This paper makes the argument that the burgeoning field of Filipino psychology (formally known as Sikolohiyang Pilipino), which draws its concepts and frameworks from the everyday indigenous experience of Filipinos, is fundamentally transpersonal. By surfacing the implicit psychology embedded in language, folklore, and customary behavior, various cultural notions related to personhood, growth, and healing are seen to encourage a holistic approach that recognizes the self as a part of larger consciousness and culture. Of particular interest is the concept of kapwa (shared identity), central to the understanding of Filipino psychology, that acknowledges the interrelationship of self, other, and the world. Interdisciplinary overlaps that make the academic connection between Filipino psychology and transpersonal psychology stronger are also pointed out, especially Jaime Bulatao’s “Filipino Transpersonal Worldview” and Sikolohiyang Pangrelihiyon (Religious Psychology). The humanistic goal of self-actualization is seen here as the fullness of kapwa, toward a shared kaginhawaan (comfort and stability). This paper aims to contribute to the global understanding of the human experience—not in the sense that it becomes a universal psychology, but rather in the sense that it is a contribution to the international potluck of ideas, which is what the indigenous psychology scholars call “cross-indigenous psychology.”
AlejoA. E. (2018). Loob ng tao [Relational interiority]. In Pe-PuaR. (Ed.), Handbook of Filipino psychology volume 1: Perspectives and methodology (pp. 368–381). The University of the Philippines Press.
2.
AngA. V.MontielC. J. (2019). Understanding spirit possession in the Philippines: A social representations approach. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 22(7), 738–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2019.1646232
3.
BeauregardM.TrentN. L.SchwartzG. E. (2018). Toward a postmaterialist psychology: Theory, research, and applications. New Ideas in Psychology, 50, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.02.004
4.
BulataoJ. C. (1992). Phenomena and their interpretation: Landmark essays 1957-1989. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
CervantesC. L.FernandezK. T. G. (2023). The interpretation of a phenomenon: Telepathy in psychotherapy among therapists trained under Fr. Jaime C. Bulatao. Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 14(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2023.2193752
7.
ComptonW. C. (2024). Self-actualization myths: What did Maslow really say?Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 64, 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818761929
8.
De GuiaK. (2018). Connected with all life—The enduring Filipino kapwa orientation, the Filipino shared self in a postmodern context. In Pe-PuaR. (Ed.), Handbook of Filipino psychology volume 1: Perspectives and methodology (pp. 310–328). The University of the Philippines Press. (Original work published 2017)
9.
DemetrioF. (1969). The engkanto belief: An essay in interpretation. Asian Folklore Studies, 28(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177781
10.
EnriquezV. G. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. The University of the Philippines Press.
11.
EnriquezV. G.BaldeP. J.BernardoM. A. (1989). Ang kababalaghan at parasikolohiya [The paranormal and parapsychology]. Akademya ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino.
12.
Estrada-ClaudioS. (2018). Has Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology) become Sikolohiya ng mga Pilipino sa Pilipinas (psychology of Filipinos in the Philippines)? In Pe-PuaR. (Ed.), Handbook of Filipino psychology: Perspectives and methodology (pp. 235–247). The University of the Philippines Press. (Original work published 2017)
13.
FriedmanH. (2009). Xenophilia as a cultural trap: Bridging the gap between transpersonal psychology and religious/spiritual traditions. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 28(1), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2009.28.1.107
14.
Galvez-TanJ. Z. (1977). Religious elements in Samar-Leyte folk medicine. In MercadoL. N. (Ed.), Filipino religious psychology (pp. 3–21). Divine Word University Publications.
GrofS.GrofC. (Eds.). (1989). Spiritual emergency: When personal transformation becomes a crisis. Jeremy P. Tarcher; Putnam.
17.
HarteliusG.RotheG.RoyP. J. (2013). A brand from the burning: Defining Transpersonal Psychology. In FriedmanH. L.HarteliusG. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of Transpersonal Psychology (pp. 3–22). Wiley Blackwell.
18.
HongY. (2009). A dynamic constructivist approach to culture: Moving from describing culture to explaining culture.” In WyerR. S.ChiuC.JongY. (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3–23). Psychology Press.
19.
JoaquinN. (2004). Culture and history. Anvil Publishing. (Original work published 1988)
NixonG. (2016). Heightened consciousness. In Miller, Jr.H. L. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of theory in psychology, volume 1 (pp. 409–411). Sage.
29.
Pe-PuaR. (2005). Kros-katutubong perspektibo sa metodolohiya: Ang karanasan ng Pilipinas [Cross-indigenous perspective in methodology: The Philippine experience]. Pambansang Samahan sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino.
30.
Pe-PuaR. (2015). Indigenous psychology. In WrightJ. D. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 788–794). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24067-1
31.
Pe-PuaR.Protacio-MarcelinoE. (2000). Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00054
SalazarZ. A. (1977). Ang kamalayan at kaluluwa: Isang paglilinaw ng ilang konsepto sa kinagisnang sikolohiya [The consciousness and soul: A clarification on some concepts in folk psychology]. In AntonioL. F.SamsonL. L.ReyesE. S.PaguioM. E. A. (Eds.), Ulat ng ikalawang pambansang kumperensya sa sikolohiyang Pilipino (pp. 131–144). Pambansang Samahan ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino.
34.
Samaco-ZamoraM. C. F.FernandezK. T. G. (2016). A grounded theory of Filipino wellness (kaginhawaan). Psychological Studies, 61(4), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-016-0373-7
35.
ShapiroS. I.LeeG. W.GrossP. L. (2002). The essence of Transpersonal Psychology: Contemporary views. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 21(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2002.21.1.19
TanM. L. (2008). Revisiting usog, pasma, kulam. University of the Philippines Press.
38.
TuliaoA. P. (2014). Mental health help seeking among Filipinos: A review of the literature. Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 5(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2014.913641
39.
Villaroman-BautistaV. (2019). Gamit at etika ng sikolohiyang pangrelihiyon (Sinundan ng talakayan ng papel) [Application and ethics of religious psychology (Followed by a discussion of the paper)]. In Pe-PuaR. (Ed.), Handbook of Filipino psychology volume 2: Applications (pp. 273–284). The University of the Philippines Press. (Original work published 1999)
40.
WeilS. (2024). The need for roots (SchwartzR., Trans.). Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1949)
41.
WilkinsonD. (2017). Is there such a thing as animism?Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 85(2), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfw064
