In 2016, researchers from two educator preparation programs (EPPs) in two differing states (southeast and west) chose to examine the intervention of co-teaching during student teaching that had been in place for 3 years in each of their locals. The researchers wanted to (a) identify and articulate the co-teaching model within the context of each location, (b) begin to learn why this approach may be beneficial as a culminating pre-service experience, and (c) explore next steps in how to better operationalize the co-teaching experience within the pre-service programming, regardless of context. Co-teaching during student teaching was examined at one elementary program (southeast) and one secondary program (west). Results indicate co-teaching during student teaching to be a viable option for pre-service training and mentor development for both the elementary and middle school experiences. Teacher candidates (TCs) identified co-teaching strategies based upon the needs of teachers, students, and content taught. This was seen as a unique finding not reported in existing literature. Other findings indicate the model promoted increased confidence and comfort in TCs’ teaching, supported increased differentiation and instructional time, facilitated currency in MTs’ knowledge of and experience with technology, and helped TCs learn to manage human resources with increased intentionality. Recommendations for future research and suggestions for faculty of EPPs interested in implementing co-teaching during student teaching are provided.
BacharachN.Washut-HeckT. (2012). Voices from the field: Multiple perspectives on a co-teaching in student teaching model. The Renaissance Group, 1(1), 49–61.
3.
BacharachN.Washut-HeckT.DahlbergK. (2010). Changing the face of student teaching through co-teaching. Action in Teacher Education, 32(1), 3–14.
4.
BakerJ.GrantS.MorlockL. (2008). The teacher–student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 3–15.
5.
BawensJ.HourcadeJ. (1995). Cooperative teaching: Rebuilding the schoolhouse for all students. PrEdo.
6.
Behrstock-SherrattE.BassettK.OlsonD.JacquesC. (2014). From good to great: Exemplary teachers share perspectives on increasing teacher effectiveness across the career continuum. Center on Great Teachers and Leaders at American Institutes for Research. http://www.gtlcenter.org/sites/default/files/Good_to_Great_Report.pdf
7.
BenuzziS. (2015). Preparing future elementary teachers with a STEM-rich, clinical, co-teaching model of student teaching (Publication No. 3708290) [Doctoral dissertation, California State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
8.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
9.
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993–1028). Wiley.
10.
CavanaghM.McMasterH. (2015). A professional experience learning community for secondary mathematics: Developing pre-service teachers’ reflective practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27, 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0145-z
11.
CaytonC. (2016, October). Co-planning strategies to support co-teaching [Conference session]. National Conference on Co-Teaching, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
12.
ColdronJ.SmithR. (1999). Active location in teachers’ construction of their professional identities. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(6), 711–726.
CoogleC.RahnN.OttleyJ. (2015). Pre-service teacher use of communication strategies upon receiving immediate feedback. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32, 105–115.
15.
CookL.FriendM. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1–17.
16.
CreswellJ. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson.
17.
DiekerL. A. (2001). What are the characteristics of “effective” middle and high school co-taught teams for students with disabilities?Preventing School Failure, 46, 14–24.
18.
DonivtoC.VillaluzL.MurrayC. (2015, October). Co-teaching and collaboration in student teaching: Promoting equity and democratic practice in the classroom [Conference session]. National Network for Educational Renewal Annual Conference, Chico, CA, United States.
19.
ElfordM. (2013). Virtual reality check: Teachers use Bug-in-Ear coaching to practice feedback techniques with student avatars. Journal of Staff Development, 34(1), 40–43.
20.
EllisJ.BogleD. (2008, November). Placement: An unforeseen casualty of No Child Left Behind [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the Southeastern Regional Association of Teacher Educators, Myrtle Beach, SC, United States.
21.
EvertsonC. M.EmmerE. T.ClementsB. S.StandfordJ. P.WorshmanM. E.WilliamsE. L. (n.d.). Organizing and managing the elementary classroom. University of Texas, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.
22.
Gallo-FoxJ.ScantleburyK. (2015). It isn’t necessarily sunshine and daisies every time”: Coplanning opportunities and challenges when student teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2015.1060294
GerberP. I.PoppP. A. (1999). Consumer perspectives on the collaborative teaching model views of students with and without LD and their parents. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 288–297.
25.
Gilar-CorbíR.Pozo-RicoT.SánchezB.CastejónJ. L. (2018). Can emotional competence be taught in higher education? A randomized experimental study of an emotional intelligence training program using a multimethodological approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1039.
26.
GoldringR.TaieS.RiddlesM. (2014). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2012-2013 teacher follow-up survey (NCES 2014-077). U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014077.pdf
27.
GrissmerD.KirbyS. (1987). Teacher attrition: The uphill climb to staff the nation’s schools. RAND.
28.
GrissmerD.KirbyS. (1992). Patterns of attrition among Indiana teachers, 1965-1987. RAND.
29.
GrissmerD.KirbyS. (1997). Teacher turnover and teacher quality. Teachers College Record, 99, 45–56.
30.
GuytonE.McIntyreD. (1990). Student teaching and school experiences. In HoustonW. R.HabermanM.SikulaJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 437–449). Macmillan.
31.
HafnerA.OwingsJ. (1991). Careers in teaching: Following members of the high school class of 1972 in and out of teaching. National Center for Education Statistics.
32.
HangQ.RabrenK. (2009). An examination of co-teaching: Perspectives and efficacy indicators. Remedial and Special Education, 30(5), 259–268.
33.
HarrisD.SassT. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 798–812.
34.
HruschkaD.SchwartzD.St JohnD.Pecone-DecaroE.JenkinsR.CareyJ. (2004). Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods, 16(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X04266540
IngersollR.MayH. (2011). Recruitment, retention and the minority teacher shortage. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
37.
IngersollR.PerdaD. (2010). Is the supply of mathematics and science teachers sufficient?American Educational Research Journal, 47, 563–595.
38.
IngersollR.StrongM. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233.
39.
JohnsonS.FinlonK.KobakR.IzardC. (2017). Promoting student-teacher interactions: Exploring a peer coaching model for teachers in a preschool setting. Early Childhood Education, 45, 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0790-1
LucknerJ.VelaskiA.WurstD. (2000). To plan, coordinate, and deliver instruction. Odyssey, Winter, 26–29.
42.
McCormickL.NoonanM. J.OgataV.HeckR. (2001). Co-teacher relationship and program quality: Implications for preparing teachers for inclusive preschool settings. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 119–132.
43.
McCormickM.O’ConnorE. E.CappellaE.McClowryS. (2013). Teacher-child relationships and academic achievement: A multi-level propensity score model approach. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 611–624.
44.
MurawskiW.SwansonH. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research: Where is the data?Remedial and Special Education, 22, 258–267.
45.
MurnaneR.SingerJ.WillettJ.KempleJ.OlsonR. (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Harvard University Press.
46.
MurphyC.ScantleburyK.MilineC. (2015). Using Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development to propose and test an explanatory model for conceptualizing coteaching in pre-service science teacher education. Asian-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 281–295.
47.
NaiditchF.VillaluzL.SlusarczykA. (2015, October). The co-teaching experience: Becoming a new teacher in changing and challenging times [Conference session]. National Network for Educational Renewal Annual Conference, Chico, CA, United States.
48.
NoonanM.McCormickL.HeckR. (2003). The co-teacher relationship scale: Applications for professional development. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(1), 113–120. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23880190
49.
OttleyJ.HandlineM. (2014). Bug in the ear coaching: Impacts on early childhood educators’ practices and associations with toddlers’ expressive communication. Journal of Early Intervention, 36(2), 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815114563614
PikeE. (2020). The stories of how two different student teaching models impacted teacher identity: Six narratives of beginning teachers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University].
52.
PlattJ.Walker-KnightD.LeeT.HewittR. (2001, February). Shaping future teacher education practices through collaboration and co-teaching [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the American Association of College for Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA, United States.
53.
Pozo-RicoT.SandovalI. (2020). Can academic achievement in primary school students be improved through teacher training on Emotional Intelligence as a Key Academic Competency?Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02976
54.
RiceD.ZigmondN. (2000). Co-teaching in secondary schools: Teachers reports and American classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 190–198.
55.
RothW.TobinK. (2004). Coteaching: From praxis to theory. Teachers & Teaching, 10(2), 161–180.
56.
SebaldA.BalgopolM.HoweJ. (2021, accepted). The Impact of Co-Teaching on the Professional Practices of Veteran, Novice, and Prospective STEM teachers, School Science and Mathematics.
57.
ScheelerM. (2010). Providing immediate feedback to co-teachers through Bug-in-Ear technology: An effective method of peer coaching in inclusion classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409357013
58.
SutcherL.Darling-HammondL.Carver-ThomasD. (2016). A Coming Crisis in Teaching?Teacher Supply, Demand, and Shortages in the U.S. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
59.
VaughnS.SchummJ.ArguellesM. (1997). The ABCDEs of co-teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(2), 4–10.
60.
Washut-HeckT.BacharachN.DahlbergN. (2008). Co-teaching: Enhancing the student teaching experience [Conference session]. Eighth Annual IBER & TLC Conference Proceedings, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
61.
WeilbacherG.TilfordK. (2015). Co-teaching in a year-long professional development school. School-University Partnerships, 8, 37–48. ERIC Number: EJ106472.
62.
WiswallM. (2013). The dynamics of teacher quality. Journal of Public Economics, 100, 61–78.
63.
WuE. H. (2013). The path leading to differentiation: An interview with Carol Tomlinson. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(2), 125–133.
64.
YoungK. K.TalanquerV. (2013). Effect of different types of small-group activities on students’ conversations. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(9), 1123–1129. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400049a
