We use a unique platform called the Open Dynamic Interaction Network (ODIN) app, to collect fine grained, daily data from participants. Our results graphically depict the feasibility of using the ODIN app with people who use drugs (PWUD) in the Great Plains. During fall 2022-spring 2023, 100 participants (53% female), using an Android smartphone with the ODIN app installed, were asked up to 22 questions per day on substance use, stress, and social support over 30 days. The mean overall daily response rates to the ecological momentary assessment questions using the ODIN app was 82%. Overall, 82% of participants reported that the ODIN app was “somewhat” or “very easy” to use. Our graphical depictions highlight, for example, that response rates do not typically drop off until the third block of questions. These findings have methodological significance for those who work with PWUD and other hard to reach populations.
Anderson GoodellE. M.NordeckC.FinanP. H.VandreyR.DunnK. E.ThrulJ. (2021). Feasibility and acceptability of using smartphone-based EMA to assess patterns of prescription opioid and medical cannabis use among individuals with chronic pain. Internet Interventions, 26, 100460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2021.100460
2.
BielloK. B.SalhaneyP.ValenteP. K.ChildsE.OlsonJ.EarlywineJ. J.MarshallB. D.R BazziA. (2020). Ecological momentary assessment of daily drug use and harm reduction service utilization among people who inject drugs in non-urban areas: A concurrent mixed-method feasibility study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 214, 108167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108167
3.
CohnA. M.Hunter-ReelD.HagmanB. T.MitchellJ. (2011). Promoting behavior change from alcohol use through mobile technology: The future of ecological momentary assessment. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 35(12), 2209–2215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01571.x
4.
Cole-LewisH.KershawT. (2010). Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. Epidemiologic Reviews, 32(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxq004
5.
HeckathornD. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096941
6.
JonesA.RemmerswaalD.VerveerI.RobinsonE.FrankenI. H. A.WenC. K. F.FieldM. (2019). Compliance with ecological momentary assessment protocols in substance users: A meta-analysis. Addiction, 114(4), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14503
7.
KirkG. D.LinasB. S.WestergaardR. P.PiggottD. A.BollingerR. C.ChangL. W.GenzA. (2013). The exposure assessment in current time study: Implementation, feasibility, and acceptability of real-time data collection in a community cohort of illicit drug users. Aids Research and Treatment, 2013(2013), 594671–594710. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/594671
8.
Mackesy-AmitiM. E.BoodramB. (2018). Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment to study mood and risk behavior among young people who inject drugs. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 187, 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.03.016
9.
MarkowskiK. L.SmithJ. A.GauthierG. R.HarceyS. R. (2021). Practical problems and positive experiences with ecological momentary assessment: Reflections from people who use drugs. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 47(3), 311–318. Published online May 19, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2021.1910700
10.
OsborneB.KellyP. J.LaranceB.RobinsonL. D.IversR.DeaneF. P.WebberA.KellyD. (2020). Substance use and co-occurring physical health problems: File review of a residential drug and alcohol treatment service. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 16(2), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2019.1704960
11.
PappL. M.BarringerA.BlumenstockS. M.GuP.BlaydesM.LamJ.KourosC. D. (2020). Development and acceptability of a method to investigate prescription drug misuse in daily life: Ecological momentary assessment study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(10), Article e21676. https://doi.org/10.2196/21676
12.
Santa MariaD.PadhyeN.YangY.GallardoK.SantosG. M.JungJ.BusinelleM. (2018). Drug use patterns and predictors among homeless youth: Results of an ecological momentary assessment. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 44(5), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2017.1407328
SlesnickN.GuoX.BrakenhoffB.BantchevskaD. (2015). A comparison of three interventions for homeless youth evidencing substance use disorders: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 54, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2015.02.001
15.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2020). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2019 national survey on drug use and health (HHS Publication No. PEP20-07-01-001, NSDUH Series H-55). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
16.
TuotS.MburuG.MunP.ChhounP.ChannN.PremK.YiS. (2019). Prevalence and correlates of HIV infection among people who use drugs in Cambodia: A cross-sectional survey using respondent driven sampling method. BMC Infectious Diseases, 19(1), 515. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4154-5
17.
TylerK. A.OlsonK.RayC. M. (2019). Understanding daily depression, drinking, and marijuana use among homeless youth using short message service surveying. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 28(3), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/1067828X.2019.1667286
18.
TylerK. A.SchmitzR. M. (2017). Using cell phones for data collection: Benefits, outcomes, and intervention possibilities with homeless youth. Children and Youth Services Review Services Review, 76, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.031.
