This article explores Swedish students’ perspectives on being new to teacher education and what challenges they meet. Nineteen students were interviewed in three focus groups. The analytical framework draws on the theory of situated learning and the concept of enculturation, and the empirical data have been categorized through a thematic content analysis, which revealed two qualitatively different categories of challenges: as academic student, and as trainee teacher. Conclusively, the study shows how the education can support or obstruct the enculturation into the educational practices. Conceiving such hinders can facilitate the students’ understanding of both the studies and their future profession.
AspánM.JanssonA.StåhleY. (2014). . Studenterfarenheter av lärarutbildningens första termin – utbildningsvetenskaplig kärna [Teacher Students’ experiences of the term – the core of educational sciences]. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholms universitet.
2.
BeachD.PuacaG. (2014). Changing higher education by converging policy-packages: Education choices and student identities. European Journal of Higher Education, 4, 67-79.
3.
BoyleP.BoiceB. (1998). Best practices for enculturation: Collegiality, mentoring, and structure. New Directions for Higher Education. Issue, 101, 87-94.
4.
BriggsJ. (2004). Teaching for quality learning at universities. What the student does. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press. (Original work published 1999)
5.
BrownleeJ.WalkerS.LennoxS.ExleyB.PearceS. (2009). The first year university experience: Using personal epistemology to understand effective learning and teaching in higher education. High Education, 58, 599-618.
6.
BurnardP.GillP.StewartK.TreasureE.ChadwickB. (2013). Analysing and presenting qualitative data. British Dental Journal, 204, 429-432.
7.
BusseV. (2013). Why do first-year students of German lose motivation during their first year at university?Studies in Higher Education, 38, 951-971.
8.
CairesS.AlmeidaL.VieiraD. (2012). Becoming a teacher: Student teachers’ experiences and perceptions about teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 163-178.
9.
CarlhedC. (2015). Vid den normala studietaktens utkanter. Analyser av studieavbrott på lärarutbildningar vid Uppsala universitet [At the outskirts of the normal study rate. Analyses of defections in teacher education at Uppsala University] (Sociology of Education and Culture Research Reports, No. 54). Uppsala: Uppsalauniversitet. Retrieved from http://www.skeptron.uu.se/broady/sec/
10.
CaseJ. M. (2008). Alienation and engagement: Development of an alternative theoretical framework for understanding student learning. I Higher Education, 55, 321-332.
11.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 166-173.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Improving schools in Sweden: An OECD perspective. Paris, France: Author.
17.
SmithsonJ. (2000). Using and analyzing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 103-119.
18.
Ståhle. (2006) Pedagogiken i tiden: om framväxten av nya undervisningsformer under tidigt 2000-tal - exemplet Kunskapsskolan [Pedagogy of today. On the development of new teaching methods during the early 2000’s. A case study of Kunskapsskolan]. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholms universitet.
TintoV.PusserB. (2006). Moving from theory to action: Building a model of institutional action for student success. Arlington, VA: The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center.
23.
WegnerE.NücklesM. (2013). Knowledge acquisition or participation in communities of practice? Academics’ metaphors of teaching and learning at the university. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 624-643.
24.
ZeichnerK. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89-99.
