This study uses 16 years (2002–2017) of federal criminal drug sentences from the U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC) to examine trends in two criminal sentencing outcomes: whether a defendant received a prison sentence and the length of a prison sentence. Logistic and ordinary least squares regression analyses were used to assess criminal sentencing outcomes. Moderation analyses are conducted to assess variation in sentencing for specific drug offenses over time. Results demonstrate that sentencing for federal drug crimes has become less severe over time. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in sentencing across different drug types, with pharmaceutical opioid cases receiving the least leniency over time regarding the incarceration decision and methamphetamine cases experiencing the lowest reduction in the length of prison sentences from 2002 to 2017. Finally, our analysis stratified by race/ethnicity suggested that there is heterogeneity in sentencing outcomes for federal drug offenders, conditional on racial and ethnic background.
AlbonettiC. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31, 789–822.
2.
AlexanderM. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.
3.
Al-TayyibA.KoesterS.LangeggerS.RavilleL. (2017). Heroin and methamphetamine injection: An emerging drug use pattern. Substance Use & Misuse, 52(8), 1051–1058.
4.
BeletskyL. (2019). America’s favorite antidote: Drug-induced homicide in the age of the overdose crisis. Utah Law Review, 4(4), 833–890.
5.
BjerkD. (2017). Mandatory minimums and the sentencing of federal drug crimes. The Journal of Legal Studies, 46(1), 93–128.
6.
BlumsteinA. (2003). The notorious 100:1 crack: Powder disparity: The data tell us that it is time to restore the balance. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 16(1), 87–92.
7.
BontragerS.BalesW.ChiricosT. (2005). Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons. Criminology, 43, 589–622.
8.
BrennanP. K.SpohnC. (2008). Race/ethnicity and sentencing outcomes among drug offenders in North Carolina. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 371–398.
9.
CohenA.YangC. S. (2019). Judicial politics and sentencing decisions. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(1), 160–191.
10.
CsesteJ. (2019). Criminal justice barriers to treatment of opioid use disorders in the United States: The need for public health advocacy. American Journal of Public Health, 109, 419–422.
11.
CurryT. R.Corral-CamachoG. (2008). Sentencing young minority males for drug offenses. Punishment and Society, 10, 253–267.
12.
DoernerJ. K.DemuthS. (2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in US federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 1–27.
13.
EllisM. S.KasperZ. A.CiceroT. J. (2018). Twin epidemics: The surging rise of methamphetamine use in chronic opioid users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 193, 14–20.
14.
ExumJ. J. (2018). From warfare to welfare: Reconceptualizing drug sentencing during the opioid crisis. University of Kansas Law Review, 67, 941–959.
15.
FeldmeyerB.UlmerJ. T. (2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 238–270.
16.
FischmanJ. B.SchanzenbachM. M. (2012). Racial disparities under the federal sentencing guidelines: The role of judicial discretion and mandatory minimums. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9(4), 729–764.
17.
FreiburgerT. L. (2009). Race and the sentencing of drug offenders: An examination of the focal concerns perspective. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 6(2), 163–177.
18.
GhandnooshN.AndersonC. (2017). Opioids: Treating an illness, ending a war. The Sentencing Project.
19.
GladdenR. M.O’DonnellJ.MattsonC. L.SethP. (2019). Changes in opioid-involved overdose deaths by opioid type and presence of benzodiazepines, cocaine, and methamphetamine—25 states, July–December 2017 to January–June 2018. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(34), 737–744.
20.
GonzalesR.MooneyL.RawsonR. A. (2010). The methamphetamine problem in the United States. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 385–398.
HarrisA. R. (1977). Sex and theories of deviance: Toward a functional theory of deviant typescripts. American Sociological Review, 42, 3–16.
23.
HarrisA. R.HillG. D. (1986). Bias in status processing decisions. In HarrisA. R. (Ed.), Rationality and collective belief (pp. 1–89). Ablex.
24.
HarrisK. N. (2018). The drug overdose epidemic: Not just about opioids. Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University.
25.
HartleyR. D.TillyerR. (2018). Examining prosecutorial discretion in federal criminal cases: Legal and extra-legal determinants of declination and charge change decisions. Justice Quarterly, 35(7), 1195–1225.
26.
HedegaardH.MiniñoA. M.WarnerM. (2020). Drug overdose deaths in the United States, 1999-2018. NCHS Data Brief. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
27.
HoferP. J. (2019). Federal Sentencing after Booker. Crime and Justice, 48(1), 137–186.
28.
HolmesB.FeldmeyerB. (2019). Reassessing the influence of criminal history in federal criminal courts. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1206–1228.
29.
JohnsonB. D. (2018). In search of the missing link: Examining contextual variation in federal charge bargains across US district courts. Justice Quarterly, 35(7), 1133–1165.
30.
JohnsonB. D.BetsingerS. (2009). Punishing the “model minority”: Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47(4), 1045–1090.
31.
JohnsonB. D.LarrouletP. (2019). The “distance traveled”: Investigating the downstream consequences of charge reductions for disparities in incarceration. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1229–1257.
32.
JohnsonB. D.UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46(3), 737–783.
33.
JonesC. M.UnderwoodN.ComptonW. M. (2020). Increases in methamphetamine use among heroin treatment admissions in the United States, 2008–17. Addiction, 115(2), 347–353.
34.
KauttP. M. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 633–671.
35.
KauttP. M.SpohnC. (2002). Crack-ing down on black drug offenders? Testing for interactions among offenders’ race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly, 19(1), 1–35.
36.
Kimbrough v. United States. (2007). 552 U.S. 85.
37.
KimB.CanoM. V.KimK.SpohnC. (2016). The impact of United States v. Booker and Gall/Kimbrough v. United States on sentence severity: Assessing social context and judicial discretion. Crime & Delinquency, 62(8), 1072–1094.
38.
KingR. D. (2019). Cumulative impact: Why prison sentences have increased. Criminology, 57(1), 157–180.
39.
KingR. D.LightM. T. (2019). Have racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing declined?Crime and Justice, 48(1), 365–437.
40.
KramerJ. H.UlmerJ. T. (2009). Sentencing guidelines: Lessons from Pennsylvania. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
41.
KutnerM. H.NachtsheimC.NeterJ. (2004). Applied linear regression models. McGraw-Hill.
42.
LaFrentzC. D.SpohnC. (2006). Who is punished more harshly in federal court? The interaction of race/ethnicity, gender, age, and employment status in the sentencing of drug offenders. Justice Research and Policy, 8(2), 25–56.
43.
LeeJ. D.RichJ. D. (2012). Opioid pharmacotherapy in criminal justice settings: Now is the time. Substance Abuse, 33, 1–4.
44.
LeeJ. G. (2019). To detain or not to detain? Using propensity scores to examine the relationship between pretrial detention and conviction. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(1), 128–152.
45.
LeeJ. G.TestaA. (2020). Evidence, arrest circumstances, and felony cocaine case processing. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society, 21(1), 39–59.
46.
LeiberM. J.PeckJ. H.LugoM.BishopD. M. (2017). Understanding the link between race/ethnicity, drug offending, and juvenile court outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 63(14), 1807–1837.
47.
LehmannP. S. (2020). Race, ethnicity, crime type, and the sentencing of violent felony offenders. Crime & Delinquency, https://doi.org/0011128720902699
48.
LightM. T. (2014). The new face of legal inequality: Noncitizens and the long-term trends in sentencing disparities across US district courts, 1992–2009. Law & Society Review, 48(2), 447–478.
49.
LightM. T.MassogliaM.KingR. D. (2014). Citizenship and punishment: The salience of national membership in US criminal courts. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 825–847.
50.
LinnemannT. (2013). Governing through meth: Local politics, drug control and the drift toward securitization. Crime, Media, Culture, 9(1), 39–61.
51.
LippoldK.AliB. (2020). Racial/ethnic differences in opioid-involved overdose deaths across metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas in the United States, 1999-2017. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 212: 108059.
52.
LopezM. H.LightM. T. (2009). A rising share: Hispanics and federal crime. Pew Research Center.
53.
LynchM. (2012). Theorizing the role of the “war on drugs” in US punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 16, 175–199.
54.
LynchM.OmoriM. (2014). Legal change and sentencing norms in the wake of Booker: The impact of time and place on drug trafficking cases in federal court. Law & Society Review, 48(2), 411–445.
55.
McGintyE. E.Kennedy-HendricksA.BallerJ.NiederdeppeJ.GollustS.BarryC. L. (2016). Criminal activity or treatable health condition? News media framing of opioid analgesic abuse in the United States, 1998-2012. Psychiatric Services, 67, 405–411.
56.
MetcalfeC.ChiricosT. (2018). Race, plea, and charge reduction: An assessment of racial disparities in the plea process. Justice Quarterly, 35(2), 223–253.
57.
MitchellO. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439–466.
58.
MurthyV. H. (2016). Ending the opioid epidemic—A call to action. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(25), 2413–2415.
59.
MustardD. B. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 285–314.
60.
MustoD. M. (1987) The American disease: Origins of narcotic control. Oxford University Press.
61.
MustoD. F. (1999). The American disease: Origins of narcotic control. Oxford University Press.
62.
NetherlandJ.HansenH. B. (2016). The war on drugs that wasn’t: Wasted whiteness, “dirty doctors,” and race in media coverage of prescription opioid misuse. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 40(4), 664–686.
63.
OmoriM. K. (2013). Moral panics and morality policy: The impact of media, political ideology, drug use, and manufacturing on methamphetamine legislation in the United States. Journal of Drug Issues, 43(4), 517–534.
64.
ProvineD. M. (2011). Race and inequality in the war on drugs. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 41–60.
65.
PortillosE. L. (1998). Latinos, gangs, and drugs. In MannC. R.ZatzM. (Eds.), Images of color, images (pp. 156–166). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
66.
ReinarmanC.LevineH. G. (1997). Crack in American: Demon drugs and social justice. University of California Press.
67.
RothbergR. L.StithK. (2018). Fentanyl: A whole new world?The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(2), 314–324.
68.
RuhmC. J. (2019). Nonopioid overdose death rates rose almost as fast as those involving opioids, 1999–2016. Health Affairs, 38(7), 1216–1224.
69.
SampsonR. J.LauritsenJ. L. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. Crime and Justice, 21, 311–374.
70.
SevignyE. L. (2009). Excessive uniformity in federal drug sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(2), 155–180.
71.
ShacharC.WiseT.KatznelsonG.CampbellA. L. (2019). Criminal justice or public health: A comparison of the representation of the crack cocaine and opioid epidemics in the media. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(2), 211–239.
72.
ShermerL. O. N.JohnsonB. D. (2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in US federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27(3), 394–430.
73.
SpohnC.DeLoneM. (2000). When does race matter? An analysis of the conditions under which race affects sentence severity. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 2, 3–37.
74.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38(1), 281–306.
75.
SpohnC.SampleL. L. (2013). The dangerous drug offender in federal court: Intersections of race, ethnicity, and culpability. Crime and Delinquency, 59, 3–31.
76.
SteenS.EngenR. L.GaineyR. R. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435–468.
77.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798.
78.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705–729.
79.
SteffensmeierD.Painter-DavisN.UlmerJ. (2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Sociological Perspectives, 60(4), 810–833.
80.
StithK.CabranesJ. A. (1998). Fear of judging: Sentencing guidelines in the federal courts. University of Chicago Press.
81.
StricklandJ. C.HavensJ. R.StoopsW. W. (2019). A nationally representative analysis of “twin epidemics”: Rising rates of methamphetamine use among persons who use opioids. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 204, 107592.
82.
TaxyS.SamuelsJ.AdamsW. (2015). Drug offenders in federal prison: Estimates of characteristics based on linked data. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
83.
TestaA.JohnsonB. D. (2020). Paying the trial tax: Race, guilty pleas, and disparity in prosecution. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(4), 500–531.
84.
TonryM. (1994). Racial politics, racial disparities, and the war on crime. Crime and Delinquency, 40, 475–494.
85.
TonryM. (1996). Sentencing matters. Oxford University Press.
86.
TsaiA. C.KiangM. V.BarnettM. L.BeletskyL.KeyesK. M.McGintyE. E.VenkataramaniA. S. (2019). Stigma as a fundamental hindrance to the United States opioid overdose crisis response. PLOS Medicine, 16(11), e1002969.
87.
UlmerJ. T.JohnsonB. D. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42(1), 137–178.
88.
UlmerJ. T.JohnsonB. D. (2017). Organizational conformity and punishment. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 107(2), 253–292.
89.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (1997). Special report to Congress: Cocaine and federal sentencing policy. U.S. Department of Justice.
90.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2006). Final report on the impact of United States v. Booker on federal sentencing. U.S. Department of Justice.
91.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2015a). Life Sentences in the federal system. U.S. Department of Justice.
92.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2015b). Report to Congress: Impact of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. U.S. Department of Justice.
93.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2018). Fiscal year 2018: Overview of federal criminal cases.
94.
United States v. Booker. (2005). 543 U.S. 220.
95.
WardJ. T.HartleyR. D.TillyerR. (2016). Unpacking gender and racial/ethnic biases in the federal sentencing of drug offenders: A causal mediation approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 196–206.
96.
WarrenP.ChiricosT.BalesW. (2012). The imprisonment penalty for young Black and Hispanic males: A crime-specific analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 56–80.
97.
YangC. S. (2015). Free at last? Judicial discretion and racial disparities in federal sentencing. The Journal of Legal Studies, 44(1), 75–111.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
