Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Pre-booking diversion enables police officers to divert individuals to supportive services in lieu of prosecution for minor crimes related to substance use. We surveyed 204 Philadelphia Police Department officers authorized to initiate pre-booking diversions. We used bivariate x² tests and multivariate logistic regression to examine differences in respondent perspectives. 78% agreed that pre-booking diversion provides important services to people who use drugs, 69% wanted to expand the geographic score of programming, and 52% wanted to expand eligibility. Yet 59% questioned whether diversion is “what police should be doing”, and only 27% believed that it will improve public safety. In logistic regression, the perceived value that the police department places on referrals correlated with agreement that PAD improves safety, provides important services for people who use drugs, and fits within officers’ role. Tension between beliefs that the program provides important services but may not improve safety reflects both potential value and inherent challenges of pre-booking diversion models.

Keywords

policing substance use criminal justice public health

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Shefner

Koppel

Megerian

Frasso

(2022). Experiences with the Philadelphia police assisted diversion program: A qualitative study. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 100(1), 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103521

Barberi

Taxman

F. S.

(2019). Diversion and alternatives to arrest: A qualitative understanding of police and substance users’ perspective. Journal of Drug Issues, 49(4), 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042619861273

Brennan

Mazowita

(2019). Prior contact with the criminal justice system among people who fatally overdosed on illicit drugs in Surrey and in British Columbia, 2011 to 2016. Juristat: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. https://tc.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/prior-contact-with-criminal-justice-system-among/docview/2229638566/se-2

Brinkley-Rubinstein

(2013). Incarceration as a catalyst for worsening health. Health & Justice, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2194-7899-1-3

Clear

T. R.

Montagnet

C. L.

(2022). Impact of incarceration on community public safety and public health. In Greifinger

R. B

(Ed.), Public health behind bars: From prisons to communities (pp. 13–29). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1807-3_2

Clifasefi

S. L.

Lonczak

H. S.

Collins

S. E.

(2017). Seattle’s law enforcement assisted diversion (LEAD) program. Crime & Delinquency, 63(4), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716687550

Collins

S. E.

Lonczak

H. S.

Clifasefi

S. L.

(2017). Seattle’s law enforcement assisted diversion (LEAD): Program effects on recidivism outcomes, evaluation and program planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 64, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.008

Collins

S. E.

Lonczak

H. S.

Clifasefi

S. L.

(2019). Seattle’s law enforcement assisted diversion (LEAD): Program effects on criminal justice and legal system utilization and costs. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09352-7

Covin

(2012). Homelessness, poverty, and incarceration: The criminalization of despair. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12(5), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2012.713835

10.

Dasgupta

Beletsky

Ciccarone

(2018). Opioid crisis: No easy fix to its social and economic determinants. American Journal of Public Health, 108(2), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304187

11.

Dumont

D. M.

Brockmann

Dickman

Alexander

Rich

J. D.

(2012). Public health and the epidemic of incarceration. Annual Review of Public Health, 33(2), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124614

12.

Geller

Curtis

M. A.

(2011). A Sort of Homecoming: Incarceration and the housing security of urban men. Social Science Research, 40(4), 1196–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.03.008

13.

Gilbert

A. R.

Siegel

Easter

M. M.

Hofer

M. S.

Sivaraman

J. C.

Ariturk

Swanson

J. W.

Swartz

M. S.

Wygle

Feng

(2023). North Carolina law enforcement assisted diversion (LEAD): Considerations for optimizing eligibility and referral. Law and Contemporary Problems, 86(1), 73–101.

14.

Goetz

Mitchell

R. E.

(2006). Pre-arrest/booking drug control strategies: Diversion to treatment, harm reduction and police involvement. Contemporary Drug Problems, 33(3), 473–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/009145090603300307

15.

Joudrey

P. J.

Nelson

C. R.

Lawson

Morford

K. L.

Muley

Watson

Okafor

Wang

E. A.

Crusto

(2021). Law enforcement assisted diversion: Qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators of program implementation. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 129(1), 108476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108476

16.

Kopak

A. M.

Gleicher

(2020). Law enforcement deflection and prearrest diversion programs: A tale of two initiatives. J Adv Justice, 3(1), 37–55.

17.

Lattimore

Tueller

Levin-Rector

Witwer

(2020). The prevalence of local criminal justice practices. Federal Probation.

18.

Magaña

E. J.

Perrone

Malm

(2022). A process evaluation of san francisco’s law enforcement assisted diversion program. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 33(2), 148–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034211033328

19.

Mars

S. G.

Bourgois

Karandinos

Montero

Ciccarone

(2014). Every ‘never’ I ever said came true”: Transitions from opioid pills to heroin injecting. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 25(2), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.10.004

20.

Meaders

W. A.

, (1976). The applicability of miranda to the police booking process.Duke Law Journal, 1976(3), 574–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372056

21.

Mital

Wolff

Carroll

J. J.

(2020). The relationship between incarceration history and overdose in North America: A scoping review of the evidence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 213(3), 108088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108088

22.

Morrissey

Nyrop

Lee

(2019). Landscapes of loss and recovery: The anthropology of police-community relations and harm reduction. Human Organization, 78(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259.78.1.28

23.

Neusteter

S. R.

Subramanian

Trone

Khogali

Reed

(2019). Gatekeepers: The role of police in ending mass incarceration. Vera Institute of Justice.

24.

Open Philly Data , Crime Incidents (2022). https://opendataphilly.org/datasets/crime-incidents/(accessed 07 January 2022).

25.

Pettus-Davis

Doherty

E. E.

Veeh

Drymon

(2017). Deterioration of postincarceration social support for emerging adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(10), 1317–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817721936

26.

Philadelphia City Controller (2022). Review and analysis of the Philadelphia police department and other related police spending. https://controller.phila.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/PPD-Review-Final.pdf

27.

Rouhani

Gudlavalleti

Atzmon

Park

J. N.

Olson

S. P.

Sherman

S. G.

(2019). Police attitudes towards pre-booking diversion in Baltimore, Maryland. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 65(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.11.012

28.

Schiff

D. M.

Drainoni

M. L.

Weinstein

Z. M.

Chan

Bair-Merritt

Rosenbloom

(2017). A police-led addiction treatment referral program in Gloucester, MA: Implementation and participants' experiences. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 82(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.09.003

29.

Sheely

Kneipp

S. M.

(2015). The effects of collateral consequences of criminal involvement on employment, use of temporary assistance for needy families, and health. Women & Health, 55(5), 548–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2015.1022814

30.

Shefner

R. T.

Koppel

Wood

Anderson

E. D.

(2023). Co-deplyment is an answer, but what are the questions? Insights from officer focus groups (pp. 1–7). Police Practice and Research.

31.

Shefner

R. T.

Sloan

J. S.

Sandler

K. R.

Anderson

E. D.

(2020). Missed opportunities: Arrest and court touchpoints for individuals who fatally overdosed in Philadelphia in 2016. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 78(1), 102724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102724

32.

Western

(2018). Homeward: Life in the year after prison. Russell Sage Foundation.

33.

Wildeman

(2016). Incarceration and population health in wealthy democracies. Criminology, 54(2), 360–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12107

34.

Wildeman

Wang

E. A.

(2017). Mass incarceration, public health, and widening inequality in the USA. Lancet (London, England), 389(10077), 1464–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30259-3

35.

Worden

R. E.

McLean

S. J.

(2018). Discretion and diversion in Albany’s lead program. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(6–7), 584–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403417723960

36.

Zhang

Balles

J. A.

Nyland

J. E.

Nguyen

T. H.

White

V. M.

Zgierska

A. E.

(2022). The relationship between police contacts for drug use-related crime and future arrests, incarceration, and overdoses: A retrospective observational study highlighting the need to break the vicious cycle. Harm Reduction Journal, 19(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00652-2

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB

Police officer Perspectives on a Pre-booking Diversion Program for People who use Drugs in Philadelphia

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material