This article explores the utility of networked improvement communities (NICs) as an organizing structure for scaling character education across educational leadership programs through a case study of one network committed to integrating character education across varied institutions and contexts. In examining the improvement science process that guided NIC members’ development and implementation of character education approaches and their perceptions of and participation in NIC activities, this case study offers insights on the promise of structured collaboration across diverse institutions. Furthermore, it identifies the need for NICs to differentiate improvement science activities based on participants’ institutional readiness for character education.
BerkowitzM. W.BierM. C. (2004). Research-based character education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 72–85.
2.
BertramR. M.BlaseK. A.FixsenD. L. (2015). Improving programs and outcomes: Implementation frameworks and organization change. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(4), 477–487.
3.
BrykA. S. (2020). Improvement in action: Advancing quality in America’s schools. Harvard Education Press.
4.
BrykA. S.GomezL. M.GrunowA. (2011). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Frontiers in sociology of education (pp. 127–162). Springer.
5.
BrykA. S.GomezL. M.GrunowA.LeMahieuP. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.
6.
BuysseV.SparkmanK. L.WesleyP. W. (2003). Communities of practice: Connecting what we know with what we do. Exceptional Children, 69(3), 263–277.
7.
CoburnC. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.
8.
ElmoreR. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–27.
9.
FullanM. (2016). The elusive nature of whole system improvement in education. Journal of Educational Change, 17(4), 539–544.
10.
KrutkaD. G.CarpenterJ. P. (2017). Enriching professional learning networks: A framework for identification, reflection, and intention. Techtrends, 61(3), 246–252.
11.
LangleyG. J.MoenR. D.NolanK. M.NolanT. W.NormanC. L.ProvostL. P. (2009). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. John Wiley.
12.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
MorelR. P.CoburnC.CattersonA. K.HiggsJ. (2019). The multiple meanings of scale: Implications for researchers and practitioners. Educational Researcher, 48(6), 369–377.
15.
PattonK.ParkerM. (2017). Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 351–360.
16.
ReedJ. E.CardA. J. (2016). The problem with plan-do-study-act cycles. BMJ Quality and Safety, 25, 147–152.
17.
RussellJ. L.BrykA. S.DolleJ.GomezL. M.LeMahieuP.GrunowA. (2017). A framework for the initiation of networked improvement communities. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–36.
18.
ScacciaJ. P.CookB. S.LamontA.WandersmanA.CastellowJ.KatzJ.BeidasR. (2015). A practical implementation science heuristic for organizational readiness: R=MC2. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(4), 484–501.
19.
StollL.BolamR.McMahonA.WallaceM.ThomasS. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.
20.
Tichnor-WagnerA.ColemanH.BohlinH.KrisD. F. (2021). Promising practices for character education and educational leadership: A report of the Kern Partners for Character and Educational Leadership. Kern Family Foundation. https://bbk12e1-cdn.myschoolcdn.com/ftpimages/465/misc/misc_239331.pdf
21.
Tichnor-WagnerJ.CannataM.Cohen-VogelL. (2017). Continuous improvement in the public school context: Understanding how educators respond to plan–do–study–act cycles. Journal of Educational Change, 18(4), 465–494.
22.
Tichnor-WagnerA. (2019). District agency in implementing instructional reform: A comparative case study of global education. Journal of Educational Change, 20(4), 495–525.
23.
VanderWeeleT. (2021). The importance, opportunities, and challenges of empirically assessing character for the promotion of flourishing. Journal of Education.
