A Qualitative Illustration of the Operation of Secondary Effect of Social Stratification: Decisions of Community-College Students in Seeking a Transfer in Hong Kong
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2023
A Qualitative Illustration of the Operation of Secondary Effect of Social Stratification: Decisions of Community-College Students in Seeking a Transfer in Hong Kong
This paper offers a qualitative analysis of decisions of 64 community-college students in seeking a transfer in Hong Kong. In weighing a number of educational options and then offers, with a similar level of desirability in some cases, in order to achieve their transfers, advantaged-class and disadvantaged-class respondents struggled with different logics of reasoning and negotiated anxiously with their changing structural realities. This qualitative analysis addresses the contextual, processual and emotional aspects of their decision making and provides a more convincing illustration of how the secondary effect of social stratification operates against a changing landscape of higher education.
ArcherL.HutchingsM. (2000). Bettering yourself? Discourses of risk, cost and benefit in ethnically diverse, young working-class non-participants’ constructions of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(4), 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/713655373.
2.
BaertS.CockxB. (2013). Pure ethnic gaps in educational attainment and school to work transitions: when do they arise?Economics of Education Review, 36, 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.07.006.
3.
BallS. J.DaviesJ.DavidM.ReayD. (2002). Classification” and “judgement”: social class and the “cognitive structure” of choice of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690120102854.
4.
BallS.MaguireM.MacraeS. (2000). Choice, Pathways and Transitions Post-16: New youth, new economies in the global city. RoutlegdeFalmer.
5.
BeckerR.HeckenA.E. (2009). Why Are Working-class children diverted from universities? – an Empirical Assessment of the Diversion Thesis. European Sociological Review, 25(2), 233–250.
6.
BoudonR. (1974). Education, opportunity and social inequality. Wiley.
7.
BreenR.Van de WerfhorstH. G.JaegerM. M. (2014). Deciding under doubt: A theory of risk Aversion, time discounting preferences, and educational decision-making. European Sociological Review, 30(2), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu039.
8.
BrownP.LauderH.AshtonD. (2010). The global auction: The broken promises of education, jobs and rewards. Oxford University Press.
Education Commission Report (2000). Learning for life, learning through life, reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Education Commission Report.
11.
GerberT. P.CheungS. Y. (2008) Horizontal stratification in postsecondary education: forms, explanations, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134604.
12.
GoldthorpeJ.H. (2016). Sociology as a population science. Cambridge University Press.
13.
HillmertS.JacobM. (2003). Social inequality in higher education: is vocational training a pathway leading to or away from university?European Sociological Review, 19(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/19.3.319.
14.
JacksonM.V. (Ed), (2013). Determined to succeed: performance versus choice in educational attainment. Stanford University Press.
15.
JaegerM.M.HolmA. (2012). Conformists or rebels? Relative risk aversion, educational decisions and social class reproduction. Rationality and Society, 24(2), 221–253.
LynchK.O'riordanC. (1998). Inequality in Higher Education: a study of class barriers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(4), 445–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569980190401.
18.
Ming Pao News (2012). The transfer rate of some community colleges are as low as 7-8% Ming Pao (a local newspaper). Ming Pao News (p. 27). 27 March (in Chinese).
19.
Ming Pao Newspaper Editorial (2007) The prospects for transfer of associate degree exaggerated Ming Pao (a local newspaper). Ming Pao Newspaper Editorial. 5 July (in Chinese).
20.
NgJ.ChengK.Y. (2001). Transfer of associate degree students in Hong Kong: What can we learn from the US model?’, mimeo, Hong Kong: A conference on continuing education and lifelong learning.
21.
PostD. (2004). Family resources, gender, and immigration: changing sources of Hong Kong educational inequality, 1971-2001. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1238–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00274.x.
22.
ReayD. (1996). Contextualising choice: social power and parental involvement. British Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192960220505.
23.
ReayD.BallS. J. (1997). Spoilt for choice”: the working classes and educational markets. Oxford Review of Education, 23(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498970230108.
24.
ReayD.DaviesJ.DavidM.BallS. J. (2001). Choices of degree or degrees of choice? Class, “race” and the higher education choice process. Sociology, 35(4), 855–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038501035004004.
25.
Van de WerfhorstH. G. (2009). Credential inflation and educational strategies: a comparison of the United States and The Netherlands. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 27(4), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2009.10.001.
26.
VoigtK. (2007). Individual choice and unequal participation in higher education. Theory and Research in Education, 5(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878507073617.
27.
WilliamsJ. (2006). Extended review) ‘understanding choices and constraints in student applications for university entry. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(2), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690600558376.
