Since the mid-1980s, the nonprofit social services sector has been promoted as an option for cheaper and more flexible delivery of services. In order to comply with government standards and funding requirements, the sector has been subject to ongoing waves of restructuring and the introduction of new private market-like, outcomes-based management models, such as New Public Management. This article explores ways in which nonprofit social services sector workers experience their work as highly fragmented. Drawing on case studies completed as part of a larger project addressing restructuring in the nonprofit social services sector in Scotland, New Zealand, Australia and Canada, we examine three key aspects shaping work in the nonprofit social services sector: 1) workers’ experience of managerialism; 2) gendered strategies drawn on by workers in the agencies studied; and 3) union strategies in the nonprofit social services sector, as well as within individual workplaces. Conclusions focus on contributions to understanding managerialism as a strong but fragmented project in which even weak union presence and the willingness of the predominantly female workforce to sacrifice to provide care for others ensure that some level of social solidarity endures.
BachSBordognaL (2011) Varieties of New Public Management or alternative models? The reform of public service employment relations in industrialized democracies. International Journal of Human Resource Management22(11): 2281–2294.
3.
BachSGivanR (2011) Varieties of New Public Management? The reform of public services employment relations in the UK and USA. International Journal of Human Resource Management22(11): 2349–2366.
4.
BainesD (2004a) Caring for nothing: Work organization and unwaged labour in social services. Work, Employment and Society18(2): 267–295.
5.
BainesD (2004b) Pro-market, non-market: The dual nature of organizational change in social services delivery. Critical Social Policy24(1): 5–29.
6.
BainesD (2010a) ‘In a different way’: Social unionism in the nonprofit social services: An Australian–Canadian comparison. Journal of Labor Studies35(4): 480–502.
7.
Baines D (2010b) Neoliberal Restructuring/Activism, Participation and Social Unionism in the Nonprofit Social Services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39(1):10–28.
8.
BainesDCunninghamI (2011) White knuckle care work: Working on the edge with the most excluded. Work, Employment and Society25(4): 760–776.
9.
BainesDCharlesworthSCunninghamIDassingerJ (2012) Self-monitoring, self-blaming, self-sacrificing workers: Gendered managerialism in the non-profit sector. Women’s Studies International Forum35(5): 362–371.
10.
BainesDCunninghamIFraserH (2011) Constrained by managerialism: Caring as participation in the voluntary social services. Economic and Industrial Democracy32(2): 329–352.
11.
Beaumont PB (1992) Annual review article 1991. British Journal of Industrial Relations 30(1): 107–125.
12.
BlackS (2005) Community unionism: Strategy for organizing in the new economy. New Labor Forum14(3): 24–32.
13.
BrainardLSiplonP (2004) Toward nonprofit organization reform in the voluntary spirit: Lessons from the Internet. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly33(3): 435–457.
14.
ClarkeJ (2004) Dissolving the public realm? The logics and limits of Neo-liberalism. Journal of Social Policy33(1): 27–48.
15.
Connell RW (2005) Masculinities, 2nd edn. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
CooperR (2003) Peak council organizing at work: ACTU strategy 1994–2000. Labour and Industry14(1): 1–21.
17.
Cross S and Bagilhole B (2002) Girls' Jobs for the Boys? Men, Masculinity and Non-Traditional Occupations. Gender, Work and Organization 9(2): 204–226.
18.
CunninghamI (2008) Employment Relations in the Voluntary Sector, London: Routledge.
19.
CunninghamIJamesP (2010) Strategies for union renewal in the context of public sector outsourcing. Economic and Industrial Democracy31(1): 34–61.
20.
Cunningham I and Nickson D (2009) Re-tendering and the voluntary sector: Implications for terms and conditions and workforce attitudes. Paper presented at the International Labour Process Conference, 6–8 April, Edinburgh.
21.
Davies S (2011) Outsourcing and the Voluntary Sector: A Review of the Evolving Landscape. In: Cunningham I and James P (eds) Voluntary Organisations and Public Service Delivery. London: Routledge, pp. 15–36.
22.
DeWaltK (2007) Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Esping-AndersenG (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economics, London: Oxford.
25.
FairbrotherPYatesC (2003) Unions in crisis, unions in renewal? In: FairbrotherPYatesC (eds) Trade Unions in Renewal: A Comparative Study, London: Continuum.
26.
GlesneC (2005) Becoming Qualitative Researchers, White Plains, NY: Longman.
27.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
Hood C (2000) Paradoxes of Public-Sector Managerialism, Old Public Management and Public Service Bargains. International Public Management Journal 3(1): 1–22.
29.
HoodCPetersG (2004) The middle ageing of NPM: Into the age of paradox?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14(3): 267–282.
30.
KerfootDKnightsD (2006) The Hidden Agenda: Masculinity in Management and Organisation, Berkeley, CA: SAGE Publications.
31.
KirbySGreavesSReidC (2005) Experience Research Social Change: Methods Beyond the Mainstream, Toronto: Garamond Press.
32.
Kumar P and Murray G (2003) Strategic Dilemma: The State of Union Renewal in Canada. In: Fairbrother P and Yates C (eds) Trade Unions in Renewal: A Comparative Study. London: Continuum.
Lightman E (2003) Social policy in Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
35.
LuptonB (2000) Maintaining masculinity: Men who do ‘women’s work’. British Journal of Management11(Special edition): 33–48.
36.
LuptonB (2006) Explaining men’s entry into female-concentrated occupations: Issues of masculinity and social class. Gender, Work and Organization13(2): 103–128.
37.
McDonaldC (2006) Challenging Social Work: The Institutional Context of Practice, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
MeyerMStorbakkenM (2000) Shifting the burden back to families. In: MeyerM (eds) Care Work: Gender, Labour and the Welfare State, London: Routlege, pp. 217–228.
39.
NavarroVSchmittJAstudilloJ (2004) Is globalization undermining the welfare state? The evolution of the welfare state in developed capitalist countries during the 1990s. International Journal of Health Services34(2): 185–227.
40.
NicksonDWarhustCDuttonEHurrellS (2008) A job to believe in: Recruitment in the Scottish voluntary sector. Human Resource Management Journal18(1): 20–35.
Patton M (2002) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
43.
Pollitt C and Bouckaert G (2004) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
RichmondTShieldsJ (2004) NGO restructuring: Constraints and consequences. Canadian Review of Social Policy53(Spring/Summer): 53–67.
45.
RoseN (2005) The death of the social? Refiguring the territory of government. In: VijR (eds) Globalization and Welfare: A Critical Reader, London: Palgrave.
ShieldsJEvansBRichmondT (2005) Structuring neoliberal governance: The nonprofit sector, emerging new modes of control and the marketization of service delivery. Policy and Society24(1): 73–97.
48.
SimpsonR (2004) Masculinity at work: The experience of men in female dominated occupations. Work, Employment and Society18(2): 349–368.
49.
Statistics New Zealand (2005) Focusing on Women, Wellington, NZ: Statistics New Zealand.
50.
StraussACorbinC (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
51.
ThemundoN (2009) Gender and the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly38(4): 663–683.
52.
TuftsS (1998) Community unionism in Canada and labor’s (re)organization of space. Antipode30(3): 227–250.
