Mind the Gap! Using a Discourse Perspective to Bridge Students’ Experiences of Learning Mathematics Across Grade Levels

Abstract

Presently, in Malta, syllabi are being replaced by learning outcomes. For ages 3–7, the outcomes are framed holistically (e.g. identity, communication, etc.), and it is recommended that children learn mathematics informally through play and projects. For ages 8–11, learning outcomes are subject-based, and new mathematics textbooks are being phased in. I discuss the importance of a smooth transition between informal and structured approaches to learning mathematics. I draw on Anna Sfard’s 4-element definition of discourse, linking the theory with my research classroom data. I argue that a discourse perspective can provide a basis for ensuring continuity across Grade levels.

Keywords

mathematics discourse early childhood education primary mathematics education transitions and continuity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Battersby

(1999). So, What’s a Learning Outcome Anyway? [Descriptive Report] https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED430611

Camilleri Grima

(2003). Do as I say, not as I do. Legitimate language in bilingual Malta!. In Huss

Camilleri Grima

King

K. A.

(Eds.), Transcending monolingualism. Linguistic revitalization in education (pp. 55–66). Swets and Zeitlingee.

Camilleri Grima

(2013). A select review of bilingualism in education in Malta. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(5), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.716813

Clarke

(2015). Assessing young children’s mathematical understanding: Opportunities and expectations at the transition to school. In Perry

MacDonald

Gervasoni

(Eds), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 31–46). Springer.

Clements

D. H.

Sarama

(2018). Myths of early math. Education Sciences, 8(2), 71–78. http://doi.10.3390/educsci8020071

Directorate for Quality and Standards in Education [Malta] (2015a). Learning outcomes framework: Toolkit for the early years cycle. Author. https://www.schoolslearningoutcomes.edu.mt/en/

Directorate for Quality and Standards in Education [Malta] . (2015b). Learning outcomes framework . Mathematics. Author. https://www.schoolslearningoutcomes.edu.mt/en/.

European Commission (2022). National education systems (eurydice report). Author. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/malta_en#:∼:text=Around50%25ofstudentsin,14%25areinIndependentSchools

Fabian

Dunlop

A.-W.

(2006). Outcomes of good practice in transition processes for children entering primary school. Paper commissioned for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2007, Strong foundations: Early childhood care and education. UNESCO.

10.

Farrugia

M. T.

(2017). Young children’s appropriation of mathematical discourse: Learning subtraction in a plurilingual classroom. In Dooley

Gueudet

(eds) Proceedings of the tenth conference of the European society for research in mathematics education (CERME 10, February 1–5, 2017). (pp. 1268–1275). DCU Institute of Education and ERME.

11.

Farrugia

M. T.

(2019). From policy to practice: Giving attention to language in primary mathematics education. In Bezzina

Caruana

(Eds), Teacher education matters: Transforming lives (pp. 288–301). University of Malta.

12.

Farrugia

M. T.

(2021a). ‘Mathematics through play’: The influence of adult intervention on young children’s shifts between play and mathematical discourses. In Planas

Morgan

Schütte

(Eds), Classroom research on mathematics and language. (pp. 134–150). Routledge.

13.

Farrugia

M. T.

(2021b). From everyday to scientific (mathematical) concepts: A vygotskian interpretation of a young child’s speech. Avances de Investigación en Educatión Matemática (AIEM), 19, 86–99.

14.

Farrugia

M. T.

(2022). Engaging in the discourse of fractions in a bilingual Maltese classroom. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 124(5), 89, 107 special issue entitled ‘teaching and learning mathematics and computing in multilingual contexts’. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221103977

15.

Finish National Agency for Education (2018). National core curriculum for early childhood education and care 2018. Author.

16.

Fullan

(2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

17.

Garry

(2020). Mastery in primary mathematics: A guide for teachers and leaders. Bloomsbury Education.

18.

Gasteiger

(2015).Early mathematics in play situations: Continuity of learning. In Perry

MacDonald

Gervasoni

(Eds), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 255–271). Springer.

19.

Gelman

Gallistel

C. R.

(1986). The child’s understanding of number. Harvard University Press.

20.

Gervasoni

Perry

(2015).Children’s mathematical knowledge prior to starting school and implications for transition. In Perry

MacDonald

Gervasoni

(Eds), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 47–64). Springer.

21.

Gibbons

(2015). Scaffolding Language, scaffolding learning (2nd ed.). Heinemann.

22.

Gouëdard

Pont

Hyttinen Pinhsuan Huang

(2020) Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation. Working Paper No. 239 [EDU/WKP(2020)27]. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/efe8a48c-en

23.

Hasselhorn

(2005). Lernen im altersbereich zwischen 4 und 8 jahren: individuelle voraussetzungen, entwicklung, diagnostik und förderung [Learning in the age range between 4 and 8 years: Individual requirements, development, diagnostics and support]. In Guldimann

Hauser

(eds), Bildung 4- Bis 8-Jähriger Kinder [Education of 4- to 8-Year-Old Children] (77–88). Waxmann.

24.

Haylock

Manning

R.)

(2014). Mathematics explained for primary teachers (5th ed.) SAGE.

25.

Hodge

Kress

(1988). Social semiotics. Polity Press.

26.

Lave

Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

27.

Lee

(2006). Language for learning mathematics. Open University Press.

28.

Lee

Lomas

(2015). A New Zealand perspective: Mathematical progressions from early childhood to school through a child centred curriculum. In Perry

MacDonald

Gervasoni

(Eds), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 199–216). Springer.

29.

Lombardi

(1992). Beyond transition: Ensuring continuity in early childhood services. ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. .EDO-PS-92–3.

30.

MacDonald

(2015). Let’s count: Early childhood educators and families working in partnership to support young children’s transitions in mathematics education. In Perry

MacDonald

Gervasoni

(Eds), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 85–102). Springer.

31.

Margetts

(1997). Factors impacting on children’s adjustment to the first year of life. Early Childhood Folio, 3(2), 53–56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0867.

32.

Melanese

Chung

Forbes

(2011). Supporting English language learners in math class: Grades 6-8. Math solutions.

33.

Merttens

Kirby

(1999). Abacus. Ginn.

34.

Ministry for Education and Employment [Malta] (2012). A national curriculum framework for all. Author.

35.

Ministry of Education [Aotearoa/New Zealand] (1996). Te whāriki: Early childhood curriculum. Learning media.

36.

Murphy

S. J.

Nash

(2000). Monster musical chairs. HarperCollins.

37.

National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) (2002). Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings . https://www.naeyc.org/positionstatements/mathematics

38.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.

39.

Newell

(2019). Mastery mathematics for primary teachers. SAGE.

40.

Nixon

(2017). Overview of early childhood education in Canada . https://www.geteduca.com/blog/early-childhood-education-canada/#:∼:text=Early%20childhood%20education%20in%20Canada%20is%20compulsory%20for%20all%20Canadian,with%20grades%201%20through%2012

41.

Perry

MacDonald

Gervansoni

(2015a). Mathematics and transition to school: Theoretical frameworks and practical implications. In Perry

MacDonald

Gervansoni

(Eds.), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 1–12). Springer.

42.

Perry

MacDonald

Gervansoni

(2015b). Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives. Springer.

43.

Sarama

Clements

D. H.

(2009). Early childhood mathematics education research. Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge.

44.

Schütte

(2018). Subject-specific academic language versus mathematical discourse. In Moschkovich

Wagner

Bose

Rodrigues Mendes

Schütte

(Eds), Language and communication in mathematics education: International perspectives (pp. 25–36). Springer.

45.

Sfard

(2008). Thinking as communication: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematising. Cambridge University Press.

46.

Sharp

(2002). School starting age: European policy and recent research. Paper presented at the LGA seminar ‘when should our children start school?’. NFER/local government education. LGA Conference Centre. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/nfer/publications/44410/44410.pdf 1 November 2002.

47.

Skwarchuk

S.-L.

LeFevre

J.-A.

(2015). In Perry

MacDonald

Gervasoni

(Eds), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 103–118). Springer.

48.

Thiel

Severina

Perry

(2021). Mathematics in early childhood: Research, reflexive practice and innovative pedagogy. Routledge.

49.

Tikkanen

Pyhältö

Pietarinen

Soini

(2020). Lessons learnt from a large-scale curriculum reform: The strategies to enhance development work and reduce reform-related stress. Journal of Educational Change, 21(4), 543–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09363-1

50.

van den Heuvel-Panhuizen

. (2001). Children Learn Mathematics. In A learning-teaching-trajectory with intermediate attainment targets for calculation with whole numbers in primary school. Freudenthal Institute.

51.

Van de Walle

J. A.

Karp

K. S.

Bay-Williams

J. M.

(2020). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (10th ed.). Pearson.

52.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 5(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.2753/rpo1061-040505036

53.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In Cole

V. M.

John-Steiner

ScribnerSouberman

(Eds), Harvard University Press.

54.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1981a). The instrumental method in psychology. In Wertsch

(Ed), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 134–143). M.E. Sharpe.

55.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1981b). The genesis of higher mental functions. In Wertsch

(Ed), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). M.E. Sharpe.

56.

Wager

A. A.

Graue

M. E.

Harrigan

(2015). In Perry

MacDonald

Gervasoni

(Eds), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 15–30). Springer.

57.

Walsh

Sproule

McGuinness

Trew

(2011). Playful structure: A novel image of early years pedagogy for primary school classrooms. Early Years, 31(2), 107–119.https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2011.579070

58.

Wein

C. A.

(2008). Emergent curriculum. In Wein

(Ed), Emergent curriculum in the primary classroom: Interpreting the reggio Emilia approach in schools (pp. 5–16). Teachers College Press/NAEYC.

59.

Weisberg

D. S.

Kittredge

A. K.

Hirsh-Pasek

Golinkoff

R. M.

Klahr

(2015). Making play work for education. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(8), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721715583955

60.

Wertsch

J. V.

(1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.