Canada has two parental leave benefit programs for the care of a newborn or adopted child: a federal program, and, since 2006, a provincial program in Québec. Informed by a social reproduction framework, this article compares access to parental leave benefits between Québec and the rest of Canada by family income and by its two different programs. Our analysis of quantitative data reveals that maternal access to leave benefits has improved dramatically over the past decade in the province of Québec, especially for low-income households. By contrast, on average 38% of mothers in the rest of Canada are consistently excluded from maternity or parental benefits under the federal program. We argue that one key explanation for the gap in rates of access to benefits between the two programs and between families by income is difference in eligibility criteria. In Canada, parental leaves paid for by all employers and employees are unevenly supporting the social reproduction of higher earners. Our article draws attention to the need for greater public and scholarly scrutiny of social class inequality effects of parental leave policy.
AlmqvistA-LDuvanderA-Z (2014) Changes in gender equality? Swedish fathers' parental leave, division of childcare and housework. Journal of Family Studies20: 19–27.
2.
BairdMO'BrienM (2015) Dynamics of parental leave in Anglophone countries: The paradox of state expansion in liberal welfare regimes. Community, Work & Family18(2): 198–217.
3.
BezansonK (2006) Gender, the State and Social Reproduction: Household Insecurity in Neo-Liberal Times, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
4.
BezansonK (2015) Return of the nightwatchman state? Federalism, social reproduction and social policy in a conservative Canada. In: StraussKMeehanK (eds) Precarious Worlds: Contested Geographies of Social Reproduction, Athens: University of Georgia Press, pp. 25–44.
5.
BoychukGW (1998) Patchworks of Purpose: The Development of Provincial Social Assistance Regimes in Canada, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
6.
Braedley S and Luxton M (eds) (2010) Neoliberalism and Everyday Life. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
7.
CalderG (2006) A pregnant pause: Federalism, equality and the maternity and parental leave debate in Canada. Feminist Legal Studies14(1): 99–118.
8.
CameronB (2006) Social reproduction and Canadian Federalism. In: BezansonKLuxtonM (eds) Social Reproduction: Feminist Political Economy Challenges Neo-Liberalism, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, pp. 45–74.
9.
CampbellA (2006) Proceeding with “care”: Lessons to be learned from the Canadian parental leave and Québec daycare initiatives in developing a national childcare policy. Canadian Journal of Family Law22(2): 171–222.
10.
Conseil de gestion de l’assurance parentale (2014) Faits saillants (décembre 2014), Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
11.
Doucet A and McKay L (in press) Parental Leave, class inequalities, and ‘caring with': An ethics of care approach to Canadian parental leave policy. In: Langford R, Prentice S and Albanese P (eds) Caring for Children: Social Movements and Public Policy in Canada.
12.
Doucet A, McKay L and Tremblay D-G (2009) Canada and Québec: Two policies, one country. In: Kammerman S and Moss P (eds) The Politics of Parental Leave Policies: Children, Parenting, Gender and the Labour Market. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 33–50.
13.
Doucet A, Lero D, McKay L and Tremblay D (2015) Canada country note. In: Moss P (ed.) International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2015. Available at: http://www.leavenetwork.org/lp_and_r_reports/.
Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) (2012) Employment Insurance Monitoring and Assessment Report. Canada Employment Insurance Commission.
16.
Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) (2012/2013) Employment Insurance Monitoring and Assessment Report 2012/13. Canada Employment Insurance Commission.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
EvansPM (2007) Comparative perspectives on changes to Canada's paid parental leave: Implications for class and gender. International Journal of Social Welfare16: 119–128.
20.
FoxB (2009) When Couples Become Parents: The Creation of Gender in the Transition to Parenthood, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
21.
HegewischAGornickJC (2011) The impact of work-family policies on women's employment: A review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family14(2): 119–138.
22.
HullJ (2013) Potential barriers to Aboriginal teenaged mothers' access to maternal and parental benefits. The International Indigenous Policy Journal4(1): 1–18.
23.
LuxtonM (2006) Feminist political economy in Canada and the politics of social reproduction. In: BezansonKLuxtonM (eds) Social Reproduction: Feminist Political Economy Challenges Neo-Liberalism, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, pp. 11–44.
24.
LuxtonM (2009) More than a Labour of Love – Women's Press Classics: Three Generations of Women's Work in the Home, Toronto: Women's Press.
25.
MarshallK (1999) Employment after childbirth. Perspectives on Labour and Income (Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 75-001-XPE)11(3): 18–25.
26.
MarshallK (2003) Benefiting from extended parental leave. Perspectives on Labour and Income (Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 75-001-X)15(2): 5–11.
27.
MarshallK (2010) Employer top-ups. Perspectives on Labour and Income (Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 75-001-X)11(2): 5–12.
28.
Mathieu S (2014) Labour markets, family-relevant policies and reproductive behaviours: Québec's fertility regimes between 1960 and 2010. PhD Dissertation, Carleton University, Canada.
29.
McKay L, Marshall K and Doucet A (2012) Fathers and parental leave in Canada: Policies and practices. In: Ball J and Daly K (eds) Engaging Fathers in Social Change: Lessons from Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 207–223.
30.
McKay L and Doucet A (2010) Without taking away her leave: A Canadian case study of couples' decisions on fathers' use of paid parental leave. Fathering: A Journal of Research, Theory, and Practice About Men as Fathers 8(3): 300–320.
31.
McKeenWPorterA (2003) Politics and transformation: Welfare state restructuring in Canada. In: ClementWVoskoLF (eds) Changing Canada: Political Economy as Transformation, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, pp. 109–134.
MossPDevenF (2015) Leave policies in challenging times: Reviewing the decade 2004–2014. Community, Work & Family18(2): 137–144.
34.
O'BrienM (2009) Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: International perspectives and policy impact. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science624(1): 190–213.
35.
O'Brien M and Wall K (eds) (in press) Fathers on Leave Alone: Work–Life Balance and Gender Equality in Comparative Perspective. New York: Springer.
36.
Ollier-MalaterreAValcourMDen DulkL (2013) Theorizing national context to develop comparative work–life research: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal31(5): 433–447.
37.
Ontario Human Rights Commission (2015) OHRC Today: Annual Report, 2014–2015.
38.
Paquin S and Lévesque P-L (sous la direction de) (2014) Social-démocratie 2.0: Le Québec comparé aux pays scandinaves. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
39.
PorterA (2003) Gendered States: Women, Unemployment Insurance, and the Political Economy of the Welfare State in Canada, 1945–1997, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
40.
RazaviS (2015) Care and social reproduction: Some reflections on concepts, policies and politics from a development perspective. In: BakshRHarcourtW (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Transnational Feminist Movements, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 422–445.
41.
RehelEM (2014) When dad stays home too: Paternity leave, gender, and parenting. Gender & Society28(1): 110–132.
42.
Rille-Pfeiffer C and Dearing H (2015) ‘Austria country note’. In: Moss P (ed.) International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2015. Available at: http://www.leavenetwork.org/lp_and_r_reports/.
SmirlEFernandezL (2012) Losing Ground: How Canada's Employment Insurance System Undermines Inner-city and Aboriginal Workers, Winnipeg: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
45.
Statistics Canada. Employment Insurance Coverage Survey (EICS) (annual). Custom tabulation of data from 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010 and 2013.
46.
Statistics Canada (2016) Labour force survey estimates (LFS), by usual hours worked, class of worker, North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and sex. Table 282-0020. Available at: http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26 (accessed 15 January 2016).
47.
TrontoJC (2013) Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice, New York: New York University Press.
48.
UppalS (2015) Employment Patterns of Families with Children. Catalogue no. 75-006-X, Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
49.
WallK (2014) Fathers on leave alone: Does it make a difference to their lives?Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice About Men as Fathers12(2): 196–210.
50.
WarskettR (2007) The legal regulation of maternal and parental leave benefits in the context of Canadian labour market polarization. Workshop on Gender and Social Politics in an Era of Globalisation, April 27–28, Ottawa: Carleton University.
