M. , & Applegate, B. (2001). Middle school students' perceptions, persistence, and performance in mathematical problem solving. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 215—228.

21.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

22.

Siegel, A.W. , Goldsmith, L.T. , & Madson, C.R. (1982). Skill in estimation problems of extent and numerosity . Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 211— 232.

23.

Sowder, J.T. (1988). Mental computation and number comparison: Their roles in the development of number sense and computational estimation. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 182—197). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics/Erlbaum.

24.

Swanson, H.L. , Carson, C. , & Sachse-Lee, C.M. (1996). A selective synthesis of intervention research for students with learning disabilities: Is there a general support for a strategy deficit model? In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 10, Part A, pp. 51—180). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

25.

Trafton, P. (1986). Teaching computational estimation: Establishing an estimation mindset. In H. L. Schoen & M. J. Zweng (Eds.), Estimation and mental computation: 1986 yearbook (pp. 16—30). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics .

26.

Van Garderen, D. (2002). A study of visual imaging and mathematical word problem solving by students of varying abilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.

27.

Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—Revised . New York: Psychological Corp.

28.

Woodcock, R. , & Johnson, W. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery— Revised. Boston: Teaching Corp.