Science Youth Action Research (Sci-YAR) is presented here as a curricular framework and instructional approach intended to enhance youth’s participation as democratic citizens. First, we frame the theoretical foundations for science curricula that promote democratic citizenship and explore models of scientific inquiry and action research that inform Sci-YAR’s design. Then, we describe Sci-YAR’s key features, explaining how Sci-YAR is designed to help youth construct views of themselves as agents who use science to bring about personal and social transformation. Finally, implications for using curricular frameworks like Sci-YAR in schools to leverage youth’s science learning for enhanced democratic participation are discussed.
BasuS. J.Calabrese BartonA.ClairmontN.LockeD. (2009). Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(2), 345–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9135-8
BenczeJ. L. (2000). Democratic constructivist science education: Enabling egalitarian literacy and self-actualization. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(6), 847–865.
6.
BirminghamD.Calabrese BartonA. (2014). Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21127
7.
BrownB. A. (2006). “It isn’t no slang that can be said about this stuff”: Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 96–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20096
BurtonD.SmithM.WoodsK. (2010). Working with teachers to promote children’s participation through pupil-led research. Educational Psychology in Practice, 26(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667361003768419
10.
Calabrese BartonA.BasuS. J.JohnsonV.TanE. (2011). Introduction. In BasuS. J.Calabrese BartonA.TanE. (Eds.), Democratic science teaching: Building the expertise to empower low-income minority youth in science (pp. 1–20). Sense Publishers.
11.
Calabrese BartonA.TanE. (2010). We be burnin’!: Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 187–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044
12.
CammarotaJ.FineM. (2008). Youth participatory action research: A pedagogy for transformational resistance. In CammarotaJ.FineM. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 1–11). Routledge.
13.
CarloneH. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20006
14.
ColemanE. R. (2014). Science youth action research: Promoting critical science literacy through relevance and agency (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3623600)
15.
DeweyJ. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31(787), 121–127.
16.
Duncan-AndradeJ. M. R.MorrellE. (2008). Youth participatory action research as critical pedagogy. In Duncan-AndradeJ. M. R.MorrellE. (Eds.), The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools (pp. 105–131). Peter Lang.
17.
Economic and Social Research Council. (2002, November). Communicating . . . consulting pupils project newsletter, No. 7. http://www.consultingpupils.co.uk/
18.
ElmeskyR.TobinK. (2005). Expanding our understandings of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20079
19.
EmdinC. (2010). Affiliation and alienation: Hip-hop, rap, and urban science education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903161118
20.
FieldingM.BraggS. (2003). Students as researchers: Making a difference. Pearson.
21.
HartR. (1997). Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. Earthscan Publications.
22.
HermannR. S.MirandaR. J. (2010). A template for open inquiry: Using questions to encourage and support inquiry in earth and space science. Science Teacher, 77(8), 26–30.
23.
HerrK.AndersonG. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. SAGE.
24.
HollandD.LachicotteW.SkinnerD.CainC. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.
25.
JeagerP.ZsolnaiJ. (2005). Research training program in primary schools of Hungary. In CsermelyP.KorcsmárosT.LedermanL.M. (Eds.), Science education: Best practices of research training for students under 21 (pp. 175–185). IOS Press.
KellettM. (2005a). Children as active researchers: A new research paradigm for the 21st century? [Unpublished manuscript] (ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM Methods Review Papers, NCRM/003). http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/87/
28.
KellettM. (2005b). How to develop children as researchers: A step-by-step guide to teaching the research process. SAGE.
29.
KellettM.ForrestR.DentN.WardS. (2004). “Just teach us the skills please, we’ll do the rest”: Empowering ten-year-olds as active researchers. Children and Society, 18(5), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/CHI.807
30.
KillionJ. P.TodnemG. R. (1991). A process for personal theory building. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 14–16.
KirshnerB.PozzoboniK.JonesH. (2011). Learning how to manage bias: A case study of youth participatory action research. Applied Developmental Science, 15(3), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2011.587720
LangM.DrakeS.OlsenJ. (2006). Discourse and the new didactics of scientific literacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500122539
35.
LeiderM. M. (2015). Science teaching and learning as transformation: Making meaning with my students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3709639)
36.
LemkeJ. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Ablex.
37.
MaglajlicR. A.TiffanyJ. (2006). Participatory action research with youth in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1–2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_10
38.
McNiffJ.WhiteheadJ. (2010). You and your action research project (3rd ed.). Routledge.
39.
MorrellE. (2006). Youth-initiated research as a tool for advocacy and change in urban schools. In GinwrightS.NogueraP.CammarotaJ. (Eds.), Beyond resistance!: Youth activism and community change (pp. 111–128). Routledge.
40.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academy Press.
41.
NygreenK.KwonS. A.SanchezP. (2006). Urban youth building community. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1–2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_07
42.
O’DonoghueJ. (2006). “Taking their own power”: Urban youth, community based organizations, and public efficacy. In GinwrightS.NogueraP.CammarotaJ. (Eds.), Beyond resistance!: Youth activism and community change (pp. 229–245). Routledge.
43.
OlitskyS. (2007). Science learning, status, and identity formation in an urban middle school. In RothW.-M.TobinK. (Eds.), Science, learning, identity: Sociocultural and cultural-historical perspectives (pp. 41–62). Sense Publishers.
44.
PiagetJ. (1959). The language and thought of the child (3rd ed., GabainM., Trans.). Routledge; Kegan Paul.
45.
PriceJ. F.McNeillK. L. (2013). Toward a lived science curriculum in intersecting figured worlds: An exploration of individual meanings in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(5), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21084
46.
ReeveS.BellP. (2009). Children’s self-documentation and understanding of the concepts “healthy” and “unhealthy.”International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1953–1974. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802311146
47.
RothW.-M. (2007). Toward a dialectical notion and praxis of scientific literacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270601032025
48.
RothW.-M. (Ed.). (2009). Science education from people for people: Taking a stand(point). Routledge.
RubinB.JonesM. (2007). Student action research: Reaping the benefits for students and school leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 91(4), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636507310316
51.
ScantleburyK. C. (2007). Outsiders within: Urban African American girls’ identity & science. In RothW.-M.TobinK. (Eds.), Science, learning, identity: Sociocultural and cultural-historical perspectives (pp. 121–134). Sense Publishers.
52.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
53.
SchwabJ. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. Harvard University Press.
ShanahanM. C.NieswandtM. (2011). Science student role: Evidence of social structural norms specific to school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 367–395.
56.
SmithL.DavisK.BhowmikM. (2010). Youth participatory action research groups as school counseling interventions. Professional School Counseling, 14(2), 174–182.
57.
SteinbergS. R.KincheloeJ. L. (Eds.). (1998). Students as researchers: Creating classrooms that matter. Falmer Press; Taylor & Francis.
58.
TaylorA. R.JonesM. G.BroadwellB.OppewalT. (2008). Creativity, inquiry or accountability?: Scientists’ and teachers’ perceptions of science education. Science Education, 92(6), 1058–1075.
59.
TorreM.FineM. (2006). Researching and resisting: Democratic policy research by and for youth. In GinwrightS.NogueraP.CammarotaJ. (Eds.), Beyond resistance!: Youth activism and community change (pp. 269–285). Routledge.
60.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE., Eds.). Harvard University Press.
61.
WrightD. (2007). ¡Escuelas, si! ¡Pintas, no! (Schools, yes! Prisons, no!): Connecting youth action research and youth organizing in California. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(2), 503–516.
