This vignette-based study examined the willingness to feign symptoms to obtain a prescription following an analysis on who might use prescription stimulants to enhance performance (N = 3,468). It experimentally manipulated three factors: the social disapproval of prescription stimulant use for enhancement purposes, the physicians’ diagnostic efforts, and the medical condition (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and narcolepsy); respondent characteristics of self-control, personal morality, and self-efficacy were also measured. Our results showed that social disapproval of prescription drug use, a personal morality that disapproves of drug use, high self-control, and high self-efficacy were negatively associated with the willingness to use. Willingness increased especially in situations of social approval when there was a stronger personal approval of drug use, or surprisingly when physicians’ diagnostic efforts were higher. The feigning willingness was lower in situations of social disapproval and when personal morality disapproved of feigning. Thus, personal and situational characteristics are relevant to understand both behaviors.
AikinsR. D. (2011). Academic performance enhancement: A qualitative study of the perceptions and habits of prescription stimulant–using college students. Journal of College Student Development, 52(5), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2011.0064
2.
AitaS. L.BorgognaN. C.AitaL. J.OgdenM. L.HillB. D. (2020). Comparison of clinical psychologist and physician beliefs and practices concerning malingering: Results from a mixed methods study. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(3), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09374-x
3.
AkersR. L.LeeG. (1996). A longitudinal test of social learning theory: Adolescent smoking. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(2), 317-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204269602600203.
4.
AlexanderC. S.BeckerH. J. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1086/268432
5.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). APA.
AuspurgK.HinzT. (2015). Multifactorial experiments in surveys: Conjoint analysis, choice experiments, and factorial surveys. Nomos.
8.
BallonJ. S.FeifelD. (2006). A systematic review of modafinil: Potential clinical uses and mechanisms of action. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 67(4), 554–566. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v67n0406
9.
BanduraA.FreemanW. H.LightseyR. (1999). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Springer.
BattledayR. M.BremA.-K. (2015). Modafinil for cognitive neuroenhancement in healthy non-sleep-deprived subjects: A systematic review. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 25(11), 1865–1881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.07.028
12.
BaumM., SattlerS., & ReimannM. (2021). Towards an understanding of how stress and resources affect the nonmedical use of prescription drugs for performance enhancement among employees. Current Psychology, online first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01873-7.
13.
BavarianN.FlayB. R.KetchamP. L.SmitE. (2013). Illicit use of prescription stimulants in a college student sample: A theory-guided analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 132(3), 665–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.024
14.
BeckL.AjzenI. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H
15.
BeckerG. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The economic dimensions of crime (pp. 13–68). Springer.
16.
BeierleinC.KemperC. J.KovalevaA.RammstedtB. (2013). Short scale for measuring general self-efficacy beliefs (ASKU). Methods, Data, Analyses, 7(2), 251–278. https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2013.014
17.
BergerC.LevA.BrawY.ElbaumT.WagnerM.RassovskyY. (2019). Detection of feigned ADHD using the MOXO-d-CPT. Journal of Attention Disorders, 25(7), 1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054719864656
18.
BobekD. D.HagemanA. M.KelliherC. F. (2013). Analyzing the role of social norms in tax compliance behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1390-7
BouffardJ. A.RiceS. K. (2011). The influence of the social bond on self-control at the moment of decision: Testing hirschi’s redefinition of self-control. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-010-9095-x
21.
BrandRKochH (2016). Using caffeine pills for performance enhancement. an experimental study on university students’ willingness and their intention to try neuroenhancements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(101), 101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00101
22.
BrauerJ. R.TittleC. R. (2017). When crime is not an option: Inspecting the moral filtering of criminal action alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 34(5), 818–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1226937
23.
BrezinaT.TopalliV. (2012). Criminal self-efficacy: Exploring the correlates and consequences of a “successful criminal” identity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(8), 1042–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812438345
CaviolaL.FaberN. S. (2015). Pills or push-ups? Effectiveness and public perception of pharmacological and non-pharmacological cognitive enhancement. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1852), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01852.
26.
ChafetzM.UnderhillJ. (2013). Estimated costs of malingered disability. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(7), 633–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act038
27.
ChampagneJ.GardnerB.DommettE. J. (2019). Modelling predictors of UK undergraduates’ attitudes towards smart drugs. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 14, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2019.02.001.
28.
ChenG., GullyS. M.EdenD. (2004). General self‐efficacy and self‐esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self‐evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 375-395. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.251.
Clegg-KraynokM. M.McBeanA. L.Montgomery-DownsH. E. (2011). Sleep quality and characteristics of college students who use prescription psychostimulants nonmedically. Sleep Medicine, 12(6), 598–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2011.01.012
31.
CochranJ. K. (2016). Moral propensity, setting, and choice: A partial test of situational action theory. Deviant Behavior, 37(7), 811–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1145024
32.
ConverseP. D.PicconeK. A.TocciM. C. (2014). Childhood self-control, adolescent behavior, and career success. Personality and Individual Differences, 59(2014), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.007
33.
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (2002). Crime as a rational choice. Criminological theories: Bridging the past to the future.Sage Publications, pp. 77–96.
34.
CutlerK. A. (2014). Prescription stimulants are “a okay”: Applying neutralization theory to college students’ nonmedical prescription stimulant use. Journal of American College Health, 62(7), 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2014.929578
35.
d’AngeloL.-S. C.SavulichG.SahakianB. J. (2017). Lifestyle use of drugs by healthy people for enhancing cognition, creativity, motivation and pleasure. British Journal of Pharmacology, 174(19), 3257–3267. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13813
36.
DillerL. H. (2011). Remembering ritalin: A doctor and generation rx reflect on life and psychiatric drugs. Penguin.
37.
DohmenT. J.FalkA.HuffmanD.SundeU.SchuppJ.WagnerG. G. (2005). Individual risk attitudes: New evidence from a large representative, experimentally-validated survey, 1730, pp. 1–56.
DunneL.PatelP.MaschauerE. L.MorrisonI.RihaR. L. (2016). Misdiagnosis of narcolepsy. Sleep and Breathing, 20(4), 1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-016-1365-5
40.
EiflerS.PetzoldK. (2019). Validity aspects of vignette experiments: expected “what‐if” differences between reports of behavioral intentions and actual behavior. Experimental methods in survey research: Techniques that combine random sampling with random assignment (pp. 393–416). Wiley Online Library.
41.
ExumM. L.BouffardJ. A. (2010). Testing theories of criminal decision making: Some empirical questions about hypothetical scenarios. Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 581–594). Springer.
FaraoneS. V.RostainA. L.MontanoC. B.MasonO.AntshelK. M.NewcornJ. H. (2020). Systematic review: Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants: Risk factors, outcomes, and risk reduction strategies. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.012
44.
FidaR.TramontanoC.PacielloM.GhezziV.BarbaranelliC. (2018). Understanding the interplay among regulatory self-efficacy, moral disengagement, and academic cheating behaviour during vocational education: A three-wave study. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3373-6
45.
FordJ. A.BlumensteinL. (2013). Self-control and substance use among college students. Journal of Drug Issues, 43(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042612462216
46.
FoxK. C.NijeboerS.DixonM. L.FlomanJ. L.EllamilM.RumakS. P.SedlmeierP.ChristoffK. (2014). Is meditation associated with altered brain structure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of morphometric neuroimaging in meditation practitioners. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 43, 48-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.016.
47.
FrankeA. G.BonertzC.ChristmannM.EngeserS.LiebK. (2012). Attitudes toward cognitive enhancement in users and nonusers of stimulants for cognitive enhancement: A pilot study. AJOB Primary Research, 3(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.608411
48.
FuermaierA. B.TuchaO.KoertsJ.TuchaL.ThomeJ.FaltracoF. (2021). Feigning ADHD and stimulant misuse among Dutch university students. Journal of Neural Transmission, 128(7), 1079–1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-020-02296-7
49.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
50.
GrasmickH. G.JrR. J. B. (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law & Society Review, 24(3), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053861
51.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.JrArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of gottfredson and hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001002
52.
GreelyH.SahakianB.HarrisJ.KesslerR. C.GazzanigaM.CampbellP.FarahM. J. (2008). Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature, 456(7223), 702–705. https://doi.org/10.1038/456702a
HainmuellerJ.HangartnerD.YamamotoT. (2015). Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8), 2395–2400. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416587112
HarrisonA. G.EdwardsM. J. (2010). Symptom exaggeration in post-secondary students: Preliminary base rates in a Canadian sample. Applied Neuropsychology, 17(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084281003715642
57.
HarrisonA.EdwardsM.ParkerK. (2007). Identifying students faking ADHD: Preliminary findings and strategies for detection. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(5), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.03.008
58.
HeslinP. A.KleheU.-C. (2006). Self-efficacy. Encyclopedia of industrial/organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 705–708).
59.
HigginsG. E.MahoneyM.RickettsM. L. (2009). Nonsocial reinforcement of the nonmedical use of prescription drugs: A partial test of social learning and self-control theories. Journal of Drug Issues, 39(4), 949–963. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260903900409
60.
HinshawS. P.SchefflerR. M. (2014). The ADHD explosion: Myths, medication, money, and today’s push for performance. Oxford University Press.
61.
HirschiT. (2004). Self-control and crime. In VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 537–552). Guilford Press.
HirtenlehnerH.HardieB. (2016). On the conditional relevance of controls: An application of Situational Action Theory to shoplifting. Deviant Behavior, 37(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1026764
64.
HirtenlehnerH.KunzF. (2016). The interaction between self-control and morality in crime causation among older adults. European Journal of Criminology, 13(3), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815623567
65.
HoltL. J.LoobyA. (2018). Factors that differentiate prescription stimulant misusers from those at-risk for misuse: Expectancies, perceived safety, and diversion. Substance Use & Misuse, 53(7), 1068–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2017.1392984
66.
HotzeT. D.ShahK.AndersonE. E.WyniaM. K. (2011). “Doctor, would you prescribe a pill to help me … ?” A national survey of physicians on using medicine for human enhancement. The American Journal of Bioethics, 11(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2011.534957
67.
HurstJ. N.EasseyJ. M.BaldwinJ. M.Ten BenselT. (2021). Medicate to graduate: Academic strain and nonmedical prescription stimulant use among graduate and undergraduate students. Journal of Drug Issues, 51(1), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042620961358
68.
KovshoffH.WilliamsS.VrijensM.DanckaertsM.ThompsonM.YardleyL.Sonuga-BarkeE. J. S. (2012). The decisions regarding ADHD management (DRAMa) study: Uncertainties and complexities in assessment, diagnosis and treatment, from the clinician’s point of view. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 21(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-011-0235-8
69.
KronebergC.HeintzeI.MehlkopG. (2010). The interplay of moral norms and Instrumental Incentives in crime causation. Criminology, 48(1), 259–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00187.x
70.
KronebergC.SchulzS. (2018). Revisiting the role of self-control in Situational Action Theory. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732189
71.
LangeC.HoebelJ.KamtsiurisP.MutersS.SchillingR.LippeE. (2011). KOLIBRI–Studie zum Konsum leistungsbeeinflussender Mittel in Alltag und Freizeit. Robert-Koch-Institut.
72.
LeonM. R.HarmsP. D.GilmerD. O. (2019). PCE use in the workplace: The open secret of performance enhancement. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(1), 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618790091
73.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (3rd ed., Vol. 7). Stata press.
74.
MacheS.BernburgM.GronebergD.HarthV. (2020). Neuro-enhancement among German junior physicians: Prevalence, reasons and associations to mental health outcomes and quality of life. Work, 67(2), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203279
75.
MaierL. J.FerrisJ. A.WinstockA. R. (2018). Pharmacological cognitive enhancement among non-ADHD individuals-A cross-sectional study in 15 countries. International Journal of Drug Policy, 58, 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.05.009.
76.
MaierL. J.HaugS.SchaubM. P. (2015). The importance of stress, self-efficacy, and self-medication for pharmacological neuroenhancement among employees and students. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 156, 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.09.012.
MearsD. P.PloegerM.WarrM. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in delinquency: Peer influence and moral evaluations of behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427898035003001
79.
MehlkopG. (2019). Die Rolle sozialer Normen in einer weiten Rational Choice Theorie der Kriminalität. Devianz und Subkulturen, Kriminalität und Gesellschaft (pp. 13–49). Springer Fachmedien.
80.
MittenbergW.PattonC.CanyockE. M.ConditD. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exeggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379
81.
MussoM. W.HillB. D.BarkerA. A.PellaR. D.GouvierW. D. (2016). Utility of the personality assessment inventory for detecting malingered ADHD in college students. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20(9), 763–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054714548031
82.
MyrsethH.PallesenS.TorsheimT.ErevikE. K. (2018). Prevalence and correlates of stimulant and depressant pharmacological cognitive enhancement among Norwegian students. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 35(5), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1455072518778493
83.
NapperL. E.KenneyS. R.HummerJ. F.FiorotS.LaBrieJ. W. (2016). Longitudinal relationships among perceived injunctive and descriptive norms and marijuana use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 77(3), 457–463. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2016.77.457
84.
NeighborsC.LewisM. A.LaBrieJ.DiBelloA. M.YoungC. M.RinkerD. V.LittD.RodriguezL. M.KneeC. R.HamorE. (2016). A multisite randomized trial of normative feedback for heavy drinking: Social comparison versus social comparison plus correction of normative misperceptions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(3), 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000067.
85.
NormanP.ConnerP. (2005). Predicting health behaviour: A social cognition approach. In ConnerM.NormanP. (Eds.), Predicting Health Behaviour (2nd ed., pp. 1–27).
86.
NovakS. P.KroutilL. A.WilliamsR. L.Van BruntD. L. (2007). The nonmedical use of prescription ADHD medications: Results from a national Internet panel. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 2(1), 32–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-2-32
87.
OppK.-D. (2020). Analytical criminology: Integrating explanations of crime and deviant behavior. Routledge.
PartridgeB.BellS.LuckeJ.HallW. (2013). Australian university students’ attitudes towards the use of prescription stimulants as cognitive enhancers: Perceived patterns of use, efficacy and safety. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12005
90.
PartridgeBJBellSKLuckeJCYeatesSHallWD (2011). Smart drugs “as common as coffee”: Media hype about neuroenhancement. PLos One, 6(11), e28416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028416
91.
PatrzekJ.SattlerS.van VeenF.GrunschelC.FriesS. (2015). Investigating the effect of academic procrastination on the frequency and variety of academic misconduct: A panel study. Studies in Higher Education, 40(6), 1014–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.854765
92.
PauwelsL. J. R. (2018). The conditional effects of self-control in situational action theory. A preliminary test in a randomized scenario study. Deviant Behavior, 39(11), 1450–1466. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2018.1479920
93.
PauwelsL. J. R.SvenssonR.HirtenlehnerH. (2018). Testing situational action theory: A narrative review of studies published between 2006 and 2015. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732185
RacineE.ForliniC. (2009). Expectations regarding cognitive enhancement create substantial challenges. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(8), 469–470. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.030460
98.
RacineE.SattlerS.BoehlenW. (2021). Cognitive enhancement: Unanswered questions about human psychology and social behavior. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(19), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00294-w
99.
RafalovichA. (2005). Exploring clinician uncertainty in the diagnosis and treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(3), 305–https://doi.org/323. 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00444.x
100.
RobitailleC.CollinJ. (2016). Prescription psychostimulant use among young adults: A narrative review of qualitative studies. Substance Use & Misuse, 51(3), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2015.1110170
101.
SahakianBJ, BruhlAB, CookJ, KillikellyC, SavulichG, PiercyT, HafiziS, PerezJ, Fernandez-EgeaE, SucklingJ, & JonesPB (2015). The impact of neuroscience on society: Cognitive enhancement in neuropsychiatric disorders and in healthy people. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 370(20140214), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0214.
102.
SamuelR. Z.MittenbergW. (2005). Determination of malingering in disability evaluations. Primary Psychiatry, 12(1), 60–68.
103.
SattlerS. (2019). Nonmedical use of prescription drugs for cognitive enhancement as response to chronic stress especially when social support is lacking. Stress and Health, 35(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2846
104.
SattlerS.GraeffP.SauerC.MehlkopG. (2018). Der illegale Verkauf verschreibungspflichtiger Medikamente zur kognitiven Leistungssteigerung. Monatsschrift Für Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform, 101(3), 352-379. https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2018-1013-408.
105.
SattlerS.MehlkopG.GraeffP.SauerC. (2014). Evaluating the drivers of and obstacles to the willingness to use cognitive enhancement drugs: The influence of drug characteristics, social environment, and personal characteristics. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 9(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1371/10.1186/1747-597X-9-8
106.
SattlerS.SauerC.MehlkopG.GraeffP. (2013). The rationale for consuming cognitive enhancement drugs in university students and teachers. PLos One, 8(7), e68821. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068821
107.
SattlerS.SchunckR. (2016). Associations between the big five personality traits and the non-medical use of prescription drugs for cognitive enhancement. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1971), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01971.
108.
SattlerS.van VeenF.HasselhornF.MehlkopG.SauerC. (under review). A comprehensive experimental test of the situational action theory of crime causation. Social Science Research.
109.
SattlerS.WiegelC. (2013). Cognitive test anxiety and cognitive enhancement: The influence of students’ worries on their use of performance-enhancing drugs. Substance Use & Misuse, 48(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2012.751426
110.
SchelleKJFaulmüllerNCaviolaLHewstoneM (2014). Attitudes toward pharmacological cognitive enhancement-a review. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8(53), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00053.
111.
SchepersD.ReineckeJ. (2018). Conditional relevance of controls: A simultaneous test of the influences of self-control and deterrence on criminal behaviour in the context of situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732191
112.
SchröderH.KöhlerT.KnerrP.KühneS.MoesgenD.KleinM. (2015). Einfluss psychischer Belastungen am Arbeitsplatz auf das Neuroenhancement. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin: Bielefeld University.
SinghI.BardI.JacksonJ. (2014). Robust resilience and substantial interest: A survey of pharmacological cognitive enhancement among university students in the UK and Ireland. PLos One, 9(10), e105969. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105969
115.
SollmanM. J.RanseenJ. D.BerryD. T. R. (2010). Detection of feigned ADHD in college students. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018857
SuhrJ.HammersD.Dobbins-BucklandK.ZimakE.HughesC. (2008). The relationship of malingering test failure to self-reported symptoms and neuropsychological findings in adults referred for ADHD evaluation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(5), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2008.05.003
118.
SullivanB. K.MayK.GalballyL. (2007). Symptom exaggeration by college adults in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder assessments. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(3), 189–https://doi.org/20710.1080/09084280701509083
119.
SussmanS.ChouC.-P.PangR. D.KirkpatrickM.GuillotC. R.StoneM.LeventhalA. M. (2016). Social self-control is a statistically nonredundant correlate of adolescent substance use. Substance Use & Misuse, 51(6), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2016.1141959
120.
TeterC. J.DiRaimoC. G.WestB. T.SchepisT. S.McCabeS. E. (2020). Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants among US high school students to help study: Results from a national survey. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 33(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190018783887
121.
TurnerR. J. (2003). The pursuit of socially modifiable contingencies in mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519812
122.
Ullah AlozaiU.McPhersonP. K. (2019). Malingering. StatPearls [Internet].
WeyandtL.WhiteT.GudmundsdottirB.NitensonA.RathkeyE.De LeonK.BjornS. (2018). Neurocognitive, autonomic, and mood effects of adderall: A pilot study of healthy college students. Pharmacy, 6(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6030058
125.
WiegelC.SattlerS.GöritzA. S.DiewaldM. (2016). Work-related stress and cognitive enhancement among university teachers. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 29(1), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2015.1025764
126.
WikströmP.-O. H. (2014). Why crime happens: A situational action theory. In.Analytical sociology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, (pp. 71–94).
127.
WikströmP.-O. H. (2019). Situational action theory: A general, dynamic and mechanism-based theory of crime and its causes. Handbook on crime and deviance. Springer, (pp. 259–281).
128.
WikströmP.-O.OberwittlerD.TreiberK.HardieB. (2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. OUP.
129.
WilliamsonK. D.CombsH. L.BerryD. T. R.HarpJ. P.MasonL. H.EdmundsonM. (2014). Discriminating among ADHD alone, ADHD with a comorbid psychological disorder, and feigned ADHD in a college sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(7), 1182–1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.956674
130.
World Health Organization (2021). QC30 Malingering. In International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics. (11th Revision)https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en
131.
ZelliA.LucidiF.MalliaL. (2015). The complexity of neuroenhancement and the adoption of a social cognitive perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1880), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01880.
132.
ZimmermanG. M.MessnerS. F. (2010). Neighborhood context and the gender gap in adolescent violent crime. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 958–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410386688
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
