PHAST (for Phonological and Strategy Training) is a research-based remedial reading program that attempts to capitalize upon current research on reading disabilities and their remediation. The focus of the program is on the primary obstacles to word identification learning and independent decoding that most disabled readers face and the steps necessary to help these children achieve independent reading skills. A framework of phonologically based remediation was used as a foundation upon which a set of flexible and effective word identification strategies were scaffolded in an integrated developmental sequence. The program uses a combination of direct instruction and dialogue-based metacognitive training, with the pedagogical emphasis shifting from an initial direct instruction, remedial focus to increasingly metacognitive-strategy-based methods. A continuum of intervention over 70 hours provides both (a) remediation of the basic phonological awareness and letter-sound-learning deficits of disabled readers and (b) specific training of five word identification strategies that offer different approaches to the decoding of unfamiliar words and exposure to different levels of subsyllabic segmentation. Explicit instruction in the application and monitoring of multiple word identification strategies and their application to text-reading activities continues throughout the PHAST Program. PHAST training provides the disabled reader with the opportunity to become a flexible reader who approaches new words in or out of context with multiple strategies and has the ability to evaluate the success of their application. The PHAST Program was developed following the controlled evaluation of its components in laboratory classroom settings and recent positive results from their sequential combination. PHAST represents a new integrated approach to programming in this area using instructional components that have already demonstrated their efficacy with children with severe reading disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benson, N.J., Lovett, M.W., & Kroeber, C.L. (1997). Training and transfer-of-learning effects in disabled and normal readers: Evidence of specific deficits. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 343-366.
2.
Bishop, D.V.M., & Adams, C. (1990). A prospective study of the relationship between specific language impairment, phonological disorders and reading retardation . Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 1027-1050.
3.
Boden, C., & Brodeur, D.A. (1999). Visual processing of verbal and nonverbal stimuli in adolescents with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 58-71.
4.
Borkowski, J.G., Estrada, M.T., Milstead, M., & Hale, C.A. (1989). General problem-solving skills: Relations between metacognition and strategic processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 57-70.
5.
Bowers, P.G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links between naming speed, precise mechanisms, and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 69-85.
6.
Brady, S.A. (1997). Ability to encode phonological representations: An underlying difficulty of poor readers. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia (pp. 21-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Brady, S.A., & Shankweiler, D. (1991). Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874-886.
9.
Bruck, M., & Treiman, R. (1992). Learning to pronounce words: The limitations of analogies. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 374-388.
10.
Ehri, L.C., & Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 12-26.
11.
Elbro, C., Borstrom, I., & Petersen, D.K. (1998). Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: The importance of distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(1), 36-60.
12.
Engelmann, S., & Bruner, E.C. (1988). Reading Mastery I/II Fast Cycle: Teacher's Guide . Chicago: Science Research Associates .
13.
Engelmann, S., Carnine, L., & Johnson, G. (1988). Corrective reading, word attack basics, decoding A. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
14.
Engelmann, S., Johnson, G., Carnine, L., Meyer, L., Becker, W., & Eisele, J. (1988). Corrective reading: Decoding strategies, decoding B1. Chicago: Science Research Associates .
15.
Fawcett, A., & Nicolson, R. (1996). Impaired performance of children with dyslexia on a range of cerebellar tasks. Annals of Dyslexia, 46.
16.
Felton, R.H., & Brown, I.S. (1990). Phonological processes as predictors of specific reading skills in children at risk for reading failure. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 39-59.
17.
Filipek, P.A. (1995). Neurobiological correlates of developmental dyslexia: What do we know of how dyslexics' brains differ from those of normal readers? Journal ofChild Neurology, 10(supplemental), S62-S69.
18.
Filipek, P.A. (1999). Neuroimaging in the developmental disorders: The state of the science. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 40(1), 113-128.
19.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 37-55.
20.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., & Fletcher, J.M. (1997). The case for early reading intervention. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia (pp. 243-264). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Winikates, D., Mehta, P., Schatschneider, C., & Fletcher, J.M. (1997). Early interventions for children with reading disabilities. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(3), 255-276.
22.
Gaskins, I.W., Downer, M.A., Anderson, R.C., Cunningham, P.M., Gaskins, R.W., Schommer, M., & Teachers of the Benchmark School. (1988). A metacognitive approach to phonics: Using what you know to decode what you don't know. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 3641, 66.
23.
Gaskins, I.W., Downer, M.A., & Gaskins, R.W. (1986). Introduction to the Benchmark School Word Identification/Vocabulary Development Program. Media, PA: Benchmark School .
24.
Gathercole, S.E., & Baddeley, A.D. (1987). The processes underlying segmental analysis. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology , 7, 462-464.
Grigorenko, E.L., Wood, F.B., Meyer, M.S., Hart, L.A., Speed, W.C., Shuster, A., & Pauls, D.L. (1997). Susceptibility loci for distinct components of developmental dyslexia on chromosomes 6 and 15. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 60, 27-39.
27.
Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Pressley, M. (1992). Cognitive-behavioral approaches in reading and written language: Developing self-regulated learners. In N. N. Singh & I. L. Beale (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Nature, theory, and treatment (pp. 415-451). New York.
28.
Haskell, D.W., Foorman, B.R., & Swank, P.R. (1992). Effects of three orthographic/phonological units on first-grade reading. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 40-49.
29.
Kavale, K.A. (1980). The reasoning abilities of normal and learning disabled readers on measures of reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 34-45.
30.
Levin, B.E. (1990). Organizational deficits in dyslexia: Possible frontal lobe dysfunction. Developmental Neuropsychology, 6, 95-110.
31.
Levy, B.A., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Beginning word recognition: Benefits of training by segmentation and whole word methods. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(4), 359-387.
32.
Liberman, A., & Mattingly, I.G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
33.
Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A.M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I.Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1-33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
34.
Lovett, M.W. (1991). Reading, writing, and remediation: Perspectives on the dyslexic learning disability from remedial outcome data. Learning and Individual Differences, 3, 295-305.
35.
Lovett, M.W. (1997). Developmental reading disorders. In T. E. Feinberg & M. J. Farah (Eds.), Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology (pp. 773-787). New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
Lovett, M.W. (in press). Defining and remediating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Lessons from remedial outcome research with reading disabled children . In R. Klein & P. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
Lovett, M.W., Borden, S.L., DeLuca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N.J., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer-of-learning following phonologically- and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805-822.
38.
Lovett, M.W., Lacerenza, L., Borden, S.L., Frijters, J.C., Steinbach, K.A., & De Palma, M. (in press). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disability: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology.
39.
Lovett, M.W., Ransby, M.J., & Barron, R.W. (1988). Treatment, subtype, and word type effects in dyslexic children's response to remediation. Brain andLanguage, 34, 328-349.
40.
Lovett, M.W., Ransby, M.J., Hardwick, N., Johns, M.S., & Donaldson, S.A. (1989). Can dyslexia be treated? Treatment-specific and generalized treatment effects in dyslexic children's response to remediation. Brain andLanguage, 37, 90-121.
41.
Lovett, M.W., & Steinbach, K.A. (1997). The effectiveness of remedial programs for reading disabled children of different ages: Is there decreased benefit for older children?Learning Disability Quarterly , 20, 189-210.
42.
Lovett, M.W., Steinbach, K.A., & Frijters, J.C. (in press). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
43.
Lovett, M.W., Warren-Chaplin, P.M., Ransby, M.J., & Borden, S.L. (1990). Training the word recognition skills of reading disabled children: Treatment and transfer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 769-780.
44.
Lyon, G.R. (1995). Research initiatives in learning disabilities: Contributions from scientists supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Journal ofChild Neurology, 10(1), S120-S126.
45.
Lyon, G.R., & Moats, L.C. (1997). Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 30, 578-588.
46.
Mann, V. (1986). Why some children encounter reading problems. In J. Torgesen & B. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 133-159). New York: Academic Press.
47.
Meltzer, L.J. (1994). Assessment of learning disabilities: The challenge of evaluating the cognitive strategies and processes underlying learning. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 571-606). Baltimore: Brookes .
48.
Moats, L.C., & Foorman, B.R. (1997). Introduction to special issue of SSR: Components of effective reading instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading , 1(3), 187-189.
49.
Olson, R.K., Wise, B., Ring, J., & Johnson, M. (1997). Computer-based remedial training in phoneme awareness and phonological decoding: Effects on the post-training development of word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 235-254.
50.
Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
51.
Pennington, B.F. (1997). Using genetics to dissect cognition. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 60, 13-16.
52.
Pressley, M. (1991). Can learning-disabled children become good information processors? How can we find out? In L.V Feagans , E. J. Short, & L. J. Meltzer (Eds.), Subtypes of learning disabilities: Theoretical perspectives and research (pp. 137-162). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53.
Scanlon, D.M., & Vellutino, F.R. (1997). A comparison of the instructional backgrounds and cognitive profiles of poor, average, and good readers who were initially identified as at risk for reading failure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 191-216.
54.
Scarborough, H.S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children . Child Development, 61, 1728-1743.
55.
Snowling, M., & Hulme, C. (1993). Developmental dyslexia and language disorders . In G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J.C. Marshall, & C.-W. Wallesch (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies: An international handbook (pp. 724-732). New York: de Gruyter.
56.
Snowling, M., Van Wagtendonk, B., & Stafford, C. (1988). Object-naming deficits in developmental dyslexia . Journal of Research in Reading, 11, 67-85.
57.
Stanovich, K.E. (1991). Changing models of reading and reading acquisition . In L. Rieben & C.A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 19-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58.
Stanovich, K.E. (1994). Annotation: Does dyslexia exist?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 579-595.
59.
Swanson, H.L. (1999). Reading comprehension and working memory in learning-disabled readers: Is the phonological loop more important than the executive system?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 1-31.
60.
Swanson, H.L. (in press). Reading research for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
61.
Swanson, H.L., & Alexander, J.E. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 128-158.
62.
Swanson, H.L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277-321.
63.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1997a). Approaches to the prevention and remediation of phonologically-based reading disabilities. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia (pp. 287-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1997b). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mind. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 217-234.
65.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Sipay, E.R. (1997). Toward distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as primary sources of difficulty in learning to read: The importance of early intervention in diagnosing specific reading disability. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia (pp. 347-379). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
66.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M.B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily re-mediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
67.
Wagner, R.K., & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin,101, 192-212.
68.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology , 30(1), 73-87.
69.
Wise, B.W., & Olson, R.K. (1995). Computer-based phonological awareness and reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 99-122.
70.
Wise, B.W., Ring, J., Sessions, L., & Olson, R.K. (1997). Phonological awareness with and without articulation: A preliminary study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 211-225.
71.
Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123-141.
72.
Wolf, M. (1997). A provisional integrative account of phonological and naming speed deficits in dyslexia: Implications for diagnosis and intervention . In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition (pp. 67-92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
73.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (in press). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias . Journal of Educational Psychology.
74.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. (in press). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
75.
Wolf, M., Miller, L., & Donnelly, K. (in press). Retrieval, automaticity, vocabulary elaboration-orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive, fluency-based reading intervention program. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
76.
Wolff, P.H. (1993). Impaired temporal resolution in developmental dyslexia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682(Temporal Information Processing in the Nervous System: Special Reference to Dyslexia and Dysphasia), 87-103.
77.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1991). Assessment of metacognitive research in learning disabilities: Theory, research, and practice. In H. L. Swanson (Ed.), Handbook on the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 265-284). Austin, TX: PRO-ED .
