A wealth of studies have been conducted on drug treatment courts (DTCs) over the past two decades. However, relatively few studies have employed qualitative research methods, and even fewer are grounded in social science theory. Using structural ritualization theory (SRT), this research provides a theoretical framework for understanding specifically how DTC programs effect change in the lives of participants and the influence of DTC organizational structure on this process using qualitative methods. Data for this study were collected from semi-structured interviews with 23 DTC graduates previously enrolled in either Kalamazoo or Van Buren County DTC, both of which are located in southwest Michigan. Findings reveal support for SRT as a useful approach identifying the mechanisms of change within the DTC program that contribute to participant success.
BurnsS. L.PeyrotM. (2003). Tough love: Nurturing and coercing responsibility and recovery in California drug courts. Social Problems, 50, 416-438. doi:10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.416
2.
DeVallK. E.GregoryP. D.HartmannD. J. (2012). The potential of social science theory for the evaluation and improvement of drug courts: Do we need a theory of drug court effectiveness?Journal of Drug Issues, 42, 320-336. doi:10.1177/0022042612461767
3.
FaroleD. J.CissnerA. B. (2005). Seeing eye to eye? Participant and staff perspectives on drug court. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation.
4.
FischerM.GeigerB.HughesM. (2007). Female recidivists speak about their experiences in drug court while engaging in appreciative inquiry. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 703-722. doi:10.1177/0306624X07299304
5.
FulkersonA. (2009). The drug treatment court as a form of restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 12, 253-267. doi:10.1080/10282580903105772
6.
FulkersonA.KeenaL. D.LongmanA. (2016). In or out: The drug court dilemma. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 17(2), 34-45.
7.
FulkersonA.KeenaL. D.O’BrienE. (2013). Understanding success and nonsuccess in the drug court. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 1297-1316. doi:10.1177/0306624X12447774
8.
GallagherJ. R.NordbergA.DerankeM. S.IvoryE.CarltonJ.MillerJ. W. (2015). Predicting termination from drug court and comparing recidivism patterns: Treating substance use disorders in criminal justice settings. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 33, 28-43. doi:10.1080/07347324.2015.982451
9.
GilmoreA. S.RodriguezN.WebbV. J. (2005). Substance abuse and drug courts: The role of social bonds in juvenile drug courts. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 287-315. doi:10.1177/1541204005278803
10.
GottfredsonD.KearleyB.NajakaS.RochaC. (2005). The Baltimore City drug treatment court: 3-year self report outcome study. Evaluation Review, 29, 42-64. doi:10.1177/0193841X04269908
11.
GoldkampJ. S.WhiteM. D.RobinsonJ. B. (2002). An honest chance: Perspectives of drug court participants: Findings from focus groups in Brooklyn, Miami, Seattle, Las Vegas, and San Bernardino. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 14, 369-374. doi:10.1525/fsr.2002.14.6.369
12.
HoraP. F.SchmaW. G.RosenthalJ. T. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 439-538.
13.
KnottnerusJ. D. (1997). The theory of structural ritualization. Advances in Group Processes, 14, 257-279.
14.
KnottnerusJ. D. (2005). The need for theory and the value of cooperation: Disruption and deritualization. Sociological Spectrum, 25, 5-19. doi:10.1080/027321790500130
15.
KnottnerusJ. D. (2011). Ritual as a missing link: Sociology, structural ritualization theory and research. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
16.
KnottnerusJ. D.UlspergerJ. S.CumminsS.OsteenE. (2006). Exposing Enron: Media representations of ritualized deviance in corporate culture. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 2, 177-195.
17.
LiangB.KnottnerusJ. D.LongM. A. (2016). A theoretical model of drug/DUI courts: An application of structural ritualization theory. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 31-46. doi:10.1007/s12103-015-9331-5
18.
LiangB.LongM. A.KnottnerusJ. D. (2016). What do clients achieve in drug/DUI court? Examining intended and unintended outcomes. Justice System Journal, 37, 272-289. doi:10.1080/0098261X.2016.1151841
19.
LindquistC. H.KrebsC. P.LattimoreP. K. (2006). Sanctions and rewards in drug court programs: Implementation, perceived efficacy, and decision making. Journal of Drug Issues, 36, 119-145. doi:10.1177/002204260603600106
20.
Marinelli-CaseyP.GonzalesR.HillhouseM.AngA.ZwebenJ.CohenJ.. . . Methamphetamine Treatment Project Corporate Authors. (2008). Drug court treatment for methamphetamine dependence: Treatment response and posttreatment outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 34, 242-248. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.005
21.
MarloweD. B.FestingerD. S.FoltzC.LeeP. A.PatapisN. S. (2005). Perceived deterrence and outcomes in drug court. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 183-198. doi:10.1002/bsl.636
22.
MayC. K. (2008). Drug courts: A social capital perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 78, 513-535. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00261.x
23.
MeitheT. D.LuH.ReeseE. (2000). Reintegrative shaming and recidivism risks in drug court: Explanations for some unexpected findings. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 522-541. doi: 10.1177/0011128700046004006
24.
MooreK. A.BarongiM. M.RiggK. K. (2016). The experiences of young adult offenders who completed a drug court treatment program. Qualitative Health Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1049732316645782
25.
MorseD. S.SilversteinJ.ThomasK.BedelP.CerulliC. (2015). Finding the loopholes: A cross-sectional qualitative study of systemic barriers to treatment access for women drug court participants. Health and Justice, 3(12), 1-9. doi:10.1186/s40352-015-0026-2
26.
NaragR. E.MaxwellS. R.LeeB. (2013). A phenomenological approach to assessing a DUI/DWI program. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 229-250. doi:10.1177/0306624X11431685
27.
National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2004). Defining drug courts: The key components (NCJ 205621). Rockville, MD: Bureau of Justice Assistance Clearinghouse.
28.
O’HearM. M. (2009). Rethinking drug courts: Restorative justice as a response to racial injustice. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 20, Article 463.
29.
PattenR.MesserS.CandelaK. (2015). “I don’t see myself as prison material”: Motivations for entering a rural drug court. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59, 1188-1202. doi:10.1177/0306624X14532321
30.
PodkopaczM. (2004). Drug court defendant experience and fairness study. Minneapolis: Fourth Judicial District Court of Minnesota.
31.
RobertsJ. C.WolferL. (2011). Female drug offenders reflect on their experiences with a county drug court program. Qualitative Report, 16, 84-102. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol16/iss1/5
32.
SandbergS. (2010). What can “lies” tell us about life? Notes towards a framework of narrative criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21, 447-465. doi:10.1080/10511253.2010.516564
33.
UlspergerJ. S.KnottnerusJ. D. (2011). Elder care catastrophe: Rituals of abuse in nursing homes—And what you can do about it. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
34.
UlspergerJ. S.KnottnerusJ. D.UlspergerK. (2016). The importance of rituals in understanding mass homicide: A structural ritualization analysis of the Ronald gene Simmons murders. In BaileyE. (Ed.), Rituals: Past, present and future perspectives. (pp. 199-230). Hauppauge, NY: NOVA Science.
35.
Van de Poel-KnottnerusF.KnottnerusJ. D. (2011). Disruption and deritualization: Concentration camp internment and the breakdown of social order. In KnottnerusJ. D. (Ed.), Ritual as a missing link: Sociology, structural ritualization theory and research (pp. 107-131). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
36.
WolferL. (2006). Graduates speak: A qualitative exploration of drug court graduates’ views of the strengths and weaknesses of the program. Contemporary Drug Problems, 33, 303-320. doi:10.1177/009145090603300206
37.
WolferL.RobertsJ. C. (2008). A theoretical exploration of a drug court program based on client experiences. Contemporary Drug Problems, 35, 481-507. doi:10.1177/009145090803500213
