It is generally assumed that multinational companies will, to some extent at least, adapt their practices to host country environments. However, recent work suggests that this process of adaptation is yet more complex and uneven. It is our contention that subsidiary policy on labour relations is not simply the product of adaptation from and to home and host institutional environments but is in fact shaped by the multiple power relations that characterize multinational company subsidiaries. This three country comparison between Argentina, Canada, and Mexico shows that a policy of strong engagement with trade unions requires the presence of actors that can mobilize power resources. It is when both management and workers have power resources that subsidiaries are more likely to develop a policy of strong engagement with trade unions.
Almond P and Ferner A (eds) (2006) American Multinationals in Europe: Managing Employment Relations across National Borders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AnnerM (2013) Workers’ power in global value chains: Fighting sweatshop practices at Russell, Nike and Knights Apparel. In: FairbrotherPHennebertM-ALévesqueC (eds) Transnational Trade Unionism: Building Union Power, Oxford: Routledge, pp. 23–41.
3.
BélangerJLévesqueCJaletteP (2013) Discretion in employment relations policy among foreign-controlled multinational in Canada. Human Relations66(3): 307–332.
4.
BensusánG (2013) Legislation and labor policy in Latin America: Crisis, renovation or restoration. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal34(3): 665–676.
5.
BensusánGCarrilloJAhumadaI (2011) Es el sistema nacional de relacionees laborales mexicano: un obstáculo o una ventaja para la competitividad de las CMNs?Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Trabajo16(25): 121–154.
6.
BensusánGMiddlebrookK (2012) Organized Labor and Politics in Mexico: Changes, continuities and contradictions, University of London, UK: Institute for the Study of the Americas.
7.
BensusánGMoreno-BridJC (2012) La interacción de las políticas macroeconómicas y laborales: continuidades y rupturas. In: PuchetM (ed.) América Latina en los albores del siglo XXI. Vol. 2. Aspectos sociales y politicos, Mexico: Ed. Flacso, pp. 145–180.
8.
BouquetCBirkinshawJ (2008) Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management34(3): 477–508.
9.
CampbellJ (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10.
CaufieldN (2004) Labor relations in Mexico: Historical legacies and some recent trends. Labor History45(4): 445–467.
11.
CoeNMDickenPHessM (2008) Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography8(3): 271–295.
12.
CollingsDG (2008) Multinational corporations and industrial relations research: A road less travel. International Journal of Management Reviews10(2): 173–193.
13.
Dörrenbächer C and Geppert M (eds) (2011) Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
EdwardsPBélangerJ (2009) The multinational firm as a contested terrain. In: CollinsonSMorganG (eds) Images of the Multinational Firm, Chichester: Wiley, pp. 193–216.
15.
EdwardsTMarginsonPFernerA (2013) Multinational companies in cross-national context: Integration, differentiation and the interactions between MNCs and Nation State. Industrial and Labor Relations Review66(3): 547–587.
16.
EtchemendySCollierR (2007) Down but not out: Union resurgence and segmented neocorporatism in Argentina (2003–2007). Politics & Society35(3): 363–401.
17.
FernerABélangerJTregaskisO (2013) US multinationals and the control of subsidiary employment policies. Industrial and Labor Relations Review66(3): 645–669.
18.
FernerAEdwardsTTempelA (2012) Power, institutions and the cross-national transfer of employment practices in multinationals. Human Relations65(2): 163–187.
19.
FernerATempelA (2006) Multinationals and national business systems: A ‘power and institutions’ perspective. In: AlmondPFernerA (eds) American Multinationals in Europe: Managing Employment Relations across National Borders, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 10–33.
20.
FudgeJ (2008) The Supreme Court of Canada and the right to bargain collectively. Industrial Law Journal37(1): 25–48.
21.
GereffiGHumphreyJSturgeonT (2005) The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy12(1): 78–104.
22.
GodardJ (2009) The exceptional decline of the American labor movement. Industrial and labor Relations Review63(1): 82–108.
23.
GodardJ (2011) Industrial Relations, the Economy and Society, 4th edn. Concord, Ontario: Captus Press.
24.
GunniglePCollingsDGMorleyM (2005) Exploring the dynamics of industrial relations in US multinationals: Evidence from the Republic of Ireland. Industrial Relations Journal36(3): 241–256.
25.
HardyC (1996) Understanding power: Bringing about strategic change. British Journal of Management7(suppl 1): 3–16.
26.
HerodARainnieAMcGrath-ChampS (2007) Working space: Why incorporating the geographical is central to theorizing work and employment practices. Work, Employment and Society21(2): 247–264.
27.
JacobyS (1997) Modern Manors: Welfare Capitalism since the New Deal, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28.
KristensenPHMorganG (2012) From institutional change to experimentalist institutions. Industrial Relations51(1): 413–437.
29.
KristensenPHZeitlinJ (2005) Local Players in Global Games: The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
LamareJRGunniglePMarginsonP (2013) Union status and double-breasting at multinational companies in three liberal market economies. Industrial and Labor Relations Review66(3): 696–722.
31.
LévesqueCMurrayG (2011) Asymmetric integration and the restructuring of social relations in global firms: Actors, institutions and norms. In: BlackettALévesqueC (eds) Social Regionalism in the Global Economy, Oxford: Routledge, pp. 31–47.
32.
LévesqueCMurrayGDufourC (2013) Trade unions strategies in cross-border alliances: Articulating institutional specificity with local power dynamics. In: FairbrotherPHennebertMALévesqueC (eds) Transnational Trade Unionism: Building Union Power, Oxford: Routledge, pp. 57–80.
33.
MurilloMV (2000) From populism to neoliberalism: Labor unions and market reforms in Latin America. World Politics52(2): 135–174.
34.
MurrayGVergeP (1999) La représentation syndicale: visages juridiques actuel et futur, Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.
35.
Novick M, Palomino H and Gurrera MS (eds) (2011) Multinacionales en la Argentina; estrategias de empleo, relaciones laborales y cadenas de valor. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social, Programa Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.
36.
PalominoHTrajtembergD (2012) Negociación colectiva y recuperación económica en Argentina. In: Macroeconomía, empleo e ingresos. Debates y políticas en Argentina frente a la crisis internacional 2008–2009. Libro de la OIT, Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social, OIT-Office Buenos Aires.
37.
SchmitterPC (1982) Reflections on where the theory of neo-corporatism has gone and where the praxis of neo-corporatism may be going. In: LehmbruchGSchmitterP (eds) Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, London: SAGE, pp. 259–279.
38.
SpaltenbergR (2012) La diversidad de los conflictos laborales: dispersión y centralización en las lógicas de acción de los asalariados privados. In: Serie Trabajo, ocupación y empleo/11, Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social.
39.
TempelAEdwardsTFernerA (2006) Subsidiary responses to institutional duality: Collective representation practices of US multinationals in Britain and Germany. Human Relations59(11): 1543–1570.
40.
TrajtembergDSenén GonzálezDMedwidB (2010) La negociación colectiva en argentina, debates teóricos y evidencias empíricas: datos de la encuesta EIL y otras fuentes. In: Serie Estudios Trabajo, Ocupación y Empleo/9, Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social.
41.
VillarrealMAFergussonIF (2014) NAFTA at 20: Overview and Trade Effects, Washington: Congressional Research Service 7-5700.
42.
WrightEO (2000) Working-class power, capitalist-class interests, and class compromise. The American Journal of Sociology105(4): 957–1002.
