The impact of technological change on employment, inequality and job quality has attracted considerable analysis from both scholars and practitioners. However, less attention has been paid to how digital technologies are changing contemporary workplaces and how workers are responding to these changes. This article reviews recent research from the multidisciplinary comparative employment relations field, with a focus on institutional resilience or change associated with digitalization; and the strategic responses of unions and other worker representatives to these trends. We find that the insights of economists, sociologists and employment relations scholars are complementary, as each addresses a different dimension of technological change and associated worker outcomes. Comparative employment relations researchers are more likely to influence current debates where they both articulate the unique contribution of their multi-method and comparative research methods and aggregate findings beyond single or paired industry and national case studies.
AbilioLCGrohmannRWeissHC (2021) Struggles of delivery workers in Brazil: Working conditions and collective organization during the pandemic. Journal of Labor and Society1(aop): 1–19.
2.
AcemogluDAutorD (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. In: AshenfelterOCardD (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, pp.1043–1171.
3.
AdlerL (2021) Framing disruption: How a regulatory capture frame legitimized the deregulation of Boston’s ride-for-hire industry. Socio-Economic Review19(4): 1421–1450.
4.
ArntzMGregoryTZierahnU (2016) The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: a Comparative Analysis", OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 189, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en.
5.
AutorDHMindellDAReynoldsE (2022) The Work of the Future: Building Better Jobs in the Age of Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
AutorDHLevyFMurnaneRJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics118(4): 1279–1333.
7.
BaccaroLHowellC (2017) Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation: European Industrial Relations Since the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BaldwinR (2019) The Globotics Upheaval: Globalization, Robotics, and the Future of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
BechterBBrandlBMeardiG (2021) Sectors or countries? Typologies and levels of analysis in comparative industrial relations. European Journal of Industrial Relations18(3): 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680112452691
10.
BergJCherryMARaniU (2019) Digital labour platforms: A need for international regulation?Revista de Economía Laboral – Spanish Journal of Labour Economics16(2): 104–128.
11.
BermanEBoundJGrilichesZ (1994) Changes in the demand for skilled labor within US manufacturing: Evidence from the annual survey of manufactures. The Quarterly Journal of Economics109(2): 367–397.
12.
BoesALangesB (2019) Die Cloud und der digitale Umbruch in Wirtschaft und Arbeit: Strategien, Best Practices und Gestaltungsimpulse. Freiburg: Haufe-Lexware.
13.
BorghiPMurgiaAMondon-NavazoM, et al. (2021) Mind the gap between discourses and practices: Platform workers’ representation in France and Italy. European Journal of Industrial Relations27(4): 425–443.
14.
BoschGSchmitz-KießlerJ (2020) Shaping Industry 4.0 – an experimental approach developed by German trade unions. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research26(2): 189–206.
BrynjolfssonEMcAfeeA (2014) The Second Machine age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W W Norton & Co.
17.
ButolloF (2021) Digitalization and the geographies of production: Towards reshoring or global fragmentation?Competition & Change25(2): 259–278.
18.
CarstensenMBIbsenCL (2021) Three dimensions of institutional contention: Efficiency, equality and governance in Danish vocational education and training reform. Socio-Economic Review19(3): 1037–1063.
19.
CiniLMaccarroneVTassinariA (2021) With or without U (nions)? Understanding the diversity of gig workers’ organizing practices in Italy and the UK. European Journal of Industrial Relationshttps://doi.org/10.1177/09596801211052531.
20.
De StefanoV (2019) “Negotiating the algorithm”: Automation, artificial intelligence, and labor protection. Comparitive Labor Law & Policy Journal41: 15.
21.
DelfantiA (2021) Machinic dispossession and augmented despotism: digital work in an Amazon warehouse. New Media & Society23(1): 39–55.
22.
DettmerA (2021) Industry 4.0 in Germany and Australia: Digital choices, human responses. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work: 1–8.
23.
DiessnerSDurazziNHopeD (2022) Skill-biased liberalization: Germany’s transition to the knowledge economy. Politics & Society50(1): 117–155.
24.
DoellgastV (2022) Exit, Voice, and Solidarity: Contesting Precarity in US and European Telecommunications Firms. New York City: Oxford University Press.
25.
EdwardsPRamirezP (2016) When should workers embrace or resist new technology?New Technology, Work and Employment31(2): 99–113.
26.
EichhorstWHemerijckAScaliseG (2020) Welfare states, labor markets, social investment and the digital transformation. IZA Discussion paper series. https://docs.iza.org/dp13391.pdf.
27.
FisherBFisherE (2019) When push comes to shove: Dynamics of unionising in the Israeli high-tech sector. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation13(2): 37–56.
28.
FregeCGodardJ (2014) Varieties of capitalism and job quality: The attainment of civic principles at work in the United States and Germany. American Sociological Review79(5): 942–965.
29.
FreyCOsborneM (2017) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?Technological Forecasting and Social Change114: 254–280.
30.
FunkeCPicotG (2021) Platform work in a coordinated market economy. Industrial Relations Journal52(4): 348–363.
31.
GallieD (2007) Production regimes, employment regimes, and the quality of work. In: GallieD (ed) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp.1–35.
32.
GandiniA (2019) Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations72(6): 1039–1056.
33.
GasparriSTassinariA (2020) ‘Smart’ industrial relations in the making? insights from analysis of union responses to digitalization in Italy. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations75(4): 796–817.
34.
GautiéJJaehrlingKPerezC (2020) Neo-Taylorism in the digital age: Workplace transformations in French and German retail warehouses. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations75(4): 774–795.
35.
GegenhuberTEllmerMSchüßlerE (2020) Microphones, not megaphones: Functional crowdworker voice regimes on digital work platforms. Human Resource Management Journal31: 259–276.
36.
GrahamMHjorthILehdonvirtaV (2017) Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research23(2): 135–162.
37.
GrimshawD (2020) International organisations and the future of work: How new technologies and inequality shaped the narratives in 2019. Journal of Industrial Relations62(3): 477–507.
38.
HaidarJKeuneM eds (2021) Work and Labour Relations in Global Platform Capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
39.
HaipeterT (2016) The interests of white–collar workers and their representation in the German manufacturing sector: New initiatives, opportunity structures, framing and resources. Industrial Relations Journal47(4): 304–321.
40.
HaipeterT (2020) Digitalisation, unions and participation: The German case of ‘Industry 4.0’. Industrial Relations Journal51(3): 242–260.
41.
HallPASoskiceD (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
HealyJNicholsonDParkerJ (2017) Guest editors’ introduction: Technological disruption and the future of employment relations. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work27(3): 157–164.
43.
HelfenMSydowJWirthC (2020) Service delivery networks and employment relations at German airports: jeopardizing industrial peace on the ground?British Journal of Industrial Relations58(1): 168–198.
44.
HelperSMartinsRSeamansR (2019) Who profits from industry 4.0? Theory and evidence from the automotive industry. In: Theory and Evidence from the Automotive Industry (January 31, 2019). NYU Stern School of Business, pp.1–45.
45.
HoltgreweU (2014) New new technologies: The future and the present of work in information and communication technology. New Technology, Work and Employment29(1): 9–24.
46.
IlsøeA (2017) The digitalisation of service work–social partner responses in Denmark, Sweden and Germany. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research23(3): 333–348.
47.
IlsøeALarsenTP (2021) Why do labour platforms negotiate? platform strategies in tax-based welfare states. Economic and Industrial Democracy: 0143831X211056974.
48.
JesnesK (2019) Employment models of platform companies in Norway: A distinctive approach?Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9(S6): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v9iS6.114691.
49.
JesnesKOppegaardSMN (2020) Platform Work in the Nordic Models: Issues, Cases and Responses. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
50.
JoyceSStuartM (2021) Trade union responses to platform work: An evolving tension between mainstream and grassroots approaches. In: DrahokoupilJVandaeleK (eds) A Modern Guide to Labour and the Platform Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.177–192.
51.
KrzywdzinskiM (2017) Automation, skill requirements and labour-use strategies: High-wage and low-wage approaches to high-tech manufacturing in the automotive industry. New Technology, Work and Employment32(3): 247–267.
52.
LehndorffSBoschGHaipeterTLatniakE (2009) From the ‘sick man’ to the ‘overhauled engine’ of Europe? Upheaval in the German model. In: BoschGLehndorffSRuberyJ (eds) European Employment Models in Flux. A Comparison of Institutional Change in Nine European CountriesBasing-stoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 105–133.
53.
LeiYW (2021) Upgrading China through automation: Manufacturers, workers and the techno-developmental state. Work, Employment and SocietyEarly View. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017021999198.
54.
LitwinAS (2011) Technological change at work: the impact of employee involvement on the effectiveness of health information technology. ILR Review64(5): 863–888.
55.
LiuCFriedmanE (2021) Resistance under the radar: Organization of work and collective action in China’s food delivery industry. The China Journal86(1): 68–89.
56.
LloydCPayneJ (2019) Rethinking country effects: Robotics, AI and work futures in Norway and the UK. New Technology, Work and Employment34(3): 208–225.
57.
LloydCPayneJ (2021a) Food for thought: Robots, jobs and skills in food and drink processing in Norway and the UK. New Technology, Work and Employment. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12194.
58.
LloydCPayneJ (2021b) Fewer jobs, better jobs? An international comparative study of robots and ‘routine’ work in the public sector. Industrial Relations Journal52(2): 109–124.
59.
LoganJ (2021) Crushing unions, by any means necessary: How Amazon’s blistering anti-union campaign won in Bessemer, Alabama. New Labor Forum30(3): 38–45.
60.
MacKenzieDWajcmanJ (1999) The Social Shaping of Technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.
61.
MarencoMSeidlT (2021) The discursive construction of digitalization: A comparative analysis of national discourses on the digital future of work. European Political Science Review: 1–19.
62.
Martínez LucioMMustchinSMarinoS, et al. (2021) New technology, trade unions and the future: Not quite the end of organised labour. Revista Española de Sociología30(3): 68.
63.
MassimoF (2020) A struggle for bodies and souls: Amazon management and union strategies in France and Italy. In: Alimahomed-WilsonJReeseE (eds) The Cost of Shipping: Amazon in the Global Economy. London: Pluto Press, pp.129–144.
64.
MeyerB (2019) Financialization, technological change, and trade union decline. Socio-Economic Review17(3): 477–502.
65.
MeyerC (2022) Forward! and let's remember. In: NussSButolloF (eds) Marx and the Robots: Networked Production, AI and Human Labour. London: Pluto Press, pp.86–98.
66.
MilkmanRElliott-NegriLGriesbachKReichA (2021) Gender, class, and the gig economy: The case of platform-based food delivery. Critical Sociology47(3): 357–372.
67.
MoodyK (2022) High tech, low growth: robots and the future of work. In: ButolloFNussS (eds) Marx and the Robots: Networked Production, AI and Human Labour. London: Pluto Press, pp.101–119.
68.
MoorePV (2017) The Quantified Self in Precarity: Work, Technology and What Counts. Abingdon: Routledge.
69.
NeufeindMO'ReillyJRanftF (2018) Work in the Digital Age: Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. London: Rowan and Littlefield. ISBN 9781786609069.
PfeifferS (2016) Robots, Industry 4.0 and humans, or why assembly work is more than routine work. Societies6(2): 16.
72.
PolkowskaD (2021) Unionisation and mobilisation within platform work: Towards precarisation—a case of Uber drivers in Poland. Industrial Relations Journal52(1): 25–39.
73.
RanganathanA (2021) Identification and worker responses to workplace change: Evidence from four cases in India. Ilr Review74(3): 663–688.
74.
RegoK (2021) Works councils and the digitalisation of manufacturing: Opportunity or threat for their power position?Economic and Industrial Democracy: 0143831X2110541.
75.
RothsteinSA (2019) Unlikely activists: building worker power under liberalization. Socio-Economic Review17(3): 573–602.
76.
RothsteinSA (2021) How workers mobilize in financializing firms: a theory of discursive opportunism. British Journal of Industrial Relations. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJIR.12608.
77.
RutherfordTFrangiL (2020) Is Industry 4.0 a good fit for high performance work systems? trade unions and workplace change in the Southern Ontario automotive assembly sector. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations75(4): 751–773.
78.
Shalini BathiniDRKandathilG (2021) Actions in phygital space: Work solidarity and collective action among app–based cab drivers in India. New Technology, Work and Employment. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12223.
79.
SoskiceD (2020) The ICT revolution and neo-liberalism: Its major pathologies and a Polanyian second movement. Stato e mercato40(1): 17–39.
80.
SpencerD (2017) Work in and beyond the second machine age: The politics of production and digital technologies. Work, Employment and Society31(1): 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017016645716.
81.
StroudDTimperleyVWeinelM (2020) Digitalized drones in the steel industry: The social shaping of technology. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations75(4): 730–750.
82.
SusskindD (2020) A World Without Work: Technology, Automation and How We Should Respond. London: Penguin UK.
83.
TassinariAMaccarroneV (2020) Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society34(1): 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019862954.
84.
ThelenK (2018) Regulating Uber: The politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on Politics16(4): 938–953.
85.
ThelenK (2019) Transitions to the knowledge economy in Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands. Comparative Politics51(2): 295–315.
86.
ThompsonP (2020) Capitalism, technology and work: Interrogating the tipping point thesis. The Political Quarterly91(2): 299–309.
87.
UpchurchM (2018) Robots and AI at work: the prospects for singularity. New Technology, Work and Employment33(3): 205–218.
88.
VandaeleK (2021) Collective resistance and organizational creativity amongst Europe’s platform workers: a new power in the labour movement? In: HaiderJKeuneM (eds) Work and Labour Relations in Global Platform Capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.206–236.
89.
VeenABarrattTGoodsC (2020) Platform-capital’s ‘app-etite’for control: a labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society34(3): 388–406.
90.
WestDM (2018) The Future of Work: Robots, AI, and Automation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
91.
WoodAJLehdonvirtaV (2021) Antagonism beyond employment: How the ‘subordinated agency’ of labour platforms generates conflict in the remote gig economy. Socio-Economic Review19(4): 1369–1396.
92.
WSI – Wirtschafts und Sozialwissenschaftliche Institut (2016) WSI-Arbeitskampfbilanz 2015. Ein außergewöhnliches Streikjahr – Zwei Millionen Streiktage, ganz unterschiedliche Arbeitskämpfe fielen zusammen, press release, 3 March 2016. Available at: www.boeckler. de/pdf/pm_ta_2016_03_03.pdf (30.10.2019).
93.
ZuboffS (201) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books, 2019.
