Abstract
Reparations are a public health priority and could reduce health disparities and improve the economic position of Black Americans. Reparations are rooted in transitional justice, and examining public perceptions regarding reparations is important. The present study examines opinions on reparations, given that attitudes may have shifted in recent years due to increased national and international attention. The current study is a qualitative study of college students’ opinions on general reparations and reparations for Black descendants of chattel slavery. Results revealed that 83% (N = 322) of the participants supported general reparations on the closed-ended responses. From thematic analysis, five main themes arose in terms of support for reparations: (a) Fairness/Equity, (b) Repair Historical Harms, (c) Systemic Oppression and Racism, (d) Generational Wealth/Economics, and (e) Accountability and Acknowledgement. Of those who opposed general reparations, four themes emerged: (a) Oppression Occurred Long Ago, (b) No Direct Benefits, (c) Determinations of Reparations, and (d) Only Direct Descendants Should Receive. Of those who endorsed general support for reparations, 94% (n = 304) supported reparations for Black American descendants of chattel slavery. Findings suggest possible generational differences in perspectives and opinions on reparations, which can inform future research and policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
