There has been considerable discussion of the methods used for the identification of children with reading disabilities. This study examined three different methods that could be used in the identification of children with reading disabilities and their consistency with teacher ratings of behaviors believed to be associated with reading disabilities. Standardized, norm-referenced measures of achievement, phonological processing measures, and curriculum-based measures of reading fluency were used with 40 children in Grades 1 and 2. Comparisons were made to determine which measures, if any, differentiated between children referred for reading disabilities (n = 20) and children who were progressing typically in reading in their general education classroom settings (n = 20). The results indicated significant between-group differences on standardized, norm-referenced measures of reading recognition, word attack, and comprehension; phonological measures of blending nonwords and elision; and reading fluency. Teacher ratings on the Dyslexia Screening Instrument were consistent with teacher beliefs regarding children's progress in reading. All measures were found to correlate significantly with each other. However, correlations were generally in the moderate range, suggesting that the measures used did not measure the same reading skills or, in the case of phonological processing, the underlying abilities believed to be necessary for reading. Given the differences in tasks and the moderate correlations, it is likely that the choice of measures may affect the conclusions reached regarding a student's reading ability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaron, P.G. (1995). Differential diagnosis of reading disabilities . School Psychology Review, 24, 345-360.
2.
Aaron, P.G., & Joshi, R.M. (1992). Reading problems: Consultation and remediation . New York: Guilford Press.
3.
Aaron, P.G., & Phillips, S. (1986). A decade of research with dyslexic college students: A summary of findings. Annals of Dyslexia, 36, 44-66.
4.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
5.
Alabama State Department of Education. (1993 ). Special programs I: Division of special education services . Montgomery: Author.
6.
Badian, N.A. (1993). Predicting reading progress in children receiving special help. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 90-109.
7.
Badian, N.A. (1994). Preschool prediction: Orthographic and phonological skills, and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 3-25.
8.
Badian, N.A. (1998). A validation of the role of preschool phonological and orthographic skills in the prediction of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 472-481.
9.
Ball, E.W. (1993). Phonological awareness: What's important and to whom?Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary journal, 5, 141-159.
10.
Ball, E.W., & Blachman, B.A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49-66.
11.
Beck, I.L., & Juel, C. (1992). The role of decoding in learning to read. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 101-123). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
12.
Bentin, S., & Leshem, A. (1993). On the interaction between phonological awareness and reading acquisition: It's a two-way street. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 125-148.
13.
Blankenship, C.S. (1985). Using curriculum-based assessment data to make instructional decisions. Exceptional Children, 52, 233-238.
14.
Bond, G.L., & Dykstra, R. (1967). The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5-142.
15.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1991). Phonological skills before and after learning to read. In S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Brady, S., Fowler, A., Stone, B., & Winbury, N. (1994). Training phonological awareness: A study with inner-city kindergarten children. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 26-59.
17.
Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439-454.
18.
Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874-886.
19.
Bursuck, W.D., & Lessen, E. (1987). A classroom-based model for assessing students with learning disabilities. Learning DisabilitiesFocus, 3, 17-29.
20.
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1990). Acquiring the alphabetic principle: A case for teaching recognition of phoneme identity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 805-812.
21.
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young people. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451-455.
22.
Calfee, R. (1984). Applying cognitive psychology to educational practice: The mind of the reading teacher. Annals of Dyslexia, 34, 219-240.
23.
California State University Institute for Education Reform. (1996). Building a powerful reading program from research to practice. Sacramento: Author.
24.
Catts, H.W. (1989). Speech production deficits in developmental dyslexia . Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 422-428.
25.
Catts, H.W. (1991). Defining dyslexia as a developmental language disorder. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 50-64.
26.
Christenson, S.L., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1989). Assessing student performance: An important change is needed. Journal of School Psychology , 27, 409-425.
27.
Coles, G. (1987). The learning mystique: A critical look at learning disabilities. New York: Pantheon .
Cunningham, A.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 264-274.
31.
Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
Deno, S.L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and alternative special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 1-17). New York: Guilford Press.
34.
Deno, S.L., Marston, D., & Mirkin, P.K. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 46, 368-371.
35.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45.
36.
Felton, R.H., & Pepper, P.P. (1995). Early identification and intervention of phonological deficits in kindergarten and early elementary children at risk for reading disability. School Psychology Review, 24, 405-414.
37.
Flanagan, D.P., Andrews, T.J., & Genshaft, J.L. (1997). The functional utility of intelligence tests with special education populations. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft , & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (pp. 457-483). New York: Guilford Press.
38.
Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Liberman, I.Y., Stuebing, K.K., et al. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6-23.
39.
Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516, 575-578.
40.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Curriculum-based assessment of progress toward long-term and short-term goals. The Journal of Special Education , 20, 69-82.
41.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Allinder, R.M. (1989). The reliability and validity of skills analysis within curriculum-based measurement. Diagnostique , 14, 203-221.
42.
Galagan, J.E. (1985). Psychoeducational testing: Turn out the lights, the party's over. Exceptional Children, 52, 288-299.
43.
Germann, G., & Tindal, G. (1985). An application of curriculum-based assessment: The use of direct and repeated measurement. Exceptional Children , 52, 244-265.
44.
Glaub, V.E., & Kamphaus, R.W. (1994). Evaluating the congruence among methods of reading disability identification. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 270-282.
45.
Gough, P.B. (1996). How children learn to read and why they fail. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 3-20.
46.
Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10.
47.
Hutton, J.B., Dubes, R., & Muir, S. (1992). Assessment practices of school psychologists: Ten years later. School Psychology Review, 21, 271-284.
48.
Hynd, G.W., Morgan, A.E., Edmonds, J.E., Black, K., Riccio, C.A., & Lombardino, L.J. (1995). Reading disabilities, comorbid psychopathology, and the specificity of neurolinguistic deficits . Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 311-322.
49.
Jenkins, J.R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze reading. Exceptional Children , 59, 421-432.
50.
Jenkins, J., & Pany, D. (1978). Standardized achievement tests: How useful for special education. Exceptional Children, 44, 448-453.
51.
Joshi, R.M. (1995). Assessing reading and spelling skills. School Psychology Review, 24, 361-375.
52.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first through fourth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
Kavale, K., & Forness, S.R. (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don't say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 239-256.
55.
Korhonen, T.T. (1995). The persistence of rapid naming problems in children with reading disabilities: A nine-year follow-up. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 232-239.
56.
Lombard, T. (1988). Caution urged in embracing CBM assessment. Communique, 20.
57.
Lombardino, L.J., Riccio, C.A., Hynd, G.W., & Pinheiro, S.B. (1997). Linguistic deficits in children with reading disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 6, 71-78.
58.
Lovett, M.W., Steinbach, K.A., & Fritjers, J.C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334-358.
59.
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Peterson, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263-284.
60.
Lyon, G.R. (1996). Learning disabilities. Special Education for Students with Disabilities, 6, 54-76.
61.
Mardell-Czudnowski, C. (1996). A survey of assessment professionals in the US: Testing children with special needs. School Psychology International , 17, 189-203.
62.
Marston, D. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What is it and why do it? In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford Press.
63.
Marston, D., & Magnusson, D. (1985). Implementing curriculum-based measurement in special and regular education settings. Exceptional Children, 52, 266-276.
64.
McGuinness, C., McGuinness, D., & McGuinness, G. (1996). Phono-graphix: A new method of remediating reading difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 73-96.
65.
Mehrens, W.A., & Clarizio, H.F. (1993). Curriculum-based measurement: Conceptual and psychometric considerations. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 241-254.
66.
Mercer, C.D., Jordan, L., Allsop, D.H., & Mercer, A.R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly , 19, 217-232.
67.
Neisworth, J.T., & Bagnato, S.J. (1986). Curriculum-based developmental assessment: Congruence of testing and teaching. School Psychology Review, 15, 180-199.
68.
Ogilvy, C.M. (1994). What is the diagnostic significance of specific learning difficulties ?School Psychology International, 15, 55-68.
69.
Palincsar, A.S., & Perry, N.E. (1995). Developmental, cognitive, and sociocultural perspectives on assessing and instructing reading. School Psychology Review , 24, 331-344.
70.
Perfetti, C.A., Beck, I., Bell, L.C., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283-319.
71.
Pfeiffer, S.I., & Dean, R.S. (1988). Guest editors' comments: School psychology in evolution. School Psychology Review, 17, 388-390.
72.
Poland, S., Thurlow, M.L., Ysseldyke, J.E., & Mirkin, P.K. (1982). Current psychoeducational assessment and decision-making practices as reported by directors of special education. Journal of School Psychology, 20, 171-179.
73.
Raz, I.S., & Bryant, P. (1990). Social background, phonological awareness and children's reading. British Journal of Developmental Psychology , 8, 209-225.
74.
Reschly, D.J. (1988). Special education reform: School psychology revolution . School Psychology Review, 17, 459-475.
75.
Reschly, D. (1997). Diagnostic and treatment utility of intelligence tests. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (pp. 437-455). New York: Guilford Press.
76.
Reschly, D., Kicklighter, R., & McKee, P. (1988). Recent placement litigations: Part III: Analysis of differences in Larry P., Marshall, and S-1 and implications for future practices. School Psychology Review, 17, 39-50.
77.
Reschly, D.J., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1995). School psychology paradigm shift. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-III (pp. 17-32). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
78.
Shapiro, E.S., & Derr, T.F. (1987). An examination of overlap between reading curricula and standardized achievement tests. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 58-67.
79.
Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., Holahan, J.M., & Shaywitz, S.E. (1992). Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability: Results from the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 639-648.
80.
Shaywitz, S. (1996). Dyslexia. Scientific American , 24, 2-8.
81.
Shaywitz, S.E., Escobar, M.D., Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., & Makuch, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. The New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 145-150.
82.
Shinn, M.R. (1988). Development of curriculum-based local norms for use in special education decision making. The Journal of Special Education, 17, 61-80.
83.
Shinn, M.R. (1995). Best practices in curriculum-based measurement and its use in a problem-solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-III (pp. 547-568). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists .
84.
Shinn, M.R., Good, R.H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W.A., Iii, & Collins , V.L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading . School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
85.
Shinn, M.R., & Habedank, L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement in special education problem identification and certification decisions. Preventing School Failure, 36, 11-15.
86.
Shinn, M.R., & Hubbard, D.D. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement problem-solving assessment: Basic procedures and outcomes. Focus onExceptional Children , 24, 1-20.
87.
Shinn, M.R., Rosenfield, S., & Knutson, N. (1989). Curriculum-based assessment: A comparison of models . School Psychology Review, 18, 299-316.
88.
Shinn, M.R., Tindal, G., & Stein, S. (1988). Curriculum-based measurement and the identification of mildly handicapped students: A research review. Professional School Psychology, 3, 69-86.
89.
Siegel, L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469-478.
90.
Snider, V.E. (1995). A primer on phonemic awareness: What it is, why it's important, and how to teach it. School Psychology Review , 24, 443-455.
91.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
92.
Stanovich, K.E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590-604.
93.
Stanovich, K.E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?Reading Research Quarterly , 26, 7-29.
94.
Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E., & Cramer, B.B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175-190.
95.
Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L.S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
96.
Stedman, L.C., & Kaestel, C.E. (1987). Literacy and reading performance in the United States from 1880 to the present. Reading Research Quarterly , 22, 8-46.
Tucker, J.A. (1985). Curriculum-based assessment: An introduction. Exceptional Children, 52, 199-204.
102.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223-238.
103.
Wagner, R.K., & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin,101, 192-212.
104.
Webster, R.E., & Braswell, L.A. (1991). Curriculum bias and reading achievement test performance. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 193-199.
105.
Webster, R.E., McInnis, E.D., & Craver, L. (1986). Curriculum biasing effects in standardized and criterion-referenced reading achievement tests. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 205-213.
106.
Wechsler, D. (1991).Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). New York: Psychological Corp.
107.
Witt, J.C., & Gresham, F.M. (1985). Review of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. In J. Mitchell (Ed.), Ninth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1716-1719). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.
108.
Woodcock, R.W., & Mather, N. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement-Revised examiner's manual. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
109.
Ysseldyke, J.E., & Marston, D. (1982). A critical analysis of standardized reading tests . School Psychology Review, 11, 257-266.
