Many students with learning disabilities (LD) experience difficulties with extracting relationships from expository text, especially if they are implicit. Results from studies with K—12 participants have been inconclusive regarding the potency of the graphic organizer (GO) as a comprehension tool. This study attempted to address some of the concerns with GO research by examining the effects of using GOs with middle school students with LD to convey and cue relational knowledge, using a longer intervention and using written essays to assess the students' attainment of relational knowledge. The results lend support for using GOs with students with LD to gain relational knowledge from expository textbooks. When factual knowledge was assessed via multiple choice tests and quizzes, no differences were found between treatment and control conditions. As in other GO studies, both groups demonstrated attainment of facts and concepts. But when relational knowledge was assessed, the two groups responded differentially. On essays that required application, the GO group provided significantly more relational knowledge statements than students in the No GO group did.
Alexander, A.A., Schallert, D.L., & Hare, C.H. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research , 61, 315—343.
3.
Alvermann, D.E. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 44—48.
4.
Alvermann, D.E. (1982). Restructuring text facilitates written recall of main ideas. Journal of Reading, 25, 754—758.
5.
Alvermann, D.E. (1988). Effects of spontaneous and induced lookbacks on self-perceived high- and low-ability comprehenders. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 325—331.
6.
Alvermann, D.E., & Boothby, P.R. (1983). A preliminary investigation of the differences in children's retention of “inconsiderate” text. Reading Psychology: AnInternational Quarterly, 4, 237—246.
7.
Alvermann, D.E., & Boothby, P.R. (1986). Children's transfer of graphic organizer instruction. Reading Psychology: AnInternational Quarterly, 7, 87—100.
8.
Alvermann, D.E., Boothby, P.R., & Wolfe, J. (1984). The effect of graphic organizer instruction on fourth graders' comprehension of social studies text. Journal of Social Studies Research, 8, 13—21.
9.
Archer, A., & Gleason, M. (1990). Skills for school success: Book6. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
10.
Armbruster, B.B., & Anderson, T.H. (1988). On selecting “considerate” content area textbooks. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 47—52.
11.
Armbruster, B.B., Anderson, T.H., & Meyer, J.L. (1989). The framing project: A collaboration to improve content area reading using instructional graphics. Unpublished manuscript , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Reading Research and Education Center.
12.
Ausubel, D.P. (1968). The psychology of meaningful learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
13.
Barron, R.F., & Schwartz, R.M. (1984). Graphic post organizers: A spatial learning strategy. In C. D. Holley & D. F. Dansereau (Eds.), Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications, and related issues (pp. 275—289). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14.
Barron, R.F., & Stone, V.F. (1974). Effect of student-constructed traditional post organizers upon learning vocabulary relationships. In P. L. Nacke (Ed.), Interaction: Research and practice for college-adult reading (pp. 172—175). Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference.
15.
Bean, T.W., Singer, H., Sorter, J., & Frazee, C. (1986). The effect of metacognitive instruction in outlining and graphic organizer instruction on students' comprehension in a tenth grade history class. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 153—169.
16.
Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & Gromoll, E.W. (1989). Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 99—158.
17.
Beck, I., McKeown, M., Hamilton, R., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
18.
Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., Hamilton, R.L., & Kucan, L. (1998, Spring/ Summer). Getting at the meaning: How to help students unpack difficult text. American Educator, 22(1 & 2), 66—71, 85.
19.
Berkowitz, S.J. (1986). Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth-grade students' memory for expository reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 161—178.
20.
Bernard, R.M. (1990). Effects of processing instructions on the usefulness of a graphic organizer and structural cueing in text. InstructionalScience, 19, 207—216.
21.
Boothby, P.R., & Alvermann, D.E. (1984). A classroom training study: The effects of graphic organizer instruction on fourth graders' comprehension . Reading World, 24, 325—339.
22.
Bos, C.S., & Vaughn, S. (1994). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
Boyle, J.R., & Weishaar, M. (1997). The effects of expert-generated versus student-generated cognitive organizers on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 12, 228—235.
24.
Bromley, K., Irwin-DeVitas, L., & Modlo, M. (1995). Graphic organizers: Visual strategies for active learning. New York: Scholastic.
Codding, D. (1995). An evaluation of instructional features of social studies classrooms in middle schools. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Oregon.
27.
Darch, C., & Carnine, D. (1986). Teaching content area material to learning disabled students. Exceptional Children, 53, 240— 246.
28.
Darch, C., Carnine, D., & Kameenui, E.J. (1986). The role of graphic organizers and social structure in content area instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 28, 275— 294.
29.
Darch, C., & Eaves, R.C. (1986). Visual displays to increase comprehension of high school learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 20, 309—318.
30.
Dunston, P.J. (1992). A critique of graphic organizer research. Reading Research and Instruction, 32(2), 57—65.
31.
Durkin, D. (1978—1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly , 14, 481—533.
32.
Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications . New York: Irvington.
33.
Gillespie, C., & Rasinski, T. (1989). Content area teachers' attitudes and practices toward reading in the content areas: A review. Reading Research and Instruction, 28, 45—67.
34.
Gleason, M.M., & Archer, A.L. (2001). Creating opportunities for success by teaching study skill strategies. In L. Denti & P. Tefft-Cousin (Eds.), New ways of looking at learning disabilities: Connections to classroom practice (pp. 237—266). Denver: Love.
35.
Griffin, C.C., Malone, L.D., & Kameenui, E.J. (1995). Effects of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 98—107.
36.
Griffin, C.C., Simmons, D.C., & Kameenui, E.J. (1991). Investigating the effectiveness of graphic organizer instruction on the comprehension and recall of science content by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 7, 355—376.
37.
Griffin, C.C., & Tulbert, B.L. (1995). The effect of graphic organizers on students' comprehension and recall of expository text: A review of the research and implications for practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 11(1), 73—89.
38.
Hallahan, D.P. (1998, March). We need more intensive instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Virginia Council for Learning Disabilities, Charlottesville, VA.
39.
Hawk, P.P. (1986). Using graphic organizers to increase achievement in middle school life science. Science Education, 70, 81—87.
40.
Holley, C.D., & Dansereau, D.F. (1984). Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications, and related issues. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41.
Horton, S.C., Lovitt, T.C., & Bergerud, D. (1990). The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 12—29.
42.
Hudson, P., Lignugaris-Kraft, B., & Miller, T. (1993). Using content enhancements to improve the performance of adolescents with learning disabilities in content classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 106—126.
43.
Hyerle, D. (1996). Visual tools for constructing knowledge. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
44.
Juel, C. (1996). What makes literacy tutoring effective?Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 268—289.
45.
Kameenui, E.J., & Simmons, D.C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problems. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
46.
Lenz, B.K., Alley, G.R., & Schumaker, J.B. (1987). Activating the inactive learner: Advance organizers in the secondary content classroom. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 53—67.
47.
Lenz, K., Bulgren, J., Schumaker, J., Deshler, D., & Boudah, D. (1994). Content enhancement series. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
48.
Moore, D.W., & Readence, J.E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78(1), 11—17.
49.
Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Oakhill, J., & Patel, S. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems?Journal of Research in Reading, 14, 106—115.
51.
Oregon Department of Education. (1986). Administrative Rules, Chapter 581-15-051(5). Salem: Author.
52.
Prawat, R.S. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and disposition in students: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research , 59(1), 1—41.
53.
Rashotte, C.A., Torgesen, J.K., & Wagner, R.K. (1997, September). Growth in reading accuracy and fluency as a result of intensive intervention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Florida Branch of the International Dyslexia Association, Miami.
54.
Rice, G.E. (1994). Need for explanations in graphic organizer research. Reading Psychology: AnInternational Quarterly, 15, 39— 67.
55.
Sheinker, I., & Sheinker, A. (1989). Metacognitive approach to study strategies. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
56.
Simmons, D., Griffin, C., & Kameenui, E.J. (1988). Effects of teacher-constructed pre— and post—graphic organizer instruction on sixth grade science students' comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 15—21.
Torgesen, J.K. (1982). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner: Educational implications. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2, 45—52.
59.
Torgesen, J.K. (1998, Spring/Summer). Catch them before they fall: Identification and assessment to prevent reading failure in young children. American Educator, 22(1 & 2), 32—39.
60.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D.M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352—373.
61.
Troyer, S.J. (1994, April). The effects of three instructional conditions in text structure on upper elementary students' reading comprehension and writing performance. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Service Reproduction No. ED 373315)
62.
Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J.S. (1996). Classroom ecologies: Classroom interactions and implications for inclusion of students with learning disabilities. In D. L. Speece & B. K. Keogh (Eds.), Research on classroom ecologies (pp. 107—124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63.
Weisberg, R., & Balajthy, E. (1989, May). Effects of topic familiarity and training in generative learning activities on poor readers' comprehension of comparison/contrast expository text structure: Transfer to real-world materials. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association , New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 305618)
64.
Weisberg, R., & Balajthy, E. (1990). Development of disabled readers' metacomprehension ability through summarization training using expository text: Results of three studies. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities , 6, 117—136.
65.
Williams, R.G., & Haladyna, T.M. (1982). Logical operations for generating intended questions (LOGIC): A typology for higher level test items . In G. H. Roid & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), A technology for test-item writing (pp. 161—187). New York: Academic Press.
66.
Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
