Impacts of Reading for Ethiopia’s Achievement Developed Community Outreach Project Intervention on Students’ Oral Reading Fluency,Reading Comprehension,and Academic Achievements

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of Reading for Ethiopia’s Achievement Developed Community Outreach (READ CO) project intervention on students’ oral reading fluency, reading comprehension, academic achievements, and listening comprehension. It also aimed at identifying the students and teachers’ awareness and practices about the READ CO project interventions. Experimental research—Posttest-only control group—design was employed for the study, which is mainly quantitative, but also uses qualitative techniques (latent content analysis). The results were analyzed using t tests and econometrics analysis mainly. Questionnaires and observations were also developed and employed as other tools among the experimental group principals and language teachers in the school to investigate the overall practice. The results from quantitative data analysis indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the posttest performance of the study group and the control group for reading comprehension, academic achievements, and listening comprehension, yet oral reading fluency is significant. The result from questionnaire and observation also showed that the project has not been found to have a positive impact on students reading performance or improvement. Finally, it was mainly recommended that practical training and real service should be given for the targeted schools on how to improve and implement reading practices via the project.

Keywords

fluency comprehension achievements project intervention simple view reading decoding

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amanda

T-Shaka

Matthew

(2015). The impact of reading intervention programs on student achievement and motivation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Lipscomb University.

Amendum

S. J.

(2014). Embedded professional development and classroom-based early reading intervention: Early diagnostic reading intervention through coaching. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30, 348–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.819181

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.).

Bridgeland

J. M.

Dilulio

J. J.

Morison

K. B.

(2006). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts. Civic Enterprises.

Cohen

Manion

Morrison

(2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.

Cossu

(1999). Biological constraints on literacy acquisition. Reading and Writing, 11(3), 213–237.

Crano

W. D.

Brewer

M. B.

(2008). Principles and methods of social research. New Jersey.

De la

Fuente A.

(2003). Human capital in a global and knowledge-based economy, part II: Assessment at the EU country level (No. 98).

Dornyei

(2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method approaches. Oxford University Press.

10.

Duff

F. J.

Hayiou-Thomas

M. E.

Hulme

(2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of a phonologically based reading intervention for struggling readers with varying language profiles. Reading and Writing, 25, 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9291-6

11.

Facemire

N. E.

(2000). The effect of the accelerated reader on the reading comprehension of third graders [Master’s thesis] (ERIC database ED442097). Salem-Teikyo University.

12.

Gough

P. B.

Tunmer

W. E.

(1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.

13.

Hanushek

E. A.

Woessmann

(2009). Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. Journal of Economic Growth, 17, 267–321. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14633

14.

Harris

T. L.

Hodges

R. E.

(1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. International Reading Association.

15.

Hernandez

D. J.

(2011). Double jeopardy. How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. The Annie E. Casey Foundation.

16.

Hoover

W. A.

Gough

P. B.

(1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 127–160. http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/PlainTextHistories.asp?groupid=3517&HistoryID=a

17.

Jim

Makoto

Jacqueline

(2011). An experimental study of the Project CRISS Reading Program on Grade 9 reading achievement in rural high schools. U.S. Department of Education/Northwest. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518226.pdf

18.

Kang

E. Y

Mikyung

(2019). The contributions of reading fluency and decoding to reading comprehension for struggling readers in fourth grade. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1521758

19.

Levy

B. A.

(2001). Moving the bottom. In Wolf

(Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 357–379). York Press.

20.

Lyon

(1998). Learning to read: A call from research to action. Center for Development and Learning. http://www.cdl.org/resource-library/articles

21.

Martin-Chang

S. L.

Levy

(2005). Fluency transfer: Differential gains in reading speed and accuracy following isolated word and context training. Reading and Writing, 18, 343–376.

22.

McAlenney

A. L.

Coyne

M. D.

(2011). Identifying at-risk students for early reading intervention: Challenges and possible solutions. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 27, 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2011.596100

23.

Morris

R. D.

Stuebing

K. K.

Fletcher

J. M.

Shaywitz

S. E.

Lyon

G. R.

Shankweiler

D. P.

… Shaywitz

B. A.

(1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 347.

24.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel—Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

25.

Nunnery

J. A.

Ross

S. M.

(2007). The effects of the school Renaissance program on student achievement in reading and mathematics. Research in the Schools, 14(1), 40–59. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED500028.pdf

26.

Pace Miles

Lauterbach

M. D.

Murano

D. M.

Dembek

G. A.

(2019). Reading rescue: A follow-up on effectiveness of an intervention for struggling readers. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1514358

27.

Shaywitz

S. E.

Shaywitz

B. A.

(2008). Paying attention to reading: The neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 1329–1349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000631

28.

Singh

Y. K.

(2006). Fundamental of research methodology and statistics. New Age International.

29.

Snowling

M. J.

(2008). Specific disorders and broader phenotypes: The case of dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 142–156.

30.

Stainthorp

Hughes

(2004). What happens to precocious readers’ performance by the age of eleven? Journal of Research in Reading, 27(4), 357–372.

31.

Tadesse

(1999). The effect of a process approach to teaching reading on first year students at Kotebe college of teacher education. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Addis Ababa University: Addis Ababa.

32.

Talbot

(1997). Testing an L2 reading strategy programme. RELC Journal, 28(2), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829702800207

33.

Tilstra

McMaster

Van den Broek

Kendeou

Rapp

(2009). Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(4), 383–401.

34.

Torgesen

J. K.

Hudson

R. F.

(2006). Reading fluency: Critical issues for struggling readers. In Samuels

S. J.

Farstrup

A. E.

(Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 130–158). International Reading Association.

35.

USAID. (2010). Ethiopia Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA) Data Analytic Report: Language and Early Learning. Addis Ababa.

36.

Wagner

D. L.

Espin

C. A.

(2015). The reading fluency and comprehension of fifth- and sixth-grade struggling readers across brief tests of various intervention approaches. Reading Psychology, 36, 545–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2014.927812

37.

Walczyk

J. J.

Griffith-Ross

D. A.

(2007). How important is reading skill fluency for comprehension? The Reading Teacher, 60, 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.60.6.6

38.

Woodward

M. M.

Talbert-Johnson

(2009). Reading intervention models: Challenges of classroom support and separated instruction. The Reading Teacher, 63(3), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.63.3.2

39.

Woolley

(2011). Reading comprehension: Assisting children with learning difficulties. Springer.