COVID-19 in South Carolina: Experiences Using Facebook as a Self-Organizing Tool for Grassroots Advocacy,Education,and Social Support

Abstract

This retrospective case study describes our experiences, processes, and lessons learned using social media for pandemic response. Our team created and maintained a large Facebook group, and we used this platform to support grassroots advocacy, public health messaging, and health equity during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina. The Facebook group was initially formed to urge local and state leaders to implement a stay-at-home order, but we recognized a continued need for our virtual space. Group leaders performed tasks including data tracking/reporting and content review/approval. Initial advocacy successes included the stay-at-home order, efforts to limit transmission, and social/mental health support. As the Delta variant emerged, we posted vaccine education and access information and supported school mitigation, including a successful litigation effort that led to a mask requirement on school buses. With the Omicron variant, our group’s focus shifted to educating about immune evasion, transmissibility, and individual protection. This included updates on mask use, antigen testing, vaccine boosters, treatment, data reports, and vaccines. Throughout the pandemic, we addressed health equity, especially for those identifying as disabled. We learned that virtual communities could support each other and improve public health, even when disinformation was present and elected officials emphasized politics over science.

Keywords

social media COVID-19 advocacy health equity pandemic response self-organizing grassroots

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albrecht

S. S.

Aronowitz

S. V.

Buttenheim

A. M.

Coles

Dowd

J. B.

Hale

Kumar

Leininger

Ritter

A. Z.

Simanek

A. M.

Whelan

C. B.

Jones

(2022). Lessons learned from Dear Pandemic, a social media-based science communication project targeting the COVID-19 infodemic. Public Health Reports, 137(3), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549221076544

Al-Taie

M. Z.

Ali

(2017). A self-organizing communication model for disaster risk management. International Journal of Advances in Soft Computing & Its Applications, 9(2), 17–30.

Bálint

Vörös-Horváth

Széchenyi

(2022). Omicron: Increased transmissibility and decreased pathogenicity. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 7, Article 151. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01009-8

Bene

(2017). Influenced by peers: Facebook as an information source for young people. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 2056305117716273. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117716273

Bessi

Zollo

Vicario

M. D.

Puliga

Scala

Caldarelli

Uzzi

Quattrociocchi

(2016). Users polarization on Facebook and Youtube. PLOS ONE, 11(8), Article e0159641. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159641

Biggs

A. T.

Littlejohn

L. F.

(2021). Revisiting the initial COVID-19 pandemic projections. The Lancet Microbe, 2(3), e91–e92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00029-X

Bland

A. M.

(2020). Existential givens in the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 60(5), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167820940186

Bradshaw

A. S.

Shelton

S. S.

Wollney

Treise

Auguste

(2021). Pro-Vaxxers get out: Anti-vaccination advocates influence undecided first-time, pregnant, and new mothers on Facebook. Health Communication, 36(6), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1712037

Branswell

(2022, August 17). In an effort to address its missteps during Covid, CDC plans an “ambitious” agency overhaul. STAT. https://www.statnews.com/2022/08/17/cdc-ambitious-overhaul-covid-missteps/

10.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). NCHS COVID-19 death data and resources: Excess deaths associated with COVID-19. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm

11.

Collins

P. H.

(2013). On intellectual activism. Temple University Press.

12.

Conrad

E. J.

Becker

Powell

Hall

K. C.

(2020). Improving health promotion through the integration of technology, crowdsourcing, and social media. Health Promotion Practice, 21(2), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839918811152

13.

de Soyres

Santacreu

A. M.

Young

. (2022, July 15). FEDS Notes: Fiscal policy and excess inflation during COVID-19: A cross-country view. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/fiscal-policy-and-excess-inflation-during-covid-19-a-cross-country-view-20220715.htm

14.

Dixon

(2022). Facebook: Number of monthly active users worldwide 2008-2022. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/346167/facebook-global-dau/

15.

Dunne

Smallwood

Taylor

(2022, April 5). A solve long covid initiative white paper: Long covid impact on adult Americans: Early indicators estimating prevalence and cost. https://solvecfs.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/04/Long_Covid_Impact_Paper.pdf

16.

Gao

Zheng

Jia

Chen

Mao

Chen

Wang

Dai

(2020). Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLOS ONE, 15(4), Article e0231924. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231924

17.

George

D. R.

Rovniak

L. S.

Kraschnewski

J. L.

(2013). Dangers and opportunities for social media in medicine. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 56(3), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e318297dc38

18.

Gilligan

(1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.

19.

Herby

Jonung

Hanke

(2022). A literature review and meta-analysis of the effects of lockdowns on COVID-19 mortality. Studies in Applied Economics, 200. https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf

20.

Horowitz

(2017). Who is this “We” you speak of? Grounding activist identity in social psychology. Socius, 3, 2378023117717819. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117717819

21.

Jaggar

A. M.

(1995). Caring as a feminist practice of moral reason [1995]. In Held

(Ed.), Justice and care (pp. 179–202). Routledge.

22.

Koçak

N. G.

Kaya

Erol

(2013). Social media from the perspective of Diffusion of Innovation Approach. The Macrotheme Review: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Global Macro Trends, 2(3), 22–29.

23.

Koh

K.-K.

Chan

L. L.

Tan

E.-K.

(2020). Messaging fatigue and desensitisation to information during pandemic. Archives of Medical Research, 51(7), 716–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.06.014

24.

Leung

T. Y. M.

Chan

A. Y. L.

Chan

E. W.

Chan

V. K. Y.

Chui

C. S. L.

Cowling

B. J.

Gao

M. Q.

Hung

I. F. N.

M. S. M.

Lau

K. K.

Lau

C. S.

Lau

L. K. W.

Leung

W. K.

Luo

Man

K. K. C.

. . .Wong

I. C. K.

(2020). Short- and potential long-term adverse health outcomes of COVID-19: A rapid review. Emerging Microbes & Infections, 9(1), 2190–2199. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1825914

25.

Lewin

(1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers ( Cartwright

, Ed.). Harpers.

26.

Malecki

K. M. C.

Keating

J. A.

Safdar

(2021). Crisis communication and public perception of COVID-19 risk in the era of social media. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 72(4), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa758

27.

Maslow

(1962). Toward a psychology of being. Van Nostrand.

28.

Miller

J. B.

(1987). Toward a new psychology of women (2nd ed.). Beacon Press.

29.

Patton

(2022, April 13). Covid-19 related inflation surpasses 40 year record: How long will it persist? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2022/04/13/covid-19-related-inflation-surpasses-40-year-record-how-long-will-it-persist/?sh=69125b6f1a82

30.

Pyszczynski

Lockett

Greenberg

Solomon

(2021). Terror management theory and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 61(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167820959488

31.

Raskin

J. D.

(2021, April 13). Humanistic psychology post-pandemic Using humanistic principles and practices to more forward together https://www.apadivisions.org/division-32/news-events/humanistic-psychology-post-pandemic

32.

Raskin

J. D.

Efran

J. S.

(2021). The coronavirus in context guidance for psychotherapists during a pandemic. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 61(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/0022167820937509

33.

Rogers

C. R.

(1961). On becoming a person. Houghton Mifflin.

34.

Rogers

C. R.

(1980). A way of being. Houghton Mifflin.

35.

Rogers

E. M.

(1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.

36.

Saleem

Morrill

Karter

J. M.

(2021b). Introduction to the special issue on radical humanism, critical consciousness, and social change. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 61(6), 851–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167819878912

37.

Scott

J. T.

Maryman

(2016, March 15). Using social media as a tool to complement advocacy efforts. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 7(1). https://www.gjcpp.org/en/article.php?issue=21&article=121

38.

Simsa

Rameder

Aghamanoukjan

Totter

(2019). Spontaneous volunteering in social crises: Self-organization and coordination. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(2_suppl), 103S–122S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018785472

39.

Sobo

E. J.

Huhn

Sannwald

Thurman

(2016, Mar 22). Information curation among vaccine cautious parents: Web 2.0, Pinterest thinking, and pediatric vaccine choice. Cross-Cultural Studies in Health and Illness, 35(6), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2016.1145219

40.

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. (2022a, February 18). SCDHEC press release: DHEC announces planned reductions in COVID-19 testing operations. https://scdhec.gov/news-releases/dhec-announces-planned-reductions-covid-19-testing-operations

41.

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. (2022b, March 11). SCDHEC press release: DHEC will begin reporting COVID-19 data weekly on March 15, closing more testing sites. https://scdhec.gov/news-releases/dhec-will-begin-reporting-covid-19-data-weekly-march-15-closing-more-testing-sites

42.

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. (2022c, March 29). SCDHEC Facebook announcement indicating a change in the reporting of SC deaths. https://www.facebook.com/SCDHEC/posts/pfbid02dcUNdcXeoQLFj47F263GkBCCjx9HKW9Kik2WYkXGAYN5wSDetMmzaToWbmbkDSuBl

43.

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. (2022d, August 19). COVID-19 community levels dashboard. https://scdhec.gov/covid19/covid-19-data

44.

Spearman

(2021, July 6). Proviso 1.108 Guidance and face coverings on school buses update [Memorandum]. South Carolina Department of Education. https://ed.sc.gov/newsroom/school-district-memoranda-archive/proviso-1-108-guidance-and-face-coverings-on-school-buses-update/proviso-1-108-guidance-and-face-coverings-on-school-buses-update-memo/

45.

Starbird

Palen

(2011, May 7). “Voluntweeters”: Self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2011, pp. 1071–1080). Vancouver, BC, Canada. ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979102

46.

Tsao

S.-F.

Chen

Tisseverasinghe

Yang

Butt

Z. A.

(2021). What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: A scoping review. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(3), e175–e194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30315-0

47.

Twigg

Mosel

(2017). Emergent groups and spontaneous volunteers in urban disaster response. Environment and Urbanization, 29(2), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247817721413

48.

United States Food & Drug Administration. (2022, March 19). Consumer update: Know your treatment options for COVID-19. https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/know-your-treatment-options-covid-19

49.

Ventola

C. L.

(2014). Social media and health care professionals: Benefits, risks, and best practices. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 39(7), 491–520.

50.

Wang

Hao

Platt

L. S.

(2021). Examining risk and crisis communications of government agencies and stakeholders during early-stages of COVID-19 on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, Article 106568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106568

51.

Webb

Jirotka

Stahl

B. C.

Housley

Edwards

Williams

Procter

Rana

Burnap

(2017). The ethical challenges of publishing Twitter data for research dissemination. Presented at WEbSci’17: ACM Web Science Conference. Troy, NY, USA. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference (pp. 339–348). ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3091489

52.

Wieland

M. L.

Asiedu

G. B.

Njeru

J. W.

Weis

J. A.

Lantz

Abbenyi

Molina

Ahmed

Osman

Goodson

Torres-Herbeck

Nur

Porraz Capetillo

Mohamed

A. A.

Sia

I. G.

(2022). Community-engaged bidirectional crisis and emergency risk communication with immigrant and refugee populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Reports, 137(2), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549211065514

53.

Williams

MacDonald

Rollins

Janssen

L. F.

Grealy

Kirk

Young

Flowers

(2021). Sharing positive behavior change made during COVID-19 lockdown: A mixed-methods coproduction study. Health Psychology, 40(10), 655–665. https://doi.org.1037/hea0001130

54.

Wukich

Steinberg

(2013). Nonprofit and public sector participation in self-organizing information networks: Twitter hashtag and trending topic use during disasters. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 4(2), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12036

55.

Yter

Murillo

Georgiou

(2022). Bounded solidarity as an asset for public health care intervention. Qualitative Health Research, 32(3), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211057081

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB

0.02 MB

0.20 MB

0.11 MB