Analysis of Sex-Specific Gene-by-Cohort and Genetic Correlation-by-Cohort Interaction in Educational and Reproductive Outcomes Using the UK Biobank Data
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2024
Analysis of Sex-Specific Gene-by-Cohort and Genetic Correlation-by-Cohort Interaction in Educational and Reproductive Outcomes Using the UK Biobank Data
Synthesizing prior gene-by-cohort (G×C) interaction studies, we theorize that changes in genetic effects by social conditions depend on the level of resource constraints, the distribution and use of resources, structural constraints, and constraints on individual choice. Motivated by the theory, we explored several sex-specific G×C trends across a set of outcomes using 30 birth cohorts of UK Biobank data (N = 400,000). We find that genetic coefficients on years of schooling and secondary educational attainment substantially decrease, but genetic coefficients on college attainments only moderately increase. On the other hand, genetic coefficients for education ranks are stable. Genetic coefficients on reproductive behavior increase for younger cohorts. Additional genetic-correlation-by-cohort analysis shows shifting genetic correlations between education and reproductive behavior. Our results suggest that the G×C patterns are highly heterogenous and that social and genetic factors jointly shape the diversity of human phenotypes.
AlbermanEva. 1991. “Are Our Babies Becoming Bigger?” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine84(5):257–60.
2.
BarbanNicolaJansenRickde VlamingRonaldVaezAhmadMandemakersJornt J.TropfFelix C.ShenXia, et al. 2016. “Genome-Wide Analysis Identifies 12 Loci Influencing Human Reproductive Behavior.” Nature Genetics48(12):1462–72.
3.
BlauPeter M.DuncanOtis Dudley. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York, NY: Wiley.
4.
BoardmanJason D.BlalockCasey L.PampelFred C.2010. “Trends in the Genetic Influences on Smoking.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior51(1):108–23.
5.
BoardmanJason D.FletcherJason M.2021. “Evaluating the Continued Integration of Genetics into Medical Sociology.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior62(3):404–18.
6.
BoliverVikki. 2013. “How Fair Is Access to More Prestigious U.K. Universities?” British Journal of Sociology64(2):344–64.
7.
BongaartsJohn. 2002. “The End of Fertility Transition in the Developed World.” Population and Development Review28(3):419–43.
8.
BreenRichardGoldthorpeJohn H.2001. “Class, Mobility, and Merit.” European Sociological Review17(2):81–101.
9.
Bulik-SullivanBrendanFinucaneHilary K.AnttilaVerneriGusevAlexanderDayFelix R.LohPo-RuConsortiumReproGen, et al. 2015. “An Atlas of Genetic Correlations across Human Diseases and Traits.” Nature Genetics47(11):1236–41.
10.
ConleyDalton. 2016. “Socio-genomic Research Using Genome-Wide Molecular Data.” Annual Review of Sociology42:275–99.
11.
ConleyDaltonBennett.Neil G.2000. “Is Biology Destiny? Birth Weight and Life Chances.” American Sociological Review65(3):458–67.
12.
DiPreteThomas A.GruskyDavid B.1990. “Structure and Trend in the Process of Stratification for American Men and Women.” American Journal of Sociology96(1):107–43.
13.
DomingueBenjamin W.ConleyDaltonFletcherJasonBoardmanJason D.2015. “Cohort Effects in the Genetic Influence on Smoking.” Behavior Genetics46(1):31–42.
14.
DomingueBenjamin W.TrejoSamArmstrong-CarterEmmaTucker-Drob.Elliot M.2020. “Interactions between Polygenic Scores and Environments: Methodological and Conceptual Challenges.” Sociological Science7:465–86.
15.
DomingueBenjamin W.KanopkaKlintMallardTravis T.TrejoSamTucker-Drob.Elliot M.2022. “Modeling Interaction and Dispersion Effects in the Analysis of Gene-by-Environment Interaction.” Behavior Genetics52(1):56–64.
16.
DomingueBenjamin W.KanopkaKlintTrejoSamRhemtullaMijkeTucker-Drob.Elliot M.2022. “Ubiquitous Bias and False Discovery due to Model Misspecification in Analysis of Statistical Interactions: The Role of the Outcome’s Distribution and Metric Properties.” Psychological Methods. doi:10.1037/met0000532.
17.
EngzellPerTropfFelix C.2019. “Heritability of Education Rises with Intergenerational Mobility.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(51):25386–88.
18.
FryAnnaLittlejohnsThomas J.SudlowCathieDohertyNicolaAdamskaLigiaSprosenTimCollinsRoryAllenNaomi E.2017. “Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of U.K. Biobank Participants with Those of the General Population.” American Journal of Epidemiology186(9):1026–34.
19.
GoosMaartenManningAlan. 2007. “Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain.” The Review of Economics and Statistics89(1):118–33.
20.
GuoGuangLiuHexuanWangLingShenHaipengHuWen. 2015. “The Genome-Wide Influence on Human BMI Depends on Physical Activity, Life Course, and Historical Period.” Demography52(5):1651–70.
21.
HardenKathryn Paige. 2021. The Genetic Lottery: Why DNA Matters for Social Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
HarperKristinArmelagosGeorge. 2010. “The Changing Disease-Scape in the Third Epidemiological Transition.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health7(2):675–97.
23.
HeathAndrew C.BergKareEavesLindon J.SolaasMarit H.CoreyLinda A.SundetJon MartinMagnusPerNanceWalter E.1985. “Education Policy and the Heritability of Educational Attainment.” Nature314:734–36.
24.
HenrettaJohn C.2007. “Early Childbearing, Marital Status, and Women’s Health and Mortality after Age 50.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior48(3):254–66.
25.
HerdPamelaFreeseJeremySicinskiKamilDomingueBenjamin W.HarrisKathleen MullanWeiCaipingHauser.Robert M.2019. “Genes, Gender Inequality, and Educational Attainment.” American Sociological Review84(6):1069–98.
26.
JohnsonRebeccaSotoudehRaminaConleyDalton. 2022. “Polygenic Scores for Plasticity: A New Tool for Studying Gene–Environment Interplay.” Demography59(3):1045–70.
27.
KendlerKenneth S.KesslerRonald C.WaltersEllen E.MacLeanCharlesNealeMichael C.HeathAndrew C.EavesLindon J.2010. “Stressful Life Events, Genetic Liability, and Onset of an Episode of Major Depression in Women.” Focus8(3):459–70.
28.
KendlerKenneth S.NealeMichael C.2010. “Endophenotype: A Conceptual Analysis.” Molecular Psychiatry15(8):789–97.
29.
KravdalØysteinRindfussRonald R.2008. “Changing Relationships between Education and Fertility: A Study of Women and Men Born 1940 to 1964.” American Sociological Review73(5):854–73.
30.
KuhDiana L.PowerChrisRodgersBryan. 1991. “Secular Trends in Social Class and Sex Differences in Adult Height.” International Journal of Epidemiology20(4):1001–1009.
31.
LegewieJoschaDiPreteThomas A.2012. “School Context and the Gender Gap in Educational Achievement.” American Sociological Review77(3):463–85.
32.
LesthaegheRon. 2014. “The Second Demographic Transition: A Concise Overview of Its Development.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111(51):18112–15.
33.
LewisAnna C. F.MolinaSantiago J.AppelbaumPaul S.DaudaBegeDi RienzoAnnaFuentesAgustinFullerton.Stephanie M.2022. “Getting Genetic Ancestry Right for Science and Society.” Science376(6590):250–52.
34.
LiuHexuan. 2018. “Social and Genetic Pathways in Multigenerational Transmission of Educational Attainment.” American Sociological Review83(2): 278–304.
35.
MartinAlicia R.GignouxChristopher R.WaltersRaymond K.WojcikGenevieve L.NealeBenjamin M.GravelSimonDalyMark J.BustamanteCarlos D.KennyEimear E.2017. “Human Demographic History Impacts Genetic Risk Prediction across Diverse Populations.” American Journal of Human Genetics100(4):635–49.
36.
MezquitaLauraSánchez-RomeraJuan F.IbáñezManuel I.MorosoliJosé J.Colodro-CondeLucíaOrtetGenerósOrdoñanaJuan R.2018. “Effects of Social Attitude Change on Smoking Heritability.” Behavior Genetics48(1):12–21.
37.
MillsMelinda C.TropfFelix C.2020. “Sociology, Genetics, and the Coming of Age of Sociogenomics.” Annual Review of Sociology46:553–81.
38.
MirowskyJohnRoss.Catherine E.2015. “Education, Health, and the Default American Lifestyle.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior56(3):297–306.
39.
MostafaviHakhamaneshHarpakArbelAgarwalIpsitaConleyDaltonPritchardJonathan K.PrzeworskiMolly. 2020. “Variable Prediction Accuracy of Polygenic Scores within an Ancestry Group.” Elife9: e48376. doi:10.7554/eLife.48376.
40.
PurcellShaun M.WrayNaomi R.StoneJennifer L.VisscherPeter M.O’DonovanMichael C.SullivanPatrick F.SklarPamela. 2009. “Common Polygenic Variation Contributes to Risk of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.” Nature460:748–52.
41.
SchoonIngrid. 2010. “Planning for the Future: Changing Education Expectations in Three British Cohorts.” Historical Social Research35(2):99–119.
42.
ShanahanMichael J.HoferScott M.2005. “Social Context in Gene–Environment Interactions: Retrospect and Prospect.” Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences60(S1):S65–76.
43.
SotoudehRaminaHarrisKathleen MullanConleyDalton. 2019. “Effects of the Peer Metagenomic Environment on Smoking Behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(33):16302–307.
44.
TenesaAlbertHaley.Chris S.2013. “The Heritability of Human Disease: Estimation, Uses, and Abuses.” Nature Reviews Genetics14(2):139–49.
45.
TurkheimerEricHaleyAndreanaWaldronMaryD’OnofrioBrianGottesmanIrving I.2003. “Socioeconomic Status Modifies Heritability of IQ in Young Children.” Psychological Science14(6):623–28.
46.
Van AltenSjoerdDomingueBenjamin W.GalamaTitusMarees.Andries T.2022. “Reweighting the U.K. Biobank to Reflect Its Underlying Sampling Population Substantially Reduces Pervasive Selection Dias Due to Volunteering.” medRxiv. doi:10.1101/2022.05.16.22275048.
47.
Van WinkleZacharyConleyDalton. 2021. “Genome-Wide Heritability Estimates for Family Life Course Complexity.” Demography58(4):1575–602.
48.
WalterStefanMejía-GuevaraIvánEstradaKarolLiuSze Y.GlymourM. Maria. 2016. “Association of a Genetic Risk Score with Body Mass Index across Different Birth Cohorts.” Journal of the American Medical Association316(1):63–69.
49.
WedowRobbeeZacherMeghanHuibregtseBrooke M.HarrisKathleen MullanDomingueBenjamin W.Boardman.Jason D.2018. “Education, Smoking, and Cohort Change: Forwarding a Multidimensional Theory of the Environmental Moderation of Genetic Effects.” American Sociological Review83(4):802–32.
50.
YoungAlexander I.NehzatiSeyedBenonisdottirStefaniaOkbayAysuJayashankarHariharanLeeChanwookCesariniDavidBenjaminDaniel J.TurleyPatrickKongAugustine. 2022. “Mendelian Imputation of Parental Genotypes Improves Estimates of Direct Genetic eEfects.” Nature Genetics54(6):897–905.
51.
ZhengBoyanFletcherJasonZhengFengyiLuQiongshi. 2022. “Gene-by-Peer-Environment Interaction Effects on Cigarette, Alcohol, and Marijuana Use among US High School Students of European Ancestry.” Social Science & Medicine309:115249. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115249.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
