This study examined the effectiveness of a highly explicit, teacher-directed instructional routine used to teach three planning strategies for writing to fourth and fifth graders with learning disabilities. In comparison to peers who received process writing instruction, children who were taught the three planning strategies—goal setting, brainstorming, and organizing—spent more time planning stories in advance of writing and produced stories that were qualitatively better. One month after the end of instruction, students who had been taught the strategies not only maintained their advantage in story quality but also produced longer stories than those produced by their peers who were taught process writing. However, the highly explicit, teacher-directed strategy instructional routine used in this study did not promote transfer to an uninstructed genre, persuasive essay writing. These findings are discussed in terms of their relevance to effective writing instruction practices for students with learning disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arana-Ward, M. (1997, March 16). The lady in her labyrinth. Washington Post Book World, p. 10.
2.
Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1990). Interactive learning environments and the teaching of science and mathematics. In M. Gardner, J. Green, F. Reif, A. Schoenfeld , A. di Sessa, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 112—139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Calkins, L. (1981). Case study of a nine year old writer. In D. Graves (Ed.), A case study observing the development of primary children's composing, spelling, and motor behavior during the writing process (pp. 239—262). Durham : University of New Hampshire.
4.
Calkins, L. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5.
Danoff, B., Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1993). Incorporating strategy instruction within the writing process in the regular classroom: Effects on the writing of students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(3), 295—322.
6.
De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1997). Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 203—222.
7.
Deshler, D.D., & Schumaker, J.B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52, 583—590.
8.
Englert, C.S., & Mariage, T. (1996). A socio-cultural perspective: Teaching ways-of-thinking and ways-of-talking in a literary community. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 157—167.
9.
Englert, C.S., Raphael, T., Anderson, L., Anthony, H., Stevens, D., & Fear, K. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Cognitive strategy instruction in writing in regular and special education classrooms . American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337—373.
10.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 31—50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Gould, J.D. (1980). Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths, and some observations. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 97—127). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Graham, S. (2000). Should the natural learning approach replace spelling instruction?Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 235—247.
13.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1989). A components analysis of cognitive strategy training: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353— 361.
14.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1993). Self-regulated strategy development: Helping students with learning problems develop as writers. Elementary School Journal, 94, 169—181.
15.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1994). Implications of constructivism for teaching writing to students with special needs. The Journal of Special Education , 28, 275—289.
16.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1996). Self-regulation and strategy instruction for students who find writing and learning challenging. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 347—360). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1997a). Self-regulation and writing: Where do we go from here?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 102—114.
18.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1997b). It can be taught, but it does not develop naturally: Myths and realities in writing instruction. School Psychology Review, 26, 414—424.
19.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist , 35, 3—12.
20.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2001). Prevention and intervention of writing difficulties for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 74—84.
21.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., MacArthur, C.A., & Schwartz, S.S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction with students with learning disabilities: A review of a program of research . Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 89—114.
22.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Troia, G.A. (1998). Writing and self-regulation: Cases from the self-regulated strategy development model. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Developing self-regulated learners: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 20—41). New York: Guilford Press.
23.
Graves, D.H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
24.
Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
25.
Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251—262.
26.
Harris, K.R., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392—405.
27.
Hayes, J., & Nash, J. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 29—55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
Kellogg, R.T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory & Cognition, 15, 256—266.
29.
MacArthur, C.A., Graham, S., Schwartz, S.S., & Schafer, W.D. (1995). Evaluation of a writing instruction model that integrated a process approach, strategy instruction, and word processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 278—291.
30.
MacArthur, C.A., Schwartz, S.S., & Graham, S. (1991). Effects of a reciprocal peer revision strategy in special education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 201—210.
31.
McCutchen, D. (1988). “Functional automaticity” in children's writing: A problem of metacognitive control. Written Communication, 5, 306—324.
32.
Minzesheimer, B. (1997, August 28). Reichs' literary skulduggery: Forensic anthropologist digs into mysteries with `Deja Dead.' USA Today , p. 6D.
33.
Poplin, M. (1988). The reductionist fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 389—400.
34.
Pressley, M., & Harris, K.R. (1990). What we really know about strategy instruction . Educational Leadership, 48, 31—34.
35.
Sawyer, R., Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on learning disabled students' composition skills and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340—352.
36.
Stein, N., & Glenn, G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2, pp. 53—120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
37.
Thomas, C.C., Englert, C.S., & Gregg, S. (1987). An analysis of errors and strategies in the expository writing of learning disabled students. Remedial and Special Education, 8(1), 21—30.
38.
Troia, G.A., Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1999). Teaching students with learning disabilities to mindfully plan when writing. Exceptional Children, 65, 235—252.
39.
Wansart, W. (1988). The student with learning disabilities in a writing process classroom: A case study. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 4, 311—319.
40.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1994). Instructional parameters promoting transfer of learned strategies in students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 110—120.
41.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1997). Research on genre-specific strategies for enhancing writing in adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 140—159.
42.
Wong, B.Y.L., Butler, D.L., Ficzere, S.A., & Kuperis, S. (1996). Teaching low achievers and students with learning disabilities to plan, write, and revise opinion essays. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 197—212.
43.
Wong, B.Y.L., Butler, D.L., Ficzere, S.A., & Kuperis, S. (1997). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities and low achievers to plan, write, and revise compare-and-contrast essays. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 2—15.
44.
Wong, B.Y.L., Butler, D.L., Ficzere, S.A., Kuperis, S., & Cosden, M. (1994). Teaching problem learners revision skills and sensitivity to audience through two instructional modes: student—teacher versus student—student interactive dialogues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 78—90.
45.
Zaragoza, N., & Vaughn, S. (1992). The effects of process writing instruction on three 2nd grade students with different achievement profiles. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 184—193.
