Drawing on material collected from periods of fieldwork between 2011 and 2014, this article examines the institutions and practices of Thai employment relations in the context of broader conflicts over state power and regime type. It argues that a focus on regime and regime dynamics offers a more complex and nuanced way of investigating the political mediations of workplace regulation. It discusses how competing regime framers in Thailand have each had an impact on the establishment and modification of the rules that govern employment relations, as well as determining how those rules are enforced or not enforced in practice. Despite their differences, the interests of statist, liberal and pluto-populist forces have coalesced around using the various powers of the state to constrain workers’ collective attempts to engage in the work-effort bargain.
BrownA (2004) Labour, Politics and the State in Industrialising Thailand, London: Routledge.
2.
BrownA (2007) Labour and modes of participation in Thailand. Democratization14(5): 817–834.
3.
BrownAHewisonK (2005) Economics is the deciding factor: Labour politics in Thaksin’s Thailand. Pacific Affairs78(3): 353–375.
4.
BrownASakdinaCNA (2012) Labour activism in Thailand. In: FordM (ed.) Social Activism in Southeast Asia, London: Routledge, pp. 104–118.
5.
BrownE (2003) Thailand: Labour and the law. In: FrostSGeorgeOShepherdE (eds) Asia Pacific Labour Law Review, Hong Kong: Asia Monitor Research Center, pp. 353–366.
6.
Bunyun S (2009a) panha raenngan samphan nai phak tawan ook [Labour Relations Problems in the Eastern Region]. Prachathai Online Newspaper. Available at: http://prachathai.com/05/th/home/15927 (accessed 17 March 2009), pp. 1–4.
7.
Bunyun S (2009b) panha raenngan samphan nai phak tawan ook phak 2 [Labour Relations Problems in the Eastern Region, part two]. Prachathai Online Newspaper. Available at: http://prachathai.com/05/th/home/15951 (accessed 17 March 2009), pp. 1–5.
8.
Butsarat K (2014) thathi khosorotho. soroso. lae ongkonraenggnan tang tang to sathanakan kanmuang thai nai patjupan [Stances of the Thai Labour Solidarity Committee, State Enterprise Relations Confederation and other labour organisations toward the current political situation]. Unpublished manuscript.
9.
CollierRBCollierD (2002) Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
10.
ConnorsM (2009) Liberalism, authoritarianism and the politics of decisionism in Thailand. The Pacific Review22(3): 355–373.
11.
DeyoFC (2006) South-east Asian industrial labour: Structural demobilisation and political transformation. In: RodanGHewisonKRobisonR (eds) The Political Economy of South-east Asia: Markets, Power and Contestation, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, pp. 283–304.
12.
FrenkelSPeetzD (1998) Globalization and industrial relations in East Asia: A three-country comparison. Industrial Relations37(3): 282–310.
13.
HewisonK (2003a) Neo-liberalism and domestic capital: The political outcomes of the economic crisis in Thailand. Journal of Development Studies41(2): 310–330.
14.
HewisonK (2003b) Crafting a new social contract: Domestic capitalist responses to the challenges of neoliberalism. In: UngpakornJ (ed.) Radicalising Thailand: New Political Perspectives, Bangkok: Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University, pp. 120–151.
15.
HewisonKRobisonRRodanG (eds) (1993) Introduction: Changing forms of state power in Southeast Asia. In: HewisonKRobisonRRodanG (eds) Southeast Asia in the 1990s: Authoritarianism, Democracy & Capitalism, Sydney: Allen & Unwin, pp. 2–8.
16.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1986) Labour Relations Laws in ASEAN, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
17.
JayasuriyaKRodanG (2007) Beyond hybrid regimes: More participation, less contestation in Southeast Asia. Democratization14(5): 773–794.
18.
JunyaY (2012) raengngan um chat [Labour: Bearers of the Nation], Nonthaburi: Goal Power Printing.
19.
LawlerJLChokechaiS (2000) Labour unions, globalization and deregulation in Thailand. In: RowleyCBensonJ (eds) Globalization and Labour in the Asia Pacific Region, London: Frank Cass, pp. 214–238.
20.
Mabry B (1979) The Development of Labor Institutions in Thailand. Data Paper no. 112, Southeast Asia Program, Department of Asian Studies, Cornell University.
21.
National Human Rights Committee (2004) kan lamoet sithi raengngan dan kan ruam tua lae kan carac to rong ruam [Violation of Labour Rights with Respect to Organising and Collective Bargaining], Bangkok: National Human Rights Commission.
22.
PrakanphrukC (1988) khabuankan kammakon thai: 1 thotsawat haeng khwam taek yaek [The Thai Labour Movement: A Decade of Disunity]. Warasan Setasatkanmuang6(3): 38–68.
23.
RobinsonW (1996) Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, US Intervention and Hegemony, New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Sakdina CA (2014) The political environment and the weakness of the Thai labour Movement. Unpublished manuscript.
25.
Samnakgnan plad krasuang raeng ngan [Office of the Permanent Secretary Ministry of Labour] (2012) sathiti raeng ngan pracam pi 2555 [Labour Statistics Yearbook 2012]. Bangkok: Ministry of Labour.
26.
SerranoM (2014) Thailand. In: SerranoM (ed.) Between Flexibility and Security: The Rise of Non-standard Employment in Selected ASEAN Countries, Jakarta: ASEAN Services Employees Trade Union Council, pp. 120–137.
27.
Solidarity Center (2007) Justice for All: The Struggle for Worker Rights in Thailand, Washington, DC: American Center for International Labor Solidarity.
Thai Senate (2003) Investigation Results of the Corruption in the Election of the Central Labour Court Assistant Judges. Bangkok: The Administrative Committee Working Group, The Committee Office 2, The Senate Secretariat.
30.
YoshidaM (2003) Fundamental characteristics of Thai labour law and direction of reform. The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations19(3): 347–362.
