This study investigates the potential stages of drug use. Data from the longitudinal Cohort Study on Substance Use Risk Factors were used (N = 5,116). Drug use (alcohol, tobacco, and 16 illicit drugs) over the previous 12 months was assessed at two time points. Patterns and trajectories of drug use were studied using latent transition analysis (LTA). This study’s substantive contributions are twofold. First, the pattern of drug use displayed the well-known sequence of drug involvement (licit drugs to cannabis to other illicit drugs), but with an added distinction between two kinds of illicit drugs (“middle-stage” drugs: uppers, hallucinogens, inhaled drugs; and “final-stage” drugs: heroin, ketamine, GHB/GBL, research chemicals, crystal meth, and spice). Second, subgroup membership was stable over time, as the most likely transition was remaining in the same latent class.
BaggioS.StuderJ.Mohler-KuoM.DaeppenJ.-B.GmelG. (2013). Profiles of drug users in Switzerland and effects of early-onset intensive use of alcohol, tobacco and cannabis on other illicit drug use. Swiss Medical Weekly, 143, Article w13805.
2.
ClevelandM. J.LanzaS. T.RayA. E.TurrisiR.MallettK. A. (2012). Transitions in first-year college student drinking behaviors: Does pre-college drinking moderate the effects of parent- and peer-based intervention components?Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26, 440-450.
3.
CollinsL. M. (2002). Using latent transition analysis to examine the gateway hypothesis. In KandelD. B. (Ed.), Stages and pathways of drug involvement (pp. 254-269). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,.
4.
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. (2009). Polydrug use: Patterns and responses. Lisbon, Portugal: Author.
5.
FergussonD. M.BodenJ. M.HorwoodL. J. (2006). Cannabis use and other illicit drug use: Testing the cannabis gateway hypothesis. Addiction, 101, 556-569.
6.
GoodmanL. A. (1974). Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61, 215-231.
7.
GrossS. R.BarrettS. P.ShestowskyJ. S.PihlR. O. (2002). Ecstasy and drug consumption patterns: A Canadian rave population study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47, 546-551.
8.
HamburgB. A.KraemerH. C.JahnkeW. (1975). A hierarchy of drug use in adolescence: Behavioral and attitudinal correlates of substantial drug use. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 1155-1163.
9.
HawkinsJ. D.HillK. G.GuoJ.Battin-PearsonS. R. (2002). Substance use norms and transitions in substance use: Implications for the gateway hypothesis. In KandelD. B. (Ed.), Stages and pathways of drug involvement (pp. 42-64). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
HaysR. D.StacyA. W.WidamanK. F.Di MatteoM. R.DownyR. (1986). Multistage path models of adolescent alcohol and drug use: A reanalysis. Journal of Drug Issues, 16, 357-369.
11.
KamC. M.CollinsL. M. (2000). Latent transition analysis of substance use among adolescents in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. University Park: The Methodology Center, Pennsylvania State University.
12.
KandelD. B. (1975). Stages in adolescent involvement in drug use. Science, 190, 912-914.
13.
KandelD. B. (2002). Examining the gateway hypothesis stages and pathways of drug involvement. In KandelD. B. (Ed.), Stages and pathways of drug involvement: Examining the gateway hypothesis (pp. 3-15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
KandelD. B.DaviesM. (1992). Progression to regular marijuana involvement: Phenomenology and risk factors for near-daily use. In GlantzM. D.PickensR. W. (Eds.), Vulnerability to drug abuse (pp. 211-253). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
KandelD. B.YamaguchiK. (2002). Stages of involvement in the U.S. population. In KandelD. B. (Ed.), Stages and pathways of drug involvement: Examining the gateway hypothesis (pp. 65-89). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KandelD. B.YamaguchiK.KleinL. C. (2006). Testing the gateway hypothesis. Addiction, 101, 470-472; discussion 474-476.
17.
KoJ. Y.MartinsS. S.KuramotoS. J.ChilcoatH. D. (2010). Patterns of alcohol-dependence symptoms using a latent empirical approach: Associations with treatment usage and other correlates. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71, 870-878.
18.
KokkeviA.RichardsonC.FlorescuS.KuzmanM.StergarE. (2007). Psychosocial correlates of substance use in adolescence: A cross-national study in six European countries. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86, 67-74.
19.
La FlairL. N.ReboussinB. A.StorrC. L.LetourneauE.GreenK. M.MojtabaiR. . . . CrumR. M. (2013). Childhood abuse and neglect and transitions in stages of alcohol involvement among women: A latent transition analysis approach. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 132, 491-498.
20.
LanzaS. T.PatrickM. E.MaggsJ. L. (2010). Latent transition analysis: Benefits of a latent variable approach to modeling transitions in substance use. Journal of Drug Issues, 40, 93-120.
LoY.MendellN. R.RubinD. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767-778.
23.
Maldonado-MolinaM. M.LanzaS. T. (2010). A framework to examine gateway relations in drug use: An application of latent transition analysis. Journal of Drug Issues, 40, 901-924.
24.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
25.
PapeH.RossowI.StorvollE. E. (2009). Under double influence: Assessment of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use in general youth populations. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 101, 69-73.
26.
PatrickM. E.CollinsL. M.SmithE.CaldwellL.FlisherA.WegnerL. (2009). A prospective longitudinal model of substance use onset among South African adolescents. Substance Use & Misuse, 44, 647-662.
27.
PentzM. A.LiC. (2002). The gateway theory applied to prevention. In KandelD. B. (Ed.), Stages and pathways of drug involvement: Examining the gateway hypothesis (pp. 139-157). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
RafteryA. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111-163.
29.
ScholeyA. B.ParrottA. B.BuchananT.HeffernanT. M.LingJ.RodgersJ. (2004). Increased intensity of ecstasy and polydrug usage in the more experienced recreational Ecstasy/MDMA users: A WWW study. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 743-752.
30.
StuderJ.BaggioS.Mohler-KuoM.DermotaP.GaumeJ.BertholetN. . . . GmelG. (2013). Examining non-response bias in substance use research—Are late respondents proxies for non-respondents?Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 132, 316-323.
31.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2012). Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings. Rockville, MD: Author.
32.
TangZ.LanzaS. T.CollinsL. M. (2001). Modeling adolescent substance use using latent transition analysis: The healthy for life data set. University Park: The Methodology Center, Pennsylvania State University.
33.
ValenzuelaE.FernándezM. (2011). The sequence of drug use: Testing the gateway hypothesis in Latin America. The Journal of International Drug, Alcohol and Tobacco Research, 1, 1-8.
34.
WagnerF. A.AnthonyJ. C. (2002). Into the world of illegal drug use: Exposure opportunity and other mechanisms linking the use of alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, and cocaine. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155, 918-925.
35.
WhiteH. R.BrayB. C.FlemingC. B.CatalanoR. F. (2009). Transitions into and out of light and intermittent smoking during emerging adulthood. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11, 211-219.
36.
WillnerP. (2001). A view through the gateway: Expectancies as a possible pathway from alcohol to cannabis. Addiction, 96, 691-703.
37.
WindleM.BarnesG. M.WelteJ. (1989). Causal models of adolescent substance use: An examination of gender differences using distribution-free estimators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 132-142.
38.
WuL.-T.SchlengerW. E.GalvinD. M. (2006). Concurrent use of methamphetamine, MDMA, LSD, ketamine, GHB, and flunitrazepam among American youths. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 84, 102-113.
