Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Educational contexts are often seen as constraints in school settings. We propose a framework to analyze how teachers draw on their contexts to find resources to support their learning. Following five preservice elementary teachers into their first years of teaching, we draw on interviews, surveys, artifacts, and videorecords. We apply this framework to identify the resources available in elementary science teaching. Our findings show how some resources can cascade from higher levels (e.g., state standards and mistrust of science) and impact classroom opportunities. Our analysis highlights the importance of teacher education and school leadership in illuminating contextual resources available to teachers.

Keywords

instructional contexts elementary science teacher preparation novice elementary teachers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appleton

(2002). Science activities that work: Perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 32(3), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020878121184

Arias

A. M.

Davis

E. A.

Marino

J. -C.

Kademian

S. M.

Palincsar

A. S.

(2016). Teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials to engage students in science practices. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1504-1526.

Banilower

E. R.

Smith

P. S.

Malzahn

K. A.

Plumley

C. L.

Gordon

E. M.

Hayes

M. L.

(2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research, Inc.

Barton

A. C.

(1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199804)35:4<379::aid-tea8>3.0.co;2-n

Baumert

Kunter

Blum

Brunner

Voss

Jordan

Klusmann

Krauss

Neubrand

Tsai

Y.-M.

(2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157

Bismack

(2019). In Davis

(E. A.

(Ed.), Content knowledge for teaching science: A longitudinal study of novice elementary teachers’ knowledge development in a practice-based teacher education program and school contexts. [Ph.D.]. University of Michigan.

Bismack

Arias

A. M.

Davis

E. A.

Palincsar

A. S.

(2014). Connecting curriculum materials and teachers: Elementary science teachers’ enactment of a reform-based curricular unit. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(4), 489-512.

Bronfenbrenner

(1994). Ecological models of human development. In International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., 3, pp. 37–43). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1994.tb00025.x

Carlsen

(1992). Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 72(2), 163–170.

10.

Charalambous

C. Y.,

Hill

H. C.

(2012). Teacher knowledge, curriculum materials, and quality of instruction: Unpacking a complex relationship. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(4), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.650215

11.

Charmaz

(2004). Grounded theory. In Hesse-Beiber

S. N.

Leavy

P.,

(Eds), Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice (pp. 496–518). Oxford University Press.

12.

Cohen

D. K.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Ball

D. L.

(2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119

13.

Cohen

D. K.

Spillane

J. P.

Peurach

D. J.

(2018). The dilemmas of educational reform. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x17743488

14.

Cowie

Jones

Otrel-Cass

(2011). Re-engaging students in science: Issues of assessment, funds of knowledge, and sites for learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9229-0

15.

Davis

E. A.

Palincsar

A. S.

Kademian

S. M.

(2020). Designing a practice-based elementary teacher education program and supporting professional learning in science teaching. In Davis

E. A.

Zembal-Saul

Kademian

S. M.

(Eds.), Sensemaking in elementary science: Supporting teacher learning. Routledge.

16.

Davis

E. A.

Palincsar

A. S.

Smith

P. S.

Arias

A. M.

Kademian

S. M.

(2017). Educative curriculum materials: Uptake, impact, and implications for research and design. Education Researcher, 46(6), 293-304.

17.

Davis

E. A.

Petish

Smithey

(2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607-651.

18.

Dotterer

A. M.,

Lowe

(2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(12), 1649–1660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5

19.

Du Plessis

A. E.

Hobbs

Luft

J. A.

Vale

(2019). The out-of-field teacher in context: The impact of the school context and environment. In Hobbs

Törner

(Eds), Examining the phenomenon of “teaching out-of-field”: International perspectives on teaching as a non-specialist (pp. 217–242). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_9

20.

Genzuk

(1999). Tapping into community funds of knowledge. In Effective strategies for English language acquisition: Curriculum guide for the professional development of teachers grades kindergarten through eighth (pp. 9–21). ARCO Foundation.

21.

Gholson

M.,

Martin

D. B.

(2014). Smart girls, Black girls, mean girls, and bullies: At the intersection of identities and the mediating role of young girls’ social network in mathematical communities of practice. Journal of Education, 194(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741419400105

22.

Hopkins

M.,

Woulfin

S. L.

(2015). School system (re)design: Developing educational infrastructures to support school leadership and teaching practice. Journal of Educational Change, 16(4), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9260-6

23.

Iyengar

S.,

Massey

(2019). Scientific communication in a post-truth society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(16), 7656–7661. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805868115

24.

Johnson

S. M.

Kraft

M. A.

Papay

J. P.

(2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211401004

25.

Kennedy

M. M.

(2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x10390804

26.

Khasnabis

D.,

Reischl

C. H.

(2018). Six blocks down, take a left at the corner: Learning to teach English learners outside the school walls. TESOL Journal, 9(4), Article e00385. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.385

27.

Krajcik

Codere

Dahsah

Bayer

Mun

(2014). Planning instruction to meet the intent of the next generation science standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9383-2

28.

Manz

(2015). Resistance and the development of scientific practice: Designing the mangle into science instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 33(2), 89–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.1000490

29.

Marco-Bujosa

Levy

A. J.

McNeill

(2020). A case study exploring the identity of an in-service elementary science teacher: A language teacher first. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9681-8

30.

Marx

R. W.,

Harris

C. J.

(2006). No Child Left behind and science education: Opportunities, challenges, and risks. The Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1086/505441

31.

McLaughlin

D. S.,

Calabrese Barton

(2013). Preservice teachers’ uptake and understanding of funds of knowledge in elementary science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9284-1

32.

McLaughlin

M. W.,

Talbert

J. E.

(1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation’s educational goals. Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED357023.pdf

33.

McNeill

K. L.

(2009). Teachers’ use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93(2), 233–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20294

34.

McNeill

K. L.

Lowenhaupt

R. J.

Katsh‐Singer

(2018). Instructional leadership in the era of the NGSS: Principals’ understandings of science practices. Science Education, 102(3), 452–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21336

35.

McNeill

K. L.

Marco-Bujosa

L. M.

González-Howard

Loper

(2018). Teachers’ enactments of curriculum: Fidelity to procedure versus fidelity to goal for scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1455–1475. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1482508

36.

National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (2021). Science and engineering in preschool through elementary grades: The brilliance of children and the strengths of educatorsCommittee on enhancing science and engineering in PreK through 5th grade board on science education and teacher advisory council division of behavioral and social science and education. The National Academies Press.

37.

NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.

38.

Opdenakker

M. C.,

Damme

J. V.

(2007). Do school context, student composition and school leadership affect school practice and outcomes in secondary education? British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701208233

39.

Ostovar-Nameghi

S. A.,

Sheikhahmadi

(2016). From teacher isolation to teacher collaboration: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p197

40.

Remillard

J. T.

(2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211

41.

Rivera Maulucci

M. S.

(2013). Emotions and positional identity in becoming a social justice science teacher: Nicole’s story. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(4), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21081

42.

Ronfeldt

(2012). Where should student teachers learn to teach?: Effects of field placement school characteristics on teacher retention and effectiveness. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711420865

43.

Roseman

J. E.,

Koppal

(2008). Using national standards to improve K–8 science curriculum materials. The Elementary School Journal, 109(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1086/590521

44.

Roth

K. J.

(2014). Elementary science teaching. In Lederman

Abell

(Eds), Handbook of research on science teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 361–394). Routledge.

45.

Saunders

W. M.

Goldenberg

C. N.

Gallimore

(2009). Increasing achievement by focusing grade-level teams on improving classroom learning: A prospective, quasi-experimental study of title I schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1006–1033. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209333185

46.

Sinha

(2021). Knowledge about family and school contribution in academic achievement: The context of schooling and social representations in India. Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211025977. OnlineFirst.

47.

Smith

T. M.,

Ingersoll

R. M.

(2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041003681

48.

Spillane

J. P.

Diamond

J. B.

Walker

L. J.

Halverson

Jita

(2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 918–940. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1039

49.

Stake

R. E.

(2005). Qualitative case studies. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (Vol. 3, pp. 443–466). Sage Publications Ltd.

50.

Wolsey

T. D.,

Lapp

(2014). School gardens: Situating students within a global context. Journal of Education, 194(3), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741419400306

51.

Zangori

Forbes

C. T.

Biggers

(2013). Fostering student sense making in elementary science learning environments: Elementary teachers’ use of science curriculum materials to promote explanation construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 989–1017. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21104

The Resources of Instructional Contexts: Examples From New Elementary Science Teachers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References