The study involved 543 teacher trainees and 33 tutors. The reliability of the questionnaire was determined using Cronbach’s alpha (α). For the teacher trainee questionnaire, α = .738. For the tutor questionnaire, α = .886. The results from the study showed that a little more than half (51.7%) of the respondents said that their tutors call the introvert trainee to answer questions while 48 (8.8%) of the minority of the respondents said that tutors do nothing to teacher trainees who are introvert. It is recommended that tutors should engage trainees in activities that will encourage more discourse.
AhmadF.AzizJ. (2009). Students’ perceptions of the teachers’ teaching of literature communicating and understanding through the eyes of the audience. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 17–39.
2.
AryD.JacobsC. L.RazaviehA. (2002). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth Thompson Learning.
3.
AuduT. A.AchorE. E. (2003). The role of questioning and wait- time interactional processes in science teaching and learning. Journal of Science and Vocational Education, 2(2), 53–56.
4.
BeckJ.CzerniakC. M.LumpeA. T. (2000). An exploratory study of teachers’ beliefs regarding the implementation of constructivism in their classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4), 323–343.
5.
BrownB. A.RevelesJ. M.KellyG. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89(5), 779–802.
6.
BrownC. A.CooneyT. J. (1982). Research on teacher education: A philosophical orientation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15(4), 13–18.
7.
BushG. (2006). Learning about learning: From theories to trends. Teacher Librarian, 34(2), 14–19.
8.
ChinC. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 8–15.
9.
CohenL.ManionL. (1991). Research methods in education (4th ed.). Routledge.
10.
CokerW. (2011). Power struggle in a female group discussion: The case of a Ghanaian university. Journal of Language, Society and Culture, 32, 28–36.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conduction and evaluation quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
12.
CumminsJ. (2007). Pedagogies for the poor? Realigning reading instruction for low-income students with scientifically based reading research. Educational Researcher, 36(9), 564–573.
13.
CurtinE. (2005). Instructional styles used by regular classroom teachers while teaching recently mainstreamed ESL students: Six urban middle school teachers in Texas share their experiences and perceptions. Multicultural Education, 12(4), 36–42.
14.
Den BrokP.LevyJ.BrekelmansM.WubbelsT. (2005). The effect of teacher interpersonal behaviour on students’ subject-specific motivation. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40, 20–33.
15.
DufresneJ. R.GeraceJ. W.LeonardW. J.MestreJ. P.WenkL. (2010). Classroom talk: A classroom communication system for active learning, 7(2), 3–27.
16.
EkenD. K. (2000). Through the eyes of the learner: Learner observations of teaching and learning. ELT Journal, 53(4), 66–80.
17.
EribaJ. O.AchorE. E. (2010). Effects of school type and teacher gender on classroom interaction patterns in integrated science class. Brunei International Journal of Science and Mathematics, 2(1), 48–58.
18.
FangZ. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practice. Educational Research, 38, 47–65.
19.
FlickU. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.
20.
FowlerF. J.JuniorM. (1993). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.
GarmonM. R. (2004). Changing preservice teachers’ attitudes/beliefs about diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 201–213.
23.
GeeJ. P. (2001). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction and what is literacy? In CushmanE.KintgenE. R.KrollB. M.RoseM. (Eds.), Literacy: A critical sourcebook (pp. 525–544). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
24.
GoldhaberD. D.BrewerD. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129–145.
25.
GuskeyT. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15, 5–12.
26.
HancockE. S.GallardA. J. (2004). Preservice science teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: The influence of K-12 field experiences. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 281–291.
27.
HaneyJ. J.LumpeA. T.CzerniakC. M. (2003). Constructivist beliefs about the science classroom learning environment: Perspectives from teachers, administrators, parents, community members, and students. School Science and Mathematics, 103(8), 366–377.
28.
HashwehM. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47–63.
29.
HoganK.NastasiB. K.PressleyM. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432.
30.
KaluI. (2008). Classroom interaction patterns and students` learning outcomes in physics. Medwel Journals, 3(1), 57–60.
KangN.WallaceC. S. (2004). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89, 140–165.
33.
KumarM. (2006). Constructivists epistemology in action. Journal of Educational Thought, 40(3), 246–262.
34.
LannieA. L.McCurdyB. (2007). Preventing disruptive behavior in the urban classroom: Effects of the good behavior game on student and teacher behavior. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 85–98.
35.
LepperM. R.CorpusJ. H.IyengarS. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184–196.
36.
MelladoV. (1998). The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Education, 82(2), 197–214.
37.
MorseJ. (2010). Procedures and practice of mixed method design: Maintaining control, rigor, and complexity. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 776–802). SAGE.
38.
MortimerE.ScottP. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Open University Press.
39.
NesporJ. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.
40.
NwagboC.OkoroA. (2014). Effect of interaction patterns on secondary school students’ interest in biology. Journal of Scientific Issues, Research and Essays, 2(10), 442–445.
41.
OdundoP. A.GungaS. O. (2013). Effects of application of instructional methods on learner achievement in business studies in secondary schools in Kenya. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(5), 2201–6333. http://www.ijern.com
42.
OforiR.DampsonD. G. (2011). Research methods and statistics using SPSS. Payless Publication Limited.
43.
PajaresM. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and education research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
44.
PartinT. C. M.RobertsonR. E.MagginD. M.OliverR. M.WehbuJ. H. (2010). Using teacher praise and opportunities to respond to promote appropriate student behavior. Preventing School Failure, 54(3), 172–178.
45.
PiantaR. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships: Between children and teachers. American Psychological Association.
46.
PolitD. E.HunglerB. F. (1995). Nursing research: Principles and methods (5th ed.). J. B. Lippincott.
47.
RoehrigG. H.KruseR. A. (2005). The role of teachers’ beliefs and knowledge in the adoption of a reform-based curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 105(8), 412–422.
48.
Savasci-AcikalinF. (2009). Teacher beliefs and practice in science education. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1–14.
49.
SimmonsP. E.EmoryA.CarterT.CokerT.FinneganB.CrockettD.RichardsonL.YagerR.CravenJ.TillotsonJ.BrunkhorstH.TwiestM.HossainK.GallagerJ.Duggan-HaasD.ParkerJ.CajasF.AlshannagQ.McGlameryS.. . . LabudaK. (1999). Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 930–954.
50.
SitsebeV. F. (2012). Student discourse in a natural science classroom: A case study of high school teaching in Swaziland [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
51.
SmartJ. B.MarshallJ. C. (2012). Interactions between classroom discourse, teacher questioning, and student cognitive engagement in middle school science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(2), 249–267.
52.
TsaiC. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning, and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 771–783.
53.
UdeaniU. N. (1992). Learning outcomes in integrated science as related to teacher and student characteristics and classroom interaction pattern [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
54.
UsendiaA.UdoM.EffiongG. T. (2015). Verbal interaction patterns and junior secondary students’ achievement in basic science and technology in Uyo Akwa Ibom Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Social and Science Education Research, 3(4), 16–21.
55.
Van den OordE. J.RossemV. (2002). Differences in first graders’ school adjustment: The role of classroom characteristics and social structure of the group. Journal of School Psychology, 40(5), 371–394.
56.
YerrickR.ParkeH.NugentJ. (1997). Struggling to promote deeply rooted change: The “filtering effect” of teachers’ beliefs on understanding transformational views of teaching science. Science Education, 81, 137–159.
