The article gives an overview of psychological formulation, a rapidly expanding practice in the United Kingdom that is supported by the British Psychological Society. It is argued that formulation can provide a credible alternative to psychiatric diagnosis in the context of public admissions about lack of reliability and validity of current diagnostic systems. However, vigilance and best-practice principles are essential to ensure that this approach is not assimilated back into the status quo.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington DC: Author.
2.
BentallR. P. (2009). Doctoring the mind: Why psychiatric treatments fail. London, England: Allen Lane.
3.
BerryK.BarrowcloughC.WeardenA. (2009). A pilot study investigating the use of psychological formulations to modify psychiatric staff perceptions of service users with psychosis. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37(1), 39-48.
British Psychological Society. (2007). New ways of working for applied psychologists in health and social care: Working psychologically in teams. Leicester, England: Author.
British Psychological Society. (2014). Understanding psychosis and schizophrenia. Leicester, England: Author. Retrieved from www.understandingpsychosis.net
10.
British Psychological Society, Division of Clinical Psychology. (2000). Recent advances in understanding mental illness and psychotic experiences. Leicester, England: Author.
11.
British Psychological Society, Division of Clinical Psychology (2010). Understanding bipolar disorder. Leicester, England: Author.
CasaresP.JohnstoneL. (2015). Integration of formulation in adult multidisciplinary services across a large NHS Foundation Trust - Phases 1 and 2: Training and integration. Clinical Psychology Forum, 275, 20-27.
14.
ChadwickP.WilliamsC.MackenzieJ. (2003). Impact of case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14, 671-680.
15.
ClarkeI. (2015). The emotion focused formulation approach: Bridging individual and team formulation. Clinical Psychology Forum, 275, 28-32.
16.
ColeS. (2013). Using integrative formulation in health settings. In JohnstoneL.DallosR. (Eds.), Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed., pp. 243-259). London, England: Routledge.
17.
ColeS.WoodK.SpendelowJ. (2015). Team formulation: A critical evaluation of current literature and future research directions. Clinical Psychology Forum, 275, 13-19.
18.
CraddockN.Mynors-WallisL. (2014). Psychiatric diagnosis: Impersonal, imperfect and important. British Journal of Psychiatry, 204, 93-95.
Division of Clinical Psychology. (2011). Good practice guidelines on the use of psychological formulation. Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.
23.
Division of Clinical Psychology. (2013). Classification of behaviour and experience in relation to functional psychiatric diagnosis: Time for a paradigm shift. Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.
JohnstoneL. (2013a). Controversies and debates about formulation. In JohnstoneL.DallosR. (Eds.), Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed., pp. 260-289). London, England: Routledge.
34.
JohnstoneL (2013b). Using formulation in teams. In JohnstoneL.DallosR. (Eds.), Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed., pp. 216-242). London, England: Routledge.
35.
JohnstoneL. (2014). A straight-talking introduction to psychiatric diagnosis. Ross-on-Wye, England: PCCS Books.
36.
JohnstoneL.DallosR. (Eds.). (2013). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge
37.
JohnstoneL.DurrantC.JamesL.LewisH.MayburyE.McCannS.. . . SandfordC. (2015). Team formulation developments in AMH services in South Wales. Clinical Psychology Forum, 275, 38-42.
38.
KindermanP.ReadJ.MoncrieffJ.BentallR. P. (2013). Drop the language of disorder. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 16(1), 2-3.
39.
KirkS. A.KutchinsH. (1997). Making us crazy: DSM—The psychiatric bible and the creation of mental disorder. New York, NY: Free Press.
40.
KovelJ. (1980). The American mental health industry. In InglebyD. (Ed.), Critical psychiatry: The politics of mental health (pp. 72-101). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
41.
KuykenW.FothergillC. D.MusaM.ChadwickP. (2005). The reliability and quality of cognitive case formulation. Behavior Research and Therapy, 43, 1187-1201.
42.
MartindaleB. V. (2007). Psychodynamic contributions to early intervention in psychosis. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 13, 34-42.
43.
MilsonG.PhillipsK. (2015). Formulation meetings in a Tier 4 CAMHS inpatient unit. Clinical Psychology Forum, 275, Online supplement.
44.
Morberg PainC.ChadwickP.AbbaN. (2008). Clients’ experience of case formulation in CBT for psychosis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 127-138.
45.
ReadJ. (2013). Childhood adversity and psychosis. In ReadJ.DillonJ. (Eds.), Models of madness: Psychological, social and biological approaches to psychosis (2nd ed., pp. 249-275). London, England: Routledge.
46.
ReadJ.BentallR. B. (2012). Negative childhood experiences and mental health: theoretical, clinical and primary prevention implications. British Journal of Psychiatry, 200, 89-91.
47.
RedheadS.JohnstoneL.NightingaleJ. (2015). Clients’ experiences of formulation. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/papt.12054
