The gap between what people admit about their behavior and what is actually true has plagued social scientists and survey methodologists for decades. This gap would not matter if it did not play an important role in estimation of the extent of the consumption of illegal drugs and/or changing trends in illegal use, both data critical for developing public policy and determining the effects of intervention programming and policy changes. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) survey matches anonymous self-reported interview information to a urine test for nine drugs in a probability-based sample of adult male arrestees conducted within 48 hr of their arrest. Using data from 2000-2003 and 2007-2011 collected in 10 U.S. counties, this article looks at how the gap between the truth and reality in self-report varies by the drug reported, by the region of the country, over time, and by characteristics of the user, and discusses the relevance of these findings to policy.
BrenerN.BillyJ.GradyW. (2003). Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: Evidence from the scientific literature. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 436-457.
2.
DeJongC.WishE. (2000). Is it advisable to urine test arrestees to assess risk of re-arrest? A comparison of self-report and urinalysis based measures of drug use. Journal of Drug Issues, 30(10), 133-146.
3.
FendrichM.JohnsonT.WislarS.HubbellA.SpiehlerV. (2004). The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: Results from a general population survey. Addiction, 99, 197-208.
4.
GfroererJ.EyermanJ.ChromyJ. (2002). Redesigning an ongoing national household survey: Methodological issues(Publication No. SMA 03–3768) Rockville, MD: DHHS Publication.
5.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
6.
HarrisonL. D. (1995). The validity of self-reported data on drug use. Journal of Drug Issues, 25(1), 91-111.
7.
HarrisonL. D.HughesA. (1997). Introduction: The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates. In HarrisonL. D.HughesA. (Eds.), The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates (NIDA Monograph, 167, NIH Publication No. 97–4147, pp. 1-17). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
8.
HarrisonL. D.MartinS. S.EnevT.HarringtonD. (2007). Comparing drug testing and self-report of drug use among youth and young adults in the general population (DHHS Publication No. SMA 07-4249, Methodology Series M-7). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies.
9.
HserY. I. (1999). Validity of self-report of drug use among STD patients, ER patients and arrestees. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25, 81-91.
10.
HuntD. (2004). Rise of hallucinogens. In InciardiJ.McElrathK. (Eds.), The American drug scene (4th ed., pp. 288-302). Los Angeles CA: Roxbury Publishing.
11.
JohnsonT. P.BowmanP. J. (2003). Cross cultural sources of measurement error in substance use surveys. Substance Use & Misuse, 38, 1447-1490.
12.
MaguraS. (2010). Validating self-reports of illegal drug use to evaluate National Drug Control Policy: A reanalysis and critique. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33, 234-237.
13.
MaguraS.KangS. Y. (1996). Validity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations: A meta-analytic review. Substance Use & Misuse, 31, 1131-1153.
14.
MidanikL. T. (1988). Validity of self-report alcohol use: A literature review and assessment. British Journal of Addictions, 83, 1019-1030.
15.
MustoD. (1999). The American disease: Origins of narcotic control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2007-2014). ADAM II: Annual reports. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
18.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2012a, May). ADAM II: 2011 Annual report. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
19.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2012b). Drug availability estimate in the United States 2012. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
20.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2012c). What America’s users spend on illegal drugs, 2000-2006. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
21.
Office of National Drug Control Policy (2014a) National Drug Control Strategy (2014).Washington DC: Executive Office of the President.
22.
Office of National Drug Control Policy (2014b) ADAM II: Annual Report 2014 National Drug Control Strategy (2014). Washington DC: Executive Office of the President.
23.
PattonD. (2005). An exploration of the external validity of self-report among arrestees. Surveillance & Society, 2, 564-580.
24.
RhodesW.KlingR.JohnsonP. (2007). Using booking data to model drug use arrest rates: A preliminary to estimating the prevalence of chronic drug users. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 1-22.
25.
RiggsbeeB.ChenT. (2009, November). 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, screening application specifications. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration.
26.
SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration) (2010). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2010). Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1998-2008—State Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services (DASIS Series: S-55, Publication No. (SMA) 10-4613). Rockville, MD: Health and Human Services.
27.
SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration). (2011) National Survey on Drug Use and Health Retrieved from icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/SAMHDA
28.
SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration). (2014). Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings (NSDUH series H-48, Publication No. (SMA) 14-4863). Rockville, MD: Health and Human Services.
29.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2006). ONDCP media campaign: Contractor’s national evaluation did not find that the youth anti-media campaign was effective in reducing youth drug use. Washington, DC: Author.
30.
WelpA. E.BosmanI.LangendamM. W.TotteM.MaesR. A. A.van AmeijdenE. J. C. (2003). Amount of self-reported illicit drug use compared to quantitative hair test results in community recruited young drug users in Amsterdam. Addiction, 98, 987-994.
31.
WilliamsR. J.NowatzkiN. (2005). Validity of adolescent self-report of substance use. Substance Use & Misuse, 40, 299-311.
