We present a series of four between-subject, multifactorial experiments that examine how labeling offenders with addiction, as well as if that psychiatric label is described to be biologically influenced, may affect community perceptions regarding the importance of procedural justice in drug treatment courts. Stigmatization toward addiction is hypothesized to moderate community views on procedural justice. Labeling with addiction garnered nonsignificant effects on community perceptions of the importance of procedural justice in drug treatment courts. Yet, patterns of moderation analyses indicated that participants with higher degrees of stigmatization toward an offender with addiction, and particularly if that psychiatric label was also described to be biologically influenced, rated the importance of offenders experiencing aspects of procedural justice as significantly higher. Higher degrees of public stigmatization associated with the “brain disease model” of addiction appear to coexist with increased community support for offenders with such labels experiencing increased procedural justice and fairness.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
AntrobusE.BradfordB.MurphyK.SargeantE. (2015). Community norms procedural justice, and the public’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Journal of contemporary criminal justice, 31(2), 151–170.
4.
Atkin-PlunkC. A.ArmstrongG. S. (2016). An examination of the impact of drug court clients’ perceptions of procedural justice on graduation rates and recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 55(8), 525–547.
5.
BanksD.GottfredsonD. C. (2003). The effects of drug treatment and supervision on time to rearrest among drug treatment court participants. Journal of Drug Issues, 33(2), 385–412.
6.
BartneckC.DuenserA.MoltchanovaE.ZawieskaK. (2015). Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment. PLOS ONE, 10(4), Article e0121595.
7.
BelenkoS. (1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1(1), 1–42.
8.
BeneshS. C. (2006). Understanding public confidence in American courts. The Journal of Politics, 68(3), 697–707.
9.
BeneshS. C.HowellS. E. (2001). Confidence in the courts: A comparison of users and non-users. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19(2), 199–214.
10.
BerryessaC. M. (2018). The effects of psychiatric and “biological” labels on lay sentencing and punishment decisions. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(2), 241–256.
11.
BieneckS. (2009). How adequate is the vignette technique as a research tool for psycho-legal research. In OswaldM. E.BieneckS.Hupfeld-HeinemannJ. (Eds.), Social psychology of punishment of crime (pp. 255–271). John Wiley.
12.
BoboL. D.ThompsonV. (2006). Unfair by design: The war on drugs, race, and the legitimacy of the criminal justice system. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 73(2), 445–472.
13.
BoldtR. C. (2014). Problem-solving courts and pragmatism. Maryland Law Review, 73, 1120–1172.
14.
BrocknerJ.AckermanG.GreenbergJ.GelfandM. J.FrancescoA. M.ChenZ. X.. . . ShapiroD. (2001). Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(4), 300–315.
15.
BuchmanD.ReinerP. B. (2009). Stigma and addiction: Being and becoming. The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(9), 18–19.
16.
BurkeK. S. (2010). Just what made drug courts successful. New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 36, 39–58.
17.
BurkeK.LebenS. (2007). Procedural fairness: A key ingredient in public satisfaction. Court Review, 44(1–2), 4–25.
18.
CorriganP. W.MarkowitzF. E.WatsonA.RowanD.KubiakM. A. (2003). An attribution model of public discrimination toward persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(2), 162–179.
19.
CorriganP. W.LarsonJ. E.RueschN. (2009). Self-stigma and the “why try” effect: Impact on life goals and evidence-based practices. World psychiatry, 8(2), 75–81.
20.
CorriganP. W.WasselA. (2008). Understanding and influencing the stigma of mental illness. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 46(1), 42–48.
21.
DackisC.O’BrienC. (2005). Neurobiology of addiction: Treatment and public policy ramifications. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1431–1436.
22.
DayE. N.EdgrenK.EshlemanA. (2007). Measuring stigma toward mental illness: Development and application of the mental illness stigma scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(10), 2191–2219.
23.
GottfredsonD, (personal communication, September 14th, 2018).
24.
GottfredsonD. C.KearleyB. W.NajakaS. S.RochaC. M. (2007). How drug treatment courts work: An analysis of mediators. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(1), 3–35.
25.
GottfredsonD. C.NajakaS. S.KearleyB. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(2), 171–196.
26.
HenryK. (2011). The role of drug court participant attitudes and perceptions. In RossmanS. B.ZweigJ. M.KralsteinD.HenryK.DowneyP. M.LindquistC. H. (Eds.), The multi-site adult drug court evaluation: The drug court experience (pp. 84–100). Urban Institute.
27.
HirstA. (1999). Compliance with the court system as a function of perceptions of procedural justice [Paper presentation]. American Society of Criminology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
28.
HoraP. F.SchmaW. G.RosenthalJ. T. A. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74(2), 439–538.
29.
JohnsonC.DowdT. J.RidgewayC. L. (2006). Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 53–78.
30.
KaiserH. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187–200.
31.
LebowitzM. S.RosenthalJ. E.AhnW. K. (2012). Effects of biological versus psychosocial explanations on stigmatization of children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20(3), 240–250.
32.
LeshnerA. I. (1997). Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science, 278(5335), 45–47.
33.
LindE. A.EarleyP. C. (1992). Procedural justice and culture. International journal of Psychology, 27(2), 227–242.
34.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Springer Science + Business Media.
35.
LinkB. G.PhelanJ. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual review of Sociology, 27(1), 363–385.
36.
LivingstonJ. D.BoydJ. E. (2010). Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 71(12), 2150–2161.
37.
LongM. A.CrossJ. E.ShelleyT. O. C.Kutnjak IvkovićS. (2013). The normative order of reporting police misconduct: Examining the roles of offense seriousness, legitimacy, and fairness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76(3), 242–267.
38.
MaD. S.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior research methods, 47(4), 1122–1135.
39.
MarieD.MilesB. (2008). Social distance and perceived dangerousness across four diagnostic categories of mental disorder. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42(2), 126–133.
40.
McIvorG. (2009). Therapeutic jurisprudence and procedural justice in Scottish drug courts. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 9(1), 29–49.
41.
MeurkC.CarterA.PartridgeB.LuckeJ.HallW. (2014). How is acceptance of the brain disease model of addiction related to Australians’ attitudes towards addicted individuals and treatments for addiction?BMC Psychiatry, 14(1), 373–383.
42.
MeurkC.PartridgeB.CarterA.HallW.MorphettK.LuckeJ. (2014). Public attitudes in Australia towards the claim that addiction is a (brain) disease. Drug and Alcohol Review, 33(3), 272–279.
43.
NixJ.WolfeS. E.RojekJ.KaminskiR. J. (2015). Trust in the police: The influence of procedural justice and perceived collective efficacy. Crime & Delinquency, 61(4), 610–640.
44.
PaternosterR.BachmanR.BrameR.ShermanL. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law and Society Review, 31(1), 163–204.
45.
PennD. L.KommanaS.MansfieldM.LinkB. G. (1999). Dispelling the stigma of schizophrenia: The impact of information on dangerousness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 25(3), 437–446.
46.
RaaijmakersE.de KeijserJ. W.NieuwbeertaP.DirkzwagerA. J. E. (2015). Criminal defendants’ satisfaction with lawyers: Perceptions of procedural fairness and effort of the lawyer. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(2), 186–201.
47.
RacineE.BellE.ZizzoN.GreenC. (2015). Public discourse on the biology of alcohol addiction: Implications for stigma, self-control, essentialism, and coercive policies in pregnancy. Neuroethics, 8(2), 177–186.
48.
ReadJ. (2007). Why promoting biological ideology increases prejudice against people labelled “schizophrenic.” Australian Psychologist, 42(2), 118–128.
49.
RosenbaumD. P.LawrenceD. S.HartnettS. M.McDevittJ.PosickC. (2015). Measuring procedural justice and legitimacy at the local level: The police–community interaction survey. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(3), 335–366.
50.
RottmanD. B. (2007). Adhere to procedural fairness in the justice system. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(4), 835–842.
51.
SattlerS.EscandeA.RacineE.GöritzA. S. (2017). Public stigma toward people with drug addiction: A factorial survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 78(3), 415–425.
52.
SchomerusG.CorriganP. W.KlauerT.KuwertP.FreybergerH. J.LuchtM. (2011). Self-stigma in alcohol dependence: Consequences for drinking-refusal self-efficacy. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 114(1), 12–17.
53.
SunI. Y.WuY. (2006). Citizens’ perceptions of the courts: The impact of race, gender, and recent experience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(5), 457–467.
54.
SunshineJ.TylerT. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548.
55.
TauberJ.SnavelyK. R. (1999). Drug courts: A research agenda. National Drug Court Institute.
56.
ThieloA. J.CullenF. T.BurtonA. L.MoonM. M.Burton, Jr., V. S. (2019). Prisons or problem-solving: Does the public support specialty courts?Victims & Offenders, 14(3), 267–282.
57.
ThornicroftG. (2008). Stigma and discrimination limit access to mental health care. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 17(1), 14–19.
58.
ThornicroftG.RoseD.KassamA.SartoriusN. (2007). Stigma: Ignorance, prejudice or discrimination?The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(3), 192–193.
59.
TorresS. (1996). Use of a credible drug testing program for accountability and intervention. Federal Probation, 60(4), 18–23.
60.
TylerT. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants’ evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law and Society Review, 51–74.
61.
TylerT. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357.
62.
TylerT. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
63.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, & cooperative behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361.
64.
TylerT. R.ShermanL.StrangH.BarnesG. C.WoodsD. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural Justice, and recidivism: The engagement of offenders’ psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE Drinking-and-Driving Experiment. Law & Society Review, 41(3), 553–586.
65.
TylerT. R.WakslakC. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42(2), 253–282.
66.
VolkowN. D.LiT. K. (2004). Drug addiction: The neurobiology of behaviour gone awry. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(12), 963–970.
67.
VreckoS. (2009). Therapeutic justice in drug courts: Crime, punishment and societies of control. Science as Culture, 18(2), 217–232.
68.
WalterS.SeibertS.GoeringD. D.O’BoyleE. H. (2016). An examination of the convergence of online panel data and conventionally sourced data. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), 11498.
69.
WatsonA. C.AngellB. (2013). The role of stigma and uncertainty in moderating the effect of procedural justice on cooperation and resistance in police encounters with persons with mental illnesses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(1), 30–39.
70.
WienerR. L.WinickB. J.GeorgesL. S.CastroA. (2010). A testable theory of problem solving courts: Avoiding past empirical and legal failures. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(5–6), 417–427.
71.
WinickB. J.WexlerD. B. (2001). Drug treatment court: Therapeutic jurisprudence applied. Touro Law Review, 18, 479–502.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
