Diversion programs connect individuals to treatment instead of criminal sanctions and are used more frequently to address substance use. This systematic scoping review included 31 published empirical studies to examine evaluations of diversion programs that address substance use and misuse. We assessed the program characteristics and implementation settings, as well as the outcomes measured and study methods used. We identified five prevalent study outcomes categories: (a) Service utilization (program retention and completion), (b) Recidivism/criminality, (c) Substance use, (d) Psychosocial functioning, and (e) Other outcomes (e.g., trauma, quality of life, and housing). Findings demonstrated limited but promising evidence for improvements in recidivism, substance use, and psychosocial outcomes. The limited evidence may be partly due to heterogeneity in diversion program implementation, study designs used, and differences among subpopulations. Most studies examined postbooking diversion programs; therefore, further examination of alternative approaches such as prebooking diversion programs is needed to fully understand diversion program impacts.
AlbertS.BrasonF. W.II.SanfordC. K.DasguptaN.GrahamJ.LovetteB. (2011). Project lazarus: Community-based overdose prevention in rural North Carolina. Pain Medicine, 12(2), S77–S85.
2.
BagleyS. M.SchoenbergerS. F.WayeK. M.WalleyA. Y. (2019). A scoping review of post opioid-overdose interventions. Preventive Medicine, 128, Article 105813.
3.
BassukE. L.HansonJ.GreeneR. N.RichardM.LaudetA. (2016). Peer-delivered recovery support services for addictions in the United States: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 63, 1–9.
4.
BronerN.BorumR.GawleyK. (2002). Criminal justice diversion of individuals with co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorders: An overview. In LandsbergG.RockM.BergL. K. W.SmileyA. (Eds.), Serving mentally ill offenders: Challenges and opportunities for mental health professionals (pp. 83–106). Springer.
5.
BronerN.LattimoreP. K.CowellA. J.SchlengerW. E. (2004). Effects of diversion on adults with co-occurring mental illness and substance use: Outcomes from a national multi-site study. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22(4), 519–541.
6.
BroussardR. D. M. S. (2012). Factors correlated to graduating from the fourteenth judicial district (Louisiana) adult drug treatment court program. Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies, 12(1), 1–IX.
7.
BrownR. (2011). Drug court effectiveness: A matched cohort study in the Dane County drug treatment court. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(4), 191–201.
8.
BrundageS. C.LevineC. (2019). The ripple effect: The impact of the opioid epidemic on children and families. United Hospital Fund and Milbank Memorial Fund.
9.
ButzinC. A.SaumC. A.ScarpittiF. R. (2002). Factors associated with completion of a drug treatment court diversion program. Substance Use and Misuse, 37(12–13), 1615–1633.
10.
CaseB.SteadmanH. J.DupuisS. A.MorrisL. S. (2009). Who succeeds in jail diversion programs for persons with mental illness? A multi-site study. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27(5), 661–674.
11.
CaulkinsJ. P.GouldA.PardoB.ReuterP.SteinB. D. (2020). Opioids and the criminal justice system: New challenges posed by the modern opioid epidemic. Annual Review of Criminology, 4, 353–375.
CharlierJ. A.ReichertJ. (2020). Introduction: Deflection—Police-led responses to behavioral health challenges. Journal for Advancing Justice, 3, 1–13.
15.
ClarkA. K.WilderC. M.WinstanleyE. L. (2014). A systematic review of community opioid overdose prevention and naloxone distribution programs. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 8(3), 153–163.
16.
ClarkC. B.McCullumsmithC. B.RedmondN.HardyS.WaescheM. C.OsulaG.CropseyK. L. (2013). Factors associated with rapid failure in a treatment alternatives for safer communities (TASC) program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 45(4), 376–380.
17.
ClifasefiS. L.LonczakH. S.CollinsS. E. (2017). Seattle’s law enforcement assisted diversion (LEAD) program: Within-subjects changes on housing, employment, and income/benefits outcomes and associations with recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 63(4), 429–445.
18.
CollinsS. E.LonczakH. S.ClifasefiS. L. (2019). Seattle’s law enforcement assisted diversion (LEAD): Program effects on criminal justice and legal system utilization and costs. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(2), 201–211.
19.
ComptonM. T.BahoraM.WatsonA. C.OlivaJ. R. (2008). A comprehensive review of extant research on crisis intervention team (CIT) programs. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 36(1), 47–55.
20.
ComptonM. T.HalpernB.BroussardB.AndersonS.SmithK.EllisS.GriffinK.PauselliL.MyersN. (2017). A potential new form of jail diversion and reconnection to mental health services: I. Stakeholders’ views on acceptability. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 35, 480–491.
21.
CowellA. J.BronerN.DupontR. (2004). The cost-effectiveness of criminal justice diversion programs for people with serious mental illness co-occurring with substance abuse: Four case studies. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20(3), 292–314.
22.
CrowleyD. M.ConnellC. M.JonesD.DonovanM. W. (2019). Considering the child welfare system burden from opioid misuse: Research priorities for estimating public costs. The American Journal of Managed Care, 25(Suppl. 13), S256–S263.
23.
DegenhardtL.CharlsonF.FerrariA.SantomauroD.ErskineH.Mantilla-HerraraA.. . . RehmJ. (2018). The global burden of disease attributable to alcohol and drug use in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Psychiatry, 5(12), 987–1012.
24.
DemboR.BrionesR.GulledgeL.KarasL.WintersK. C.BelenkoS.GreenbaumP. E. (2012). Stress, mental health, and substance abuse problems in a sample of diversion program youths: An exploratory latent class analysis. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 21(2), 130–155.
25.
DemboR.WarehamJ.PoythressN.MeyersK.CookB.SchmeidlerJ. (2007). Continuities in problem behavior among high risk youths. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 16(4), 91–118.
26.
DemboR.WarehamJ.PoythressN. G.CookB.SchmeidlerJ. (2006). The impact of arbitration intervention services on youth recidivism: One-year follow-up. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(4), 95–131.
27.
DownsW. R.RobertsonJ. F.HarrisonL. R. (1997). Control theory, labeling theory, and the delivery of services for drug abuse to adolescents. Adolescence, 32(125), 1–24.
28.
EvansE.LiL. B.HserY. I. (2009). Client and program factors associated with dropout from court mandated drug treatment. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(3), 204–212.
FisherW. H.SilverE.WolffN. (2006). Beyond criminalization: Toward a criminologically informed framework for mental health policy and services research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33(5), 544–557.
31.
FlorenceC.LuoF.XuL.ZhouC. (2016). The economic burden of prescription opioid overdose, abuse and dependence in the United States, 2013. Medical Care, 54(10), 901–906.
32.
FrismanL. K.LinH. J.SturgesG. E.LevinsonM.BaranoskiM. V.PollardJ. M. (2006). Outcomes of court-based jail diversion programs for people with co-occurring disorders. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 2(2), 5–26.
33.
GuyG. P.Jr.PasalicE.ZhangK. (2018). Emergency department visits involving opioid overdoses, US, 2010–2014. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 54(1), Article e37.
34.
HagemeierN. E. (2018). Introduction to the opioid epidemic: The economic burden on the healthcare system and impact on quality of life. The American Journal of Managed Care, 24(Suppl. 10), S200–S206.
35.
HallE. A.PrendergastM. L.RollJ. M.WardaU. (2009). Reinforcing abstinence and treatment participation among offenders in a drug diversion program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 935–953.
36.
HartfordK.CareyR.MendoncaJ. (2006). Pre-arrest diversion of people with mental illness: Literature review and international survey. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24(6), 845–856.
37.
HarveyE.ShakeshaftA.HetheringtonK.SannibaleC.MattickR. P. (2007). The efficacy of diversion and aftercare strategies for adult drug-involved offenders: A summary and methodological review of the outcome literature. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26(4), 379–387.
38.
HedrichD.AlvesP.FarrellM.StöverH.MøllerL.MayetS. (2012). The effectiveness of opioid maintenance treatment in prison settings: A systematic review. Addiction, 107(3), 501–517.
39.
HoffR. A.RosenheckR. A.BaranoskyM. V.BuchananJ.ZonanaH. (1999). Diversion from jail of detainees with substance abuse: The interaction with dual diagnosis. American Journal on Addictions, 8(3), 201–210.
40.
KopakA. M.GleicherL. (2020). Law enforcement deflection and prearrest diversion programs: A tale of two initiatives. Journal for Advancing Justice, 3, 37–55.
41.
KretschmarJ. M.ButcherF.FlanneryD. J.SingerM. I. (2016). Diverting juvenile justice-involved youth with behavioral health issues from detention. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27(3), 302–325.
42.
LattimoreP. K.BronerN.ShermanR.FrismanL.ShaferM. S. (2003). A comparison of prebooking and postbooking diversion programs for mentally ill substance-using individuals with justice involvement. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 19(1), 30–64.
43.
LattimoreP. K.TuellerS.Levin-RectorA.WitwerA. (2020). The prevalence of local criminal justice practices. Federal Probation, 84, Article 28.
44.
LiangB.LongM. A. (2013). Testing the gender effect in drug and alcohol treatment: Women’s participation in Tulsa County drug and DUI programs. Journal of Drug Issues, 43(3), 270–288.
45.
LoganT. K.HoytW. H.McCollisterK. E.FrenchM. T.LeukefeldC.MintonL. (2004). Economic evaluation of drug court: Methodology, results, and policy implications. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 381–396.
46.
LovelandD.BoyleM. (2007). Intensive case management as a jail diversion program for people with a serious mental illness: A review of the literature. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(2), 130–150.
47.
LulhamR. (2009). The magistrates early referral into treatment program. Crime & Justice Bulletin, 130(1), 1–20.
48.
MartireK. A.LarneyS. (2011). Health outcomes, program completion, and criminal recidivism among participants in the rural alcohol diversion program, Australia. Journal of Substance Use, 16(1), 50–56.
49.
McCollisterK. E.FrenchM. T.PrendergastM. L.HallE.SacksS. (2004). Long-term cost-effectiveness of addiction treatment for criminal offenders. Justice Quarterly, 21(3), 659–679.
50.
McSweeneyT.HughesC. E.RitterA. (2016). Tackling “drug-related” crime: Are there merits in diverting drug-misusing defendants to treatment? Findings from an Australian case study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 49(2), 198–220.
51.
MendozaN. S.AnthonyE. K.Roe-SepowitzD. E. (2018). Underage drinking diversion: Characterizing severity with latent class analysis. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 18(4), 432–447.
52.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal, 339, Article b2535.
53.
MuellerleileP.MullenB. (2006). Sufficiency and stability of evidence for public health interventions using cumulative meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 515–522.
54.
MunnZ.PetersM. D.SternC.TufanaruC.McArthurA.AromatarisE. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), Article 143.
Newton-TaylorB.PatraJ.GliksmanL. (2009). Toronto drug treatment court: Participant intake characteristics as predictors of “successful” program completion. Journal of Drug Issues, 39(4), 965–987.
58.
PasseyM.FlahertyB.DidcottP. (2006). The Magistrates Early Referral into Treatment (MERIT) pilot program: A descriptive analysis of a court diversion program in rural Australia. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 38(4), 521–529.
59.
PatraJ.GliksmanL.FischerB.Newton-TaylorB.BelenkoS.FerrariM.. . . RehmJ. (2010). Factors associated with treatment compliance and its effects on retention among participants in a court-mandated treatment program. Contemporary Drug Problems, 37(2), 289–313, 190–192.
60.
PinalsD. A. (2017). Jail diversion, specialty court, and reentry services: Partnerships between behavioral health and justice systems. In RosnerR.ScottC.L. (Eds.), Principles and practice of forensic psychiatry (pp. 237–246). Taylor & Francis.
PollardJ. M.SchusterJ.Hsiu-JuL.FrismanL. K. (2007). Evaluation of a gender and trauma specific jail diversion program for female offenders PART II. American Jails, 21(5), 53–63.
63.
ReifS.BraudeL.LymanD. R.DoughertyR. H.DanielsA. S.GhoseS. S.. . . Delphin-RittmonM. E. (2014). Peer recovery support for individuals with substance use disorders: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services, 65(7), 853–861.
64.
RuddR. A.AleshireN.ZibbellJ. E.GladdenR. M. (2016). Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths—United States, 2000–2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64(50–51), 1378–1382.
65.
RysavyP.CunninghamT.O’Reilly-MartinezR. (2011). Preliminary analysis of the Northern Territory’s illicit drug court diversion program highlights the need to examine lower program completion rates for indigenous clients. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30(6), 671–676.
66.
SavageR. J.DuRantN.Brendan ClarkC.NairP.CropseyK. (2015). The adverse effects of motherhood on substance use treatment program outcomes among adolescent women. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 9(6), 478–484.
67.
ShaferM. S.ArthurB.FranczakM. J. (2004). An analysis of post-booking jail diversion programming for persons with co-occurring disorders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22(6), 771–785.
68.
ShafferD. K.HartmanJ. L.ListwanS. J. (2009). Drug abusing women in the community: The impact of drug court involvement on recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 39(4), 803–827.
69.
ShapiroG. K.CusiA.KirstM.O’CampoP.NakhostA.StergiopoulosV. (2015). Co-responding police-mental health programs: A review. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 606–620.
70.
SirotichF. (2009). The criminal justice outcomes of jail diversion programs for persons with mental illness: A review of the evidence. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 37(4), 461–472.
71.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2019). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP19-5068, NSDUH Series H-54). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
72.
Vander KooiG. P. (2015). The impact of diversion on recidivism rates in a rural Michigan County—A local perspective. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 11(1), 11–18.
73.
WinkelmanT. N.ChangV. W.BinswangerI. A. (2018). Health, polysubstance use, and criminal justice involvement among adults with varying levels of opioid use. JAMA Network Open, 1(3), Article e180558.
74.
ZajacG.NurS. A.KreagerD. A.SternerG. (2019). Estimated costs to the Pennsylvania criminal justice system resulting from the opioid crisis. The American Journal of Managed Care, 25(13), S250–S255.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
