First-grade students (N = 221) were individually tested on a battery of cognitive and achievement measures of verbal fluency, visual attention, phonological awareness, orthographic recognition, rapid automatized naming (RAN) of letters and objects, and reading. All tests were subjected to postacquisition scoring, and all RAN measures were segregated into measures of articulation time, pause time, and consistency of the pause time. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that word reading was directly and significantly predicted by RAN letter naming and general RAN cognitive processing time of objects. Moreover, RAN letter reading constructs were significantly and directly predicted by the latent variables of phonological awareness, orthographic recognition, and general RAN object articulation and cognitive processing times. RAN letter naming constructs were also significantly and indirectly predicted by visual attention. The reading model was found to be consistent with a total mediation of the relation of phonological awareness and reading through RAN letter naming and supported the validity of the RAN letter naming subtest as a basic letter reading test. These findings supported the double-deficit hypothesis for letter reading. We suggest that phonological memory is a basic factor underlying general RAN cognitive processing time of objects and domain-specific information associated with phonemes and their graphic representations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
2.
Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin,103, 411-423.
3.
Anderson, S.W., Podwall, R.N., & Jaffee, J. (1984). Timing analysis of coding and articulation processes in dyslexia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 433, 71-86.
4.
Avons, S.E., & Hanna, C. (1995). The memory-span deficit in children with specific reading disability: Is speech rate responsible?British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 303-311.
5.
Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin,85, 555-606.
6.
Berninger, V.B. (2000, November). Language based reading and writing intervention: Findings of the University of Washington Multi-Disciplinary Disability Center . Paper presented at the meeting of the International Dyslexia Association, Washington, DC.
7.
Berninger, V.B., Abbott, R.D., Thomson, J.B., & Raskind, W.H. (2001). Language phenotype for reading and writing disability: A family approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 59-106.
8.
Blachman, B. (1984). Relationship of rapid naming ability and language analysis skills to kindergarten and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 610-622.
9.
Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
10.
Bowers, P.G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming, precise timing mechanisms, and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 69-85.
11.
Browne, C.S., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Cassar, M., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 631-644.
13.
Conners, C.K. (1995). Conners' Continuous Performance Test computer program (CPT 3.0) [computer software]. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
14.
Denckla, M.B., & Cutting, L.E. (1999). History and significance of rapid automatized naming. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 29-42.
15.
Denckla, M., & Rudel, R. (1974). Rapid "automatized" naming of pictured objects, colors, letters, and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186-202.
16.
Denckla, M., & Rudel, R. (1976). Rapid "automatized" naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia , 14, 471-479.
17.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., & Lynn, A. (1996). Relation of phonological and orthographic processing to early reading: Comparing two approaches to regression-based, reading-level-match designs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 639-652.
18.
Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin,123, 71-99.
19.
Gathercole, S.E., & Baddeley, A.D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
20.
Holmbeck, G.N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 559-610.
21.
Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Hoyle, R.H., & Smith, G.T. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 429-440.
23.
Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Brown, G.D.A., & Mercer, R. (1995). The role of long term memory mechanisms in memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 527-536.
24.
Jöreskög, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Windows LISREL 8.03 [computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software.
25.
Kail, R., Hall, L.K., & Caskey, B.J. (1999). Processing speed, exposure to print, and naming speed. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 303-314.
Neuhaus, G.F. (2000). An investigation of phonological awareness, orthographic recognition, and attention as predictors of rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston.
28.
Neuhaus, G.F., Carlson, C., Jeng, M.W., Post, Y., & Swank, P.R. (2001). The reliability and validity of rapid automatized naming (RAN) scoring software for the determination of pause and articulation component durations. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 61, 490-504.
29.
Neuhaus, G.F., Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., & Carlson, C. (2001). Measures of information processing in rapid automatized naming (RAN) and their relation to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 359-373.
30.
Neuhaus, G.F., & Swank, P.R. (2000). What is rapid automatized naming of letters? Manuscript submitted for publication.
31.
Olson, R., Forsberg, H., & Wise, B. (1994). Genes, environment, and the development of orthographic skills. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 27-71). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
32.
Passenger, T., Stuart, M., & Terrell, C. (2000). Phonological processing and early literacy. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(1), 55-66.
Schatschneider, C., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B.R., & Fletcher, J.M. (1999). The dimensionality of phonological awareness: An application of item response theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 439-449.
35.
Schumacker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
Torgesen J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K., Conway, T., & Rose, E. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
37.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161-185.
38.
Vellutino, F.R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 437-443.
39.
Wagner, R.K., & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processes and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin,101, 192-212.
40.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1993). Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 83-103.
41.
Wijsman, E.M., Peterson, D., Leutenegger, A., Thompson, J.B., Goddard, K.A.B., Hsu, L., Berninger, V.W., & Raskind, H.W. (2000). Segregation analysis of phenotypic components of learning disabilities. 1. Nonword memory and digit span. American Journal of Human Genetics, 67, 631-646.
42.
Wolf, M. (1986). Rapid alternating stimulus naming in the developmental dyslexias. Brain andLanguage, 27, 360-379.
43.
Wolf, M. (1997). A provisional, integrative account of phonological and naming-speed deficits in dyslexia: Implications for diagnosis and intervention . In B. Blachman, (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early interventions (pp. 67-92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
45.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387-407.
