Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study focuses on the challenge of promoting significant mathematical discourse among preservice teachers. The study was conducted as part of an academic course that accompanies their practical training. Twenty-three math preservice teachers’ learning process was examined as a result of using an analytic model designed for discourse protocols’ analysis. Findings revealed that an active and dynamic process occurred, modifying teacher practice and developing critical reflective thinking among preservice teachers. The change occurred in two “ripples of influence”: (1) improving discourse to one promoting learning by demonstrating hypothetical scenarios and (2) perception of the role of teachers and class management.

Keywords

math discourse preservice teachers critical reflective thought

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

(2008). Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy. In Mercer

Hodgkinson

(Eds.), Exploring talk in school (pp. 91–114). SAGE.

Ariav

(2014). Practicum in teacher training: “Recalculating route.” MOFET Institute Journal, 53, 13–19. (In Hebrew)

Bozo-Schwartz

(2011). Asking questions in classroom. Avney Rosha. (In Hebrew)

Chapin

S. H.

O’Connor

M. C.

Anderson

N. C.

(2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, Grades K-6. Math Solutions.

Collins

Joseph

Bielaczyc

(2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.

Harel

Sowder

(2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. In Lester

(Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 805–842). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Hill

H. C.

Blunk

M. L.

Charalambous

C. Y.

Lewis

J. M.

Phelps

G. C.

Sleep

Ball

D. L.

(2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235

Korthagen

F. A. J.

(2010). Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative, view of teacher behavior and teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 98–106.

McClain

Cobb

(2001). An analysis of development of sociomathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 236–266.

10.

Mercer

Sams

(2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528.

11.

Michaels

O’Connor

Resnick

L. B.

(2007). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297.

12.

Perkins

(1998). What is understanding. In Wiske

M. S.

(Ed.), Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice (pp. 39–57). Jossey-Bass.

13.

Ran

(2016). Reflection: Reflective thinking in Education. MOFET Institute. (In Hebrew)

14.

Santagata

Yeh

(2013). Learning to teach mathematics and to analyze teaching effectiveness: Evidence from a video- and practice-based pre-service course. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9263-2

15.

Shulman

L. S.

Shulman

J. H.

(2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257–271.

16.

Smith

Higgins

(2006). Opening classroom interaction: The importance of feedback. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(4), 485–502.

17.

Spitzer

S. M.

Phelps

C. M.

Beyers

J. E.

Johnson

D. Y.

Sieminski

E. M.

(2011). Developing prospective elementary teachers’ abilities to identify evidence of student mathematical achievement. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(1), 67–87.

Exploring a Model to Develop Critical Reflective Thought Among Elementary School Math Preservice Teachers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References