Patterns of performance on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised (WISC-R) have been proposed as useful tools for the identification of children with learning disabilities (LD). However, most of the studies of WISC-R patterns in children with LD have been plagued by the lack of a typically achieving comparison group, by failure to measure individual patterns, and by the lack of a precise definition of LD. In an attempt to address these flaws and to assess the presence of patterns of performance on the WISC-R, we examined data from 121 children with typical achievement (TA), 143 children with reading disabilities (RD), and 100 children with a specific arithmetic disability (AD), ages 6 to 16 years. The results indicated that the RD and AD groups had significantly lower scores than the TA group on all the Verbal IQ subtests. Many of the children with AD and RD showed a significant difference between Verbal and Performance IQ scores, but so did many of the typically achieving children. Although there were some children with LD who showed the predicted patterns, typically, 65% or more of the children with LD did not. Furthermore, a proportion of the TA group—generally not significantly smaller than that of the RD and AD groups—showed discrepancy patterns as well. Our results indicate that the patterns of performance on intelligence tests are not reliable enough for the diagnosis of LD in individual children. Therefore, it might be more profitable to base the detection of an individual's LD on patterns of achievement test scores.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bannatyne, A. (1971). Language, reading, and learning disabilities. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
2.
Bannatyne, A. (1974). Diagnosis: A note on recategorization of WISC scale scores. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 272—273.
3.
Beery, K.E. (1982). Revisited administration, scoring, and teaching manual for the Developmental Test of Visual—Motor Integration. Cleveland, OH: Modern Curriculum Press.
4.
Bull, R., & Johnston, R.S. (1997). Children's arithmetical difficulties: Contributions from processing speed, item identification, and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 65, 1—24.
5.
D'Angiulli, A., Lesaux, N.K., & Siegel, L.S. (2002). Arithmetic disability, dyslexia, and visual—spatial skills in adults [Abstract]. Canadian Pschology, 43(2), 99.
6.
Decker, S.N., & Corley, R.P. (1984). Bannatyne's “genetic dyslexic” subtype: A validation study. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 300—304.
Fletcher, J.M. (1985). Memory for verbal and nonverbal stimuli in learning disability subgroups: Analysis by selective reminders. Journal of EducationalChild Psychology, 40, 244—259.
9.
Fletcher, J.M. (1992). The validity of distinguishing children with language and learning disabilities according to discrepancies with IQ: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 546—548.
10.
Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shankweiler, D., Katz, L., Liberman, I., Steubing, K., et al. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 1—18.
Hitch, G.J., & McAuley, E. (1991). Working memory in children with specific arithmetical learning difficulties. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 375—386.
13.
Hitch, G.J., & Towse, J.N. (1995). Working memory, what develops? In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development (pp. 3—21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G.S. (1984). Wide range achievement test—Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
15.
Johnson, D.J., & Mykelbust, H.R. (1967). Learning disabilities: Education principles and practice. New York: Grune & Stratton.
16.
Kaufman, A. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley.
17.
Kaufman, A. (1981). The WISC-R and learning disabilities assessment: State of the art. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 520— 526.
18.
Kaufman, A. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York: Wiley.
19.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1984). A meta-analysis of the validity of Wechsler Scale profiles and recategorizations: Patterns or parodies?Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 136—156.
20.
Kinsbourne, M., & Warrington, E.K. (1963). The developmental Gerstmann syndrome. Archives ofNeurology, 8, 490—501.
21.
Kosc, L. (1974). Developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 164—177.
22.
Levine, M.D., Oberklaid, F., & Meltzer, L. (1981). Developmental output failure: A study of low productivity in school-aged children. Pediatrics, 67, 18—25.
23.
Morrison, S.R., & Siegel, L.S. (1991a). Arithmetic disability: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence for this subtype. In L. V. Feagans, E. J. Short, & L. Meltzer (Eds.), Subtypes of learning disabilities: Theoretical perspectives and research (pp. 189—208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
Morrison, S.R., & Siegel, L.S. (1991b). Learning disabilities: A critical review of definitional and assessment issues. In J. E. Obrzut & G. W. Hynd (Eds.), Neuropsychological foundations of learning disabilities: A handbook of issues, methods, and practice (pp. 79—97). San Diego: Academic Press.
25.
Passolunghi, M.C., Cornoldi, C., & De Liberto, S. (1999). Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific problem solvers. Memory & Cognition, 5, 779—790.
26.
Rack, J.P., Snowling, M., & Olson, R. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28—53.
27.
Rourke, B.P. (1991). Validation of learning disabilities subtypes: An overview. In B. P. Rourke (Ed.), Neuropsychological validation of learning disability subtypes (pp. 3— 11). New York: Guilford .
28.
Rourke, B.P. (1998). Significance of verbal— performance discrepancies for subtypes of children with learning disabilities: Opportunities for the WISC-III. In A. Pritiera & D. Saklofske (Eds.), WISC-III, clinical use and interpretation (pp. 139—156). San Diego: Academic Press.
29.
Rourke, B.P., Del Dotto, J.E., Rourke, S.B., & Casey, J.E., (1990). Nonverbal learning disabilities: The syndrome and a case study. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 361—385.
30.
Rourke, B.P., & Finlayson, M.A.J. (1978). Neuropsychological significance of variations in patterns of academic performance: Verbal and visual—spatial abilities. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 121—133.
31.
Rourke, B.P., & Tsatsanis, K.D. (1996). Syndrome of nonverbal learning disabilities: Psycholinguistic assets and deficits. Topics in Language Disorders, 16, 30—34.
32.
Sattler, J.M. (1992). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego: Author.
33.
Shafrir, U., & Siegel, L.S. (1994a). Preference for visual scanning strategies versus phonological rehearsal in university students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 583—588.
34.
Shafrir, U., & Siegel, L.S. (1994b). Subtypes of learning disabilities in adolescents and adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 123—134.
35.
Siegel, L.S. (1985). Psycholinguistic aspects of reading disabilities . In L. S. Siegel & F. J. Morrison (Eds.), Cognitive development in atypical children (pp. 45—66). New York: Springer Verlag.
36.
Siegel, L.S. (1988a). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 202—215.
37.
Siegel, L.S. (1988b). Definitional and theoretical issues and research on learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 21, 264—266.
38.
Siegel, L.S. (1989a). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469—478, 486.
39.
Siegel, L.S. (1989b). Why we do not need intelligence test scores in the definition and analyses of learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 514—518.
40.
Siegel, L.S. (1990a). IQ and learning disabilities: R.I.P. In H. L. Swanson & B. Keogh (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Theoretical and research issues (pp. 111—128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
Siegel, L.S. (1991a, July). Phonological processing, working memory, and syntactic awareness as determinants of reading skill. Paper presented at the International Conference on Memory, Lancaster, UK.
42.
Siegel, L.S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 618—629.
43.
Siegel, L.S. (1993a). Alice in IQ land, or why IQ is still irrelevant to learning disabilities. In R. M. Joshi & C. K. Leong (Eds.), Reading disabilities: Diagnosis and component processes (pp. 71—84). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
44.
Siegel, L.S. (1993b). Phonological processing deficits as the basis of a reading disability. Developmental Review, 13, 246—257.
45.
Siegel, L.S. (1994). The modularity of reading and spelling: Evidence from hyperlexia. In G. D. A. Brown & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 227—248). Chichester, NY: Wiley.
46.
Siegel, L.S. (1998). The discrepancy formula: Its use and abuse. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 123—135). Timonium, MD: York Press.
47.
Siegel, L.S., & Faux, D. (1989). Acquisition of certain grapheme—phoneme correspondences in normally achieving and disabled readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 37—52.
48.
Siegel, L.S., & Feldman, W. (1983). Non-dyslexic children with combined writing and arithmetic difficulties. Clinical Pediatrics, 22, 241—244.
49.
Siegel, L.S., & Heaven, R.K. (1986). Categorization of learning disabilities. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (Vol. 2, pp. 95—121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50.
Siegel, L.S., & Linder, B.A. (1984). Short-term memory processes in children with reading and arithmetic learning disabilities. Developmental Psychology , 20, 200— 207.
51.
Siegel, L.S., & Ryan, E.B. (1984). Reading disability as a language disorder. Remedial and Special Education, 5(3), 28—33.
52.
Siegel, L.S., & Ryan, E.B. (1988). Development of grammatical sensitivity, phonological, and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children . Developmental Psychology, 24, 28—37.
53.
Siegel, L.S., & Ryan, E.B. (1989a). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973—980.
54.
Siegel, L.S., & Ryan, E.B. (1989b). Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: The influence of definitional variables. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 257— 287.
55.
Snowling, M.J. (1980). The development of grapheme—phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 294— 305.
56.
Spellacy, F., & Peter, B. (1978). Dyscalculia and elements of the developmental Gerstmann syndrome in school children. Cortex, 14, 197—206.
57.
Stanovich, K.E. (1988a). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and garden variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590—604, 612.
58.
Stanovich, K.E. (1988b). The right and wrong places to look for the cognitive locus of reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 154—177.
59.
Stanovich, K.E. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350—361.
60.
Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L.S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with learning disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24—53.
61.
Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L.S. (1998). The role of IQ in the diagnosis of reading disorders: The quest for a subtype based on aptitude/achievement discrepancy. In J. Rispens, T. A. van Yperen, & W. Yule (Eds.), Perspectives on the classification of specific developmental disorders (pp. 105— 136). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
62.
Vellutino, F.R. (1978). Toward an understanding of dyslexia: Neuropsychological factors in specific reading disability. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (Eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 61— 112). New York: Oxford University Press.
63.
Vellutino, F.R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MT Press.
64.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ—achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223—238.
65.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D., Sipay, E., Small, S., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601—638.
66.
Wechsler, D. (1949). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
67.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
68.
Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
