Leveraging the Relationship Between Teacher Instructional Autonomy and Teacher Professional Identity to Improve Teacher Job Satisfaction in High-Poverty Schools
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Leveraging the Relationship Between Teacher Instructional Autonomy and Teacher Professional Identity to Improve Teacher Job Satisfaction in High-Poverty Schools
Teacher turnover remains a persistent issue. Effective teachers represent a critical factor in student success; however, high-poverty schools tend to experience more turnover than low-poverty schools. In this mixed-survey study, the researcher investigates how limited instructional autonomy in Title I-funded elementary schools may challenge teachers’ professional identities, leading to decreased job satisfaction. Bandura’s (1985) reciprocal determinism theory frames the complexity of teachers’ environments, a trilateral connection among working conditions, teachers’ beliefs, and associated responses. By addressing the relationship between teachers’ instructional autonomy and sense of professionalism, leaders can improve teachers’ job satisfaction and retention in high-poverty schools.
Abu-AlruzJ.KhasawnehS. (2013). Professional identity of faculty members at higher education institutions: A criterion for workplace success. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 18(4), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2013.847235
AllensworthE.PonisciakS.MazzeoC. (2009). The schools teachers leave: Teacher mobility in Chicago public schools. Consortium on Chicago School Research.
5.
BanduraA. (1985). Model of causality in social learning theory. In MahoneyM. J.FreemanA. (Eds.), Cognition and psychotherapy (pp. 81–99). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7562-3_3
BerryB.ShieldsP. M. (2017). Solving the teacher shortage: Revisiting the lessons we’ve learned. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(8), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717708289
8.
BoydD.GrossmanP.IngM.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2011). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 303–333. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210380788
9.
CastroA. J.JabbarH.Núñez MirandaS. (2022). School choice, teachers’ work, and professional identity. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30(104), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6122
10.
ChapmanS.WrightP.PascoeR. (2018). Arts curriculum implementation: “Adopt and adapt” as policy translation. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2016.1201031
DayC.KingtonA.StobartG.SammonsP. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities. British Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600775316
14.
de SaxeJ. G.BucknovitzS.Mahoney-MosedaleF. (2020). The deprofessionalization of educators: An intersectional analysis of neoliberalism and education “reform.”. Education and Urban Society, 52(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124518786398
15.
DesimoneL. M.Le FlochK. C. (2004). Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve surveys in education research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737026001001
16.
EisenbachB. B. (2012). Teacher belief and practice in a scripted curriculum. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 85(4), 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2012.663816
GuytonT. (2021). Correlation of teacher perceptions of the Expeditionary Learning and Eureka math curricula and student achievement [Doctoral dissertation, Union University] (Order No. 28649162). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
21.
HowardA. K.BolyardC. S.FinleyS. L. (2024). Deficit to asset thinking: An exploration of incorporating community cultural wealth on preservice teachers’ mindsets. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 18(2), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v18i2.8806
22.
IngersollR. M.PerdaD. (2008). The status of teaching as a profession. In BallantineJ.SpadeJ.StuberJ. (Eds.), Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (pp. 199–213). Sage Publications.
23.
JonesA. L.KesslerM. A. (2020). Teachers’ emotion and identity work during a pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 583775. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.583775
24.
KelchtermansG. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self‐understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875332
25.
KraftM. A.LyonM. A. (2024). The rise and fall of the teaching profession: Prestige, interest, preparation, and satisfaction over the last half century. American Educational Research Journal, 61(6), 1192–1236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713519496
26.
KraftM. A.PapayJ. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476–500. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713519496
27.
LaddH. F. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711398128
28.
MacGillivrayL.Lassiter ArdellA.Sauceda CurwenM.PalmaJ. (2004). Colonized teachers: Examining the implementation of a scripted reading program. Teaching Education, 15(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621042000213575
29.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2002). P.L. 107–110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319.
PattonM. Q. (2007). Sampling, qualitative (purposeful). In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology.Wiley.
33.
PearsonL. C.HallB. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1993.9941155
34.
PearsonL. C.MoomawW. (2006). Continuing validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.1.44-51
35.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
36.
SimonN. S.JohnsonS. M. (2015). Teacher turnover in high-poverty schools: What we know and can do. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700305
37.
StrongL. E. G.YoshidaR. K. (2014). Teachers’ autonomy in today’s educational climate: Current perceptions from an acceptable instrument. Educational Studies, 50(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.880922
38.
UrryK.Chur-HansenA.ScholzB. (2024). From member checking to collaborative reflection: A novel way to use a familiar method for engaging participants in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 21(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2355972
39.
WronowskiM. L.UrickA. (2019). Examining the relationship of teacher perception of accountability and assessment policies on teacher turnover during NCLB. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(86), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.3858
40.
YossoT. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race and Ethnicity in Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
